Loading…
Chlorophyll Meter Readings, Leaf Area Index, and Their Stability as Assessments of Yield and Quality in Sugar Beet Cultivars Grown in Two Contrasting Environments
ABSTRACT Across 2 yr and two locations in central Greece, 12 sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars were tested for yield (fresh root weight [FRW], sugar yield [SY], and white sugar yield [WSY]), sucrose content (SC) (% in fresh root weight), and their stability. Cultivar differences in photosynthe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Crop science 2014-01, Vol.54 (1), p.265-273 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-63696426a3217c331b6ecd173bcc4ca00af1af7f4301dfc964155b83f31ddc9c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-63696426a3217c331b6ecd173bcc4ca00af1af7f4301dfc964155b83f31ddc9c3 |
container_end_page | 273 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 265 |
container_title | Crop science |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Tsialtas, J. T. Baxevanos, D. Maslaris, N. |
description | ABSTRACT
Across 2 yr and two locations in central Greece, 12 sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars were tested for yield (fresh root weight [FRW], sugar yield [SY], and white sugar yield [WSY]), sucrose content (SC) (% in fresh root weight), and their stability. Cultivar differences in photosynthetic machinery were nondestructively assessed by leaf chlorophyll (soil plant analysis development [SPAD] readings) and leaf area index (LAI) measurements on four occasions during the growing season, within the first week of June, July, August, and September 2004 and 2005. Values over the four measurements conducted during the growing season of the physiological parameters (SPAD value over the four measurements conducted during the growing season [SPADM] and LAI value over the four measurements conducted during the growing season [LAIM]) and measurements of SPAD in June (SPAD1) and LAI in July (LAI2) showed broad‐sense heritability similar or even higher than those of yields. Both SPAD1 and LAI2 correlated positively with SPADM and LAIM, respectively, indicating that a single measurement, at a certain time point, might assess cultivar performance over the growing season. Three cultivars (Corsica, Palma, and Creta) performed best among the 12 genotypes, combining the highest WSY and stability as a genotype and genotype × environment biplot analysis depicted. Despite the fact that no relationship between SPAD and yields (FRW, SY, and WSY) or SC was found, cultivars instable in SPAD, as assessed by the Shukla stability variance (σ2i) (σ2i of SPAD1 and σ2i of SPADM), were shown to be the high yielding ones. On the contrary, cultivars with high and stable LAIs (LAI2 and LAIM) had the highest and more stable yields. Under the Mediterranean conditions of this work, where sugar beets suffer successive defoliations and regrowths, cultivars to yield better are those that sustain high LAI canopies with adapting “greenness” to the prevailing environmental conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2135/cropsci2013.03.0186 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1477880837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3183577961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-63696426a3217c331b6ecd173bcc4ca00af1af7f4301dfc964155b83f31ddc9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9qGzEQxkVJoU7aJ-hloNdsKu3sPx8dEScGh7SxC-1pkbVSrLCRHEkb16-TJ41s95BjYWBg5vd9A_MR8pXRi5xh-V16twnS5JThBU3FmuoDGbECy4xWJZ6QEaWMZazB35_IaQiPlNJ6XJcj8srXvUvq9a7v4VZF5eFeic7Yh3AOcyU0TLwSMLOd-nsOwnawXCvjYRHFyvQm7kAEmISgQnhSNgZwGv4Y1XcH9ucgDoyxsBgehIdLpSLwoY_mRfgA195t7X673DrgzkYvQky34cq-GO_swfIz-ahFH9SXf_2M_JpeLflNNr-7nvHJPJNY0CqrsBpXRV4JzFktEdmqUrJjNa6kLKSgVGgmdK0LpKzTMrGsLFcNamRdJ8cSz8i3o-_Gu-dBhdg-usHbdLJlRV03DW2wThQeqfTzELzS7cabJ-F3LaPtPoz2XRgtTZXCSKrpUbU1vdr9j6TlC57z-7sfCz7bzykejN4A6wiWGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1477880837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chlorophyll Meter Readings, Leaf Area Index, and Their Stability as Assessments of Yield and Quality in Sugar Beet Cultivars Grown in Two Contrasting Environments</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Tsialtas, J. T. ; Baxevanos, D. ; Maslaris, N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsialtas, J. T. ; Baxevanos, D. ; Maslaris, N.