Loading…
Is Portion in VAT as Source of Budget of European Union Fair for Indigenter States?
The article deals with the third resource of the EU budget, which is a certain percentage of VAT returned by Member States. It focuses on correlation between average propensity to consume and Member states' GNP per capita. It is a response to critical assessments of alleged regressiveness of th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Czech Journal of International Relations (On-line) 2003-10, Vol.38 (4), p.24 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | cze |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | Czech Journal of International Relations (On-line) |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | König, Petr |
description | The article deals with the third resource of the EU budget, which is a certain percentage of VAT returned by Member States. It focuses on correlation between average propensity to consume and Member states' GNP per capita. It is a response to critical assessments of alleged regressiveness of the third resource resulting from presumed higher relative consumption in poor vis-r-vis rich countries. Correlation analysis confirms relatively high negative interdependency of both variables. However, the author does not recommend to link VAT payments to average propensity to consume. The results indicate that besides economic prosperity there are also other factors influencing the average propensity to consume. This is even clearer from the EU-13 model not comprising Greece and Luxembourg, which significantly codetermine the intensity of measured dependency. Comparison of average propensity to consume and GNPpc with the average figures for EU-15 shows four Member States where the negative correlation does not hold. The author also estimates the position of individual Member States towards further existence of VAT as an EU budget resource, including its possible abolition. While proportional payments are among realistic possibilities, introduction of progressive elements into EU budget payments is considered politically unacceptable. Despite the discussed disadvantages, VAT is found as the most appropriate tax revenue for the common EU budget. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1446959850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3112529341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_14469598502</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjs0KgkAYRYcoSMp3-KC14L_jKiqU3AVaWxnyU0Zixubn_VOI1q3ugXu43BVxwoxSL8zzaP1jmmyJq_Xo-34U0CxNAofUlYabVIZLAVzA49QA01BLq54Isoez7QY0CxVWyQmZgLtY5JJxBb1UUImODygMKqgNM6iPe7Lp2Uuj-80dOZRFc7l6k5Jvi9q047wv5qoN4jjNk_mZH_5nfQDqW0B_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1446959850</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Portion in VAT as Source of Budget of European Union Fair for Indigenter States?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>König, Petr</creator><creatorcontrib>König, Petr</creatorcontrib><description>The article deals with the third resource of the EU budget, which is a certain percentage of VAT returned by Member States. It focuses on correlation between average propensity to consume and Member states' GNP per capita. It is a response to critical assessments of alleged regressiveness of the third resource resulting from presumed higher relative consumption in poor vis-r-vis rich countries. Correlation analysis confirms relatively high negative interdependency of both variables. However, the author does not recommend to link VAT payments to average propensity to consume. The results indicate that besides economic prosperity there are also other factors influencing the average propensity to consume. This is even clearer from the EU-13 model not comprising Greece and Luxembourg, which significantly codetermine the intensity of measured dependency. Comparison of average propensity to consume and GNPpc with the average figures for EU-15 shows four Member States where the negative correlation does not hold. The author also estimates the position of individual Member States towards further existence of VAT as an EU budget resource, including its possible abolition. While proportional payments are among realistic possibilities, introduction of progressive elements into EU budget payments is considered politically unacceptable. Despite the discussed disadvantages, VAT is found as the most appropriate tax revenue for the common EU budget.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2788-2985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2788-2993</identifier><language>cze</language><publisher>Prague: Institute of International Relations (Prague)</publisher><ispartof>Czech Journal of International Relations (On-line), 2003-10, Vol.38 (4), p.24</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute of International Relations (Prague) 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,12825,12827,33202</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>König, Petr</creatorcontrib><title>Is Portion in VAT as Source of Budget of European Union Fair for Indigenter States?