Loading…

Ecology of Youth Collective Socialization

Collective socialization (CS) is a set of neighborhood social processes that can act as a protective or risk factor for youths. CS can create trust and social cohesion reflecting the positive attributes of a neighborhood. Research emphasizes CS as a neighborhood influence, but other theoretical mode...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social work research 2013-09, Vol.37 (3), p.227-236
Main Authors: Nicotera, Nicole, Rankin Williams, Lela, Anthony, Elizabeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-9276fde6cc045e1883fda533b6d2f64adcb080d0ba7dcf1d3f89d83aeda9e83c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-9276fde6cc045e1883fda533b6d2f64adcb080d0ba7dcf1d3f89d83aeda9e83c3
container_end_page 236
container_issue 3
container_start_page 227
container_title Social work research
container_volume 37
creator Nicotera, Nicole
Rankin Williams, Lela
Anthony, Elizabeth
description Collective socialization (CS) is a set of neighborhood social processes that can act as a protective or risk factor for youths. CS can create trust and social cohesion reflecting the positive attributes of a neighborhood. Research emphasizes CS as a neighborhood influence, but other theoretical models suggest that CS simultaneously exists within other aspects of the social ecology as it works through the peer group and school components to influence outcomes in youths. The current study extends theories of CS by examining how multiple social ecology influences—peer, school, and neighborhood—are related to youths' well-being and school misbehavior. The School Success Profile data (N = 20,749 middle school and high school youths) were used to test the hypothesis that peer, school, and neighborhood CS processes are related to these outcomes. Structural equation models indicate that both positive and negative outcomes in youths are affected by multiple social ecology influences. The discussion provides suggestions for future research to inform interventions specific to the multiple aspects of the social ecology.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/swr/svt022
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1443847052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42659865</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/swr/svt022</oup_id><sourcerecordid>42659865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-9276fde6cc045e1883fda533b6d2f64adcb080d0ba7dcf1d3f89d83aeda9e83c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxbuwIB4U1iY7STY5SqkfUPCgHjyFNB-6ZW1qkm2pv96VFY_OZebw8A68CJ0SfE2whEnaxknaZFxVe2hEGGUlFyD2-xvXuGSA5SE6SmmJ-5FARuhyZkIb3nZF8MVr6PJ7MQ1t60xuNq54CqbRbfOlcxNWx-jA6za5k989Ri-3s-fpfTl_vHuY3sxLA4TkUlY199ZxYzBljggB3moGsOC28pxqaxZYYIsXurbGEwteSCtAO6ulE2BgjM6H3HUMn51LWS1DF1f9S0UoBUFrzKpeXQ3KxJBSdF6tY_Oh404RrH6qUH0VaqiixxcDDt36f3c2uGXKIf5JWnEmBWfwDWHEaQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443847052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecology of Youth Collective Socialization</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Nicotera, Nicole ; Rankin Williams, Lela ; Anthony, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Nicotera, Nicole ; Rankin Williams, Lela ; Anthony, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Collective socialization (CS) is a set of neighborhood social processes that can act as a protective or risk factor for youths. CS can create trust and social cohesion reflecting the positive attributes of a neighborhood. Research emphasizes CS as a neighborhood influence, but other theoretical models suggest that CS simultaneously exists within other aspects of the social ecology as it works through the peer group and school components to influence outcomes in youths. The current study extends theories of CS by examining how multiple social ecology influences—peer, school, and neighborhood—are related to youths' well-being and school misbehavior. The School Success Profile data (N = 20,749 middle school and high school youths) were used to test the hypothesis that peer, school, and neighborhood CS processes are related to these outcomes. Structural equation models indicate that both positive and negative outcomes in youths are affected by multiple social ecology influences. The discussion provides suggestions for future research to inform interventions specific to the multiple aspects of the social ecology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-5309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-6838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/swr/svt022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: National Association of Social Workers</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; Behavior ; Behavior Problems ; Children &amp; youth ; Ecology ; Friendship ; Middle Schools ; Neighborhood schools ; Neighborhoods ; Peer Groups ; Peer pressure ; Risk factors ; School Effectiveness ; Social work ; Socialization ; Structural Equation Models ; Wellbeing</subject><ispartof>Social work research, 2013-09, Vol.37 (3), p.227-236</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 National Association of Social Workers,Inc.</rights><rights>2013 National Association of Social Workers 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Sep 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-9276fde6cc045e1883fda533b6d2f64adcb080d0ba7dcf1d3f89d83aeda9e83c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-9276fde6cc045e1883fda533b6d2f64adcb080d0ba7dcf1d3f89d83aeda9e83c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42659865$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42659865$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33774,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nicotera, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin Williams, Lela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Ecology of Youth Collective Socialization</title><title>Social work research</title><description>Collective socialization (CS) is a set of neighborhood social processes that can act as a protective or risk factor for youths. CS can create trust and social cohesion reflecting the positive attributes of a neighborhood. Research emphasizes CS as a neighborhood influence, but other theoretical models suggest that CS simultaneously exists within other aspects of the social ecology as it works through the peer group and school components to influence outcomes in youths. The current study extends theories of CS by examining how multiple social ecology influences—peer, school, and neighborhood—are related to youths' well-being and school misbehavior. The School Success Profile data (N = 20,749 middle school and high school youths) were used to test the hypothesis that peer, school, and neighborhood CS processes are related to these outcomes. Structural equation models indicate that both positive and negative outcomes in youths are affected by multiple social ecology influences. The discussion provides suggestions for future research to inform interventions specific to the multiple aspects of the social ecology.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Friendship</subject><subject>Middle Schools</subject><subject>Neighborhood schools</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Peer Groups</subject><subject>Peer pressure</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>School Effectiveness</subject><subject>Social work</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Structural Equation Models</subject><subject>Wellbeing</subject><issn>1070-5309</issn><issn>1545-6838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxbuwIB4U1iY7STY5SqkfUPCgHjyFNB-6ZW1qkm2pv96VFY_OZebw8A68CJ0SfE2whEnaxknaZFxVe2hEGGUlFyD2-xvXuGSA5SE6SmmJ-5FARuhyZkIb3nZF8MVr6PJ7MQ1t60xuNq54CqbRbfOlcxNWx-jA6za5k989Ri-3s-fpfTl_vHuY3sxLA4TkUlY199ZxYzBljggB3moGsOC28pxqaxZYYIsXurbGEwteSCtAO6ulE2BgjM6H3HUMn51LWS1DF1f9S0UoBUFrzKpeXQ3KxJBSdF6tY_Oh404RrH6qUH0VaqiixxcDDt36f3c2uGXKIf5JWnEmBWfwDWHEaQg</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Nicotera, Nicole</creator><creator>Rankin Williams, Lela</creator><creator>Anthony, Elizabeth</creator><general>National Association of Social Workers</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Ecology of Youth Collective Socialization</title><author>Nicotera, Nicole ; Rankin Williams, Lela ; Anthony, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-9276fde6cc045e1883fda533b6d2f64adcb080d0ba7dcf1d3f89d83aeda9e83c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Friendship</topic><topic>Middle Schools</topic><topic>Neighborhood schools</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Peer Groups</topic><topic>Peer pressure</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>School Effectiveness</topic><topic>Social work</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Structural Equation Models</topic><topic>Wellbeing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nicotera, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin Williams, Lela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Social work research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nicotera, Nicole</au><au>Rankin Williams, Lela</au><au>Anthony, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecology of Youth Collective Socialization</atitle><jtitle>Social work research</jtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>236</epage><pages>227-236</pages><issn>1070-5309</issn><eissn>1545-6838</eissn><abstract>Collective socialization (CS) is a set of neighborhood social processes that can act as a protective or risk factor for youths. CS can create trust and social cohesion reflecting the positive attributes of a neighborhood. Research emphasizes CS as a neighborhood influence, but other theoretical models suggest that CS simultaneously exists within other aspects of the social ecology as it works through the peer group and school components to influence outcomes in youths. The current study extends theories of CS by examining how multiple social ecology influences—peer, school, and neighborhood—are related to youths' well-being and school misbehavior. The School Success Profile data (N = 20,749 middle school and high school youths) were used to test the hypothesis that peer, school, and neighborhood CS processes are related to these outcomes. Structural equation models indicate that both positive and negative outcomes in youths are affected by multiple social ecology influences. The discussion provides suggestions for future research to inform interventions specific to the multiple aspects of the social ecology.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>National Association of Social Workers</pub><doi>10.1093/swr/svt022</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1070-5309
ispartof Social work research, 2013-09, Vol.37 (3), p.227-236
issn 1070-5309
1545-6838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1443847052
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford Journals Online; JSTOR Archival Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adolescents
Behavior
Behavior Problems
Children & youth
Ecology
Friendship
Middle Schools
Neighborhood schools
Neighborhoods
Peer Groups
Peer pressure
Risk factors
School Effectiveness
Social work
Socialization
Structural Equation Models
Wellbeing
title Ecology of Youth Collective Socialization
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A57%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecology%20of%20Youth%20Collective%20Socialization&rft.jtitle=Social%20work%20research&rft.au=Nicotera,%20Nicole&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=236&rft.pages=227-236&rft.issn=1070-5309&rft.eissn=1545-6838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/swr/svt022&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42659865%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-9276fde6cc045e1883fda533b6d2f64adcb080d0ba7dcf1d3f89d83aeda9e83c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443847052&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42659865&rft_oup_id=10.1093/swr/svt022&rfr_iscdi=true