Loading…
Ecology of Youth Collective Socialization
Collective socialization (CS) is a set of neighborhood social processes that can act as a protective or risk factor for youths. CS can create trust and social cohesion reflecting the positive attributes of a neighborhood. Research emphasizes CS as a neighborhood influence, but other theoretical mode...
Saved in:
Published in: | Social work research 2013-09, Vol.37 (3), p.227-236 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-9276fde6cc045e1883fda533b6d2f64adcb080d0ba7dcf1d3f89d83aeda9e83c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-9276fde6cc045e1883fda533b6d2f64adcb080d0ba7dcf1d3f89d83aeda9e83c3 |
container_end_page | 236 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 227 |
container_title | Social work research |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Nicotera, Nicole Rankin Williams, Lela Anthony, Elizabeth |
description | Collective socialization (CS) is a set of neighborhood social processes that can act as a protective or risk factor for youths. CS can create trust and social cohesion reflecting the positive attributes of a neighborhood. Research emphasizes CS as a neighborhood influence, but other theoretical models suggest that CS simultaneously exists within other aspects of the social ecology as it works through the peer group and school components to influence outcomes in youths. The current study extends theories of CS by examining how multiple social ecology influences—peer, school, and neighborhood—are related to youths' well-being and school misbehavior. The School Success Profile data (N = 20,749 middle school and high school youths) were used to test the hypothesis that peer, school, and neighborhood CS processes are related to these outcomes. Structural equation models indicate that both positive and negative outcomes in youths are affected by multiple social ecology influences. The discussion provides suggestions for future research to inform interventions specific to the multiple aspects of the social ecology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/swr/svt022 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1443847052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42659865</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/swr/svt022</oup_id><sourcerecordid>42659865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-9276fde6cc045e1883fda533b6d2f64adcb080d0ba7dcf1d3f89d83aeda9e83c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxbuwIB4U1iY7STY5SqkfUPCgHjyFNB-6ZW1qkm2pv96VFY_OZebw8A68CJ0SfE2whEnaxknaZFxVe2hEGGUlFyD2-xvXuGSA5SE6SmmJ-5FARuhyZkIb3nZF8MVr6PJ7MQ1t60xuNq54CqbRbfOlcxNWx-jA6za5k989Ri-3s-fpfTl_vHuY3sxLA4TkUlY199ZxYzBljggB3moGsOC28pxqaxZYYIsXurbGEwteSCtAO6ulE2BgjM6H3HUMn51LWS1DF1f9S0UoBUFrzKpeXQ3KxJBSdF6tY_Oh404RrH6qUH0VaqiixxcDDt36f3c2uGXKIf5JWnEmBWfwDWHEaQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443847052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecology of Youth Collective Socialization</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Nicotera, Nicole ; Rankin Williams, Lela ; Anthony, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Nicotera, Nicole ; Rankin Williams, Lela ; Anthony, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Collective socialization (CS) is a set of neighborhood social processes that can act as a protective or risk factor for youths. CS can create trust and social cohesion reflecting the positive attributes of a neighborhood. Research emphasizes CS as a neighborhood influence, but other theoretical models suggest that CS simultaneously exists within other aspects of the social ecology as it works through the peer group and school components to influence outcomes in youths. The current study extends theories of CS by examining how multiple social ecology influences—peer, school, and neighborhood—are related to youths' well-being and school misbehavior. The School Success Profile data (N = 20,749 middle school and high school youths) were used to test the hypothesis that peer, school, and neighborhood CS processes are related to these outcomes. Structural equation models indicate that both positive and negative outcomes in youths are affected by multiple social ecology influences. The discussion provides suggestions for future research to inform interventions specific to the multiple aspects of the social ecology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-5309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-6838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/swr/svt022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: National Association of Social Workers</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; Behavior ; Behavior Problems ; Children & youth ; Ecology ; Friendship ; Middle Schools ; Neighborhood schools ; Neighborhoods ; Peer Groups ; Peer pressure ; Risk factors ; School Effectiveness ; Social work ; Socialization ; Structural Equation Models ; Wellbeing</subject><ispartof>Social work research, 2013-09, Vol.37 (3), p.227-236</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 National Association of Social Workers,Inc.</rights><rights>2013 National Association of Social Workers 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Sep 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-9276fde6cc045e1883fda533b6d2f64adcb080d0ba7dcf1d3f89d83aeda9e83c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-9276fde6cc045e1883fda533b6d2f64adcb080d0ba7dcf1d3f89d83aeda9e83c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42659865$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42659865$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33774,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nicotera, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin Williams, Lela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Ecology of Youth Collective Socialization</title><title>Social work research</title><description>Collective socialization (CS) is a set of neighborhood social processes that can act as a protective or risk