Loading…
Comparing Strategies of Collaborative Networks for R&D: An Agent-Based Study
In this work we analyze the evolving dynamics of different strategies of collaborative networks that emerge from the creation and diffusion of knowledge. An evolutionary economic approach is adopted by introducing decision rules that are applied routinely and an agent-based model is developed. Firms...
Saved in:
Published in: | Computational economics 2013-06, Vol.42 (1), p.1-22 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-520fb002c28406d824f07e3d4287bc9ad906b40c59fee21293c9419f332494e63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-520fb002c28406d824f07e3d4287bc9ad906b40c59fee21293c9419f332494e63 |
container_end_page | 22 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Computational economics |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Campos, Pedro Brazdil, Pavel Mota, Isabel |
description | In this work we analyze the evolving dynamics of different strategies of collaborative networks that emerge from the creation and diffusion of knowledge. An evolutionary economic approach is adopted by introducing decision rules that are applied routinely and an agent-based model is developed. Firms (the agents) can collaborate and create networks for research and development purposes. We have compared three collaboration strategies (A—peer-to-peer complementariness, B—concentration process and C—virtual cooperation networks) that were defined on the basis of literature and on empirical evidence. Strategies are introduced exogenously in the simulation. The aims of this paper are twofold: (i) to analyze the importance of the networking effects; and (ii) to test the differences among collaboration strategies. It was possible to conclude that profit is associated with higher stock of knowledge and with smaller network diameter. In addition, concentration strategies are more profitable and more efficient in transmitting knowledge through the network. These processes reinforce the stock of knowledge and the profit of the firms located in the centers of the networks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10614-013-9376-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1348575156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2962129751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-520fb002c28406d824f07e3d4287bc9ad906b40c59fee21293c9419f332494e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOFYfwF1AcBc9ubRp3I31CoOCl3VI22ToONPUpKPM29tSF27cnAOH__sPfAidUrigAPIyUsioIEA5UVxmRO2hGU0lI0pJsY9moJgkEpQ6REcxrgAgpYzN0KLwm86Epl3i1z6Y3i4bG7F3uPDrtSn9cGq-LH6y_bcPHxE7H_DL-c0Vnrd4vrRtT65NtPUAb-vdMTpwZh3tye9O0Pvd7VvxQBbP94_FfEEqnkNPUgauBGAVywVkdc6EA2l5LVguy0qZWkFWCqhS5axllCleKUGV45wJJWzGE3Q29XbBf25t7PXKb0M7vNSUizyVKU3HFJ1SVfAxBut0F5qNCTtNQY_S9CRND9L0KG0YCWITE7vRiQ1_mv-FfgAVA2zc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1348575156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Strategies of Collaborative Networks for R&D: An Agent-Based Study</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Campos, Pedro ; Brazdil, Pavel ; Mota, Isabel</creator><creatorcontrib>Campos, Pedro ; Brazdil, Pavel ; Mota, Isabel</creatorcontrib><description>In this work we analyze the evolving dynamics of different strategies of collaborative networks that emerge from the creation and diffusion of knowledge. An evolutionary economic approach is adopted by introducing decision rules that are applied routinely and an agent-based model is developed. Firms (the agents) can collaborate and create networks for research and development purposes. We have compared three collaboration strategies (A—peer-to-peer complementariness, B—concentration process and C—virtual cooperation networks) that were defined on the basis of literature and on empirical evidence. Strategies are introduced exogenously in the simulation. The aims of this paper are twofold: (i) to analyze the importance of the networking effects; and (ii) to test the differences among collaboration strategies. It was possible to conclude that profit is associated with higher stock of knowledge and with smaller network diameter. In addition, concentration strategies are more profitable and more efficient in transmitting knowledge through the network. These processes reinforce the stock of knowledge and the profit of the firms located in the centers of the networks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0927-7099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9974</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10614-013-9376-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Behavioral/Experimental Economics ; Collaboration ; Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Cooperation ; Economic theory ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Evolution ; Information sharing ; Innovations ; Knowledge ; Math Applications in Computer Science ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; R&D ; Research & development ; Simulation ; Social networks ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Computational economics, 2013-06, Vol.42 (1), p.1-22</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-520fb002c28406d824f07e3d4287bc9ad906b40c59fee21293c9419f332494e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-520fb002c28406d824f07e3d4287bc9ad906b40c59fee21293c9419f332494e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1348575156/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1348575156?