Loading…
Technical Note: Validation of rumination collars for beef cattle1
Two studies were conducted to evaluate a wireless rumination monitoring system (Hi-Tag; SCR Engineers Ltd., Netanya, Israel) for recording rumination in beef cattle. The system operates based on acoustics of rumination and has been used previously for monitoring rumination in both young and adult da...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of animal science 2013-06, Vol.91 (6), p.2858-2862 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-8e142d9cb954151a25fe32f2ed631339ed28c0621ed6907b624139ea4677e0f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-8e142d9cb954151a25fe32f2ed631339ed28c0621ed6907b624139ea4677e0f3 |
container_end_page | 2862 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2858 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Goldhawk, C. Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. Beauchemin, K. A. |
description | Two studies were conducted to evaluate a wireless rumination monitoring system (Hi-Tag; SCR Engineers Ltd., Netanya, Israel) for recording rumination in beef cattle. The system operates based on acoustics of rumination and has been used previously for monitoring rumination in both young and adult dairy cattle. Study 1 consisted of beef cattle in tie-stall housing with 72 observations for 4 cattle fed a high forage backgrounding diet and 47 observations for 3 cattle fed a high grain finishing diet. Study 2 consisted of 44 observations for 6 beef cattle fed a high forage diet in a loose-housing feedlot pen. Each observation consisted of the rumination time during a 2-h period as estimated by visual observations made by trained observers (inter-observer correlation r = 0.97) and the Hi-Tag system. The mean difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was 9.8 ± 18.7 min/2 h. The rumination times from the Hi-Tag system were only moderately correlated with visual observations (r = 0.41, P < 0.001). The difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was not correlated with head posture during the 2 h period (r = -0.02, P = 0.89). Physical and dietary differences between dairy and beef cattle may have resulted in the inaccuracy of the Hi-Tag system when used in beef cattle fed typical backgrounding and finishing diets. More work is required to improve the accuracy of this automated system for rumination monitoring before it can be used reliably with beef cattle. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas.2012-5908 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1372935418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3009552321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-8e142d9cb954151a25fe32f2ed631339ed28c0621ed6907b624139ea4677e0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LAzEURYMoWKtL9wHXqXkvk5nEXSl-QdFNcRsymQSnTCc1mS7896aMq8e9HO6DQ8g98BVKbB73Nq-QAzKpubogC5AomYBaXJIF5whMKcBrcpPznhdMarkg651332Pv7EA_4uSf6Jcd-s5OfRxpDDSdDv04JxeHwaZMQ0y09T5QZ6dp8HBLroIdsr_7v0uye3nebd7Y9vP1fbPeMgfAFVMeKuy0a7WsQIJFGbzAgL6rBQihfYfK8RqhFJo3bY0VlNZWddN4HsSSPMyzxxR_Tj5PZh9PaSwfDYgGtSizqlBsplyKOScfzDH1B5t-DXBzlmSKJHOWZM6SxB9zzlhe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1372935418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technical Note: Validation of rumination collars for beef cattle1</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Goldhawk, C. ; Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. ; Beauchemin, K. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldhawk, C. ; Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. ; Beauchemin, K. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Two studies were conducted to evaluate a wireless rumination monitoring system (Hi-Tag; SCR Engineers Ltd., Netanya, Israel) for recording rumination in beef cattle. The system operates based on acoustics of rumination and has been used previously for monitoring rumination in both young and adult dairy cattle. Study 1 consisted of beef cattle in tie-stall housing with 72 observations for 4 cattle fed a high forage backgrounding diet and 47 observations for 3 cattle fed a high grain finishing diet. Study 2 consisted of 44 observations for 6 beef cattle fed a high forage diet in a loose-housing feedlot pen. Each observation consisted of the rumination time during a 2-h period as estimated by visual observations made by trained observers (inter-observer correlation r = 0.97) and the Hi-Tag system. The mean difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was 9.8 ± 18.7 min/2 h. The rumination times from the Hi-Tag system were only moderately correlated with visual observations (r = 0.41, P < 0.001). The difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was not correlated with head posture during the 2 h period (r = -0.02, P = 0.89). Physical and dietary differences between dairy and beef cattle may have resulted in the inaccuracy of the Hi-Tag system when used in beef cattle fed typical backgrounding and finishing diets. More work is required to improve the accuracy of this automated system for rumination monitoring before it can be used reliably with beef cattle. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5908</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Automation ; Cattle ; Digestive system</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2013-06, Vol.91 (6), p.2858-2862</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Jun 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-8e142d9cb954151a25fe32f2ed631339ed28c0621ed6907b624139ea4677e0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-8e142d9cb954151a25fe32f2ed631339ed28c0621ed6907b624139ea4677e0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldhawk, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauchemin, K. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Technical Note: Validation of rumination collars for beef cattle1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Two studies were conducted to evaluate a wireless rumination monitoring system (Hi-Tag; SCR Engineers Ltd., Netanya, Israel) for recording rumination in beef cattle. The system operates based on acoustics of rumination and has been used previously for monitoring rumination in both young and adult dairy cattle. Study 1 consisted of beef cattle in tie-stall housing with 72 observations for 4 cattle fed a high forage backgrounding diet and 47 observations for 3 cattle fed a high grain finishing diet. Study 2 consisted of 44 observations for 6 beef cattle fed a high forage diet in a loose-housing feedlot pen. Each observation consisted of the rumination time during a 2-h period as estimated by visual observations made by trained observers (inter-observer correlation r = 0.97) and the Hi-Tag system. The mean difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was 9.8 ± 18.7 min/2 h. The rumination times from the Hi-Tag system were only moderately correlated with visual observations (r = 0.41, P < 0.001). The difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was not correlated with head posture during the 2 h period (r = -0.02, P = 0.89). Physical and dietary differences between dairy and beef cattle may have resulted in the inaccuracy of the Hi-Tag system when used in beef cattle fed typical backgrounding and finishing diets. More work is required to improve the accuracy of this automated system for rumination monitoring before it can be used reliably with beef cattle. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1LAzEURYMoWKtL9wHXqXkvk5nEXSl-QdFNcRsymQSnTCc1mS7896aMq8e9HO6DQ8g98BVKbB73Nq-QAzKpubogC5AomYBaXJIF5whMKcBrcpPznhdMarkg651332Pv7EA_4uSf6Jcd-s5OfRxpDDSdDv04JxeHwaZMQ0y09T5QZ6dp8HBLroIdsr_7v0uye3nebd7Y9vP1fbPeMgfAFVMeKuy0a7WsQIJFGbzAgL6rBQihfYfK8RqhFJo3bY0VlNZWddN4HsSSPMyzxxR_Tj5PZh9PaSwfDYgGtSizqlBsplyKOScfzDH1B5t-DXBzlmSKJHOWZM6SxB9zzlhe</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Goldhawk, C.</creator><creator>Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K.</creator><creator>Beauchemin, K. A.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Technical Note: Validation of rumination collars for beef cattle1</title><author>Goldhawk, C. ; Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. ; Beauchemin, K. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-8e142d9cb954151a25fe32f2ed631339ed28c0621ed6907b624139ea4677e0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldhawk, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauchemin, K. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Proquest Health & Medical Complete</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldhawk, C.</au><au>Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K.</au><au>Beauchemin, K. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technical Note: Validation of rumination collars for beef cattle1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2858</spage><epage>2862</epage><pages>2858-2862</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Two studies were conducted to evaluate a wireless rumination monitoring system (Hi-Tag; SCR Engineers Ltd., Netanya, Israel) for recording rumination in beef cattle. The system operates based on acoustics of rumination and has been used previously for monitoring rumination in both young and adult dairy cattle. Study 1 consisted of beef cattle in tie-stall housing with 72 observations for 4 cattle fed a high forage backgrounding diet and 47 observations for 3 cattle fed a high grain finishing diet. Study 2 consisted of 44 observations for 6 beef cattle fed a high forage diet in a loose-housing feedlot pen. Each observation consisted of the rumination time during a 2-h period as estimated by visual observations made by trained observers (inter-observer correlation r = 0.97) and the Hi-Tag system. The mean difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was 9.8 ± 18.7 min/2 h. The rumination times from the Hi-Tag system were only moderately correlated with visual observations (r = 0.41, P < 0.001). The difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was not correlated with head posture during the 2 h period (r = -0.02, P = 0.89). Physical and dietary differences between dairy and beef cattle may have resulted in the inaccuracy of the Hi-Tag system when used in beef cattle fed typical backgrounding and finishing diets. More work is required to improve the accuracy of this automated system for rumination monitoring before it can be used reliably with beef cattle. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jas.2012-5908</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2013-06, Vol.91 (6), p.2858-2862 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1372935418 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Animal behavior Automation Cattle Digestive system |
title | Technical Note: Validation of rumination collars for beef cattle1 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A45%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technical%20Note:%20Validation%20of%20rumination%20collars%20for%20beef%20cattle1&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Goldhawk,%20C.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2858&rft.epage=2862&rft.pages=2858-2862&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas.2012-5908&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3009552321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-8e142d9cb954151a25fe32f2ed631339ed28c0621ed6907b624139ea4677e0f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1372935418&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |