Loading…

Structure-Activity Relationship of Formamides as Organocatalysts: The Significance of Formamide Structure and Conformation

The impact of the structure and conformation of formamides as organocatalysts was investigated and reported herein as a structure–activity relationship. Selected formamides and some amides were evaluated for their ability to activate allyltrichlorosilane in the allylation of benzaldehyde. The result...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of organic chemistry 2013-04, Vol.2013 (12), p.2279-2283
Main Authors: Nguyen, Dieu, Akhani, Ravish K., Sheppard, Cody I., Wiskur, Sheryl L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The impact of the structure and conformation of formamides as organocatalysts was investigated and reported herein as a structure–activity relationship. Selected formamides and some amides were evaluated for their ability to activate allyltrichlorosilane in the allylation of benzaldehyde. The results suggest that the reactive conformation of secondary formamides is the less‐favorable cis conformation, whereas tertiary formamides and most amides are less reactive or unreactive in the reaction. A trend is observed between the Charton value for the N‐substituent on the secondary formamides and the amount of product formed, with an increase in yield as the substituent becomes larger. This work highlights the effects of sterics and solvent polarity on the reactivity of formamides. A structure–activity relationship with regard to formamides as organocatalysts is explored. This study highlights that the cis conformation of secondary formamides is the reactive conformation in the allylation of aldehydes with allyltrichlorosilane. Therefore, conditions that promote an increase in the cis conformation result in greater amounts of product formed.
ISSN:1434-193X
1099-0690
DOI:10.1002/ejoc.201201662