Loading…

Technical Note: Validation of rumination collars for beef cattle1

Two studies were conducted to evaluate a wireless rumination monitoring system (Hi-Tag; SCR Engineers Ltd., Netanya, Israel) for recording rumination in beef cattle. The system operates based on acoustics of rumination and has been used previously for monitoring rumination in both young and adult da...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of animal science 2013-06, Vol.91 (6), p.2858-2862
Main Authors: Goldhawk, C., Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K., Beauchemin, K. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-8e142d9cb954151a25fe32f2ed631339ed28c0621ed6907b624139ea4677e0f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-8e142d9cb954151a25fe32f2ed631339ed28c0621ed6907b624139ea4677e0f3
container_end_page 2862
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2858
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 91
creator Goldhawk, C.
Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K.
Beauchemin, K. A.
description Two studies were conducted to evaluate a wireless rumination monitoring system (Hi-Tag; SCR Engineers Ltd., Netanya, Israel) for recording rumination in beef cattle. The system operates based on acoustics of rumination and has been used previously for monitoring rumination in both young and adult dairy cattle. Study 1 consisted of beef cattle in tie-stall housing with 72 observations for 4 cattle fed a high forage backgrounding diet and 47 observations for 3 cattle fed a high grain finishing diet. Study 2 consisted of 44 observations for 6 beef cattle fed a high forage diet in a loose-housing feedlot pen. Each observation consisted of the rumination time during a 2-h period as estimated by visual observations made by trained observers (inter-observer correlation r = 0.97) and the Hi-Tag system. The mean difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was 9.8 ± 18.7 min/2 h. The rumination times from the Hi-Tag system were only moderately correlated with visual observations (r = 0.41, P < 0.001). The difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was not correlated with head posture during the 2 h period (r = -0.02, P = 0.89). Physical and dietary differences between dairy and beef cattle may have resulted in the inaccuracy of the Hi-Tag system when used in beef cattle fed typical backgrounding and finishing diets. More work is required to improve the accuracy of this automated system for rumination monitoring before it can be used reliably with beef cattle. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.2527/jas.2012-5908
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1372935418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3009552321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-8e142d9cb954151a25fe32f2ed631339ed28c0621ed6907b624139ea4677e0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LAzEURYMoWKtL9wHXqXkvk5nEXSl-QdFNcRsymQSnTCc1mS7896aMq8e9HO6DQ8g98BVKbB73Nq-QAzKpubogC5AomYBaXJIF5whMKcBrcpPznhdMarkg651332Pv7EA_4uSf6Jcd-s5OfRxpDDSdDv04JxeHwaZMQ0y09T5QZ6dp8HBLroIdsr_7v0uye3nebd7Y9vP1fbPeMgfAFVMeKuy0a7WsQIJFGbzAgL6rBQihfYfK8RqhFJo3bY0VlNZWddN4HsSSPMyzxxR_Tj5PZh9PaSwfDYgGtSizqlBsplyKOScfzDH1B5t-DXBzlmSKJHOWZM6SxB9zzlhe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1372935418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technical Note: Validation of rumination collars for beef cattle1</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Goldhawk, C. ; Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. ; Beauchemin, K. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldhawk, C. ; Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. ; Beauchemin, K. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Two studies were conducted to evaluate a wireless rumination monitoring system (Hi-Tag; SCR Engineers Ltd., Netanya, Israel) for recording rumination in beef cattle. The system operates based on acoustics of rumination and has been used previously for monitoring rumination in both young and adult dairy cattle. Study 1 consisted of beef cattle in tie-stall housing with 72 observations for 4 cattle fed a high forage backgrounding diet and 47 observations for 3 cattle fed a high grain finishing diet. Study 2 consisted of 44 observations for 6 beef cattle fed a high forage diet in a loose-housing feedlot pen. Each observation consisted of the rumination time during a 2-h period as estimated by visual observations made by trained observers (inter-observer correlation r = 0.97) and the Hi-Tag system. The mean difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was 9.8 ± 18.7 min/2 h. The rumination times from the Hi-Tag system were only moderately correlated with visual observations (r = 0.41, P &lt; 0.001). The difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was not correlated with head posture during the 2 h period (r = -0.02, P = 0.89). Physical and dietary differences between dairy and beef cattle may have resulted in the inaccuracy of the Hi-Tag system when used in beef cattle fed typical backgrounding and finishing diets. More work is required to improve the accuracy of this automated system for rumination monitoring before it can be used reliably with beef cattle. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5908</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Automation ; Cattle ; Digestive system</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2013-06, Vol.91 (6), p.2858-2862</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Jun 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-8e142d9cb954151a25fe32f2ed631339ed28c0621ed6907b624139ea4677e0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-8e142d9cb954151a25fe32f2ed631339ed28c0621ed6907b624139ea4677e0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldhawk, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauchemin, K. