Loading…
Spring Establishment of Four Warm-Season Turfgrasses After Fall Indaziflam Applications
Indaziflam is an effective PRE herbicide for annual bluegrass control, but soil residual effects could inhibit spring turf establishment in treated areas. To test this hypothesis, field experiments were conducted to evaluate establishment of bermudagrass, centipedegrass, St. Augustinegrass, and zoys...
Saved in:
Published in: | Weed technology 2013-07, Vol.27 (3), p.448-453 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-6b3cf5a4b584bfd1161ec95800a5b15eb3331d4392edd4bead964db5d14daeaa3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-6b3cf5a4b584bfd1161ec95800a5b15eb3331d4392edd4bead964db5d14daeaa3 |
container_end_page | 453 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 448 |
container_title | Weed technology |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Gómez de Barreda, Diego Reed, Thomas V Yu, Jialin McCullough, Patrick E |
description | Indaziflam is an effective PRE herbicide for annual bluegrass control, but soil residual effects could inhibit spring turf establishment in treated areas. To test this hypothesis, field experiments were conducted to evaluate establishment of bermudagrass, centipedegrass, St. Augustinegrass, and zoysiagrass after fall indaziflam applications. Lateral spread of turfgrasses from plugs in summer generally had no meaningful differences from treatments. However, high indaziflam rates (70 and 140 g ai ha−1) had approximately two-fold more nonrooted stolons than the nontreated control while low rates (17.5 and 35 g ha−1), oxadiazon at 3360 g ai ha−1, and prodiamine at 840 g ai ha−1 were similar to the nontreated. Indaziflam at 70 g ha−1 and prodiamine applications in fall reduced sprig establishment of the four turf species from the nontreated control, but oxadiazon and low rates of indaziflam were similar. Bermudagrass establishment from seed was significantly reduced (20 to 50%) by indaziflam at 35 to 140 g ha−1, prodiamine, and oxadiazon, on several dates, but the low rate of indaziflam was similar to the nontreated at 10 wk after seeding. Overall, fall indaziflam applications at 17.5 to 35 g ha−1 appear safe on vegetative establishment of four warm-season turfgrasses in spring but reseeding bermudagrass in areas treated with rates > 17.5 g ha−1 may cause unacceptable delays in growth. Nomenclature: Bermudagrass; Cynodon dactylon x C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davy ‘Tifway'; centipedegrass; Eremochloa ophiuroides (Munro) Hack. ‘TifBlair'; St. Augustinegrass; Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walter) Kuntze ‘Palmetto'; zoysiagrass; Zoysia matrella (L.) Merr. ‘Jamur'. Indaziflam es un herbicida PRE efectivo para el control de Poa annua, pero los efectos residuales en el suelo en áreas tratadas podrían inhibir el establecimiento del césped en la primavera. Para evaluar esta hipótesis, se realizaron experimentos de campo para evaluar el establecimiento de los céspedes Cynodon dactylon x C. transvaalensis (bermuda), Eremochloa ophiuroides (centipede), Stenotaphrum secundatum (St. Augustine), y Zoysia matrella (zoysia) después de aplicaciones de indaziflam en el otoño anterior. En el verano, el crecimiento lateral a partir de los estolones sembrados generalmente no tuvo diferencias importantes producto de los tratamientos. Sin embargo, las dosis altas de indaziflam (70 y 140 g ai ha−1) tuvieron aproximadamente dos veces más estolones sin enraizar que el testigo sin tratar, mientra |
doi_str_mv | 10.1614/WT-D-12-00168.1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1439092519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43702620</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43702620</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-6b3cf5a4b584bfd1161ec95800a5b15eb3331d4392edd4bead964db5d14daeaa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1vEzEQxS0EEqH03BPCEme3M_7YZI9R25RKlTgkVbhZ49gOG23Wwd4c4K-vyyKunObwfm_ezGPsCuEaG9Q32424EygFADaLa3zDZmgMCDnX8JbNYNGCADX__p59KOXwCkkJM7Zdn3I37Pl9Gcn1XflxDMPIU-SrdM58S_ko1oFKGvjmnOM-Uymh8GUcQ-Yr6nv-OHj63cWejnx5OvXdjsYuDeUjexepL-Hy77xgz6v7ze1X8fTt4fF2-SScMmoUjVO7aEg7s9AueqyfhF1rFgBkHJrglFLotWpl8F67QL5ttHfGo_YUiNQF-zLtPeX08xzKaA_18KFGWqw2aKXBtlI3E7XLqZQcoq1fHyn_sgj2tT273dg7i9L-ac9idXyaHIcypvwP12oOspFQ9c-THilZ2ueu2Oe1BDQAUmqDqhJiIlyX0hD-m_gCMbaEVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1439092519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spring Establishment