Loading…
Response to letter regarding the article “Low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents”
Because of the nature of registry study, some patients received UFH for >2 days because some physicians thought the prolonged antithrombotic therapy might give extra benefits to the patients with higher risk of thrombotic complications.
Saved in:
Published in: | The American heart journal 2010-09, Vol.160 (3), p.e27-e27 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Because of the nature of registry study, some patients received UFH for >2 days because some physicians thought the prolonged antithrombotic therapy might give extra benefits to the patients with higher risk of thrombotic complications. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-8703 1097-6744 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.037 |