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Across 2 yr and two locations in central Greece, 12 sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars were tested for yield (fresh root weight [FRW], sugar yield [SY], and white sugar yield [WSY]), sucrose content (SC) (% in fresh root weight), and their stability. Cultivar differences in photosynthetic machinery were nondestructively assessed by leaf chlorophyll (soil plant analysis development [SPAD] readings) and leaf area index (LAI) measurements on four occasions during the growing season, within the first week of June, July, August, and September 2004 and 2005. Values over the four measurements conducted during the growing season of the physiological parameters (SPAD value over the four measurements conducted during the growing season [SPADM] and LAI value over the four measurements conducted during the growing season [LAIM]) and measurements of SPAD in June (SPAD1) and LAI in July (LAI2) showed broad‐sense heritability similar or even higher than those of yields. Both SPAD1 and LAI2 correlated positively with SPADM and LAIM, respectively, indicating that a single measurement, at a certain time point, might assess cultivar performance over the growing season. Three cultivars (Corsica, Palma, and Creta) performed best among the 12 genotypes, combining the highest WSY and stability as a genotype and genotype × environment biplot analysis depicted. Despite the fact that no relationship between SPAD and yields (FRW, SY, and WSY) or SC was found, cultivars instable in SPAD, as assessed by the Shukla stability variance (σ2i) (σ2i of SPAD1 and σ2i of SPADM), were shown to be the high yielding ones. On the contrary, cultivars with high and stable LAIs (LAI2 and LAIM) had the highest and more stable yields. Under the Mediterranean conditions of this work, where sugar beets suffer successive defoliations and regrowths, cultivars to yield better are those that sustain high LAI canopies with adapting “greenness” to the prevailing environmental conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2013.03.0186</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRPSAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Chlorophyll ; Cultivars ; Environmental conditions ; Genotype & phenotype ; Genotypes ; Growing season ; Irrigation ; Leaves ; Seasons ; Sugar ; Sugar industry ; Temperature</subject><ispartof>Crop science, 2014-01, Vol.54 (1), p.265-273</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the Crop Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jan/Feb 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-63696426a3217c331b6ecd173bcc4ca00af1af7f4301dfc964155b83f31ddc9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-63696426a3217c331b6ecd173bcc4ca00af1af7f4301dfc964155b83f31ddc9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsialtas, J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxevanos, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maslaris, N.</creatorcontrib><title>Chlorophyll Meter Readings, Leaf Area Index, and Their Stability as Assessments of Yield and Quality in Sugar Beet Cultivars Grown in Two Contrasting Environments</title><title>Crop science</title><description>ABSTRACT
Across 2 yr and two locations in central Greece, 12 sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars were tested for yield (fresh root weight [FRW], sugar yield [SY], and white sugar yield [WSY]), sucrose content (SC) (% in fresh root weight), and their stability. Cultivar differences in photosynthetic machinery were nondestructively assessed by leaf chlorophyll (soil plant analysis development [SPAD] readings) and leaf area index (LAI) measurements on four occasions during the growing season, within the first week of June, July, August, and September 2004 and 2005. Values over the four measurements conducted during the growing season of the physiological parameters (SPAD value over the four measurements conducted during the growing season [SPADM] and LAI value over the four measurements conducted during the growing season [LAIM]) and measurements of SPAD in June (SPAD1) and LAI in July (LAI2) showed broad‐sense heritability similar or even higher than those of yields. Both SPAD1 and LAI2 correlated positively with SPADM and LAIM, respectively, indicating that a single measurement, at a certain time point, might assess cultivar performance over the growing season. Three cultivars (Corsica, Palma, and Creta) performed best among the 12 genotypes, combining the highest WSY and stability as a genotype and genotype × environment biplot analysis depicted. Despite the fact that no relationship between SPAD and yields (FRW, SY, and WSY) or SC was found, cultivars instable in SPAD, as assessed by the Shukla stability variance (σ2i) (σ2i of SPAD1 and σ2i of SPADM), were shown to be the high yielding ones. On the contrary, cultivars with high and stable LAIs (LAI2 and LAIM) had the highest and more stable yields. Under the Mediterranean conditions of this work, where sugar beets suffer successive defoliations and regrowths, cultivars to yield better are those that sustain high LAI canopies with adapting “greenness” to the prevailing environmental conditions.</description><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>Sugar industry</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><issn>0011-183X</issn><issn>1435-0653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9qGzEQxkVJoU7aJ-hloNdsKu3sPx8dEScGh7SxC-1pkbVSrLCRHEkb16-TJ41s95BjYWBg5vd9A_MR8pXRi5xh-V16twnS5JThBU3FmuoDGbECy4xWJZ6QEaWMZazB35_IaQiPlNJ6XJcj8srXvUvq9a7v4VZF5eFeic7Yh3AOcyU0TLwSMLOd-nsOwnawXCvjYRHFyvQm7kAEmISgQnhSNgZwGv4Y1XcH9ucgDoyxsBgehIdLpSLwoY_mRfgA195t7X673DrgzkYvQky34cq-GO_swfIz-ahFH9SXf_2M_JpeLflNNr-7nvHJPJNY0CqrsBpXRV4JzFktEdmqUrJjNa6kLKSgVGgmdK0LpKzTMrGsLFcNamRdJ8cSz8i3o-_Gu-dBhdg-usHbdLJlRV03DW2wThQeqfTzELzS7cabJ-F3LaPtPoz2XRgtTZXCSKrpUbU1vdr9j6TlC57z-7sfCz7bzykejN4A6wiWGQ</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Tsialtas, J. T.</creator><creator>Baxevanos, D.</creator><creator>Maslaris, N.</creator><general>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>Chlorophyll Meter Readings, Leaf Area Index, and Their Stability as Assessments of Yield and Quality in Sugar Beet Cultivars Grown in Two Contrasting Environments</title><author>Tsialtas, J. T. ; Baxevanos, D. ; Maslaris, N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-63696426a3217c331b6ecd173bcc4ca00af1af7f4301dfc964155b83f31ddc9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>Sugar industry</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsialtas, J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxevanos, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maslaris, N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsialtas, J. T.</au><au>Baxevanos, D.</au><au>Maslaris, N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chlorophyll Meter Readings, Leaf Area Index, and Their Stability as Assessments of Yield and Quality in Sugar Beet Cultivars Grown in Two Contrasting Environments</atitle><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>273</epage><pages>265-273</pages><issn>0011-183X</issn><eissn>1435-0653</eissn><coden>CRPSAY</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT
Across 2 yr and two locations in central Greece, 12 sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars were tested for yield (fresh root weight [FRW], sugar yield [SY], and white sugar yield [WSY]), sucrose content (SC) (% in fresh root weight), and their stability. Cultivar differences in photosynthetic machinery were nondestructively assessed by leaf chlorophyll (soil plant analysis development [SPAD] readings) and leaf area index (LAI) measurements on four occasions during the growing season, within the first week of June, July, August, and September 2004 and 2005. Values over the four measurements conducted during the growing season of the physiological parameters (SPAD value over the four measurements conducted during the growing season [SPADM] and LAI value over the four measurements conducted during the growing season [LAIM]) and measurements of SPAD in June (SPAD1) and LAI in July (LAI2) showed broad‐sense heritability similar or even higher than those of yields. Both SPAD1 and LAI2 correlated positively with SPADM and LAIM, respectively, indicating that a single measurement, at a certain time point, might assess cultivar performance over the growing season. Three cultivars (Corsica, Palma, and Creta) performed best among the 12 genotypes, combining the highest WSY and stability as a genotype and genotype × environment biplot analysis depicted. Despite the fact that no relationship between SPAD and yields (FRW, SY, and WSY) or SC was found, cultivars instable in SPAD, as assessed by the Shukla stability variance (σ2i) (σ2i of SPAD1 and σ2i of SPADM), were shown to be the high yielding ones. On the contrary, cultivars with high and stable LAIs (LAI2 and LAIM) had the highest and more stable yields. Under the Mediterranean conditions of this work, where sugar beets suffer successive defoliations and regrowths, cultivars to yield better are those that sustain high LAI canopies with adapting “greenness” to the prevailing environmental conditions.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</pub><doi>10.2135/cropsci2013.03.0186</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-183X |
ispartof | Crop science, 2014-01, Vol.54 (1), p.265-273 |
issn | 0011-183X 1435-0653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1477880837 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Chlorophyll Cultivars Environmental conditions Genotype & phenotype Genotypes Growing season Irrigation Leaves Seasons Sugar Sugar industry Temperature |
title | Chlorophyll Meter Readings, Leaf Area Index, and Their Stability as Assessments of Yield and Quality in Sugar Beet Cultivars Grown in Two Contrasting Environments |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A52%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chlorophyll%20Meter%20Readings,%20Leaf%20Area%20Index,%20and%20Their%20Stability%20as%20Assessments%20of%20Yield%20and%20Quality%20in%20Sugar%20Beet%20Cultivars%20Grown%20in%20Two%20Contrasting%20Environments&rft.jtitle=Crop%20science&rft.au=Tsialtas,%20J.%20T.&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=273&rft.pages=265-273&rft.issn=0011-183X&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft.coden=CRPSAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135/cropsci2013.03.0186&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3183577961%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-63696426a3217c331b6ecd173bcc4ca00af1af7f4301dfc964155b83f31ddc9c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1477880837&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |