Effect of Pulsed Light Treatments on the Growth and Resistance Behavior of Listeria monocytogenes 10403S, Listeria innocua, and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 in a Liquid Substrate

• Published in: Journal of food protection 2013-03, Vol.76 (3), p.435-439
• Main Authors: Uesugi, Aaron R, Hsu, Lillian, Moraru, Carmen I
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antibiotics; Bacteria; Bacteriology; behavioral resistance; Biological and medical sciences; Colony Count, Microbial; Consumer Product Safety; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; Drug resistance; E coli; Electric fields; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli - drug effects; Escherichia coli - growth & development; Exposure; Food contamination & poisoning; Food industries; Food Irradiation; Food Microbiology; Food Preservation - methods; Food safety; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Growth kinetics; Humans; Inactivation; Kinetics; Light; Listeria; Listeria - growth & development; Listeria - radiation effects; Listeria innocua; Listeria monocytogenes; Listeria monocytogenes - growth & development; Listeria monocytogenes - radiation effects; Microorganisms; Models, Biological; Salmonella; Stainless steel; Studies; Ultraviolet Rays
• ISSN: 0362-028X; 1944-9097
• DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-370

Pulsed light (PL) treatment can effectively inactivate a large proportion of contaminating bacteria on surfaces and in clear solutions. An important issue that needs to be investigated is whether repeated exposure to PL treatment causes any changes to the growth and resistance behavior of the bacteria surviving the treatment. To test this, three challenge microorganisms were used: Listeria monocytogenes, Listeria innocua, and Escherichia coli. Cells of the challenge bacteria were treated with either low or high PL doses. Survivors of the PL treatment were enumerated, isolated, regrown, and exposed again to PL treatment. PL inactivation curves were generated for the survivors of each exposure cycle (as well as controls) to examine possible differences induced by repeated treatments. Growth curves of L. monocytogenes, L. innocua, and E. coli isolates recovered from exposure to either 1.1 or 10.1 J/cm(2) were not significantly different from the growth curves of untreated cells. Reduction levels of up to 4 and up to 6 log CFU were obtained after exposure to 1.1 and 10.1 J/cm(2), respectively, both for the controls and the repeatedly treated and recovered isolates. These results show that PL did not significantly change the growth kinetics or resistance to PL of the target microorganisms after up to 10 exposures. These findings have significance for the practical application of PL treatment, as they indicate that this technology does not select for microorganisms with increased resistance.