Loading…
TRANSFER PRICING AND ARM'S-LENGTH STANDARD
Transfer pricing is a pricing method used for transactions for tax purposes. A standard called the arm's-length standard was created to aid in setting a transfer price and simplify the process to prevent double taxation for multinational companies. Over the years, the standard has created probl...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of business research (Cary, N.C.) N.C.), 2013-11, Vol.6 (1), p.49 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 49 |
container_title | American journal of business research (Cary, N.C.) |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Chiang, Bea Del Gaudio, Brian |
description | Transfer pricing is a pricing method used for transactions for tax purposes. A standard called the arm's-length standard was created to aid in setting a transfer price and simplify the process to prevent double taxation for multinational companies. Over the years, the standard has created problems for multinational corporations and the commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in relation to arm's-length standard transactions. Cases between multinational corporations and the IRS are reviewed to discuss the use of the arm's-length standard and the disagreements concerning the treatment of employee stock options, cost sharing agreements, and buy-in payments in relation to the arm's-length standard. The analysis of these cases sheds some light on how the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing is diminishing in its effectiveness as a rule to set transfer prices. The paper suggests that the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing be modified or the formulary apportionment approach be implemented to alleviate potential problems of setting up transfer pricing. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1477457255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3181744341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_14774572553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0tDQ20TUzsTDhYOAtLs4yAAJTE3NjMxNOBq2QIEe_YDfXIIWAIE9nTz93BUc_FwXHIF_1YF0fVz_3EA-F4BCgkGOQCw8Da1piTnEqL5TmZlB2cw1x9tAtKMovLE0tLonPyi8tygNKxRuamJubmJobmZoaE6cKACVZLHo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1477457255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>TRANSFER PRICING AND ARM'S-LENGTH STANDARD</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Chiang, Bea ; Del Gaudio, Brian</creator><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Bea ; Del Gaudio, Brian</creatorcontrib><description>Transfer pricing is a pricing method used for transactions for tax purposes. A standard called the arm's-length standard was created to aid in setting a transfer price and simplify the process to prevent double taxation for multinational companies. Over the years, the standard has created problems for multinational corporations and the commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in relation to arm's-length standard transactions. Cases between multinational corporations and the IRS are reviewed to discuss the use of the arm's-length standard and the disagreements concerning the treatment of employee stock options, cost sharing agreements, and buy-in payments in relation to the arm's-length standard. The analysis of these cases sheds some light on how the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing is diminishing in its effectiveness as a rule to set transfer prices. The paper suggests that the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing be modified or the formulary apportionment approach be implemented to alleviate potential problems of setting up transfer pricing. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1934-6484</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary: American Institute of Higher Education</publisher><subject>Apportionment ; Corporate profits ; Corporate taxes ; Double taxation ; Intangible assets ; Internet stocks ; Multinational corporations ; Prevention ; Prices ; State court decisions ; Stock options ; Studies ; Subsidiaries ; Tax courts ; Tax rates ; Transfer pricing</subject><ispartof>American journal of business research (Cary, N.C.), 2013-11, Vol.6 (1), p.49</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Institute of Higher Education Nov 2013</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1477457255/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1477457255?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Bea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Gaudio, Brian</creatorcontrib><title>TRANSFER PRICING AND ARM'S-LENGTH STANDARD</title><title>American journal of business research (Cary, N.C.)</title><description>Transfer pricing is a pricing method used for transactions for tax purposes. A standard called the arm's-length standard was created to aid in setting a transfer price and simplify the process to prevent double taxation for multinational companies. Over the years, the standard has created problems for multinational corporations and the commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in relation to arm's-length standard transactions. Cases between multinational corporations and the IRS are reviewed to discuss the use of the arm's-length standard and the disagreements concerning the treatment of employee stock options, cost sharing agreements, and buy-in payments in relation to the arm's-length standard. The analysis of these cases sheds some light on how the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing is diminishing in its effectiveness as a rule to set transfer prices. The paper suggests that the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing be modified or the formulary apportionment approach be implemented to alleviate potential problems of setting up transfer pricing. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Apportionment</subject><subject>Corporate profits</subject><subject>Corporate taxes</subject><subject>Double taxation</subject><subject>Intangible assets</subject><subject>Internet stocks</subject><subject>Multinational corporations</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Stock options</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subsidiaries</subject><subject>Tax courts</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Transfer pricing</subject><issn>1934-6484</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0tDQ20TUzsTDhYOAtLs4yAAJTE3NjMxNOBq2QIEe_YDfXIIWAIE9nTz93BUc_FwXHIF_1YF0fVz_3EA-F4BCgkGOQCw8Da1piTnEqL5TmZlB2cw1x9tAtKMovLE0tLonPyi8tygNKxRuamJubmJobmZoaE6cKACVZLHo</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Chiang, Bea</creator><creator>Del Gaudio, Brian</creator><general>American Institute of Higher Education</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>TRANSFER PRICING AND ARM'S-LENGTH STANDARD</title><author>Chiang, Bea ; Del Gaudio, Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_14774572553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Apportionment</topic><topic>Corporate profits</topic><topic>Corporate taxes</topic><topic>Double taxation</topic><topic>Intangible assets</topic><topic>Internet stocks</topic><topic>Multinational corporations</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Stock options</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subsidiaries</topic><topic>Tax courts</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Transfer pricing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Bea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Gaudio, Brian</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>American journal of business research (Cary, N.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chiang, Bea</au><au>Del Gaudio, Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>TRANSFER PRICING AND ARM'S-LENGTH STANDARD</atitle><jtitle>American journal of business research (Cary, N.C.)</jtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><pages>49-</pages><issn>1934-6484</issn><abstract>Transfer pricing is a pricing method used for transactions for tax purposes. A standard called the arm's-length standard was created to aid in setting a transfer price and simplify the process to prevent double taxation for multinational companies. Over the years, the standard has created problems for multinational corporations and the commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in relation to arm's-length standard transactions. Cases between multinational corporations and the IRS are reviewed to discuss the use of the arm's-length standard and the disagreements concerning the treatment of employee stock options, cost sharing agreements, and buy-in payments in relation to the arm's-length standard. The analysis of these cases sheds some light on how the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing is diminishing in its effectiveness as a rule to set transfer prices. The paper suggests that the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing be modified or the formulary apportionment approach be implemented to alleviate potential problems of setting up transfer pricing. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Cary</cop><pub>American Institute of Higher Education</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1934-6484 |
ispartof | American journal of business research (Cary, N.C.), 2013-11, Vol.6 (1), p.49 |
issn | 1934-6484 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1477457255 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; ABI/INFORM Global |
subjects | Apportionment Corporate profits Corporate taxes Double taxation Intangible assets Internet stocks Multinational corporations Prevention Prices State court decisions Stock options Studies Subsidiaries Tax courts Tax rates Transfer pricing |
title | TRANSFER PRICING AND ARM'S-LENGTH STANDARD |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A17%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TRANSFER%20PRICING%20AND%20ARM'S-LENGTH%20STANDARD&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20business%20research%20(Cary,%20N.C.)&rft.au=Chiang,%20Bea&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.pages=49-&rft.issn=1934-6484&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3181744341%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_14774572553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1477457255&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |