Loading…

Foundations of Contemporary Revealed Preference Theory

This paper examines methodological issues raised by revealed preference theory in economics: particularly contemporary revealed preference theory. The paper has three goals. First, to make the case that revealed preference theory is a broad research program in choice theory—not a single theory—and u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Erkenntnis 2013-10, Vol.78 (5), p.1081-1108
Main Author: Hands, D. Wade
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f2d59d4a24af36d66ea0216d6b03151cf24928ec53e5639348357e0a56b703f93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f2d59d4a24af36d66ea0216d6b03151cf24928ec53e5639348357e0a56b703f93
container_end_page 1108
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1081
container_title Erkenntnis
container_volume 78
creator Hands, D. Wade
description This paper examines methodological issues raised by revealed preference theory in economics: particularly contemporary revealed preference theory. The paper has three goals. First, to make the case that revealed preference theory is a broad research program in choice theory—not a single theory—and understanding this diversity is essential to any methodological analysis of the program. Second, to explore some of the existing criticisms of revealed preference theory in a way that emphasizes how the effectiveness of the critique depends on the particular version of revealed preference under consideration. Finally, three additional criticisms are presented that are aimed specifically at contemporary revealed preference theory.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10670-012-9395-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1433066950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42001497</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42001497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f2d59d4a24af36d66ea0216d6b03151cf24928ec53e5639348357e0a56b703f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1LAzEQDaJgrf4AD8KCeFydfG-OUqwKBUXqOaS7E21pNzXZCv33TdlSPHmagXnvzZs3hFxTuKcA-iFRUBpKoKw03MiSnZABlZqVlWBwSgZAlcxTUOfkIqUFZI7QdEDUOGzaxnXz0KYi-GIU2g5X6xBd3BYf-ItuiU3xHtFjxLbGYvqNIW4vyZl3y4RXhzokn-On6eilnLw9v44eJ2XNVdWVnjXSNMIx4TxXjVLogNHczIBTSWvPhGEV1pKjVNxwUXGpEZxUMw3cGz4kt73uOoafDabOLsImtnmlpYJzUMpIyCjao-oYUspe7TrOV_kCS8Hu47F9PDbHY_fxWJY5dwdll2q39NG19TwdiUwbqbne41iPS3nUfmH84-Af8ZuetEhdiEfR_Aqgwmi-A53MfFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1433066950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Foundations of Contemporary Revealed Preference Theory</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</source><creator>Hands, D. Wade</creator><creatorcontrib>Hands, D. Wade</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines methodological issues raised by revealed preference theory in economics: particularly contemporary revealed preference theory. The paper has three goals. First, to make the case that revealed preference theory is a broad research program in choice theory—not a single theory—and understanding this diversity is essential to any methodological analysis of the program. Second, to explore some of the existing criticisms of revealed preference theory in a way that emphasizes how the effectiveness of the critique depends on the particular version of revealed preference under consideration. Finally, three additional criticisms are presented that are aimed specifically at contemporary revealed preference theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8420</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10670-012-9395-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Behavioral economics ; Consumer behavior ; Economic research ; Economic theory ; Economic utility ; Education ; Epistemology ; Ethics ; Folk psychology ; Logic ; Normativity ; Ontology ; Original Article ; Philosophical logics. Philosophy of language ; Philosophy ; Preferences ; Rational choice theory ; Utility functions ; Welfare economics</subject><ispartof>Erkenntnis, 2013-10, Vol.78 (5), p.1081-1108</ispartof><rights>2013 Springer Science+Business Media</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f2d59d4a24af36d66ea0216d6b03151cf24928ec53e5639348357e0a56b703f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f2d59d4a24af36d66ea0216d6b03151cf24928ec53e5639348357e0a56b703f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1433066950/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1433066950?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,12842,27905,27906,34756,44181,58219,58452,74477</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27957372$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hands, D. Wade</creatorcontrib><title>Foundations of Contemporary Revealed Preference Theory</title><title>Erkenntnis</title><addtitle>Erkenn</addtitle><description>This paper examines methodological issues raised by revealed preference theory in economics: particularly contemporary revealed preference theory. The paper has three goals. First, to make the case that revealed preference theory is a broad research program in choice theory—not a single theory—and understanding this diversity is essential to any methodological analysis of the program. Second, to explore some of the existing criticisms of revealed preference theory in a way that emphasizes how the effectiveness of the critique depends on the particular version of revealed preference under consideration. Finally, three additional criticisms are presented that are aimed specifically at contemporary revealed preference theory.</description><subject>Behavioral economics</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Economic research</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic utility</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Folk psychology</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Normativity</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Philosophical logics. Philosophy of language</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Rational choice theory</subject><subject>Utility functions</subject><subject>Welfare economics</subject><issn>0165-0106</issn><issn>1572-8420</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1LAzEQDaJgrf4AD8KCeFydfG-OUqwKBUXqOaS7E21pNzXZCv33TdlSPHmagXnvzZs3hFxTuKcA-iFRUBpKoKw03MiSnZABlZqVlWBwSgZAlcxTUOfkIqUFZI7QdEDUOGzaxnXz0KYi-GIU2g5X6xBd3BYf-ItuiU3xHtFjxLbGYvqNIW4vyZl3y4RXhzokn-On6eilnLw9v44eJ2XNVdWVnjXSNMIx4TxXjVLogNHczIBTSWvPhGEV1pKjVNxwUXGpEZxUMw3cGz4kt73uOoafDabOLsImtnmlpYJzUMpIyCjao-oYUspe7TrOV_kCS8Hu47F9PDbHY_fxWJY5dwdll2q39NG19TwdiUwbqbne41iPS3nUfmH84-Af8ZuetEhdiEfR_Aqgwmi-A53MfFg</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Hands, D. Wade</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Foundations of Contemporary Revealed Preference Theory</title><author>Hands, D. Wade</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f2d59d4a24af36d66ea0216d6b03151cf24928ec53e5639348357e0a56b703f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Behavioral economics</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Economic research</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic utility</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Folk psychology</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Normativity</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Philosophical logics. Philosophy of language</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Rational choice theory</topic><topic>Utility functions</topic><topic>Welfare economics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hands, D. Wade</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Erkenntnis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hands, D. Wade</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Foundations of Contemporary Revealed Preference Theory</atitle><jtitle>Erkenntnis</jtitle><stitle>Erkenn</stitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1081</spage><epage>1108</epage><pages>1081-1108</pages><issn>0165-0106</issn><eissn>1572-8420</eissn><abstract>This paper examines methodological issues raised by revealed preference theory in economics: particularly contemporary revealed preference theory. The paper has three goals. First, to make the case that revealed preference theory is a broad research program in choice theory—not a single theory—and understanding this diversity is essential to any methodological analysis of the program. Second, to explore some of the existing criticisms of revealed preference theory in a way that emphasizes how the effectiveness of the critique depends on the particular version of revealed preference under consideration. Finally, three additional criticisms are presented that are aimed specifically at contemporary revealed preference theory.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10670-012-9395-2</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0106
ispartof Erkenntnis, 2013-10, Vol.78 (5), p.1081-1108
issn 0165-0106
1572-8420
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1433066950
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature; Art, Design & Architecture Collection
subjects Behavioral economics
Consumer behavior
Economic research
Economic theory
Economic utility
Education
Epistemology
Ethics
Folk psychology
Logic
Normativity
Ontology
Original Article
Philosophical logics. Philosophy of language
Philosophy
Preferences
Rational choice theory
Utility functions
Welfare economics
title Foundations of Contemporary Revealed Preference Theory
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A33%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Foundations%20of%20Contemporary%20Revealed%20Preference%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Erkenntnis&rft.au=Hands,%20D.%20Wade&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1081&rft.epage=1108&rft.pages=1081-1108&rft.issn=0165-0106&rft.eissn=1572-8420&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10670-012-9395-2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42001497%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f2d59d4a24af36d66ea0216d6b03151cf24928ec53e5639348357e0a56b703f93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1433066950&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42001497&rfr_iscdi=true