Loading…
Foundations of Contemporary Revealed Preference Theory
This paper examines methodological issues raised by revealed preference theory in economics: particularly contemporary revealed preference theory. The paper has three goals. First, to make the case that revealed preference theory is a broad research program in choice theory—not a single theory—and u...
Saved in:
Published in: | Erkenntnis 2013-10, Vol.78 (5), p.1081-1108 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f2d59d4a24af36d66ea0216d6b03151cf24928ec53e5639348357e0a56b703f93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f2d59d4a24af36d66ea0216d6b03151cf24928ec53e5639348357e0a56b703f93 |
container_end_page | 1108 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1081 |
container_title | Erkenntnis |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Hands, D. Wade |
description | This paper examines methodological issues raised by revealed preference theory in economics: particularly contemporary revealed preference theory. The paper has three goals. First, to make the case that revealed preference theory is a broad research program in choice theory—not a single theory—and understanding this diversity is essential to any methodological analysis of the program. Second, to explore some of the existing criticisms of revealed preference theory in a way that emphasizes how the effectiveness of the critique depends on the particular version of revealed preference under consideration. Finally, three additional criticisms are presented that are aimed specifically at contemporary revealed preference theory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10670-012-9395-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1433066950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42001497</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42001497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f2d59d4a24af36d66ea0216d6b03151cf24928ec53e5639348357e0a56b703f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1LAzEQDaJgrf4AD8KCeFydfG-OUqwKBUXqOaS7E21pNzXZCv33TdlSPHmagXnvzZs3hFxTuKcA-iFRUBpKoKw03MiSnZABlZqVlWBwSgZAlcxTUOfkIqUFZI7QdEDUOGzaxnXz0KYi-GIU2g5X6xBd3BYf-ItuiU3xHtFjxLbGYvqNIW4vyZl3y4RXhzokn-On6eilnLw9v44eJ2XNVdWVnjXSNMIx4TxXjVLogNHczIBTSWvPhGEV1pKjVNxwUXGpEZxUMw3cGz4kt73uOoafDabOLsImtnmlpYJzUMpIyCjao-oYUspe7TrOV_kCS8Hu47F9PDbHY_fxWJY5dwdll2q39NG19TwdiUwbqbne41iPS3nUfmH84-Af8ZuetEhdiEfR_Aqgwmi-A53MfFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1433066950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Foundations of Contemporary Revealed Preference Theory</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</source><creator>Hands, D. Wade</creator><creatorcontrib>Hands, D. Wade</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines methodological issues raised by revealed preference theory in economics: particularly contemporary revealed preference theory. The paper has three goals. First, to make the case that revealed preference theory is a broad research program in choice theory—not a single theory—and understanding this diversity is essential to any methodological analysis of the program. Second, to explore some of the existing criticisms of revealed preference theory in a way that emphasizes how the effectiveness of the critique depends on the particular version of revealed preference under consideration. Finally, three additional criticisms are presented that are aimed specifically at contemporary revealed preference theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8420</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10670-012-9395-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Behavioral economics ; Consumer behavior ; Economic research ; Economic theory ; Economic utility ; Education ; Epistemology ; Ethics ; Folk psychology ; Logic ; Normativity ; Ontology ; Original Article ; Philosophical logics. Philosophy of language ; Philosophy ; Preferences ; Rational choice theory ; Utility functions ; Welfare economics</subject><ispartof>Erkenntnis, 2013-10, Vol.78 (5), p.1081-1108</ispartof><rights>2013 Springer Science+Business Media</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f2d59d4a24af36d66ea0216d6b03151cf24928ec53e5639348357e0a56b703f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f2d59d4a24af36d66ea0216d6b03151cf24928ec53e5639348357e0a56b703f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1433066950/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1433066950?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,12842,27905,27906,34756,44181,58219,58452,74477</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27957372$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hands, D. Wade</creatorcontrib><title>Foundations of Contemporary Revealed Preference Theory</title><title>Erkenntnis</title><addtitle>Erkenn</addtitle><description>This paper examines methodological issues raised by revealed preference theory in economics: particularly contemporary revealed preference theory. The paper has three goals. First, to make the case that revealed preference theory is a broad research program in choice theory—not a single theory—and understanding this diversity is essential to any methodological analysis of the program. Second, to explore some of the existing criticisms of revealed preference theory in a way that emphasizes how the effectiveness of the critique depends on the particular version of revealed preference under consideration. Finally, three additional criticisms are presented that are aimed specifically at contemporary revealed preference theory.