Loading…

The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Right to Adequate Food/El Comité de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales y el Derecho a una Alimentación adecuada

General Comment No. 12 was herald as a turning point for the protection of the right to adequate food under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. It helps all public authorities -from local councils to central governments, from social services to tribunals and courts- t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anuario español de derecho internacional 2011-01, Vol.27, p.571
Main Author: Seatzu, Francesco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 571
container_title Anuario español de derecho internacional
container_volume 27
creator Seatzu, Francesco
description General Comment No. 12 was herald as a turning point for the protection of the right to adequate food under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. It helps all public authorities -from local councils to central governments, from social services to tribunals and courts- to act compatibly with this fundamental right enshrined in Art. 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and provides States Parties to the Covenant with useful baseline information for their periodic reports to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Nevertheless, more than ten years after its enactment, there is a notable lack of a positive culture of respect for this right in several Contracting States. Undeniably, in recent times the right to adequate food has been more pilloried than celebrated and General Comment No. 12 itself has suffered at the hands of a range of detractors who have frequently indicated its modest utility. This article considers the impressive ambition of General Comment No. 6 to convert society through the opening of a culture of respect for the right to food. It maintain that the failure to guarantee institutional commitment to positive compliance of the right to adequate food -and translate this fundamental right into practical reality as an integral part of public life- has fostered scepticism of General Comment No. 12 and eventually undermined the acceptance in public consciousness of the right to food as a positive social good. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1496067105</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3210568461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_14960671053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjLFOwzAQhi0EEhX0HU5iJSJpaluMVUjFxABFYquMfRAjx0dje-CRmDsy5sUwEWVmuvv-u_87YrPFgi8LIcqn47xXsi5qKfkpm4dgn8uay0oILmbsa9MhPN5BQ31vY0QE8tBq8tRbfQkPpK1yoLyBJrmYhgz39rWLYcpiLk8IkWBlcJdURFgTmavW_ThtHD_BINzggLqjMKnHfXZTONgxwMeffQJ0hwIoSF7BytkefVTajnsPyqBOyqhzdvKiXMD57zxjF-t209wW7wPtEoa4faM0-HzaVstrUQpZlbz-39c3rmtoPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1496067105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Right to Adequate Food/El Comité de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales y el Derecho a una Alimentación adecuada</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Seatzu, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Seatzu, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>General Comment No. 12 was herald as a turning point for the protection of the right to adequate food under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. It helps all public authorities -from local councils to central governments, from social services to tribunals and courts- to act compatibly with this fundamental right enshrined in Art. 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and provides States Parties to the Covenant with useful baseline information for their periodic reports to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Nevertheless, more than ten years after its enactment, there is a notable lack of a positive culture of respect for this right in several Contracting States. Undeniably, in recent times the right to adequate food has been more pilloried than celebrated and General Comment No. 12 itself has suffered at the hands of a range of detractors who have frequently indicated its modest utility. This article considers the impressive ambition of General Comment No. 6 to convert society through the opening of a culture of respect for the right to food. It maintain that the failure to guarantee institutional commitment to positive compliance of the right to adequate food -and translate this fundamental right into practical reality as an integral part of public life- has fostered scepticism of General Comment No. 12 and eventually undermined the acceptance in public consciousness of the right to food as a positive social good. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 2173-3775</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2254-660X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra</publisher><subject>Committees ; Content analysis ; Culture ; Food ; Human rights ; International law ; Public good ; Social policy ; Treaties</subject><ispartof>Anuario español de derecho internacional, 2011-01, Vol.27, p.571</ispartof><rights>Copyright Universidad de Navarra 2011</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1496067105/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1496067105?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,36037,44339,74638</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seatzu, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Right to Adequate Food/El Comité de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales y el Derecho a una Alimentación adecuada</title><title>Anuario español de derecho internacional</title><description>General Comment No. 12 was herald as a turning point for the protection of the right to adequate food under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. It helps all public authorities -from local councils to central governments, from social services to tribunals and courts- to act compatibly with this fundamental right enshrined in Art. 