Loading…

TRANSFER PRICING AND ARM'S-LENGTH STANDARD

Transfer pricing is a pricing method used for transactions for tax purposes. A standard called the arm's-length standard was created to aid in setting a transfer price and simplify the process to prevent double taxation for multinational companies. Over the years, the standard has created probl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of business research (Cary, N.C.) N.C.), 2013-11, Vol.6 (1), p.49
Main Authors: Chiang, Bea, Del Gaudio, Brian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 49
container_title American journal of business research (Cary, N.C.)
container_volume 6
creator Chiang, Bea
Del Gaudio, Brian
description Transfer pricing is a pricing method used for transactions for tax purposes. A standard called the arm's-length standard was created to aid in setting a transfer price and simplify the process to prevent double taxation for multinational companies. Over the years, the standard has created problems for multinational corporations and the commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in relation to arm's-length standard transactions. Cases between multinational corporations and the IRS are reviewed to discuss the use of the arm's-length standard and the disagreements concerning the treatment of employee stock options, cost sharing agreements, and buy-in payments in relation to the arm's-length standard. The analysis of these cases sheds some light on how the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing is diminishing in its effectiveness as a rule to set transfer prices. The paper suggests that the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing be modified or the formulary apportionment approach be implemented to alleviate potential problems of setting up transfer pricing. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1477457255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3181744341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_14774572553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0tDQ20TUzsTDhYOAtLs4yAAJTE3NjMxNOBq2QIEe_YDfXIIWAIE9nTz93BUc_FwXHIF_1YF0fVz_3EA-F4BCgkGOQCw8Da1piTnEqL5TmZlB2cw1x9tAtKMovLE0tLonPyi8tygNKxRuamJubmJobmZoaE6cKACVZLHo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1477457255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>TRANSFER PRICING AND ARM'S-LENGTH STANDARD</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Chiang, Bea ; Del Gaudio, Brian</creator><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Bea ; Del Gaudio, Brian</creatorcontrib><description>Transfer pricing is a pricing method used for transactions for tax purposes. A standard called the arm's-length standard was created to aid in setting a transfer price and simplify the process to prevent double taxation for multinational companies. Over the years, the standard has created problems for multinational corporations and the commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in relation to arm's-length standard transactions. Cases between multinational corporations and the IRS are reviewed to discuss the use of the arm's-length standard and the disagreements concerning the treatment of employee stock options, cost sharing agreements, and buy-in payments in relation to the arm's-length standard. The analysis of these cases sheds some light on how the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing is diminishing in its effectiveness as a rule to set transfer prices. The paper suggests that the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing be modified or the formulary apportionment approach be implemented to alleviate potential problems of setting up transfer pricing. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1934-6484</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary: American Institute of Higher Education</publisher><subject>Apportionment ; Corporate profits ; Corporate taxes ; Double taxation ; Intangible assets ; Internet stocks ; Multinational corporations ; Prevention ; Prices ; State court decisions ; Stock options ; Studies ; Subsidiaries ; Tax courts ; Tax rates ; Transfer pricing</subject><ispartof>American journal of business research (Cary, N.C.), 2013-11, Vol.6 (1), p.49</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Institute of Higher Education Nov 2013</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1477457255/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1477457255?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Bea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Gaudio, Brian</creatorcontrib><title>TRANSFER PRICING AND ARM'S-LENGTH STANDARD</title><title>American journal of business research (Cary, N.C.)</title><description>Transfer pricing is a pricing method used for transactions for tax purposes. A standard called the arm's-length standard was created to aid in setting a transfer price and simplify the process to prevent double taxation for multinational companies. Over the years, the standard has created problems for multinational corporations and the commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in relation to arm's-length standard transactions. Cases between multinational corporations and the IRS are reviewed to discuss the use of the arm's-length standard and the disagreements concerning the treatment of employee stock options, cost sharing agreements, and buy-in payments in relation to the arm's-length standard. The analysis of these cases sheds some light on how the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing is diminishing in its effectiveness as a rule to set transfer prices. The paper suggests that the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing be modified or the formulary apportionment approach be implemented to alleviate potential problems of setting up transfer pricing. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Apportionment</subject><subject>Corporate profits</subject><subject>Corporate taxes</subject><subject>Double taxation</subject><subject>Intangible assets</subject><subject>Internet stocks</subject><subject>Multinational corporations</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Stock options</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subsidiaries</subject><subject>Tax courts</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Transfer pricing</subject><issn>1934-6484</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0tDQ20TUzsTDhYOAtLs4yAAJTE3NjMxNOBq2QIEe_YDfXIIWAIE9nTz93BUc_FwXHIF_1YF0fVz_3EA-F4BCgkGOQCw8Da1piTnEqL5TmZlB2cw1x9tAtKMovLE0tLonPyi8tygNKxRuamJubmJobmZoaE6cKACVZLHo</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Chiang, Bea</creator><creator>Del Gaudio, Brian</creator><general>American Institute of Higher Education</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>TRANSFER PRICING AND ARM'S-LENGTH STANDARD</title><author>Chiang, Bea ; Del Gaudio, Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_14774572553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Apportionment</topic><topic>Corporate profits</topic><topic>Corporate taxes</topic><topic>Double taxation</topic><topic>Intangible assets</topic><topic>Internet stocks</topic><topic>Multinational corporations</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Stock options</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subsidiaries</topic><topic>Tax courts</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Transfer pricing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Bea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Gaudio, Brian</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>American journal of business research (Cary, N.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chiang, Bea</au><au>Del Gaudio, Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>TRANSFER PRICING AND ARM'S-LENGTH STANDARD</atitle><jtitle>American journal of business research (Cary, N.C.)</jtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><pages>49-</pages><issn>1934-6484</issn><abstract>Transfer pricing is a pricing method used for transactions for tax purposes. A standard called the arm's-length standard was created to aid in setting a transfer price and simplify the process to prevent double taxation for multinational companies. Over the years, the standard has created problems for multinational corporations and the commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in relation to arm's-length standard transactions. Cases between multinational corporations and the IRS are reviewed to discuss the use of the arm's-length standard and the disagreements concerning the treatment of employee stock options, cost sharing agreements, and buy-in payments in relation to the arm's-length standard. The analysis of these cases sheds some light on how the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing is diminishing in its effectiveness as a rule to set transfer prices. The paper suggests that the arm's-length standard of transfer pricing be modified or the formulary apportionment approach be implemented to alleviate potential problems of setting up transfer pricing. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Cary</cop><pub>American Institute of Higher Education</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1934-6484
ispartof American journal of business research (Cary, N.C.), 2013-11, Vol.6 (1), p.49
issn 1934-6484
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1477457255
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; ABI/INFORM Global
subjects Apportionment
Corporate profits
Corporate taxes
Double taxation
Intangible assets
Internet stocks
Multinational corporations
Prevention
Prices
State court decisions
Stock options
Studies
Subsidiaries
Tax courts
Tax rates
Transfer pricing
title TRANSFER PRICING AND ARM'S-LENGTH STANDARD
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A17%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TRANSFER%20PRICING%20AND%20ARM'S-LENGTH%20STANDARD&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20business%20research%20(Cary,%20N.C.)&rft.au=Chiang,%20Bea&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.pages=49-&rft.issn=1934-6484&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3181744341%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_14774572553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1477457255&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true