MEMORY, COMMUNICATION, AND DATA QUALITY IN CALENDAR INTERVIEWS

Calendar instruments are hypothesized to promote data quality through the increased use of retrieval cues and conversational probes intended to clarify meanings. This research explores these hypotheses by examining the associations between retrieval and conversational verbal behaviors and data-quali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public opinion quarterly 2013-01, Vol.77 (S1), p.194-219
Main Authors: BELLI, ROBERT F., BILGEN, IPEK, AL BAGHAL, TAREK
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Behavior
Discriminant analysis
Hypotheses
Information retrieval
INTERVIEWERS AND INTERVIEWING
Interviews
Measuring instruments
Regression analysis
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Calendar instruments are hypothesized to promote data quality through the increased use of retrieval cues and conversational probes intended to clarify meanings. This research explores these hypotheses by examining the associations between retrieval and conversational verbal behaviors and data-quality measures. A verbal behavior coding scheme was applied to transcripts of 165 calendar interviews that collected life-course information on residence, marriage, employment, and unemployment from respondents in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). Confirmatory factor analyses revealed three latent factors for interviewers (retrieval probes, rapport behaviors, and conversational behaviors intended to satisfy questionnaire objective) and three latent factors for respondents (retrieval strategies, rapport, and conversational behaviors indicative of difficulty being interviewed). Ratios of discrepancies in annual totals between retrospective calendar reports and reports collected for up to thirty years in the PSID over the total number of available years were used as measures of data quality. Regression analyses show that the level of behavior and the level of experiential complexity interact in their effect on data quality. Both interviewer and respondent retrieval behaviors are associated with better data quality when the retrieval task is more difficult but poorer accuracy when experiential complexity is low. Both interviewer and respondent rapport behaviors are associated with reduced error for complex employment histories but convey mixed results with marriage and unemployment histories. Patterns of results for interviewer conversational and respondent difficulty being interviewed behaviors are likewise inconsistent. Results do not completely confirm hypotheses but nevertheless have implications regarding interviewing practice and suggest directions for future research.
ISSN:0033-362X
1537-5331
DOI:10.1093/poq/nfs099