of Four Warm-Season Turfgrasses After Fall Indaziflam Applications</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR-E-Journals</source><creator>Gómez de Barreda, Diego ; Reed, Thomas V ; Yu, Jialin ; McCullough, Patrick E</creator><creatorcontrib>Gómez de Barreda, Diego ; Reed, Thomas V ; Yu, Jialin ; McCullough, Patrick E</creatorcontrib><description>Indaziflam is an effective PRE herbicide for annual bluegrass control, but soil residual effects could inhibit spring turf establishment in treated areas. To test this hypothesis, field experiments were conducted to evaluate establishment of bermudagrass, centipedegrass, St. Augustinegrass, and zoysiagrass after fall indaziflam applications. Lateral spread of turfgrasses from plugs in summer generally had no meaningful differences from treatments. However, high indaziflam rates (70 and 140 g ai ha−1) had approximately two-fold more nonrooted stolons than the nontreated control while low rates (17.5 and 35 g ha−1), oxadiazon at 3360 g ai ha−1, and prodiamine at 840 g ai ha−1 were similar to the nontreated. Indaziflam at 70 g ha−1 and prodiamine applications in fall reduced sprig establishment of the four turf species from the nontreated control, but oxadiazon and low rates of indaziflam were similar. Bermudagrass establishment from seed was significantly reduced (20 to 50%) by indaziflam at 35 to 140 g ha−1, prodiamine, and oxadiazon, on several dates, but the low rate of indaziflam was similar to the nontreated at 10 wk after seeding. Overall, fall indaziflam applications at 17.5 to 35 g ha−1 appear safe on vegetative establishment of four warm-season turfgrasses in spring but reseeding bermudagrass in areas treated with rates > 17.5 g ha−1 may cause unacceptable delays in growth. Nomenclature: Bermudagrass; Cynodon dactylon x C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davy ‘Tifway'; centipedegrass; Eremochloa ophiuroides (Munro) Hack. ‘TifBlair'; St. Augustinegrass; Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walter) Kuntze ‘Palmetto'; zoysiagrass; Zoysia matrella (L.) Merr. ‘Jamur'. Indaziflam es un herbicida PRE efectivo para el control de Poa annua, pero los efectos residuales en el suelo en áreas tratadas podrían inhibir el establecimiento del césped en la primavera. Para evaluar esta hipótesis, se realizaron experimentos de campo para evaluar el establecimiento de los céspedes Cynodon dactylon x C. transvaalensis (bermuda), Eremochloa ophiuroides (centipede), Stenotaphrum secundatum (St. Augustine), y Zoysia matrella (zoysia) después de aplicaciones de indaziflam en el otoño anterior. En el verano, el crecimiento lateral a partir de los estolones sembrados generalmente no tuvo diferencias importantes producto de los tratamientos. Sin embargo, las dosis altas de indaziflam (70 y 140 g ai ha−1) tuvieron aproximadamente dos veces más estolones sin enraizar que el testigo sin tratar, mientras que las dosis bajas (17.5 y 35 g ha−1), oxadiazon a 3360 g ai ha−1, y prodiamine a 840 g ai ha−1 fueron similares al testigo sin tratar. Las aplicaciones de indaziflam a 70 g ha−1 y prodiamine en el otoño redujeron el establecimiento de los estolones recién sembrados de las cuatro especies de césped en comparación con el control no tratado, pero oxadiazon y las dosis bajas de indaziflam fueron similares. El establecimiento del césped bermuda a partir de semilla fue reducido significativamente (20 a 50%) por indaziflam a 35 y 140 g ha−1, prodiamine, y oxadiazon, en varias fechas, pero la dosis baja de indaziflam fue similar el testigo sin tratar a 10 semanas después de la siembra. En general, las aplicaciones de indaziflam en el otoño a 17.5 a 35 g ha−1 parecen seguras para el establecimiento vegetativo en la primavera de cuatro especies de césped de clima cálido, pero el césped bermuda de resiembra en áreas tratadas con dosis >17.5 g ha−1 podría causar retrasos inaceptables en el crecimiento.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-12-00168.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence: The Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Clay loam soils ; Cynodon dactylon ; Environmental sciences ; Eremochloa ophiuroides ; field experimentation ; Field tests ; Grasses ; Herbicides ; Injury ; lawns and turf ; oxadiazon ; Poa annua ; prodiamine ; residual ; residual effects ; Rooting ; Seeding ; Seeds ; soil ; Soil organic matter ; sowing ; Spring ; Stenotaphrum secundatum ; Stolons ; summer ; Turf ; Turf grasses ; turfgrass ; Turfgrasses ; warm season ; WEED MANAGEMENT—MAJOR CROPS ; Weeds ; Zoysia matrella</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2013-07, Vol.27 (3), p.448-453</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2013 Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Jul-Sep 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-6b3cf5a4b584bfd1161ec95800a5b15eb3331d4392edd4bead964db5d14daeaa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-6b3cf5a4b584bfd1161ec95800a5b15eb3331d4392edd4bead964db5d14daeaa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43702620$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43702620$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gómez de Barreda, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Thomas V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jialin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Patrick E</creatorcontrib><title>Spring Establishment of Four Warm-Season Turfgrasses After Fall Indaziflam Applications</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Indaziflam is an effective PRE herbicide for annual bluegrass control, but soil residual effects could inhibit spring turf establishment in treated areas. To test this hypothesis, field experiments were conducted to evaluate establishment of bermudagrass, centipedegrass, St. Augustinegrass, and zoysiagrass after fall indaziflam applications. Lateral spread of turfgrasses from plugs in summer generally had no meaningful differences from treatments. However, high indaziflam rates (70 and 140 g ai ha−1) had approximately two-fold more nonrooted stolons than the nontreated control while low rates (17.5 and 35 g ha−1), oxadiazon at 3360 g ai ha−1, and prodiamine at 840 g ai ha−1 were similar to the nontreated. Indaziflam at 70 g ha−1 and prodiamine applications in fall reduced sprig establishment of the four turf species from the nontreated control, but oxadiazon and low rates of indaziflam were similar. Bermudagrass establishment from seed was significantly reduced (20 to 50%) by indaziflam at 35 to 140 g ha−1, prodiamine, and oxadiazon, on several dates, but the low rate of indaziflam was similar to the nontreated at 10 wk after seeding. Overall, fall indaziflam applications at 17.5 to 35 g ha−1 appear safe on vegetative establishment of four warm-season turfgrasses in spring but reseeding bermudagrass in areas treated with rates > 17.5 g ha−1 may cause unacceptable delays in growth. Nomenclature: Bermudagrass; Cynodon dactylon x C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davy ‘Tifway'; centipedegrass; Eremochloa ophiuroides (Munro) Hack. ‘TifBlair'; St. Augustinegrass; Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walter) Kuntze ‘Palmetto'; zoysiagrass; Zoysia matrella (L.) Merr. ‘Jamur'. Indaziflam es un herbicida PRE efectivo para el control de Poa annua, pero los efectos residuales en el suelo en áreas tratadas podrían inhibir el establecimiento del césped en la primavera. Para evaluar esta hipótesis, se realizaron experimentos de campo para evaluar el establecimiento de los céspedes Cynodon dactylon x C. transvaalensis (bermuda), Eremochloa ophiuroides (centipede), Stenotaphrum secundatum (St. Augustine), y Zoysia matrella (zoysia) después de aplicaciones de indaziflam en el otoño anterior. En el verano, el crecimiento lateral a partir de los estolones sembrados generalmente no tuvo diferencias importantes producto de los tratamientos. Sin embargo, las dosis altas de indaziflam (70 y 140 g ai ha−1) tuvieron aproximadamente dos veces más estolones sin enraizar que el testigo sin tratar, mientras que las dosis bajas (17.5 y 35 g ha−1), oxadiazon a 3360 g ai ha−1, y prodiamine a 840 g ai ha−1 fueron similares al testigo sin tratar. Las aplicaciones de indaziflam a 70 g ha−1 y prodiamine en el otoño redujeron el establecimiento de los estolones recién sembrados de las cuatro especies de césped en comparación con el control no tratado, pero oxadiazon y las dosis bajas de indaziflam fueron similares. El establecimiento del césped bermuda a partir de semilla fue reducido significativamente (20 a 50%) por indaziflam a 35 y 140 g ha−1, prodiamine, y oxadiazon, en varias fechas, pero la dosis baja de indaziflam fue similar el testigo sin tratar a 10 semanas después de la siembra. En general, las aplicaciones de indaziflam en el otoño a 17.5 a 35 g ha−1 parecen seguras para el establecimiento vegetativo en la primavera de cuatro especies de césped de clima cálido, pero el césped bermuda de resiembra en áreas tratadas con dosis >17.5 g ha−1 podría causar retrasos inaceptables en el crecimiento.