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campos, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazdil, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mota, Isabel</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Strategies of Collaborative Networks for R&D: An Agent-Based Study</title><title>Computational economics</title><addtitle>Comput Econ</addtitle><description>In this work we analyze the evolving dynamics of different strategies of collaborative networks that emerge from the creation and diffusion of knowledge. An evolutionary economic approach is adopted by introducing decision rules that are applied routinely and an agent-based model is developed. Firms (the agents) can collaborate and create networks for research and development purposes. We have compared three collaboration strategies (A—peer-to-peer complementariness, B—concentration process and C—virtual cooperation networks) that were defined on the basis of literature and on empirical evidence. Strategies are introduced exogenously in the simulation. The aims of this paper are twofold: (i) to analyze the importance of the networking effects; and (ii) to test the differences among collaboration strategies. It was possible to conclude that profit is associated with higher stock of knowledge and with smaller network diameter. In addition, concentration strategies are more profitable and more efficient in transmitting knowledge through the network. These processes reinforce the stock of knowledge and the profit of the firms located in the centers of the networks.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavioral/Experimental Economics</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Math Applications in Computer Science</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0927-7099</issn><issn>1572-9974</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOFYfwF1AcBc9ubRp3I31CoOCl3VI22ToONPUpKPM29tSF27cnAOH__sPfAidUrigAPIyUsioIEA5UVxmRO2hGU0lI0pJsY9moJgkEpQ6REcxrgAgpYzN0KLwm86Epl3i1z6Y3i4bG7F3uPDrtSn9cGq-LH6y_bcPHxE7H_DL-c0Vnrd4vrRtT65NtPUAb-vdMTpwZh3tye9O0Pvd7VvxQBbP94_FfEEqnkNPUgauBGAVywVkdc6EA2l5LVguy0qZWkFWCqhS5axllCleKUGV45wJJWzGE3Q29XbBf25t7PXKb0M7vNSUizyVKU3HFJ1SVfAxBut0F5qNCTtNQY_S9CRND9L0KG0YCWITE7vRiQ1_mv-FfgAVA2zc</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Campos, Pedro</creator><creator>Brazdil, Pavel</creator><creator>Mota, Isabel</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Comparing Strategies of Collaborative Networks for R&D: An Agent-Based Study</title><author>Campos, Pedro ; Brazdil, Pavel ; Mota, Isabel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-520fb002c28406d824f07e3d4287bc9ad906b40c59fee21293c9419f332494e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavioral/Experimental Economics</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Math Applications in Computer Science</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campos, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazdil, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mota, Isabel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Computational economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campos, Pedro</au><au>Brazdil, Pavel</au><au>Mota, Isabel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Strategies of Collaborative Networks for R&D: An Agent-Based Study</atitle><jtitle>Computational economics</jtitle><stitle>Comput Econ</stitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>1-22</pages><issn>0927-7099</issn><eissn>1572-9974</eissn><abstract>In this work we analyze the evolving dynamics of different strategies of collaborative networks that emerge from the creation and diffusion of knowledge. An evolutionary economic approach is adopted by introducing decision rules that are applied routinely and an agent-based model is developed. Firms (the agents) can collaborate and create networks for research and development purposes. We have compared three collaboration strategies (A—peer-to-peer complementariness, B—concentration process and C—virtual cooperation networks) that were defined on the basis of literature and on empirical evidence. Strategies are introduced exogenously in the simulation. The aims of this paper are twofold: (i) to analyze the importance of the networking effects; and (ii) to test the differences among collaboration strategies. It was possible to conclude that profit is associated with higher stock of knowledge and with smaller network diameter. In addition, concentration strategies are more profitable and more efficient in transmitting knowledge through the network. These processes reinforce the stock of knowledge and the profit of the firms located in the centers of the networks.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10614-013-9376-9</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0927-7099 |
ispartof | Computational economics, 2013-06, Vol.42 (1), p.1-22 |
issn | 0927-7099 1572-9974 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1348575156 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link |
subjects | Analysis Behavioral/Experimental Economics Collaboration Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences Cooperation Economic theory Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economics Economics and Finance Evolution Information sharing Innovations Knowledge Math Applications in Computer Science Operations Research/Decision Theory R&D Research & development Simulation Social networks Studies |
title | Comparing Strategies of Collaborative Networks for R&D: An Agent-Based Study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A34%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Strategies%20of%20Collaborative%20Networks%20for%20R&D:%20An%20Agent-Based%20Study&rft.jtitle=Computational%20economics&rft.au=Campos,%20Pedro&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=1-22&rft.issn=0927-7099&rft.eissn=1572-9974&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10614-013-9376-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2962129751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-520fb002c28406d824f07e3d4287bc9ad906b40c59fee21293c9419f332494e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1348575156&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |