Loading…
Method and Catholic Theological Ethics in the Twenty-First Century
The article proposes a Catholic ethical method for the 21st century. To that end, the authors first address the magisterium's concerns with relativism and distinguish relativism from Bernard Lonergan's perspectivism. After proposing perspectivism as an epistemological tool that accounts fo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Theological studies (Baltimore) 2013-12, Vol.74 (4), p.903-933 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-b327bf592caea6dbd005e92e3b2c2c4df8446597aea961c4aa29ff4f7e698fc03 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 933 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 903 |
container_title | Theological studies (Baltimore) |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Salzman, Todd A. Lawler, Michael G. |
description | The article proposes a Catholic ethical method for the 21st century. To that end, the authors first address the magisterium's concerns with relativism and distinguish relativism from Bernard Lonergan's perspectivism. After proposing perspectivism as an epistemological tool that accounts for a plurality of Catholic ethical methods, the authors explore virtue ethics, virtue epistemology, and a Christian stance that contribute to a reconstructed Catholic ethical method. The article concludes with a definition of chastity from two methodological perspectives that have different anthropological and normative implications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/004056391307400409 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1461737539</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A352230842</galeid><sage_id>10.1177_004056391307400409</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A352230842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-b327bf592caea6dbd005e92e3b2c2c4df8446597aea961c4aa29ff4f7e698fc03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1LAzEQhoMoWD_-gKcF8eBhNV-72Ry1-FFQvFQ8hjQ72Ua2u5qkaP-9KRW1WEFyyMyb552BySB0RPAZIUKcY8xxUTJJGBZ8mcgtNKCklHlS-DYaLLV8SeyivRCeccorKgfo8h7itK8z3dXZUKewdSYbT6Fv-8YZ3WZXcepMyFyXxSlk4zfo4iK_dj7EbJjiuV8coB2r2wCHn_c-ery-Gg9v87uHm9Hw4i43BaliPmFUTGwhqdGgy3pSY1yApMAm1FDDa1txXhZSpFdZEsO1ptJabgWUsrIGs310vKr74vvXOYSonvu571JLRXhJBBMFk99Uo1tQrrN99NrMXDDqghWUMlxxmqh8A9VAB163fQfWJXmNP9vAp1PDzJmNhtM1Q2IivMdGz0NQo_un_7O3o3WWrljj-xA8WPXi3Uz7hSJYLVdB_V6FZDr5nJwO6U-t151x4ctJK4xFgVnizldc0A38mO7flT8A4Pm7Sw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1461737539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Method and Catholic Theological Ethics in the Twenty-First Century</title><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Salzman, Todd A. ; Lawler, Michael G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Salzman, Todd A. ; Lawler, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><description>The article proposes a Catholic ethical method for the 21st century. To that end, the authors first address the magisterium's concerns with relativism and distinguish relativism from Bernard Lonergan's perspectivism. After proposing perspectivism as an epistemological tool that accounts for a plurality of Catholic ethical methods, the authors explore virtue ethics, virtue epistemology, and a Christian stance that contribute to a reconstructed Catholic ethical method. The article concludes with a definition of chastity from two methodological perspectives that have different anthropological and normative implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-5639</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-1304</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/004056391307400409</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>21st century ; Analysis ; Chastity ; Christianity ; Contemporary period ; Dogmatic theology ; Ethical aspects ; Ethical relativism ; Ethics ; General subjects ; Heterosexuality ; History and sciences of religions ; Lonergan, Bernard J. F ; Methods ; Norms ; Sexual orientation ; Spirituality ; Theology ; Theology, Catholic ; Virtue epistemology ; Virtue ethics</subject><ispartof>Theological studies (Baltimore), 2013-12, Vol.74 (4), p.903-933</ispartof><rights>2013 Theological Studies, Inc</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</rights><rights>Copyright Theological Studies, Inc. Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-b327bf592caea6dbd005e92e3b2c2c4df8446597aea961c4aa29ff4f7e698fc03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1461737539?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,62659,62660,62675,79134</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28007503$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salzman, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawler, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><title>Method and Catholic Theological Ethics in the Twenty-First Century</title><title>Theological studies (Baltimore)</title><description>The article proposes a Catholic ethical method for the 21st century. To that end, the authors first address the magisterium's concerns with relativism and distinguish relativism from Bernard Lonergan's perspectivism. After proposing perspectivism as an epistemological tool that accounts for a plurality of Catholic ethical methods, the authors explore virtue ethics, virtue epistemology, and a Christian stance that contribute to a reconstructed Catholic ethical method. The article concludes with a definition of chastity from two methodological perspectives that have different anthropological and normative implications.</description><subject>21st century</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Chastity</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Contemporary period</subject><subject>Dogmatic theology</subject><subject>Ethical aspects</subject><subject>Ethical relativism</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>General subjects</subject><subject>Heterosexuality</subject><subject>History and sciences of religions</subject><subject>Lonergan, Bernard J. F</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Sexual orientation</subject><subject>Spirituality</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Theology, Catholic</subject><subject>Virtue epistemology</subject><subject>Virtue ethics</subject><issn>0040-5639</issn><issn>2169-1304</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1LAzEQhoMoWD_-gKcF8eBhNV-72Ry1-FFQvFQ8hjQ72Ua2u5qkaP-9KRW1WEFyyMyb552BySB0RPAZIUKcY8xxUTJJGBZ8mcgtNKCklHlS-DYaLLV8SeyivRCeccorKgfo8h7itK8z3dXZUKewdSYbT6Fv-8YZ3WZXcepMyFyXxSlk4zfo4iK_dj7EbJjiuV8coB2r2wCHn_c-ery-Gg9v87uHm9Hw4i43BaliPmFUTGwhqdGgy3pSY1yApMAm1FDDa1txXhZSpFdZEsO1ptJabgWUsrIGs310vKr74vvXOYSonvu571JLRXhJBBMFk99Uo1tQrrN99NrMXDDqghWUMlxxmqh8A9VAB163fQfWJXmNP9vAp1PDzJmNhtM1Q2IivMdGz0NQo_un_7O3o3WWrljj-xA8WPXi3Uz7hSJYLVdB_V6FZDr5nJwO6U-t151x4ctJK4xFgVnizldc0A38mO7flT8A4Pm7Sw</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Salzman, Todd A.</creator><creator>Lawler, Michael G.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Theological Studies</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IHI</scope><scope>IMW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Method and Catholic Theological Ethics in the Twenty-First Century</title><author>Salzman, Todd A. ; Lawler, Michael G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-b327bf592caea6dbd005e92e3b2c2c4df8446597aea961c4aa29ff4f7e698fc03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>21st century</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Chastity</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Contemporary period</topic><topic>Dogmatic theology</topic><topic>Ethical aspects</topic><topic>Ethical relativism</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>General subjects</topic><topic>Heterosexuality</topic><topic>History and sciences of religions</topic><topic>Lonergan, Bernard J. F</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Sexual orientation</topic><topic>Spirituality</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Theology, Catholic</topic><topic>Virtue epistemology</topic><topic>Virtue ethics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salzman, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawler, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: U.S. History</collection><collection>Gale In Context: World History</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Homework Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Religion Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Theological studies (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salzman, Todd A.</au><au>Lawler, Michael G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Method and Catholic Theological Ethics in the Twenty-First Century</atitle><jtitle>Theological studies (Baltimore)</jtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>903</spage><epage>933</epage><pages>903-933</pages><issn>0040-5639</issn><eissn>2169-1304</eissn><abstract>The article proposes a Catholic ethical method for the 21st century. To that end, the authors first address the magisterium's concerns with relativism and distinguish relativism from Bernard Lonergan's perspectivism. After proposing perspectivism as an epistemological tool that accounts for a plurality of Catholic ethical methods, the authors explore virtue ethics, virtue epistemology, and a Christian stance that contribute to a reconstructed Catholic ethical method. The article concludes with a definition of chastity from two methodological perspectives that have different anthropological and normative implications.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/004056391307400409</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-5639 |
ispartof | Theological studies (Baltimore), 2013-12, Vol.74 (4), p.903-933 |
issn | 0040-5639 2169-1304 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1461737539 |
source | ProQuest One Literature; SAGE |
subjects | 21st century Analysis Chastity Christianity Contemporary period Dogmatic theology Ethical aspects Ethical relativism Ethics General subjects Heterosexuality History and sciences of religions Lonergan, Bernard J. F Methods Norms Sexual orientation Spirituality Theology Theology, Catholic Virtue epistemology Virtue ethics |
title | Method and Catholic Theological Ethics in the Twenty-First Century |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A09%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Method%20and%20Catholic%20Theological%20Ethics%20in%20the%20Twenty-First%20Century&rft.jtitle=Theological%20studies%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Salzman,%20Todd%20A.&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=903&rft.epage=933&rft.pages=903-933&rft.issn=0040-5639&rft.eissn=2169-1304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/004056391307400409&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA352230842%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-b327bf592caea6dbd005e92e3b2c2c4df8446597aea961c4aa29ff4f7e698fc03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1461737539&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A352230842&rft_sage_id=10.1177_004056391307400409&rfr_iscdi=true |