</description><subject>Clay loam soils</subject><subject>Cynodon dactylon</subject><subject>Environmental sciences</subject><subject>Eremochloa ophiuroides</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Injury</subject><subject>lawns and turf</subject><subject>oxadiazon</subject><subject>Poa annua</subject><subject>prodiamine</subject><subject>residual</subject><subject>residual effects</subject><subject>Rooting</subject><subject>Seeding</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>soil</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>sowing</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Stenotaphrum secundatum</subject><subject>Stolons</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>Turf</subject><subject>Turf grasses</subject><subject>turfgrass</subject><subject>Turfgrasses</subject><subject>warm season</subject><subject>WEED MANAGEMENT—MAJOR CROPS</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><subject>Zoysia matrella</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1vEzEQxS0EEqH03BPCEme3M_7YZI9R25RKlTgkVbhZ49gOG23Wwd4c4K-vyyKunObwfm_ezGPsCuEaG9Q32424EygFADaLa3zDZmgMCDnX8JbNYNGCADX__p59KOXwCkkJM7Zdn3I37Pl9Gcn1XflxDMPIU-SrdM58S_ko1oFKGvjmnOM-Uymh8GUcQ-Yr6nv-OHj63cWejnx5OvXdjsYuDeUjexepL-Hy77xgz6v7ze1X8fTt4fF2-SScMmoUjVO7aEg7s9AueqyfhF1rFgBkHJrglFLotWpl8F67QL5ttHfGo_YUiNQF-zLtPeX08xzKaA_18KFGWqw2aKXBtlI3E7XLqZQcoq1fHyn_sgj2tT273dg7i9L-ac9idXyaHIcypvwP12oOspFQ9c-THilZ2ueu2Oe1BDQAUmqDqhJiIlyX0hD-m_gCMbaEVw</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Gómez de Barreda, Diego</creator><creator>Reed, Thomas V</creator><creator>Yu, Jialin</creator><creator>McCullough, Patrick E</creator><general>The Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Spring Establishment of Four Warm-Season Turfgrasses After Fall Indaziflam Applications</title><author>Gómez de Barreda, Diego ; Reed, Thomas V ; Yu, Jialin ; McCullough, Patrick E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-6b3cf5a4b584bfd1161ec95800a5b15eb3331d4392edd4bead964db5d14daeaa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Clay loam soils</topic><topic>Cynodon dactylon</topic><topic>Environmental sciences</topic><topic>Eremochloa ophiuroides</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Injury</topic><topic>lawns and turf</topic><topic>oxadiazon</topic><topic>Poa annua</topic><topic>prodiamine</topic><topic>residual</topic><topic>residual effects</topic><topic>Rooting</topic><topic>Seeding</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>soil</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>sowing</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Stenotaphrum secundatum</topic><topic>Stolons</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>Turf</topic><topic>Turf grasses</topic><topic>turfgrass</topic><topic>Turfgrasses</topic><topic>warm season</topic><topic>WEED MANAGEMENT—MAJOR CROPS</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><topic>Zoysia matrella</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gómez de Barreda, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Thomas V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jialin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Patrick E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gómez de Barreda, Diego</au><au>Reed, Thomas V</au><au>Yu, Jialin</au><au>McCullough, Patrick E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spring Establishment of Four Warm-Season Turfgrasses After Fall Indaziflam Applications</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>448</spage><epage>453</epage><pages>448-453</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Indaziflam is an effective PRE herbicide for annual bluegrass control, but soil residual effects could inhibit spring turf establishment in treated areas. To test this hypothesis, field experiments were conducted to evaluate establishment of bermudagrass, centipedegrass, St. Augustinegrass, and zoysiagrass after fall indaziflam applications. Lateral spread of turfgrasses from plugs in summer generally had no meaningful differences from treatments. However, high indaziflam rates (70 and 140 g ai ha−1) had approximately two-fold more nonrooted stolons than the nontreated control while low rates (17.5 and 35 g ha−1), oxadiazon at 3360 g ai ha−1, and prodiamine at 840 g ai ha−1 were similar to the nontreated. Indaziflam at 70 g ha−1 and prodiamine applications in fall reduced sprig establishment of the four turf species from the nontreated control, but oxadiazon and low rates of indaziflam were similar. Bermudagrass establishment from seed was significantly reduced (20 to 50%) by indaziflam at 35 to 140 g ha−1, prodiamine, and oxadiazon, on several dates, but the low rate of indaziflam was similar to the nontreated at 10 wk after seeding. Overall, fall indaziflam applications at 17.5 to 35 g ha−1 appear safe on vegetative establishment of four warm-season turfgrasses in spring but reseeding bermudagrass in areas treated with rates > 17.5 g ha−1 may cause unacceptable delays in growth. Nomenclature: Bermudagrass; Cynodon dactylon x C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davy ‘Tifway'; centipedegrass; Eremochloa ophiuroides (Munro) Hack. ‘TifBlair'; St. Augustinegrass; Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walter) Kuntze ‘Palmetto'; zoysiagrass; Zoysia matrella (L.) Merr. ‘Jamur'. Indaziflam es un herbicida PRE efectivo para el control de Poa annua, pero los efectos residuales en el suelo en áreas tratadas podrían inhibir el establecimiento del césped en la primavera. Para evaluar esta hipótesis, se realizaron experimentos de campo para evaluar el establecimiento de los céspedes Cynodon dactylon x C. transvaalensis (bermuda), Eremochloa ophiuroides (centipede), Stenotaphrum secundatum (St. Augustine), y Zoysia matrella (zoysia) después de aplicaciones de indaziflam en el otoño anterior. En el verano, el crecimiento lateral a partir de los estolones sembrados generalmente no tuvo diferencias importantes producto de los tratamientos. Sin embargo, las dosis altas de indaziflam (70 y 140 g ai ha−1) tuvieron aproximadamente dos veces más estolones sin enraizar que el testigo sin tratar, mientras que las dosis bajas (17.5 y 35 g ha−1), oxadiazon a 3360 g ai ha−1, y prodiamine a 840 g ai ha−1 fueron similares al testigo sin tratar. Las aplicaciones de indaziflam a 70 g ha−1 y prodiamine en el otoño redujeron el establecimiento de los estolones recién sembrados de las cuatro especies de césped en comparación con el control no tratado, pero oxadiazon y las dosis bajas de indaziflam fueron similares. El establecimiento del césped bermuda a partir de semilla fue reducido significativamente (20 a 50%) por indaziflam a 35 y 140 g ha−1, prodiamine, y oxadiazon, en varias fechas, pero la dosis baja de indaziflam fue similar el testigo sin tratar a 10 semanas después de la siembra. En general, las aplicaciones de indaziflam en el otoño a 17.5 a 35 g ha−1 parecen seguras para el establecimiento vegetativo en la primavera de cuatro especies de césped de clima cálido, pero el césped bermuda de resiembra en áreas tratadas con dosis >17.5 g ha−1 podría causar retrasos inaceptables en el crecimiento.</abstract><cop>Lawrence</cop><pub>The Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/WT-D-12-00168.1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
ispartof | Weed technology, 2013-07, Vol.27 (3), p.448-453 |
issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1439092519 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online; JSTOR-E-Journals |
subjects | Clay loam soils Cynodon dactylon Environmental sciences Eremochloa ophiuroides field experimentation Field tests Grasses Herbicides Injury lawns and turf oxadiazon Poa annua prodiamine residual residual effects Rooting Seeding Seeds soil Soil organic matter sowing Spring Stenotaphrum secundatum Stolons summer Turf Turf grasses turfgrass Turfgrasses warm season WEED MANAGEMENT—MAJOR CROPS Weeds Zoysia matrella |
title | Spring Establishment of Four Warm-Season Turfgrasses After Fall Indaziflam Applications |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T05%3A37%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spring%20Establishment%20of%20Four%20Warm-Season%20Turfgrasses%20After%20Fall%20Indaziflam%20Applications&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=G%C3%B3mez%20de%20Barreda,%20Diego&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=448&rft.epage=453&rft.pages=448-453&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WT-D-12-00168.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43702620%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-6b3cf5a4b584bfd1161ec95800a5b15eb3331d4392edd4bead964db5d14daeaa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1439092519&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43702620&rfr_iscdi=true |