Loading…

The Concept of Communitarian Law in the Jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice and in Legal Theory

In the course of the past decades communitarian law has developed as a field of law whose theoretical explanation seems to present considerable difficulties. The traditional models of monism and dualism cannot sufficiently explain the position of communitarian law between international and municipal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Czech Journal of International Relations (On-line) 2002-01, Vol.37 (1), p.5
Main Author: Scheu, Harald Christian
Format: Article
Language:cze
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 5
container_title Czech Journal of International Relations (On-line)
container_volume 37
creator Scheu, Harald Christian
description In the course of the past decades communitarian law has developed as a field of law whose theoretical explanation seems to present considerable difficulties. The traditional models of monism and dualism cannot sufficiently explain the position of communitarian law between international and municipal law. In addition the concepts of the so-called traditionalism and autonomics deal with only a part of the problem. The theoretical difficulties concentrate on the term "supranationality", which on one hand may provide for mediation between the political actors, from the legal point of view however is a weak compromise. The article attempts to provide an overview of the relevant statements given by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) concerning the systematic of communitarian law. In the jurisdiction of the Court there occur terms like "autonomy", "sovereign rights" and "constitutional charter". Behind the application of such terms we may see the development of the concept which spans the period between the sixties and the nineties. In the next part of the article we attempt to critically analyse the jurisdiction of the ECJ in the light of concepts drawn from legal theory. As a starting point we have turned to the teachings of Hart and Kelsen, i.e. the most significant legal theorists of the twentieth century. Hart's concept is characterized by empiric criteria, according to which the validity and identity of a legal order is explained as the result of the social acceptance of norms in the form of the so-called rule of recognition. On the other hand Kelsen constructs a legal order on the basis of the basic norm which does not have a factual character but is only the logical condition for the unity of a legal system. By comparing the legal theoretical concepts with the argumentation of the ECJ we find that the jurisdiction of the Court is grounded on a Constructivist approach. However, the basic norm of communitarian law has not been identified in convincing terms. The phenomenon of communitarian law evidently calls for a modification of the Constructivist approach. The function of the theoretical model according to Kelsen is the clearing away of systematic argumentation from factors that are not part of the law (policies and power). Such factors impede the transparency of a legal system and thus also legal certainty.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1446932312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3112328411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_14469323123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjV0LgjAYhUcUJOV_GHQtuM2PeS1GiJfex9BZE91sH0T_vhnRdVfncN7nvGcDApxTGuGiINufp-kehMaMcRwTRPMsRQEQ7Z3DUsmOLxaqwdt5dlJYpgWTsGFPKCS0nqmdFqYXnRVKruCaVU6rhXuuVE5_6rUzVnQcMtmvxYbf2AT9hNKvI9gNbDI8_OoBnM5VW16iRauH48ZeR_9F-tMVJUlWEEwQJv9Rb-DSSRs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1446932312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Concept of Communitarian Law in the Jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice and in Legal Theory</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Social Science Database</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Database</source><creator>Scheu, Harald Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Scheu, Harald Christian</creatorcontrib><description>In the course of the past decades communitarian law has developed as a field of law whose theoretical explanation seems to present considerable difficulties. The traditional models of monism and dualism cannot sufficiently explain the position of communitarian law between international and municipal law. In addition the concepts of the so-called traditionalism and autonomics deal with only a part of the problem. The theoretical difficulties concentrate on the term "supranationality", which on one hand may provide for mediation between the political actors, from the legal point of view however is a weak compromise. The article attempts to provide an overview of the relevant statements given by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) concerning the systematic of communitarian law. In the jurisdiction of the Court there occur terms like "autonomy", "sovereign rights" and "constitutional charter". Behind the application of such terms we may see the development of the concept which spans the period between the sixties and the nineties. In the next part of the article we attempt to critically analyse the jurisdiction of the ECJ in the light of concepts drawn from legal theory. As a starting point we have turned to the teachings of Hart and Kelsen, i.e. the most significant legal theorists of the twentieth century. Hart's concept is characterized by empiric criteria, according to which the validity and identity of a legal order is explained as the result of the social acceptance of norms in the form of the so-called rule of recognition. On the other hand Kelsen constructs a legal order on the basis of the basic norm which does not have a factual character but is only the logical condition for the unity of a legal system. By comparing the legal theoretical concepts with the argumentation of the ECJ we find that the jurisdiction of the Court is grounded on a Constructivist approach. However, the basic norm of communitarian law has not been identified in convincing terms. The phenomenon of communitarian law evidently calls for a modification of the Constructivist approach. The function of the theoretical model according to Kelsen is the clearing away of systematic argumentation from factors that are not part of the law (policies and power). Such factors impede the transparency of a legal system and thus also legal certainty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2788-2985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2788-2993</identifier><language>cze</language><publisher>Prague: Institute of International Relations (Prague)</publisher><ispartof>Czech Journal of International Relations (On-line), 2002-01, Vol.37 (1), p.5</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute of International Relations (Prague) 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1446932312/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1446932312?