Loading…

Acromioclavicular Fusion: An Approach for Painful Clavicular Instability

Background The present study aimed to assess efficacy of acromioclavicular fusion as a salvage procedure for the treatment of painful horizontal (transverse) plane instability following distal clavicular excision. Methods A prospective, nonrandomized study of 16 consecutive cases was performed over...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Shoulder & elbow 2013-04, Vol.5 (2), p.88-92
Main Authors: Sonnabend, David H., Hughes, Jeffery S., Poon, Peter C., Schwarz, Ben
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2034-8fad9db90015363b328aff0c4cb3dde9d3368405fcb1ff6f760103fd90116e4e3
container_end_page 92
container_issue 2
container_start_page 88
container_title Shoulder & elbow
container_volume 5
creator Sonnabend, David H.
Hughes, Jeffery S.
Poon, Peter C.
Schwarz, Ben
description Background The present study aimed to assess efficacy of acromioclavicular fusion as a salvage procedure for the treatment of painful horizontal (transverse) plane instability following distal clavicular excision. Methods A prospective, nonrandomized study of 16 consecutive cases was performed over an 8½ year period, assessing fusion rates, pain relief, subjective instability and range of motion. Results Initial attempts at isolated coracoclavicular fusion were relatively unsuccessful. Subsequent procedures combined acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular fusion. Once stability was achieved, all patients noted a reduction in pain and in instability sensation. Eleven patients had similar or improved ranges of shoulder motion postoperatively. In four patients, elevation > 100 °C was limited by pain. Four patients developed sternoclavicular pain. Six patients had revision fusion procedures, two of them twice. Of these six, three achieved fusion. One other patient remained unfused and painful, declining a second procedure. Thirteen patients were satisfied with their result and all but one would have the surgery again. Conclusions Painful horizontal-plane acromioclavicular instability secondary to distal clavicle excision may be effectively treated by acromioclavicular arthrodesis, usually without excessive loss of movement but often with some sternoclavicular discomfort. Fusion is difficult to achieve, and the use of locking plates and ‘biological supplementation’ is recommended.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/sae.12004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1318558531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1111_sae.12004</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2923159821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2034-8fad9db90015363b328aff0c4cb3dde9d3368405fcb1ff6f760103fd90116e4e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcPfoOCIPjQ7aZp0ta3UjY3GCiozyFNE83o2pm0k317o_UfiPfl3offOffeg9A5hgn2NXVCTXAEEB-gEU5oGtIkhsPvmUTH6MS5NQBLWEJHaJFL225MK2uxM7KvhQ3mvTNtcx3kTZBvt7YV8jnQrQ3uhGl0XwfFD7psXCdKU5tuf4qOtKidOvvsY_Q4nz0Ui3B1e7Ms8lUoIyBxmGpRZVWZAWBKGClJlAqtQcayJFWlsooQlsZAtSyx1kwnDDAQXWWAMVOxImN0Mfj6y1565Tq-bnvb-JUcE5xSmlKCPXU1UP4756zSfGvNRtg9x8Dfg-I-KP4RlGenA_tqarX_H-T3-exLcTkonHhSv_b_sX4DWv11pw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1318558531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acromioclavicular Fusion: An Approach for Painful Clavicular Instability</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Sonnabend, David H. ; Hughes, Jeffery S. ; Poon, Peter C. ; Schwarz, Ben</creator><creatorcontrib>Sonnabend, David H. ; Hughes, Jeffery S. ; Poon, Peter C. ; Schwarz, Ben</creatorcontrib><description>Background The present study aimed to assess efficacy of acromioclavicular fusion as a salvage procedure for the treatment of painful horizontal (transverse) plane instability following distal clavicular excision. Methods A prospective, nonrandomized study of 16 consecutive cases was performed over an 8½ year period, assessing fusion rates, pain relief, subjective instability and range of motion. Results Initial attempts at isolated coracoclavicular fusion were relatively unsuccessful. Subsequent procedures combined acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular fusion. Once stability was achieved, all patients noted a reduction in pain and in instability sensation. Eleven patients had similar or improved ranges of shoulder motion postoperatively. In four patients, elevation &gt; 100 °C was limited by pain. Four patients developed sternoclavicular pain. Six patients had revision fusion procedures, two of them twice. Of these six, three achieved fusion. One other patient remained unfused and painful, declining a second procedure. Thirteen patients were satisfied with their result and all but one would have the surgery again. Conclusions Painful horizontal-plane acromioclavicular instability secondary to distal clavicle excision may be effectively treated by acromioclavicular arthrodesis, usually without excessive loss of movement but often with some sternoclavicular discomfort. Fusion is difficult to achieve, and the use of locking plates and ‘biological supplementation’ is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5732</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/sae.12004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>acromioclavicular fusion ; acromioclavicular instability ; Acromioclavicular pain</subject><ispartof>Shoulder &amp; elbow, 2013-04, Vol.5 (2), p.88-92</ispartof><rights>2013 The British Elbow &amp; Shoulder Society</rights><rights>2013 British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Shoulder and Elbow © 2013 British Elbow and Shoulder Society</rights><rights>Shoulder and Elbow © 2013 British Elbow and Shoulder Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2034-8fad9db90015363b328aff0c4cb3dde9d3368405fcb1ff6f760103fd90116e4e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,79235</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sonnabend, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Jeffery S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poon, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Ben</creatorcontrib><title>Acromioclavicular Fusion: An Approach for Painful Clavicular Instability</title><title>Shoulder &amp; elbow</title><description>Background The present study aimed to assess efficacy of acromioclavicular fusion as a salvage procedure for the treatment of painful horizontal (transverse) plane instability following distal clavicular excision. Methods A prospective, nonrandomized study of 16 consecutive cases was performed over an 8½ year period, assessing fusion rates, pain relief, subjective instability and range of motion. Results Initial attempts at isolated coracoclavicular fusion were relatively unsuccessful. Subsequent procedures combined acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular fusion. Once stability was achieved, all patients noted a reduction in pain and in instability sensation. Eleven patients had similar or improved ranges of shoulder motion postoperatively. In four patients, elevation &gt; 100 °C was limited by pain. Four patients developed sternoclavicular pain. Six patients had revision fusion procedures, two of them twice. Of these six, three achieved fusion. One other patient remained unfused and painful, declining a second procedure. Thirteen patients were satisfied with their result and all but one would have the surgery again. Conclusions Painful horizontal-plane acromioclavicular instability secondary to distal clavicle excision may be effectively treated by acromioclavicular arthrodesis, usually without excessive loss of movement but often with some sternoclavicular discomfort. Fusion is difficult to achieve, and the use of locking plates and ‘biological supplementation’ is recommended.</description><subject>acromioclavicular fusion</subject><subject>acromioclavicular instability</subject><subject>Acromioclavicular pain</subject><issn>1758-5732</issn><issn>1758-5740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcPfoOCIPjQ7aZp0ta3UjY3GCiozyFNE83o2pm0k317o_UfiPfl3offOffeg9A5hgn2NXVCTXAEEB-gEU5oGtIkhsPvmUTH6MS5NQBLWEJHaJFL225MK2uxM7KvhQ3mvTNtcx3kTZBvt7YV8jnQrQ3uhGl0XwfFD7psXCdKU5tuf4qOtKidOvvsY_Q4nz0Ui3B1e7Ms8lUoIyBxmGpRZVWZAWBKGClJlAqtQcayJFWlsooQlsZAtSyx1kwnDDAQXWWAMVOxImN0Mfj6y1565Tq-bnvb-JUcE5xSmlKCPXU1UP4756zSfGvNRtg9x8Dfg-I-KP4RlGenA_tqarX_H-T3-exLcTkonHhSv_b_sX4DWv11pw</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Sonnabend, David H.</creator><creator>Hughes, Jeffery S.</creator><creator>Poon, Peter C.</creator><creator>Schwarz, Ben</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>Acromioclavicular Fusion: An Approach for Painful Clavicular Instability</title><author>Sonnabend, David H. ; Hughes, Jeffery S. ; Poon, Peter C. ; Schwarz, Ben</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2034-8fad9db90015363b328aff0c4cb3dde9d3368405fcb1ff6f760103fd90116e4e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>acromioclavicular fusion</topic><topic>acromioclavicular instability</topic><topic>Acromioclavicular pain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sonnabend, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Jeffery S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poon, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Ben</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Shoulder &amp; elbow</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sonnabend, David H.</au><au>Hughes, Jeffery S.</au><au>Poon, Peter C.</au><au>Schwarz, Ben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acromioclavicular Fusion: An Approach for Painful Clavicular Instability</atitle><jtitle>Shoulder &amp; elbow</jtitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>88-92</pages><issn>1758-5732</issn><eissn>1758-5740</eissn><abstract>Background The present study aimed to assess efficacy of acromioclavicular fusion as a salvage procedure for the treatment of painful horizontal (transverse) plane instability following distal clavicular excision. Methods A prospective, nonrandomized study of 16 consecutive cases was performed over an 8½ year period, assessing fusion rates, pain relief, subjective instability and range of motion. Results Initial attempts at isolated coracoclavicular fusion were relatively unsuccessful. Subsequent procedures combined acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular fusion. Once stability was achieved, all patients noted a reduction in pain and in instability sensation. Eleven patients had similar or improved ranges of shoulder motion postoperatively. In four patients, elevation &gt; 100 °C was limited by pain. Four patients developed sternoclavicular pain. Six patients had revision fusion procedures, two of them twice. Of these six, three achieved fusion. One other patient remained unfused and painful, declining a second procedure. Thirteen patients were satisfied with their result and all but one would have the surgery again. Conclusions Painful horizontal-plane acromioclavicular instability secondary to distal clavicle excision may be effectively treated by acromioclavicular arthrodesis, usually without excessive loss of movement but often with some sternoclavicular discomfort. Fusion is difficult to achieve, and the use of locking plates and ‘biological supplementation’ is recommended.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1111/sae.12004</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1758-5732
ispartof Shoulder & elbow, 2013-04, Vol.5 (2), p.88-92
issn 1758-5732
1758-5740
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1318558531
source Sage Journals Online
subjects acromioclavicular fusion
acromioclavicular instability
Acromioclavicular pain
title Acromioclavicular Fusion: An Approach for Painful Clavicular Instability
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A05%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acromioclavicular%20Fusion:%20An%20Approach%20for%20Painful%20Clavicular%20Instability&rft.jtitle=Shoulder%20&%20elbow&rft.au=Sonnabend,%20David%20H.&rft.date=2013-04&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=88-92&rft.issn=1758-5732&rft.eissn=1758-5740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/sae.12004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2923159821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2034-8fad9db90015363b328aff0c4cb3dde9d3368405fcb1ff6f760103fd90116e4e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1318558531&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1111_sae.12004&rfr_iscdi=true