Loading…

INSTITUTIONAL NIHILISM AS A BASIS FOR ANTI-DEVELOPMENT POLICY

This paper discusses the causes and conditions that have disabled the pluralistic and even monistic acting of economic institutes in the practice of transitional countries and have led to their objective substitution by the quasi-institutes and meta-institutes of a sociopathological nature. It empha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Montenegrin journal of economics 2012-01, Vol.8 (1), p.119
Main Authors: Veselin, Draskovic, Mimo, Draskovic
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 119
container_title Montenegrin journal of economics
container_volume 8
creator Veselin, Draskovic
Mimo, Draskovic
description This paper discusses the causes and conditions that have disabled the pluralistic and even monistic acting of economic institutes in the practice of transitional countries and have led to their objective substitution by the quasi-institutes and meta-institutes of a sociopathological nature. It emphasizes the primary significance of institutionalization for economic policy, as well as the negative effect of pseudo-institutes on economic policy and the valorisation of economic resources. The paper explains that the institute of civil society as an instrument of people protection from the government doesn't work universally. It's denied by variety of national, corporate and informal groups ("elites"), which are superior in wealth and power and limiting the individuals. The authors start from the hypothesis that the institutional nihilism is the main cause of unsuccessful post-social transition and anti-development and vulgarized neo-liberal economic policy. They also start from hypothesis that the neo-liberal myth about "mini" state was the interest cover by privileged individuals for their promotion and choice implementation.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1328488856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2948485931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p146t-22b52d4e273029fb0f1b61cbffbb5c63cd69d9c5596122b877721ae0205dc2bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjctKAzEARYMoWGr_IeB6IO_HwkUcpzaQJsWkgqvSZCaLIrZ22v93wN7NPYvLuXdghhVCjRBa3d-YK8YfwWIcD2iKZIhQPgMv1sdk0zbZ4I2D3q6ss3ENTYQGvppoI1yGD2h8ss1b99m5sFl3PsFNcLb9egIPdf89Dotbz8F22aV21bjwblvjmhNm4tIQkjnp2UAkRUTXjCrOApdca868CFp6oXtdONcCT1slpSR4PyCCeF9IrnQOnv-9p_Px9zqMl93heD3_TJc7TIliSiku6B9qYD-8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1328488856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>INSTITUTIONAL NIHILISM AS A BASIS FOR ANTI-DEVELOPMENT POLICY</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Veselin, Draskovic ; Mimo, Draskovic</creator><creatorcontrib>Veselin, Draskovic ; Mimo, Draskovic</creatorcontrib><description>This paper discusses the causes and conditions that have disabled the pluralistic and even monistic acting of economic institutes in the practice of transitional countries and have led to their objective substitution by the quasi-institutes and meta-institutes of a sociopathological nature. It emphasizes the primary significance of institutionalization for economic policy, as well as the negative effect of pseudo-institutes on economic policy and the valorisation of economic resources. The paper explains that the institute of civil society as an instrument of people protection from the government doesn't work universally. It's denied by variety of national, corporate and informal groups ("elites"), which are superior in wealth and power and limiting the individuals. The authors start from the hypothesis that the institutional nihilism is the main cause of unsuccessful post-social transition and anti-development and vulgarized neo-liberal economic policy. They also start from hypothesis that the neo-liberal myth about "mini" state was the interest cover by privileged individuals for their promotion and choice implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1800-5845</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1800-6698</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Podgorica: Ekonomska Laboratorija za Istrazivanje Tranzicije</publisher><subject>Economic growth ; Economic policy ; Economic reform ; Entrepreneurs ; Growth models ; Human capital ; Hypotheses ; Institutionalization ; Liberalism ; Neoliberalism ; Nihilism ; Property rights ; Socialism ; Society ; State regulation ; Studies ; Transition economies</subject><ispartof>Montenegrin journal of economics, 2012-01, Vol.8 (1), p.119</ispartof><rights>Copyright Ekonomska Laboratorija za Istrazivanje Tranzicije 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1328488856/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1328488856?