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11711,12061,12824,12826,21366,21373,33200,33588,33962,36227,36252,43709,43924,44377,44382,73964,74211,74676,74681</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scheu, Harald Christian</creatorcontrib><title>The Concept of Communitarian Law in the Jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice and in Legal Theory</title><title>Czech Journal of International Relations (On-line)</title><description>In the course of the past decades communitarian law has developed as a field of law whose theoretical explanation seems to present considerable difficulties. The traditional models of monism and dualism cannot sufficiently explain the position of communitarian law between international and municipal law. In addition the concepts of the so-called traditionalism and autonomics deal with only a part of the problem. The theoretical difficulties concentrate on the term "supranationality", which on one hand may provide for mediation between the political actors, from the legal point of view however is a weak compromise. The article attempts to provide an overview of the relevant statements given by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) concerning the systematic of communitarian law. In the jurisdiction of the Court there occur terms like "autonomy", "sovereign rights" and "constitutional charter". Behind the application of such terms we may see the development of the concept which spans the period between the sixties and the nineties. In the next part of the article we attempt to critically analyse the jurisdiction of the ECJ in the light of concepts drawn from legal theory. As a starting point we have turned to the teachings of Hart and Kelsen, i.e. the most significant legal theorists of the twentieth century. Hart's concept is characterized by empiric criteria, according to which the validity and identity of a legal order is explained as the result of the social acceptance of norms in the form of the so-called rule of recognition. On the other hand Kelsen constructs a legal order on the basis of the basic norm which does not have a factual character but is only the logical condition for the unity of a legal system. By comparing the legal theoretical concepts with the argumentation of the ECJ we find that the jurisdiction of the Court is grounded on a Constructivist approach. However, the basic norm of communitarian law has not been identified in convincing terms. The phenomenon of communitarian law evidently calls for a modification of the Constructivist approach. The function of the theoretical model according to Kelsen is the clearing away of systematic argumentation from factors that are not part of the law (policies and power). Such factors impede the transparency of a legal system and thus also legal certainty.</description><issn>2788-2985</issn><issn>2788-2993</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjV0LgjAYhUcUJOV_GHQtuM2PeS1GiJfex9BZE91sH0T_vhnRdVfncN7nvGcDApxTGuGiINufp-kehMaMcRwTRPMsRQEQ7Z3DUsmOLxaqwdt5dlJYpgWTsGFPKCS0nqmdFqYXnRVKruCaVU6rhXuuVE5_6rUzVnQcMtmvxYbf2AT9hNKvI9gNbDI8_OoBnM5VW16iRauH48ZeR_9F-tMVJUlWEEwQJv9Rb-DSSRs</recordid><startdate>20020101</startdate><enddate>20020101</enddate><creator>Scheu, Harald Christian</creator><general>Institute of International Relations (Prague)</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020101</creationdate><title>The Concept of Communitarian Law in the Jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice and in Legal Theory</title><author>Scheu, Harald Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_14469323123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>cze</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scheu, Harald Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Czech Journal of International Relations (On-line)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scheu, Harald Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Concept of Communitarian Law in the Jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice and in Legal Theory</atitle><jtitle>Czech Journal of International Relations (On-line)</jtitle><date>2002-01-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><pages>5-</pages><issn>2788-2985</issn><eissn>2788-2993</eissn><abstract>In the course of the past decades communitarian law has developed as a field of law whose theoretical explanation seems to present considerable difficulties. The traditional models of monism and dualism cannot sufficiently explain the position of communitarian law between international and municipal law. In addition the concepts of the so-called traditionalism and autonomics deal with only a part of the problem. The theoretical difficulties concentrate on the term "supranationality", which on one hand may provide for mediation between the political actors, from the legal point of view however is a weak compromise. The article attempts to provide an overview of the relevant statements given by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) concerning the systematic of communitarian law. In the jurisdiction of the Court there occur terms like "autonomy", "sovereign rights" and "constitutional charter". Behind the application of such terms we may see the development of the concept which spans the period between the sixties and the nineties. In the next part of the article we attempt to critically analyse the jurisdiction of the ECJ in the light of concepts drawn from legal theory. As a starting point we have turned to the teachings of Hart and Kelsen, i.e. the most significant legal theorists of the twentieth century. Hart's concept is characterized by empiric criteria, according to which the validity and identity of a legal order is explained as the result of the social acceptance of norms in the form of the so-called rule of recognition. On the other hand Kelsen constructs a legal order on the basis of the basic norm which does not have a factual character but is only the logical condition for the unity of a legal system. By comparing the legal theoretical concepts with the argumentation of the ECJ we find that the jurisdiction of the Court is grounded on a Constructivist approach. However, the basic norm of communitarian law has not been identified in convincing terms. The phenomenon of communitarian law evidently calls for a modification of the Constructivist approach. The function of the theoretical model according to Kelsen is the clearing away of systematic argumentation from factors that are not part of the law (policies and power). Such factors impede the transparency of a legal system and thus also legal certainty.</abstract><cop>Prague</cop><pub>Institute of International Relations (Prague)</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2788-2985
ispartof Czech Journal of International Relations (On-line), 2002-01, Vol.37 (1), p.5
issn 2788-2985
2788-2993
language cze
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1446932312
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Social Science Premium Collection; Social Science Database; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Political Science Database
title The Concept of Communitarian Law in the Jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice and in Legal Theory
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T23%3A21%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Concept%20of%20Communitarian%20Law%20in%20the%20Jurisdiction%20of%20the%20European%20Court%20of%20Justice%20and%20in%20Legal%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Czech%20Journal%20of%20International%20Relations%20(On-line)&rft.au=Scheu,%20Harald%20Christian&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.pages=5-&rft.issn=2788-2985&rft.eissn=2788-2993&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3112328411%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_14469323123%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1446932312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true