</title><title>Czech Journal of International Relations (On-line)</title><description>The article deals with the third resource of the EU budget, which is a certain percentage of VAT returned by Member States. It focuses on correlation between average propensity to consume and Member states' GNP per capita. It is a response to critical assessments of alleged regressiveness of the third resource resulting from presumed higher relative consumption in poor vis-r-vis rich countries. Correlation analysis confirms relatively high negative interdependency of both variables. However, the author does not recommend to link VAT payments to average propensity to consume. The results indicate that besides economic prosperity there are also other factors influencing the average propensity to consume. This is even clearer from the EU-13 model not comprising Greece and Luxembourg, which significantly codetermine the intensity of measured dependency. Comparison of average propensity to consume and GNPpc with the average figures for EU-15 shows four Member States where the negative correlation does not hold. The author also estimates the position of individual Member States towards further existence of VAT as an EU budget resource, including its possible abolition. While proportional payments are among realistic possibilities, introduction of progressive elements into EU budget payments is considered politically unacceptable. Despite the discussed disadvantages, VAT is found as the most appropriate tax revenue for the common EU budget.</description><issn>2788-2985</issn><issn>2788-2993</issn><fulltext>false</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjs0KgkAYRYcoSMp3-KC14L_jKiqU3AVaWxnyU0Zixubn_VOI1q3ugXu43BVxwoxSL8zzaP1jmmyJq_Xo-34U0CxNAofUlYabVIZLAVzA49QA01BLq54Isoez7QY0CxVWyQmZgLtY5JJxBb1UUImODygMKqgNM6iPe7Lp2Uuj-80dOZRFc7l6k5Jvi9q047wv5qoN4jjNk_mZH_5nfQDqW0B_</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>König, Petr</creator><general>Institute of International Relations (Prague)</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>Is Portion in VAT as Source of Budget of European Union Fair for Indigenter States?</title><author>König, Petr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_14469598502</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>cze</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><creatorcontrib>König, Petr</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Czech Journal of International Relations (On-line)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>no_fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>König, Petr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Portion in VAT as Source of Budget of European Union Fair for Indigenter States?</atitle><jtitle>Czech Journal of International Relations (On-line)</jtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>24</spage><pages>24-</pages><issn>2788-2985</issn><eissn>2788-2993</eissn><abstract>The article deals with the third resource of the EU budget, which is a certain percentage of VAT returned by Member States. It focuses on correlation between average propensity to consume and Member states' GNP per capita. It is a response to critical assessments of alleged regressiveness of the third resource resulting from presumed higher relative consumption in poor vis-r-vis rich countries. Correlation analysis confirms relatively high negative interdependency of both variables. However, the author does not recommend to link VAT payments to average propensity to consume. The results indicate that besides economic prosperity there are also other factors influencing the average propensity to consume. This is even clearer from the EU-13 model not comprising Greece and Luxembourg, which significantly codetermine the intensity of measured dependency. Comparison of average propensity to consume and GNPpc with the average figures for EU-15 shows four Member States where the negative correlation does not hold. The author also estimates the position of individual Member States towards further existence of VAT as an EU budget resource, including its possible abolition. While proportional payments are among realistic possibilities, introduction of progressive elements into EU budget payments is considered politically unacceptable. Despite the discussed disadvantages, VAT is found as the most appropriate tax revenue for the common EU budget.</abstract><cop>Prague</cop><pub>Institute of International Relations (Prague)</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | no_fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2788-2985 |
ispartof | Czech Journal of International Relations (On-line), 2003-10, Vol.38 (4), p.24 |
issn | 2788-2985 2788-2993 |
language | cze |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1446959850 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
title | Is Portion in VAT as Source of Budget of European Union Fair for Indigenter States? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A11%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Portion%20in%20VAT%20as%20Source%20of%20Budget%20of%20European%20Union%20Fair%20for%20Indigenter%20States?&rft.jtitle=Czech%20Journal%20of%20International%20Relations%20(On-line)&rft.au=K%C3%B6nig,%20Petr&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=24&rft.pages=24-&rft.issn=2788-2985&rft.eissn=2788-2993&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3112529341%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_14469598502%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1446959850&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |