Loading…

Power to Do...What? Department Heads' Decision Autonomy and Strategic Priorities

Using questionnaire data from the 2010 Survey of Academic Chairs, the study focuses on decision autonomy, a component of the power wielded by science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) department chairs in U.S. research extensive universities. A "power index" is developed to m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Research in higher education 2013-05, Vol.54 (3), p.303-328
Main Authors: Bozeman, Barry, Fay, Daniel, Gaughan, Monica
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 328
container_issue 3
container_start_page 303
container_title Research in higher education
container_volume 54
creator Bozeman, Barry
Fay, Daniel
Gaughan, Monica
description Using questionnaire data from the 2010 Survey of Academic Chairs, the study focuses on decision autonomy, a component of the power wielded by science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) department chairs in U.S. research extensive universities. A "power index" is developed to measure chairs' decision autonomy, specifically their control of resources employed in negotiations with faculty job candidates. The study asks: What determines the degree of decision autonomy power possessed by department heads; and, what are the strategic implications of department heads' degree of this particular aspect of power? Results of an ordered logistic regression model show that having more power is associated with being hired from outside the current university, being male, and with department size. The power index is employed to predict departmental strategic priorities. Results show that the power index is positively associated with a strategic priority for research. The results show a negative relationship between degree of chair decision autonomy and a priority to increase faculty lines. A student-focused strategy is not predicted by the power index but is related to the size, with larger departments placing less emphasis on numbers or quality of students.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11162-012-9270-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1328122577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ999779</ericid><jstor_id>23471101</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23471101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e141t-56020e8d74a95905be397828af3aca55402fd3fe70f2dc24475b21b3d982e323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QFAIePCUmplsms1JSlutUrBgQW9LupvVFLupSYr03xuoeJmBed4PGEIugQ-Ac3UXAWCIjAMyjYozdUR6IJVgUJbvx6THxRBYHvKUnMW45tmTDT2yWPgfG2jydOIHg8Hbp0n3dGK3JqSN7RKdWdPE23ypXXS-o6Nd8p3f7KnpGvqagkn2w9V0EZwPLjkbz8lJa76ivfjbfbJ8mC7HMzZ_eXwaj-bMQgGJySFHbstGFUZLzeXKCq1KLE0rTG2kLDi2jWit4i02NRaFkiuElWh0iVag6JObQ-w2-O-djala-13ocmMFAktAlEpl1dVBZYOrq21wGxP21fRZa62Uzvj6gNcx-fDPURT5ORzEL3hUYi4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1328122577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Power to Do...What? Department Heads' Decision Autonomy and Strategic Priorities</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Springer Link</source><source>ERIC</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Bozeman, Barry ; Fay, Daniel ; Gaughan, Monica</creator><creatorcontrib>Bozeman, Barry ; Fay, Daniel ; Gaughan, Monica</creatorcontrib><description>Using questionnaire data from the 2010 Survey of Academic Chairs, the study focuses on decision autonomy, a component of the power wielded by science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) department chairs in U.S. research extensive universities. A "power index" is developed to measure chairs' decision autonomy, specifically their control of resources employed in negotiations with faculty job candidates. The study asks: What determines the degree of decision autonomy power possessed by department heads; and, what are the strategic implications of department heads' degree of this particular aspect of power? Results of an ordered logistic regression model show that having more power is associated with being hired from outside the current university, being male, and with department size. The power index is employed to predict departmental strategic priorities. Results show that the power index is positively associated with a strategic priority for research. The results show a negative relationship between degree of chair decision autonomy and a priority to increase faculty lines. A student-focused strategy is not predicted by the power index but is related to the size, with larger departments placing less emphasis on numbers or quality of students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-0365</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-188X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11162-012-9270-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer</publisher><subject>Academic departments ; Administrator Attitudes ; Chairs ; College Faculty ; Community Influence ; Correlation ; Decision Making ; Department Heads ; Engineering ; Factor analysis ; Faculty Recruitment ; Gender Differences ; Higher education ; Organizational Culture ; Power ; Power Structure ; Professional Autonomy ; Questionnaires ; Regression (Statistics) ; Research Methodology ; Research Universities ; Social interaction ; Social sciences ; STEM Education ; Strategic Planning ; Student Characteristics ; Student diversity ; Teacher Selection ; Universities ; University administration</subject><ispartof>Research in higher education, 2013-05, Vol.54 (3), p.303-328</ispartof><rights>2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1328122577/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1328122577?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,27924,27925,33611,33877,43733,43880,58238,58471,74093,74269</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ999779$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bozeman, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaughan, Monica</creatorcontrib><title>Power to Do...What? Department Heads' Decision Autonomy and Strategic Priorities</title><title>Research in higher education</title><description>Using questionnaire data from the 2010 Survey of Academic Chairs, the study focuses on decision autonomy, a component of the power wielded by science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) department chairs in U.S. research extensive universities. A "power index" is developed to measure chairs' decision autonomy, specifically their control of resources employed in negotiations with faculty job candidates. The study asks: What determines the degree of decision autonomy power possessed by department heads; and, what are the strategic implications of department heads' degree of this particular aspect of power? Results of an ordered logistic regression model show that having more power is associated with being hired from outside the current university, being male, and with department size. The power index is employed to predict departmental strategic priorities. Results show that the power index is positively associated with a strategic priority for research. The results show a negative relationship between degree of chair decision autonomy and a priority to increase faculty lines. A student-focused strategy is not predicted by the power index but is related to the size, with larger departments placing less emphasis on numbers or quality of students.</description><subject>Academic departments</subject><subject>Administrator Attitudes</subject><subject>Chairs</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Community Influence</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Department Heads</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Faculty Recruitment</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Power Structure</subject><subject>Professional Autonomy</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression (Statistics)</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Research Universities</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>STEM Education</subject><subject>Strategic Planning</subject><subject>Student Characteristics</subject><subject>Student diversity</subject><subject>Teacher Selection</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>University administration</subject><issn>0361-0365</issn><issn>1573-188X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QFAIePCUmplsms1JSlutUrBgQW9LupvVFLupSYr03xuoeJmBed4PGEIugQ-Ac3UXAWCIjAMyjYozdUR6IJVgUJbvx6THxRBYHvKUnMW45tmTDT2yWPgfG2jydOIHg8Hbp0n3dGK3JqSN7RKdWdPE23ypXXS-o6Nd8p3f7KnpGvqagkn2w9V0EZwPLjkbz8lJa76ivfjbfbJ8mC7HMzZ_eXwaj-bMQgGJySFHbstGFUZLzeXKCq1KLE0rTG2kLDi2jWit4i02NRaFkiuElWh0iVag6JObQ-w2-O-djala-13ocmMFAktAlEpl1dVBZYOrq21wGxP21fRZa62Uzvj6gNcx-fDPURT5ORzEL3hUYi4</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Bozeman, Barry</creator><creator>Fay, Daniel</creator><creator>Gaughan, Monica</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Power to Do...What? Department Heads' Decision Autonomy and Strategic Priorities</title><author>Bozeman, Barry ; Fay, Daniel ; Gaughan, Monica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e141t-56020e8d74a95905be397828af3aca55402fd3fe70f2dc24475b21b3d982e323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Academic departments</topic><topic>Administrator Attitudes</topic><topic>Chairs</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Community Influence</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Department Heads</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Faculty Recruitment</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Power Structure</topic><topic>Professional Autonomy</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression (Statistics)</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Research Universities</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>STEM Education</topic><topic>Strategic Planning</topic><topic>Student Characteristics</topic><topic>Student diversity</topic><topic>Teacher Selection</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>University administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bozeman, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaughan, Monica</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Research in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bozeman, Barry</au><au>Fay, Daniel</au><au>Gaughan, Monica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ999779</ericid><atitle>Power to Do...What? Department Heads' Decision Autonomy and Strategic Priorities</atitle><jtitle>Research in higher education</jtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>328</epage><pages>303-328</pages><issn>0361-0365</issn><eissn>1573-188X</eissn><abstract>Using questionnaire data from the 2010 Survey of Academic Chairs, the study focuses on decision autonomy, a component of the power wielded by science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) department chairs in U.S. research extensive universities. A "power index" is developed to measure chairs' decision autonomy, specifically their control of resources employed in negotiations with faculty job candidates. The study asks: What determines the degree of decision autonomy power possessed by department heads; and, what are the strategic implications of department heads' degree of this particular aspect of power? Results of an ordered logistic regression model show that having more power is associated with being hired from outside the current university, being male, and with department size. The power index is employed to predict departmental strategic priorities. Results show that the power index is positively associated with a strategic priority for research. The results show a negative relationship between degree of chair decision autonomy and a priority to increase faculty lines. A student-focused strategy is not predicted by the power index but is related to the size, with larger departments placing less emphasis on numbers or quality of students.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11162-012-9270-7</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-0365
ispartof Research in higher education, 2013-05, Vol.54 (3), p.303-328
issn 0361-0365
1573-188X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1328122577
source Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Springer Link; ERIC; JSTOR Archival Journals
subjects Academic departments
Administrator Attitudes
Chairs
College Faculty
Community Influence
Correlation
Decision Making
Department Heads
Engineering
Factor analysis
Faculty Recruitment
Gender Differences
Higher education
Organizational Culture
Power
Power Structure
Professional Autonomy
Questionnaires
Regression (Statistics)
Research Methodology
Research Universities
Social interaction
Social sciences
STEM Education
Strategic Planning
Student Characteristics
Student diversity
Teacher Selection
Universities
University administration
title Power to Do...What? Department Heads' Decision Autonomy and Strategic Priorities
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A57%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Power%20to%20Do...What?%20Department%20Heads'%20Decision%20Autonomy%20and%20Strategic%20Priorities&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Bozeman,%20Barry&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=328&rft.pages=303-328&rft.issn=0361-0365&rft.eissn=1573-188X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11162-012-9270-7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23471101%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e141t-56020e8d74a95905be397828af3aca55402fd3fe70f2dc24475b21b3d982e323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1328122577&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ999779&rft_jstor_id=23471101&rfr_iscdi=true