Lundquist v. Univ. of S.D. Sanford Sch. of Med

A state medical school cannot be sued for allegedly violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) because: (1) the state medical school lacks the capacity to be sued; and (2) an exception allowing suit against a partnership in its common name to enforce substantive rights does not apply becaus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Urban lawyer 2013-07, Vol.45 (3), p.841-842
Main Author: Simon, Amber Joy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US
Case Notes
Collaboration
Colleges & universities
Disability law
Legislatures
Medical schools
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 842
container_issue 3
container_start_page 841
container_title The Urban lawyer
container_volume 45
creator Simon, Amber Joy
description A state medical school cannot be sued for allegedly violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) because: (1) the state medical school lacks the capacity to be sued; and (2) an exception allowing suit against a partnership in its common name to enforce substantive rights does not apply because the state medical school and the regional health care system is not a "legal partnership." The former employee argued that the state medical school was in a "partnership" with the Sanford health-care system, a regional health care system, because the state medical school is located on the same campus as the regional health care system.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1466258197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24392692</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24392692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j507-93f96894e0fbad0b48816a76d2ac678bcb2a2418072a444a27b3246863a82ca33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjUtLxEAQhAdRMK7-BCHgOaGnpzOPo6yPFSIesp5D54UJmuzOJIL_3uB6qSqKj6ozEUlHmOjMqXMRAawZHGSX4iqEAUCBRIpEmi9jc1z6MMffafw-9qtOXVykD2lc8NhNvomL-uOvfG2ba3HR8Wdob_59I_ZPj_vtLsnfnl-293kyZGASpzqnraMWuoobqMhaqdnoBrnWxlZ1hYwkLRhkImI0lULSViu2WLNSG3F3mj346bi0YS6HafHj-lhK0hozK51ZqdsTNYR58uXB91_sf0ok5VA7VL9qdkWZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1466258197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lundquist v. Univ. of S.D. Sanford Sch. of Med</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Simon, Amber Joy</creator><creatorcontrib>Simon, Amber Joy</creatorcontrib><description>A state medical school cannot be sued for allegedly violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) because: (1) the state medical school lacks the capacity to be sued; and (2) an exception allowing suit against a partnership in its common name to enforce substantive rights does not apply because the state medical school and the regional health care system is not a "legal partnership." The former employee argued that the state medical school was in a "partnership" with the Sanford health-care system, a regional health care system, because the state medical school is located on the same campus as the regional health care system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-0905</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-6593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The Section of State and Local Government Law, American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US ; Case Notes ; Collaboration ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Disability law ; Legislatures ; Medical schools</subject><ispartof>The Urban lawyer, 2013-07, Vol.45 (3), p.841-842</ispartof><rights>2013 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Summer 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24392692$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24392692$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simon, Amber Joy</creatorcontrib><title>Lundquist v. Univ. of S.D. Sanford Sch. of Med</title><title>The Urban lawyer</title><description>A state medical school cannot be sued for allegedly violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) because: (1) the state medical school lacks the capacity to be sued; and (2) an exception allowing suit against a partnership in its common name to enforce substantive rights does not apply because the state medical school and the regional health care system is not a "legal partnership." The former employee argued that the state medical school was in a "partnership" with the Sanford health-care system, a regional health care system, because the state medical school is located on the same campus as the regional health care system.</description><subject>Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US</subject><subject>Case Notes</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Disability law</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><issn>0042-0905</issn><issn>1942-6593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjUtLxEAQhAdRMK7-BCHgOaGnpzOPo6yPFSIesp5D54UJmuzOJIL_3uB6qSqKj6ozEUlHmOjMqXMRAawZHGSX4iqEAUCBRIpEmi9jc1z6MMffafw-9qtOXVykD2lc8NhNvomL-uOvfG2ba3HR8Wdob_59I_ZPj_vtLsnfnl-293kyZGASpzqnraMWuoobqMhaqdnoBrnWxlZ1hYwkLRhkImI0lULSViu2WLNSG3F3mj346bi0YS6HafHj-lhK0hozK51ZqdsTNYR58uXB91_sf0ok5VA7VL9qdkWZ</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Simon, Amber Joy</creator><general>The Section of State and Local Government Law, American Bar Association</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Lundquist v. Univ. of S.D. Sanford Sch. of Med</title><author>Simon, Amber Joy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j507-93f96894e0fbad0b48816a76d2ac678bcb2a2418072a444a27b3246863a82ca33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US</topic><topic>Case Notes</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Disability law</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simon, Amber Joy</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Urban lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simon, Amber Joy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lundquist v. Univ. of S.D. Sanford Sch. of Med</atitle><jtitle>The Urban lawyer</jtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>841</spage><epage>842</epage><pages>841-842</pages><issn>0042-0905</issn><eissn>1942-6593</eissn><abstract>A state medical school cannot be sued for allegedly violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) because: (1) the state medical school lacks the capacity to be sued; and (2) an exception allowing suit against a partnership in its common name to enforce substantive rights does not apply because the state medical school and the regional health care system is not a "legal partnership." The former employee argued that the state medical school was in a "partnership" with the Sanford health-care system, a regional health care system, because the state medical school is located on the same campus as the regional health care system.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The Section of State and Local Government Law, American Bar Association</pub><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-0905
ispartof The Urban lawyer, 2013-07, Vol.45 (3), p.841-842
issn 0042-0905
1942-6593
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1466258197
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US
Case Notes
Collaboration
Colleges & universities
Disability law
Legislatures
Medical schools
title Lundquist v. Univ. of S.D. Sanford Sch. of Med
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T09%3A16%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lundquist%20v.%20Univ.%20of%20S.D.%20Sanford%20Sch.%20of%20Med&rft.jtitle=The%20Urban%20lawyer&rft.au=Simon,%20Amber%20Joy&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=841&rft.epage=842&rft.pages=841-842&rft.issn=0042-0905&rft.eissn=1942-6593&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24392692%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j507-93f96894e0fbad0b48816a76d2ac678bcb2a2418072a444a27b3246863a82ca33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1466258197&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24392692&rfr_iscdi=true