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,21394,33611,36060,43733,44363,74221,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Veselin, Draskovic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mimo, Draskovic</creatorcontrib><title>INSTITUTIONAL NIHILISM AS A BASIS FOR ANTI-DEVELOPMENT POLICY</title><title>Montenegrin journal of economics</title><description>This paper discusses the causes and conditions that have disabled the pluralistic and even monistic acting of economic institutes in the practice of transitional countries and have led to their objective substitution by the quasi-institutes and meta-institutes of a sociopathological nature. It emphasizes the primary significance of institutionalization for economic policy, as well as the negative effect of pseudo-institutes on economic policy and the valorisation of economic resources. The paper explains that the institute of civil society as an instrument of people protection from the government doesn't work universally. It's denied by variety of national, corporate and informal groups ("elites"), which are superior in wealth and power and limiting the individuals. The authors start from the hypothesis that the institutional nihilism is the main cause of unsuccessful post-social transition and anti-development and vulgarized neo-liberal economic policy. They also start from hypothesis that the neo-liberal myth about "mini" state was the interest cover by privileged individuals for their promotion and choice implementation.</description><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Nihilism</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Socialism</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>State regulation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transition economies</subject><issn>1800-5845</issn><issn>1800-6698</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNotjctKAzEARYMoWGr_IeB6IO_HwkUcpzaQJsWkgqvSZCaLIrZ22v93wN7NPYvLuXdghhVCjRBa3d-YK8YfwWIcD2iKZIhQPgMv1sdk0zbZ4I2D3q6ss3ENTYQGvppoI1yGD2h8ss1b99m5sFl3PsFNcLb9egIPdf89Dotbz8F22aV21bjwblvjmhNm4tIQkjnp2UAkRUTXjCrOApdca868CFp6oXtdONcCT1slpSR4PyCCeF9IrnQOnv-9p_Px9zqMl93heD3_TJc7TIliSiku6B9qYD-8</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Veselin, Draskovic</creator><creator>Mimo, Draskovic</creator><general>Ekonomska Laboratorija za Istrazivanje Tranzicije</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>INSTITUTIONAL NIHILISM AS A BASIS FOR ANTI-DEVELOPMENT POLICY</title><author>Veselin, Draskovic ; Mimo, Draskovic</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p146t-22b52d4e273029fb0f1b61cbffbb5c63cd69d9c5596122b877721ae0205dc2bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Nihilism</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Socialism</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>State regulation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transition economies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Veselin, Draskovic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mimo, Draskovic</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Montenegrin journal of economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Veselin, Draskovic</au><au>Mimo, Draskovic</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>INSTITUTIONAL NIHILISM AS A BASIS FOR ANTI-DEVELOPMENT POLICY</atitle><jtitle>Montenegrin journal of economics</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>119</spage><pages>119-</pages><issn>1800-5845</issn><eissn>1800-6698</eissn><abstract>This paper discusses the causes and conditions that have disabled the pluralistic and even monistic acting of economic institutes in the practice of transitional countries and have led to their objective substitution by the quasi-institutes and meta-institutes of a sociopathological nature. It emphasizes the primary significance of institutionalization for economic policy, as well as the negative effect of pseudo-institutes on economic policy and the valorisation of economic resources. The paper explains that the institute of civil society as an instrument of people protection from the government doesn't work universally. It's denied by variety of national, corporate and informal groups ("elites"), which are superior in wealth and power and limiting the individuals. The authors start from the hypothesis that the institutional nihilism is the main cause of unsuccessful post-social transition and anti-development and vulgarized neo-liberal economic policy. They also start from hypothesis that the neo-liberal myth about "mini" state was the interest cover by privileged individuals for their promotion and choice implementation.</abstract><cop>Podgorica</cop><pub>Ekonomska Laboratorija za Istrazivanje Tranzicije</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1800-5845
ispartof Montenegrin journal of economics, 2012-01, Vol.8 (1), p.119
issn 1800-5845
1800-6698
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1328488856
source ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Social Science Premium Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Economic growth
Economic policy
Economic reform
Entrepreneurs
Growth models
Human capital
Hypotheses
Institutionalization
Liberalism
Neoliberalism
Nihilism
Property rights
Socialism
Society
State regulation
Studies
Transition economies
title INSTITUTIONAL NIHILISM AS A BASIS FOR ANTI-DEVELOPMENT POLICY
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A23%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=INSTITUTIONAL%20NIHILISM%20AS%20A%20BASIS%20FOR%20ANTI-DEVELOPMENT%20POLICY&rft.jtitle=Montenegrin%20journal%20of%20economics&rft.au=Veselin,%20Draskovic&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=119&rft.pages=119-&rft.issn=1800-5845&rft.eissn=1800-6698&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2948485931%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p146t-22b52d4e273029fb0f1b61cbffbb5c63cd69d9c5596122b877721ae0205dc2bf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1328488856&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true