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Technical Note: Validation of rumination collars for beef cattle1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Two studies were conducted to evaluate a wireless rumination monitoring system (Hi-Tag; SCR Engineers Ltd., Netanya, Israel) for recording rumination in beef cattle. The system operates based on acoustics of rumination and has been used previously for monitoring rumination in both young and adult dairy cattle. Study 1 consisted of beef cattle in tie-stall housing with 72 observations for 4 cattle fed a high forage backgrounding diet and 47 observations for 3 cattle fed a high grain finishing diet. Study 2 consisted of 44 observations for 6 beef cattle fed a high forage diet in a loose-housing feedlot pen. Each observation consisted of the rumination time during a 2-h period as estimated by visual observations made by trained observers (inter-observer correlation r = 0.97) and the Hi-Tag system. The mean difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was 9.8 ± 18.7 min/2 h. The rumination times from the Hi-Tag system were only moderately correlated with visual observations (r = 0.41, P &lt; 0.001). The difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was not correlated with head posture during the 2 h period (r = -0.02, P = 0.89). Physical and dietary differences between dairy and beef cattle may have resulted in the inaccuracy of the Hi-Tag system when used in beef cattle fed typical backgrounding and finishing diets. More work is required to improve the accuracy of this automated system for rumination monitoring before it can be used reliably with beef cattle. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1LAzEURYMoWKtL9wHXqXkvk5nEXSl-QdFNcRsymQSnTCc1mS7896aMq8e9HO6DQ8g98BVKbB73Nq-QAzKpubogC5AomYBaXJIF5whMKcBrcpPznhdMarkg651332Pv7EA_4uSf6Jcd-s5OfRxpDDSdDv04JxeHwaZMQ0y09T5QZ6dp8HBLroIdsr_7v0uye3nebd7Y9vP1fbPeMgfAFVMeKuy0a7WsQIJFGbzAgL6rBQihfYfK8RqhFJo3bY0VlNZWddN4HsSSPMyzxxR_Tj5PZh9PaSwfDYgGtSizqlBsplyKOScfzDH1B5t-DXBzlmSKJHOWZM6SxB9zzlhe</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Goldhawk, C.</creator><creator>Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K.</creator><creator>Beauchemin, K. A.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Technical Note: Validation of rumination collars for beef cattle1</title><author>Goldhawk, C. ; Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. ; Beauchemin, K. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-8e142d9cb954151a25fe32f2ed631339ed28c0621ed6907b624139ea4677e0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldhawk, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauchemin, K. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Proquest Health &amp; Medical Complete</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldhawk, C.</au><au>Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K.</au><au>Beauchemin, K. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technical Note: Validation of rumination collars for beef cattle1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2858</spage><epage>2862</epage><pages>2858-2862</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Two studies were conducted to evaluate a wireless rumination monitoring system (Hi-Tag; SCR Engineers Ltd., Netanya, Israel) for recording rumination in beef cattle. The system operates based on acoustics of rumination and has been used previously for monitoring rumination in both young and adult dairy cattle. Study 1 consisted of beef cattle in tie-stall housing with 72 observations for 4 cattle fed a high forage backgrounding diet and 47 observations for 3 cattle fed a high grain finishing diet. Study 2 consisted of 44 observations for 6 beef cattle fed a high forage diet in a loose-housing feedlot pen. Each observation consisted of the rumination time during a 2-h period as estimated by visual observations made by trained observers (inter-observer correlation r = 0.97) and the Hi-Tag system. The mean difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was 9.8 ± 18.7 min/2 h. The rumination times from the Hi-Tag system were only moderately correlated with visual observations (r = 0.41, P &lt; 0.001). The difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was not correlated with head posture during the 2 h period (r = -0.02, P = 0.89). Physical and dietary differences between dairy and beef cattle may have resulted in the inaccuracy of the Hi-Tag system when used in beef cattle fed typical backgrounding and finishing diets. More work is required to improve the accuracy of this automated system for rumination monitoring before it can be used reliably with beef cattle. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jas.2012-5908</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2013-06, Vol.91 (6), p.2858-2862
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1372935418
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Animal behavior
Automation
Cattle
Digestive system
title Technical Note: Validation of rumination collars for beef cattle1
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A45%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technical%20Note:%20Validation%20of%20rumination%20collars%20for%20beef%20cattle1&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Goldhawk,%20C.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2858&rft.epage=2862&rft.pages=2858-2862&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas.2012-5908&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3009552321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-8e142d9cb954151a25fe32f2ed631339ed28c0621ed6907b624139ea4677e0f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1372935418&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true