Can aquaculture benefit the extreme poor? A case study of landless and socially marginalized Adivasi (ethnic) communities in Bangladesh

• Published in: Aquaculture 2014-01, Vol.418-419, p.1-10
• Main Authors: Pant, Jharendu, Barman, Benoy Kumar, Murshed-E-Jahan, Khondker, Belton, Benjamin, Beveridge, Malcolm
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adivasi; Aquaculture; Bangladesh; Extreme values; Family income; Fish; Fish consumption; Fisheries; Food consumption; Food security; Households; Livelihood diversification; Livelihoods; Low income areas; Low income groups; Minority & ethnic groups; Nutrition; Occupations
• ISSN: 0044-8486; 1873-5622
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.09.027

The Adivasi Fisheries Project, aimed at diversifying livelihood options for resource-poor Adivasi (ethnic) communities in the North and Northwest of Bangladesh, was implemented during 2007–9. Aquaculture and related technologies were introduced to a total of 3594 resource-poor Adivasi households. Baseline and end-line surveys were applied to assess the changes in their livelihoods following intervention. Household incomes of project participants rose significantly (p≤0.01), which was attributed to the increased share of aquaculture and related enterprises from 15% in 2007 to nearly 30% in 2009 in terms of annual household incomes. By contrast, the contribution of aquaculture to household incomes remained virtually unchanged (p>0.05) among non-project participants. The monthly frequency of fish, meat and egg consumption increased between 2007 and 2009 (p≤0.01), confirming improved food and nutrition security among project participants. Although non-project participants also slightly increased their fish consumption, it remained significantly lower (p≤0.01) than that of the project participants. The results from the present study contradict the prevailing view that aquaculture is inappropriate for landless, socially marginalized and extremely poor communities by demonstrating its relevance to improving livelihoods, provided that a diversified approach is followed and interventions are tailored to needs and capabilities of target households. •Aquaculture related activities were introduced to poor Adivasi (ethnic) households.•Significant increases in incomes, savings and fish consumption were realized.•Aquaculture enterprises can be adopted and sustained by the extreme poor.