</description><subject>Behavioral economics</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Economic research</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic utility</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Folk psychology</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Normativity</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Philosophical logics. Philosophy of language</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Rational choice theory</subject><subject>Utility functions</subject><subject>Welfare economics</subject><issn>0165-0106</issn><issn>1572-8420</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1LAzEQDaJgrf4AD8KCeFydfG-OUqwKBUXqOaS7E21pNzXZCv33TdlSPHmagXnvzZs3hFxTuKcA-iFRUBpKoKw03MiSnZABlZqVlWBwSgZAlcxTUOfkIqUFZI7QdEDUOGzaxnXz0KYi-GIU2g5X6xBd3BYf-ItuiU3xHtFjxLbGYvqNIW4vyZl3y4RXhzokn-On6eilnLw9v44eJ2XNVdWVnjXSNMIx4TxXjVLogNHczIBTSWvPhGEV1pKjVNxwUXGpEZxUMw3cGz4kt73uOoafDabOLsImtnmlpYJzUMpIyCjao-oYUspe7TrOV_kCS8Hu47F9PDbHY_fxWJY5dwdll2q39NG19TwdiUwbqbne41iPS3nUfmH84-Af8ZuetEhdiEfR_Aqgwmi-A53MfFg</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Hands, D. Wade</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Foundations of Contemporary Revealed Preference Theory</title><author>Hands, D. Wade</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f2d59d4a24af36d66ea0216d6b03151cf24928ec53e5639348357e0a56b703f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Behavioral economics</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Economic research</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic utility</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Folk psychology</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Normativity</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Philosophical logics. Philosophy of language</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Rational choice theory</topic><topic>Utility functions</topic><topic>Welfare economics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hands, D. Wade</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Erkenntnis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hands, D. Wade</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Foundations of Contemporary Revealed Preference Theory</atitle><jtitle>Erkenntnis</jtitle><stitle>Erkenn</stitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1081</spage><epage>1108</epage><pages>1081-1108</pages><issn>0165-0106</issn><eissn>1572-8420</eissn><abstract>This paper examines methodological issues raised by revealed preference theory in economics: particularly contemporary revealed preference theory. The paper has three goals. First, to make the case that revealed preference theory is a broad research program in choice theory—not a single theory—and understanding this diversity is essential to any methodological analysis of the program. Second, to explore some of the existing criticisms of revealed preference theory in a way that emphasizes how the effectiveness of the critique depends on the particular version of revealed preference under consideration. Finally, three additional criticisms are presented that are aimed specifically at contemporary revealed preference theory.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10670-012-9395-2</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0106 |
ispartof | Erkenntnis, 2013-10, Vol.78 (5), p.1081-1108 |
issn | 0165-0106 1572-8420 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1433066950 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature; Art, Design & Architecture Collection |
subjects | Behavioral economics Consumer behavior Economic research Economic theory Economic utility Education Epistemology Ethics Folk psychology Logic Normativity Ontology Original Article Philosophical logics. Philosophy of language Philosophy Preferences Rational choice theory Utility functions Welfare economics |
title | Foundations of Contemporary Revealed Preference Theory |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A33%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Foundations%20of%20Contemporary%20Revealed%20Preference%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Erkenntnis&rft.au=Hands,%20D.%20Wade&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1081&rft.epage=1108&rft.pages=1081-1108&rft.issn=0165-0106&rft.eissn=1572-8420&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10670-012-9395-2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42001497%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f2d59d4a24af36d66ea0216d6b03151cf24928ec53e5639348357e0a56b703f93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1433066950&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42001497&rfr_iscdi=true |