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and provides States Parties to the Covenant with useful baseline information for their periodic reports to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Nevertheless, more than ten years after its enactment, there is a notable lack of a positive culture of respect for this right in several Contracting States. Undeniably, in recent times the right to adequate food has been more pilloried than celebrated and General Comment No. 12 itself has suffered at the hands of a range of detractors who have frequently indicated its modest utility. This article considers the impressive ambition of General Comment No. 6 to convert society through the opening of a culture of respect for the right to food. It maintain that the failure to guarantee institutional commitment to positive compliance of the right to adequate food -and translate this fundamental right into practical reality as an integral part of public life- has fostered scepticism of General Comment No. 12 and eventually undermined the acceptance in public consciousness of the right to food as a positive social good. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Public good</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><issn>2173-3775</issn><issn>2254-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjLFOwzAQhi0EEhX0HU5iJSJpaluMVUjFxABFYquMfRAjx0dje-CRmDsy5sUwEWVmuvv-u_87YrPFgi8LIcqn47xXsi5qKfkpm4dgn8uay0oILmbsa9MhPN5BQ31vY0QE8tBq8tRbfQkPpK1yoLyBJrmYhgz39rWLYcpiLk8IkWBlcJdURFgTmavW_ThtHD_BINzggLqjMKnHfXZTONgxwMeffQJ0hwIoSF7BytkefVTajnsPyqBOyqhzdvKiXMD57zxjF-t209wW7wPtEoa4faM0-HzaVstrUQpZlbz-39c3rmtoPA</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Seatzu, Francesco</creator><general>Universidad de Navarra</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Right to Adequate Food/El Comité de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales y el Derecho a una Alimentación adecuada</title><author>Seatzu, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_14960671053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Public good</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seatzu, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America &amp; Iberia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Anuario español de derecho internacional</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seatzu, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Right to Adequate Food/El Comité de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales y el Derecho a una Alimentación adecuada</atitle><jtitle>Anuario español de derecho internacional</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>27</volume><spage>571</spage><pages>571-</pages><issn>2173-3775</issn><eissn>2254-660X</eissn><abstract>General Comment No. 12 was herald as a turning point for the protection of the right to adequate food under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. It helps all public authorities -from local councils to central governments, from social services to tribunals and courts- to act compatibly with this fundamental right enshrined in Art. 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and provides States Parties to the Covenant with useful baseline information for their periodic reports to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Nevertheless, more than ten years after its enactment, there is a notable lack of a positive culture of respect for this right in several Contracting States. Undeniably, in recent times the right to adequate food has been more pilloried than celebrated and General Comment No. 12 itself has suffered at the hands of a range of detractors who have frequently indicated its modest utility. This article considers the impressive ambition of General Comment No. 6 to convert society through the opening of a culture of respect for the right to food. It maintain that the failure to guarantee institutional commitment to positive compliance of the right to adequate food -and translate this fundamental right into practical reality as an integral part of public life- has fostered scepticism of General Comment No. 12 and eventually undermined the acceptance in public consciousness of the right to food as a positive social good. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Pamplona</cop><pub>Universidad de Navarra</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2173-3775
ispartof Anuario español de derecho internacional, 2011-01, Vol.27, p.571
issn 2173-3775
2254-660X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1496067105
source ABI/INFORM Global
subjects Committees
Content analysis
Culture
Food
Human rights
International law
Public good
Social policy
Treaties
title The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Right to Adequate Food/El Comité de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales y el Derecho a una Alimentación adecuada
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A48%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20UN%20Committee%20on%20Economic,%20Social%20and%20Cultural%20Rights%20and%20the%20Right%20to%20Adequate%20Food/El%20Comit%C3%A9%20de%20Derechos%20Econ%C3%B3micos,%20Sociales%20y%20Culturales%20y%20el%20Derecho%20a%20una%20Alimentaci%C3%B3n%20adecuada&rft.jtitle=Anuario%20espa%C3%B1ol%20de%20derecho%20internacional&rft.au=Seatzu,%20Francesco&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.spage=571&rft.pages=571-&rft.issn=2173-3775&rft.eissn=2254-660X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3210568461%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_14960671053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1496067105&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true