Loading…
Administrative Constitutionalism
The US Food and Drug Administration adopts a rule requiring tobacco companies to include graphic images warning of the health risks associated with smoking, defending the rule at length against the claim it violates the First and Fifth Amendments. The Department of Education and the Department of Ju...
Saved in:
Published in: | Texas law review 2013-06, Vol.91 (7), p.1897 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1897 |
container_title | Texas law review |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Metzger, Gillian E |
description | The US Food and Drug Administration adopts a rule requiring tobacco companies to include graphic images warning of the health risks associated with smoking, defending the rule at length against the claim it violates the First and Fifth Amendments. The Department of Education and the Department of Justice (DOJ) jointly issue guidance explaining how elementary and secondary schools can voluntarily consider race consistently with governing constitutional law. The Office of Legal Counsel in DOJ issues a memorandum to the Attorney General concluding that the President had constitutional authority to commit US forces as part of the NATO military campaign in Libya and did not need prior congressional approval. These are three recent examples of "administrative constitutionalism," in that they involve actions by federal administrative agencies to interpret and implement the US Constitution. You should be cautious about extending the doctrinal and normative implications of administrative constitutionalism to constitutional construction more generally. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1440186175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3093284701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-a330219c9896f56121ec2181881a507d384c1810483b5aac579a9e1e5fbb94133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjstqwzAQRUVoIG6SfzB0LZixRvZoGUzTFgLdNJBdkB0ZFPyKJef7a2hXl7M5565EgoYyybq4vIgEgEASIW7Eawh3ANCF0YlID7fO9z7EyUb_dGk59CH6OEc_9Lb1oduJdWPb4Pb_uxXn4_tP-SlP3x9f5eEkR2QVpVUKMjS1YZM3OscMXZ0hIzNaDcVNMdULArGqtLX1UrfGodNNVRlCpbbi7c87TsNjdiFe78M8LR_CFYkAOcdCq19kQjoV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1440186175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Administrative Constitutionalism</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Nexis UK</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Metzger, Gillian E</creator><creatorcontrib>Metzger, Gillian E</creatorcontrib><description>The US Food and Drug Administration adopts a rule requiring tobacco companies to include graphic images warning of the health risks associated with smoking, defending the rule at length against the claim it violates the First and Fifth Amendments. The Department of Education and the Department of Justice (DOJ) jointly issue guidance explaining how elementary and secondary schools can voluntarily consider race consistently with governing constitutional law. The Office of Legal Counsel in DOJ issues a memorandum to the Attorney General concluding that the President had constitutional authority to commit US forces as part of the NATO military campaign in Libya and did not need prior congressional approval. These are three recent examples of "administrative constitutionalism," in that they involve actions by federal administrative agencies to interpret and implement the US Constitution. You should be cautious about extending the doctrinal and normative implications of administrative constitutionalism to constitutional construction more generally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-4411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-857X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TXLRA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin: University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Administrative law ; Bill of Rights-US ; Constitution-US ; Constitutional law ; Constitutions ; Enforcement ; Equal rights ; Government agencies ; Political theory ; Politics ; Presidents ; Public administration ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>Texas law review, 2013-06, Vol.91 (7), p.1897</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1440186175?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,36037,44339</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Metzger, Gillian E</creatorcontrib><title>Administrative Constitutionalism</title><title>Texas law review</title><description>The US Food and Drug Administration adopts a rule requiring tobacco companies to include graphic images warning of the health risks associated with smoking, defending the rule at length against the claim it violates the First and Fifth Amendments. The Department of Education and the Department of Justice (DOJ) jointly issue guidance explaining how elementary and secondary schools can voluntarily consider race consistently with governing constitutional law. The Office of Legal Counsel in DOJ issues a memorandum to the Attorney General concluding that the President had constitutional authority to commit US forces as part of the NATO military campaign in Libya and did not need prior congressional approval. These are three recent examples of "administrative constitutionalism," in that they involve actions by federal administrative agencies to interpret and implement the US Constitution. You should be cautious about extending the doctrinal and normative implications of administrative constitutionalism to constitutional construction more generally.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Administrative law</subject><subject>Bill of Rights-US</subject><subject>Constitution-US</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Equal rights</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>0040-4411</issn><issn>1942-857X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNotjstqwzAQRUVoIG6SfzB0LZixRvZoGUzTFgLdNJBdkB0ZFPyKJef7a2hXl7M5565EgoYyybq4vIgEgEASIW7Eawh3ANCF0YlID7fO9z7EyUb_dGk59CH6OEc_9Lb1oduJdWPb4Pb_uxXn4_tP-SlP3x9f5eEkR2QVpVUKMjS1YZM3OscMXZ0hIzNaDcVNMdULArGqtLX1UrfGodNNVRlCpbbi7c87TsNjdiFe78M8LR_CFYkAOcdCq19kQjoV</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Metzger, Gillian E</creator><general>University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Administrative Constitutionalism</title><author>Metzger, Gillian E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-a330219c9896f56121ec2181881a507d384c1810483b5aac579a9e1e5fbb94133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Administrative law</topic><topic>Bill of Rights-US</topic><topic>Constitution-US</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Equal rights</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Metzger, Gillian E</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Texas law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Metzger, Gillian E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Administrative Constitutionalism</atitle><jtitle>Texas law review</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1897</spage><pages>1897-</pages><issn>0040-4411</issn><eissn>1942-857X</eissn><coden>TXLRA2</coden><abstract>The US Food and Drug Administration adopts a rule requiring tobacco companies to include graphic images warning of the health risks associated with smoking, defending the rule at length against the claim it violates the First and Fifth Amendments. The Department of Education and the Department of Justice (DOJ) jointly issue guidance explaining how elementary and secondary schools can voluntarily consider race consistently with governing constitutional law. The Office of Legal Counsel in DOJ issues a memorandum to the Attorney General concluding that the President had constitutional authority to commit US forces as part of the NATO military campaign in Libya and did not need prior congressional approval. These are three recent examples of "administrative constitutionalism," in that they involve actions by federal administrative agencies to interpret and implement the US Constitution. You should be cautious about extending the doctrinal and normative implications of administrative constitutionalism to constitutional construction more generally.</abstract><cop>Austin</cop><pub>University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-4411 |
ispartof | Texas law review, 2013-06, Vol.91 (7), p.1897 |
issn | 0040-4411 1942-857X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1440186175 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Nexis UK; ABI/INFORM Global |
subjects | Accountability Administrative law Bill of Rights-US Constitution-US Constitutional law Constitutions Enforcement Equal rights Government agencies Political theory Politics Presidents Public administration Transparency |
title | Administrative Constitutionalism |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A04%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Administrative%20Constitutionalism&rft.jtitle=Texas%20law%20review&rft.au=Metzger,%20Gillian%20E&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1897&rft.pages=1897-&rft.issn=0040-4411&rft.eissn=1942-857X&rft.coden=TXLRA2&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3093284701%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-a330219c9896f56121ec2181881a507d384c1810483b5aac579a9e1e5fbb94133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1440186175&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |