Sex differences in the energetic content of reproductive tissues in the Blackeye Goby, Rhinogobiops nicholsii

• Published in: Environmental biology of fishes 2014-03, Vol.97 (3), p.321-328
• Main Authors: Yong, Lengxob, Grober, Matthew S
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agnatha. Pisces; Animal and plant ecology; animal ovaries; Animal reproduction; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Animals; Autoecology; Bioenergetics; Biological and medical sciences; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Calorimetry; Energy; energy content; Environment; females; Fish; Freshwater & Marine Ecology; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Gender; gender differences; Life history; Life Sciences; males; mating systems; Nature Conservation; oxygen; Reproduction; sexual selection; testes; Tissues; Vertebrata; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution; Zoology
• ISSN: 0378-1909; 1573-5133
• DOI: 10.1007/s10641-013-0142-6

Differential energetic investment in reproduction between the sexes has been a driving a force of life history theory and sexual selection. However, reproductive costs between the sexes have often been based on morphology, such as gonad mass and gonadosomatic indices (GSI), and few have directly measured the energy content of gonadal tissues in relation to GSI. Using the blackeye goby, Rhinogobiops nicholsii, we measured the energetic content of whole gonadal tissues, specifically testes, ovaries and associated reproductive tissues using oxygen bomb calorimetry. The energy content per gram unit of gonadal tissues was generally predictive of GSI, indicating that GSI is a reasonable measure of energetic costs. Interestingly, although females had greater gonadal mass, GSI and energy content per gram than males, the sex difference in energy content per mass unit was only 13 %, suggesting that gross indices such as gonadal mass or GSI may overestimate energetic costs where instead the cost difference in a unit gram of gonadal tissues between the sexes is smaller than often predicted. This study also demonstrates that although the cost of ovaries is greater than testes, males’ investment in reproductive tissue can be considerable, which is consistent with the often inflated reproductive success for males in haremic mating systems.