Effects of fertilization and tillage system on growth and crude protein content of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): An alternative forage crop

A field experiment was conducted to determine the effects of fertilization and tillage on growth, yield and quality of quinoa crop (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). The agronomic performance and nutritive value of quinoa was analyzed in order to define alternatives to local forages for dry-season feeding...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Emirates journal of food and agriculture 2014-01, Vol.26 (1), p.18
Main Authors: Kakabouki, I, Bilalis, D, Karkanis, A, Zervas, G, Tsiplakou, E, Hela, D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agricultural production
Drought
Fertilizers
Fish
Grasses
Leaves
Manures
Nitrogen
Proteins
Quinoa
Rain
Split-plot design
Sprinkler systems
Statistical analysis
Tillage
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-46a237216a44b3d3f4a4fe2df4557a03e780a3c81b03e76608d662269ca9d4a13
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 18
container_title Emirates journal of food and agriculture
container_volume 26
creator Kakabouki, I
Bilalis, D
Karkanis, A
Zervas, G
Tsiplakou, E
Hela, D
description A field experiment was conducted to determine the effects of fertilization and tillage on growth, yield and quality of quinoa crop (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). The agronomic performance and nutritive value of quinoa was analyzed in order to define alternatives to local forages for dry-season feeding of ruminants in the Mediterranean region. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with two replicates, two main plots and sub-plots. The results indicated that quinoa growth was influenced by both tillage and fertilization. The lowest height and dry weight were found under MT. Moreover, the lowest height and dry weight were found under control treatment. Concerning the nitrogen content there were no significant differences between CT and MT systems. In addition, the highest quinoa nitrogen content was observed for N2 treatment. Moreover, the highest nitrogen content was measured at 150 DAS. Data indicate that quinoa crop could be used as alternative to legumes for protein production to feed ruminant animals.
doi_str_mv 10.9755/ejfa.v26i1.16831
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1494061170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3202977641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-46a237216a44b3d3f4a4fe2df4557a03e780a3c81b03e76608d662269ca9d4a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j0tPwzAQhC0EElXpnaMlLnBI8Ct2wq2qykOqxAUEt8qN162r1G5jpwj-Bf-YlNdpZ2elb2YROqckr1RRXMPa6nzPpKM5lSWnR2jAiKoyUvDy-F-z11M0itEtiBCKF6qgA_Q5tRbqFHGw2EKbXOM-dHLBY-0N7tdGLwHH95hgg3t32Ya3tPo-1m1nAG_bkMB5XAefwKcDZ9c5HzS-nKzAh20wrtv8eS890ORXN3jcBzQJWt-H7QHb0B5y6jZsz9CJ1U2E0e8coufb6dPkPps93j1MxrOs5kKkTEjNuGJUaiEW3HArtLDAjBVFoTThoEqieV3SxUFLSUojJWOyqnVlhKZ8iC5-uP0Huw5imq9D1_dp4pyKShBJqSL8C2RCaoI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1494061170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of fertilization and tillage system on growth and crude protein content of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): An alternative forage crop</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Kakabouki, I ; Bilalis, D ; Karkanis, A ; Zervas, G ; Tsiplakou, E ; Hela, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Kakabouki, I ; Bilalis, D ; Karkanis, A ; Zervas, G ; Tsiplakou, E ; Hela, D</creatorcontrib><description>A field experiment was conducted to determine the effects of fertilization and tillage on growth, yield and quality of quinoa crop (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). The agronomic performance and nutritive value of quinoa was analyzed in order to define alternatives to local forages for dry-season feeding of ruminants in the Mediterranean region. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with two replicates, two main plots and sub-plots. The results indicated that quinoa growth was influenced by both tillage and fertilization. The lowest height and dry weight were found under MT. Moreover, the lowest height and dry weight were found under control treatment. Concerning the nitrogen content there were no significant differences between CT and MT systems. In addition, the highest quinoa nitrogen content was observed for N2 treatment. Moreover, the highest nitrogen content was measured at 150 DAS. Data indicate that quinoa crop could be used as alternative to legumes for protein production to feed ruminant animals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2079-052X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2079-0538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.9755/ejfa.v26i1.16831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sofia: Pensoft Publishers</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Drought ; Fertilizers ; Fish ; Grasses ; Leaves ; Manures ; Nitrogen ; Proteins ; Quinoa ; Rain ; Split-plot design ; Sprinkler systems ; Statistical analysis ; Tillage</subject><ispartof>Emirates journal of food and agriculture, 2014-01, Vol.26 (1), p.18</ispartof><rights>Copyright United Arab Emirates University Jan 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-46a237216a44b3d3f4a4fe2df4557a03e780a3c81b03e76608d662269ca9d4a13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1494061170/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1494061170?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kakabouki, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilalis, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karkanis, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zervas, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiplakou, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hela, D</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of fertilization and tillage system on growth and crude protein content of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): An alternative forage crop</title><title>Emirates journal of food and agriculture</title><description>A field experiment was conducted to determine the effects of fertilization and tillage on growth, yield and quality of quinoa crop (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). The agronomic performance and nutritive value of quinoa was analyzed in order to define alternatives to local forages for dry-season feeding of ruminants in the Mediterranean region. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with two replicates, two main plots and sub-plots. The results indicated that quinoa growth was influenced by both tillage and fertilization. The lowest height and dry weight were found under MT. Moreover, the lowest height and dry weight were found under control treatment. Concerning the nitrogen content there were no significant differences between CT and MT systems. In addition, the highest quinoa nitrogen content was observed for N2 treatment. Moreover, the highest nitrogen content was measured at 150 DAS. Data indicate that quinoa crop could be used as alternative to legumes for protein production to feed ruminant animals.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Quinoa</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Split-plot design</subject><subject>Sprinkler systems</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><issn>2079-052X</issn><issn>2079-0538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNo9j0tPwzAQhC0EElXpnaMlLnBI8Ct2wq2qykOqxAUEt8qN162r1G5jpwj-Bf-YlNdpZ2elb2YROqckr1RRXMPa6nzPpKM5lSWnR2jAiKoyUvDy-F-z11M0itEtiBCKF6qgA_Q5tRbqFHGw2EKbXOM-dHLBY-0N7tdGLwHH95hgg3t32Ya3tPo-1m1nAG_bkMB5XAefwKcDZ9c5HzS-nKzAh20wrtv8eS890ORXN3jcBzQJWt-H7QHb0B5y6jZsz9CJ1U2E0e8coufb6dPkPps93j1MxrOs5kKkTEjNuGJUaiEW3HArtLDAjBVFoTThoEqieV3SxUFLSUojJWOyqnVlhKZ8iC5-uP0Huw5imq9D1_dp4pyKShBJqSL8C2RCaoI</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Kakabouki, I</creator><creator>Bilalis, D</creator><creator>Karkanis, A</creator><creator>Zervas, G</creator><creator>Tsiplakou, E</creator><creator>Hela, D</creator><general>Pensoft Publishers</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Effects of fertilization and tillage system on growth and crude protein content of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): An alternative forage crop</title><author>Kakabouki, I ; Bilalis, D ; Karkanis, A ; Zervas, G ; Tsiplakou, E ; Hela, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-46a237216a44b3d3f4a4fe2df4557a03e780a3c81b03e76608d662269ca9d4a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Quinoa</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Split-plot design</topic><topic>Sprinkler systems</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kakabouki, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilalis, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karkanis, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zervas, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiplakou, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hela, D</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM trade &amp; industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Emirates journal of food and agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kakabouki, I</au><au>Bilalis, D</au><au>Karkanis, A</au><au>Zervas, G</au><au>Tsiplakou, E</au><au>Hela, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of fertilization and tillage system on growth and crude protein content of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): An alternative forage crop</atitle><jtitle>Emirates journal of food and agriculture</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><pages>18-</pages><issn>2079-052X</issn><eissn>2079-0538</eissn><abstract>A field experiment was conducted to determine the effects of fertilization and tillage on growth, yield and quality of quinoa crop (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). The agronomic performance and nutritive value of quinoa was analyzed in order to define alternatives to local forages for dry-season feeding of ruminants in the Mediterranean region. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with two replicates, two main plots and sub-plots. The results indicated that quinoa growth was influenced by both tillage and fertilization. The lowest height and dry weight were found under MT. Moreover, the lowest height and dry weight were found under control treatment. Concerning the nitrogen content there were no significant differences between CT and MT systems. In addition, the highest quinoa nitrogen content was observed for N2 treatment. Moreover, the highest nitrogen content was measured at 150 DAS. Data indicate that quinoa crop could be used as alternative to legumes for protein production to feed ruminant animals.</abstract><cop>Sofia</cop><pub>Pensoft Publishers</pub><doi>10.9755/ejfa.v26i1.16831</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2079-052X
ispartof Emirates journal of food and agriculture, 2014-01, Vol.26 (1), p.18
issn 2079-052X
2079-0538
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1494061170
source ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Agricultural production
Drought
Fertilizers
Fish
Grasses
Leaves
Manures
Nitrogen
Proteins
Quinoa
Rain
Split-plot design
Sprinkler systems
Statistical analysis
Tillage
title Effects of fertilization and tillage system on growth and crude protein content of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): An alternative forage crop
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A53%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20fertilization%20and%20tillage%20system%20on%20growth%20and%20crude%20protein%20content%20of%20quinoa%20(Chenopodium%20quinoa%20Willd.):%20An%20alternative%20forage%20crop&rft.jtitle=Emirates%20journal%20of%20food%20and%20agriculture&rft.au=Kakabouki,%20I&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.pages=18-&rft.issn=2079-052X&rft.eissn=2079-0538&rft_id=info:doi/10.9755/ejfa.v26i1.16831&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3202977641%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-46a237216a44b3d3f4a4fe2df4557a03e780a3c81b03e76608d662269ca9d4a13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1494061170&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true