Loading…

Implementing the Liberal Peace in Post-conflict Scenarios: The Case of Women in Black-Serbia

This article explores the complex, and often unintended, consequences of NGO struggles to implement the normative claims embedded in discourses of liberal peace in post‐conflict situations. We study Women in Black‐Serbia (WIB) to examine the tensions between WIB’s adoption of a liberal, radically fe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global policy 2012-02, Vol.3 (1), p.46-57
Main Authors: Stephenson Jr, Max, Zanotti, Laura
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3242-ba5e8be299ebe86bd0d0fdf853b1d449bec3d6e2b9b646b2f2b9e435de7a23dc3
container_end_page 57
container_issue 1
container_start_page 46
container_title Global policy
container_volume 3
creator Stephenson Jr, Max
Zanotti, Laura
description This article explores the complex, and often unintended, consequences of NGO struggles to implement the normative claims embedded in discourses of liberal peace in post‐conflict situations. We study Women in Black‐Serbia (WIB) to examine the tensions between WIB’s adoption of a liberal, radically feminist, deterritorialized and individualistic conceptualization of peace, its development of politics and political strategies in accord with the nationalistic identities it has purported to reject, and the organization of its advocacy for peace around the memorialization of war victims. We argue, in a very polarized political climate and in the context of a heavy presence of international stakeholders, that WIB activism may produce the unintended consequence of hardening existing war identities and conflict positions. This article assesses NGOs, not mainly for the quality of their normative claims or putative roles, but as political agents whose discourses, tactics and practices are evaluated in the context of their interactions with other (local and international) actors. More broadly, this analysis illuminates the unexplored conundrums, complexities and ambiguities associated with implementation of the liberal peace in a highly polarized political space, and in the context of multi‐stakeholder peace‐building processes. Policy Implications •  Bilateral donors and multilateral organizations should assess their support for NGO advocacy activities in post‐conflict situations, not only based upon general normative claims, but in a thoroughly contextualized manner. •  Because NGO peace‐oriented advocacy activities may create unexpected and even perverse consequences as a result of mediating political and social factors, NGOs must be considered as concrete political actors involved in complex contexts and their actions evaluated by policy makers accordingly. •  Policy‐maker assumptions concerning the effects of normative claims, especially regarding justice and guilt and the memorialization of war‐related atrocities, merit careful analysis. Such efforts cannot simply be assumed to conduce to peace, as often they may not. •  International donors and policy makers should consider crafting broad‐based strategies for moving the political debate away from war‐related concerns. Policies aimed at fostering broad economic opportunities and increased economic integration may help to foster propitious conditions for political reconciliation.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00102.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1353413740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2975819761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3242-ba5e8be299ebe86bd0d0fdf853b1d449bec3d6e2b9b646b2f2b9e435de7a23dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhosoKNP_EPC6NR_9SAUvdOocFjeYMhAhJOmpZuvamXQ4_72pk117bvJC3ucceIIAERwRPxeLiGQJDxOe5xHFhEQYE0yj7UFwsv843GeOj4Mz5xbYD-M5puQkeBuv1jWsoOlM8466D0CFUWBljaYgNSDToGnrulC3TVUb3aGZhkZa07pL9OzbQ-kAtRWat35H376ppV6GM7DKyNPgqJK1g7O_dxC83N89Dx_CYjIaD6-LUDMa01DJBLgCmueggKeqxCWuyoonTJEyjnMFmpUpUJWrNE4VrXyCmCUlZJKyUrNBcL7bu7bt5wZcJxbtxjb-pCAsYTFhWYx9i-9a2rbOWajE2pqVtN-CYNHrFAvRmxK9NdHrFL86xdajVzv0y9Tw_W9OjKaTwifPhzveuA62e17apUgzliVi_jQSs-KVF4_zQtyyHyMeio0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1353413740</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementing the Liberal Peace in Post-conflict Scenarios: The Case of Women in Black-Serbia</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Stephenson Jr, Max ; Zanotti, Laura</creator><creatorcontrib>Stephenson Jr, Max ; Zanotti, Laura</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the complex, and often unintended, consequences of NGO struggles to implement the normative claims embedded in discourses of liberal peace in post‐conflict situations. We study Women in Black‐Serbia (WIB) to examine the tensions between WIB’s adoption of a liberal, radically feminist, deterritorialized and individualistic conceptualization of peace, its development of politics and political strategies in accord with the nationalistic identities it has purported to reject, and the organization of its advocacy for peace around the memorialization of war victims. We argue, in a very polarized political climate and in the context of a heavy presence of international stakeholders, that WIB activism may produce the unintended consequence of hardening existing war identities and conflict positions. This article assesses NGOs, not mainly for the quality of their normative claims or putative roles, but as political agents whose discourses, tactics and practices are evaluated in the context of their interactions with other (local and international) actors. More broadly, this analysis illuminates the unexplored conundrums, complexities and ambiguities associated with implementation of the liberal peace in a highly polarized political space, and in the context of multi‐stakeholder peace‐building processes. Policy Implications •  Bilateral donors and multilateral organizations should assess their support for NGO advocacy activities in post‐conflict situations, not only based upon general normative claims, but in a thoroughly contextualized manner. •  Because NGO peace‐oriented advocacy activities may create unexpected and even perverse consequences as a result of mediating political and social factors, NGOs must be considered as concrete political actors involved in complex contexts and their actions evaluated by policy makers accordingly. •  Policy‐maker assumptions concerning the effects of normative claims, especially regarding justice and guilt and the memorialization of war‐related atrocities, merit careful analysis. Such efforts cannot simply be assumed to conduce to peace, as often they may not. •  International donors and policy makers should consider crafting broad‐based strategies for moving the political debate away from war‐related concerns. Policies aimed at fostering broad economic opportunities and increased economic integration may help to foster propitious conditions for political reconciliation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5880</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5899</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00102.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Conflicts ; NGOs ; Nongovernmental organizations ; Peace ; Policy making ; Politics</subject><ispartof>Global policy, 2012-02, Vol.3 (1), p.46-57</ispartof><rights>2011 London School of Economics and Political Science and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3242-ba5e8be299ebe86bd0d0fdf853b1d449bec3d6e2b9b646b2f2b9e435de7a23dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stephenson Jr, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanotti, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>Implementing the Liberal Peace in Post-conflict Scenarios: The Case of Women in Black-Serbia</title><title>Global policy</title><description>This article explores the complex, and often unintended, consequences of NGO struggles to implement the normative claims embedded in discourses of liberal peace in post‐conflict situations. We study Women in Black‐Serbia (WIB) to examine the tensions between WIB’s adoption of a liberal, radically feminist, deterritorialized and individualistic conceptualization of peace, its development of politics and political strategies in accord with the nationalistic identities it has purported to reject, and the organization of its advocacy for peace around the memorialization of war victims. We argue, in a very polarized political climate and in the context of a heavy presence of international stakeholders, that WIB activism may produce the unintended consequence of hardening existing war identities and conflict positions. This article assesses NGOs, not mainly for the quality of their normative claims or putative roles, but as political agents whose discourses, tactics and practices are evaluated in the context of their interactions with other (local and international) actors. More broadly, this analysis illuminates the unexplored conundrums, complexities and ambiguities associated with implementation of the liberal peace in a highly polarized political space, and in the context of multi‐stakeholder peace‐building processes. Policy Implications •  Bilateral donors and multilateral organizations should assess their support for NGO advocacy activities in post‐conflict situations, not only based upon general normative claims, but in a thoroughly contextualized manner. •  Because NGO peace‐oriented advocacy activities may create unexpected and even perverse consequences as a result of mediating political and social factors, NGOs must be considered as concrete political actors involved in complex contexts and their actions evaluated by policy makers accordingly. •  Policy‐maker assumptions concerning the effects of normative claims, especially regarding justice and guilt and the memorialization of war‐related atrocities, merit careful analysis. Such efforts cannot simply be assumed to conduce to peace, as often they may not. •  International donors and policy makers should consider crafting broad‐based strategies for moving the political debate away from war‐related concerns. Policies aimed at fostering broad economic opportunities and increased economic integration may help to foster propitious conditions for political reconciliation.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Conflicts</subject><subject>NGOs</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><subject>Peace</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Politics</subject><issn>1758-5880</issn><issn>1758-5899</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhosoKNP_EPC6NR_9SAUvdOocFjeYMhAhJOmpZuvamXQ4_72pk117bvJC3ucceIIAERwRPxeLiGQJDxOe5xHFhEQYE0yj7UFwsv843GeOj4Mz5xbYD-M5puQkeBuv1jWsoOlM8466D0CFUWBljaYgNSDToGnrulC3TVUb3aGZhkZa07pL9OzbQ-kAtRWat35H376ppV6GM7DKyNPgqJK1g7O_dxC83N89Dx_CYjIaD6-LUDMa01DJBLgCmueggKeqxCWuyoonTJEyjnMFmpUpUJWrNE4VrXyCmCUlZJKyUrNBcL7bu7bt5wZcJxbtxjb-pCAsYTFhWYx9i-9a2rbOWajE2pqVtN-CYNHrFAvRmxK9NdHrFL86xdajVzv0y9Tw_W9OjKaTwifPhzveuA62e17apUgzliVi_jQSs-KVF4_zQtyyHyMeio0</recordid><startdate>201202</startdate><enddate>201202</enddate><creator>Stephenson Jr, Max</creator><creator>Zanotti, Laura</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201202</creationdate><title>Implementing the Liberal Peace in Post-conflict Scenarios: The Case of Women in Black-Serbia</title><author>Stephenson Jr, Max ; Zanotti, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3242-ba5e8be299ebe86bd0d0fdf853b1d449bec3d6e2b9b646b2f2b9e435de7a23dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Conflicts</topic><topic>NGOs</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><topic>Peace</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stephenson Jr, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanotti, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Global policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stephenson Jr, Max</au><au>Zanotti, Laura</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementing the Liberal Peace in Post-conflict Scenarios: The Case of Women in Black-Serbia</atitle><jtitle>Global policy</jtitle><date>2012-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>46-57</pages><issn>1758-5880</issn><eissn>1758-5899</eissn><abstract>This article explores the complex, and often unintended, consequences of NGO struggles to implement the normative claims embedded in discourses of liberal peace in post‐conflict situations. We study Women in Black‐Serbia (WIB) to examine the tensions between WIB’s adoption of a liberal, radically feminist, deterritorialized and individualistic conceptualization of peace, its development of politics and political strategies in accord with the nationalistic identities it has purported to reject, and the organization of its advocacy for peace around the memorialization of war victims. We argue, in a very polarized political climate and in the context of a heavy presence of international stakeholders, that WIB activism may produce the unintended consequence of hardening existing war identities and conflict positions. This article assesses NGOs, not mainly for the quality of their normative claims or putative roles, but as political agents whose discourses, tactics and practices are evaluated in the context of their interactions with other (local and international) actors. More broadly, this analysis illuminates the unexplored conundrums, complexities and ambiguities associated with implementation of the liberal peace in a highly polarized political space, and in the context of multi‐stakeholder peace‐building processes. Policy Implications •  Bilateral donors and multilateral organizations should assess their support for NGO advocacy activities in post‐conflict situations, not only based upon general normative claims, but in a thoroughly contextualized manner. •  Because NGO peace‐oriented advocacy activities may create unexpected and even perverse consequences as a result of mediating political and social factors, NGOs must be considered as concrete political actors involved in complex contexts and their actions evaluated by policy makers accordingly. •  Policy‐maker assumptions concerning the effects of normative claims, especially regarding justice and guilt and the memorialization of war‐related atrocities, merit careful analysis. Such efforts cannot simply be assumed to conduce to peace, as often they may not. •  International donors and policy makers should consider crafting broad‐based strategies for moving the political debate away from war‐related concerns. Policies aimed at fostering broad economic opportunities and increased economic integration may help to foster propitious conditions for political reconciliation.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00102.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1758-5880
ispartof Global policy, 2012-02, Vol.3 (1), p.46-57
issn 1758-5880
1758-5899
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1353413740
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PAIS Index
subjects Advocacy
Conflicts
NGOs
Nongovernmental organizations
Peace
Policy making
Politics
title Implementing the Liberal Peace in Post-conflict Scenarios: The Case of Women in Black-Serbia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T16%3A16%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementing%20the%20Liberal%20Peace%20in%20Post-conflict%20Scenarios:%20The%20Case%20of%20Women%20in%20Black-Serbia&rft.jtitle=Global%20policy&rft.au=Stephenson%20Jr,%20Max&rft.date=2012-02&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=46-57&rft.issn=1758-5880&rft.eissn=1758-5899&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00102.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2975819761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3242-ba5e8be299ebe86bd0d0fdf853b1d449bec3d6e2b9b646b2f2b9e435de7a23dc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1353413740&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true