Loading…
Letter to the Editor
Norman et al concluded that retrospective methods of determining the meaningfulness of clinical changes yield little information about the ability of instruments to detect treatment effects and should not be used to select instruments for use in practice or in clinical trials.2 The second issue rela...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American heart journal 2006-06, Vol.151 (6), p.e5 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Norman et al concluded that retrospective methods of determining the meaningfulness of clinical changes yield little information about the ability of instruments to detect treatment effects and should not be used to select instruments for use in practice or in clinical trials.2 The second issue relates to the meaning of the term "change in clinical status." |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-8703 1097-6744 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.02.034 |