factor for youths. CS can create trust and social cohesion reflecting the positive attributes of a neighborhood. Research emphasizes CS as a neighborhood influence, but other theoretical models suggest that CS simultaneously exists within other aspects of the social ecology as it works through the peer group and school components to influence outcomes in youths. The current study extends theories of CS by examining how multiple social ecology influences—peer, school, and neighborhood—are related to youths' well-being and school misbehavior. The School Success Profile data (N = 20,749 middle school and high school youths) were used to test the hypothesis that peer, school, and neighborhood CS processes are related to these outcomes. Structural equation models indicate that both positive and negative outcomes in youths are affected by multiple social ecology influences. The discussion provides suggestions for future research to inform interventions specific to the multiple aspects of the social ecology.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Friendship</subject><subject>Middle Schools</subject><subject>Neighborhood schools</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Peer Groups</subject><subject>Peer pressure</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>School Effectiveness</subject><subject>Social work</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Structural Equation Models</subject><subject>Wellbeing</subject><issn>1070-5309</issn><issn>1545-6838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxbuwIB4U1iY7STY5SqkfUPCgHjyFNB-6ZW1qkm2pv96VFY_OZebw8A68CJ0SfE2whEnaxknaZFxVe2hEGGUlFyD2-xvXuGSA5SE6SmmJ-5FARuhyZkIb3nZF8MVr6PJ7MQ1t60xuNq54CqbRbfOlcxNWx-jA6za5k989Ri-3s-fpfTl_vHuY3sxLA4TkUlY199ZxYzBljggB3moGsOC28pxqaxZYYIsXurbGEwteSCtAO6ulE2BgjM6H3HUMn51LWS1DF1f9S0UoBUFrzKpeXQ3KxJBSdF6tY_Oh404RrH6qUH0VaqiixxcDDt36f3c2uGXKIf5JWnEmBWfwDWHEaQg</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Nicotera, Nicole</creator><creator>Rankin Williams, Lela</creator><creator>Anthony, Elizabeth</creator><general>National Association of Social Workers</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Ecology of Youth Collective Socialization</title><author>Nicotera, Nicole ; Rankin Williams, Lela ; Anthony, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-9276fde6cc045e1883fda533b6d2f64adcb080d0ba7dcf1d3f89d83aeda9e83c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Friendship</topic><topic>Middle Schools</topic><topic>Neighborhood schools</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Peer Groups</topic><topic>Peer pressure</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>School Effectiveness</topic><topic>Social work</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Structural Equation Models</topic><topic>Wellbeing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nicotera, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin Williams, Lela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Social work research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nicotera, Nicole</au><au>Rankin Williams, Lela</au><au>Anthony, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecology of Youth Collective Socialization</atitle><jtitle>Social work research</jtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>236</epage><pages>227-236</pages><issn>1070-5309</issn><eissn>1545-6838</eissn><abstract>Collective socialization (CS) is a set of neighborhood social processes that can act as a protective or risk factor for youths. CS can create trust and social cohesion reflecting the positive attributes of a neighborhood. Research emphasizes CS as a neighborhood influence, but other theoretical models suggest that CS simultaneously exists within other aspects of the social ecology as it works through the peer group and school components to influence outcomes in youths. The current study extends theories of CS by examining how multiple social ecology influences—peer, school, and neighborhood—are related to youths' well-being and school misbehavior. The School Success Profile data (N = 20,749 middle school and high school youths) were used to test the hypothesis that peer, school, and neighborhood CS processes are related to these outcomes. Structural equation models indicate that both positive and negative outcomes in youths are affected by multiple social ecology influences. The discussion provides suggestions for future research to inform interventions specific to the multiple aspects of the social ecology.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>National Association of Social Workers</pub><doi>10.1093/swr/svt022</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1070-5309 |
ispartof | Social work research, 2013-09, Vol.37 (3), p.227-236 |
issn | 1070-5309 1545-6838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1443847052 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford Journals Online; JSTOR Archival Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Adolescents Behavior Behavior Problems Children & youth Ecology Friendship Middle Schools Neighborhood schools Neighborhoods Peer Groups Peer pressure Risk factors School Effectiveness Social work Socialization Structural Equation Models Wellbeing |
title | Ecology of Youth Collective Socialization |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A57%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecology%20of%20Youth%20Collective%20Socialization&rft.jtitle=Social%20work%20research&rft.au=Nicotera,%20Nicole&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=236&rft.pages=227-236&rft.issn=1070-5309&rft.eissn=1545-6838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/swr/svt022&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42659865%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-9276fde6cc045e1883fda533b6d2f64adcb080d0ba7dcf1d3f89d83aeda9e83c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443847052&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42659865&rft_oup_id=10.1093/swr/svt022&rfr_iscdi=true |