Loading…

Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact

Design science research (DSR) has staked its rightful ground as an important and legitimate Information Systems (IS) research paradigm. We contend that DSR has yet to attain its full potential impact on the development and use of information systems due to gaps in the understanding and application o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:MIS quarterly 2013-06, Vol.37 (2), p.337-355
Main Authors: Gregor, Shirley, Hevner, Alan R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-86b7436ba6921004408bce4a09531ac1b02923af14b56577162cc8bb5955b5f63
cites
container_end_page 355
container_issue 2
container_start_page 337
container_title MIS quarterly
container_volume 37
creator Gregor, Shirley
Hevner, Alan R.
description Design science research (DSR) has staked its rightful ground as an important and legitimate Information Systems (IS) research paradigm. We contend that DSR has yet to attain its full potential impact on the development and use of information systems due to gaps in the understanding and application of DSR concepts and methods. This essay aims to help researchers (1) appreciate the levels of artifact abstractions that may be DSR contributions, (2) identify appropriate ways of consuming and producing knowledge when they are preparing journal articles or other scholarly works, (3) understand and position the knowledge contributions of their research projects, and (4) structure a DSR article so that it emphasizes significant contributions to the knowledge base. Our focal contribution is the DSR knowledge contribution framework with two dimensions based on the existing state of knowledge in both the problem and solution domains for the research opportunity under study. In addition, we propose a DSR communication schema with similarities to more conventional publication patterns, but which substitutes the description of the DSR artifact in place of a traditional results section. We evaluate the DSR contribution framework and the DSR communication schema via examinations of DSR exemplar publications.
doi_str_mv 10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.01
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1505325903</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43825912</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43825912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-86b7436ba6921004408bce4a09531ac1b02923af14b56577162cc8bb5955b5f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UNtKAzEQDaJgrf6AIAR83naSSTa7j1JvhRar1eeQxGxNcXfbZAv6926t-DRnOJcZDiGXDEZcIsC4Dmk75sBwjGrER8COyICznGelQjgmA-Aqz5Qq8JScpbQGAKaYGpC7RZtCF9omNCtqmne6iD75ptuvtz6FVUOXLvjGefrSEya6D1q1kc7NV6h3NZ3WG-O6c3JSmc_kL_7mkLzd371OHrPZ08N0cjPLnBDYZUVulcDcmrzkDEAIKKzzwkApkRnHLPCSo6mYsDKXSvX_O1dYK0spraxyHJLrQ-4mttudT51et7vY9Cc1kyCRyxKwV_GDysU2pegrvYmhNvFbM9C_den5dPms93VpVJrrHgzJ1cG0Tl0b_x0Ciz6UcfwBMH9mGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1505325903</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Gregor, Shirley ; Hevner, Alan R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gregor, Shirley ; Hevner, Alan R. ; University of South Florida ; The Australian National University</creatorcontrib><description>Design science research (DSR) has staked its rightful ground as an important and legitimate Information Systems (IS) research paradigm. We contend that DSR has yet to attain its full potential impact on the development and use of information systems due to gaps in the understanding and application of DSR concepts and methods. This essay aims to help researchers (1) appreciate the levels of artifact abstractions that may be DSR contributions, (2) identify appropriate ways of consuming and producing knowledge when they are preparing journal articles or other scholarly works, (3) understand and position the knowledge contributions of their research projects, and (4) structure a DSR article so that it emphasizes significant contributions to the knowledge base. Our focal contribution is the DSR knowledge contribution framework with two dimensions based on the existing state of knowledge in both the problem and solution domains for the research opportunity under study. In addition, we propose a DSR communication schema with similarities to more conventional publication patterns, but which substitutes the description of the DSR artifact in place of a traditional results section. We evaluate the DSR contribution framework and the DSR communication schema via examinations of DSR exemplar publications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-7783</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-9730</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.01</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MISQDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Minneapolis: Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota</publisher><subject>Information systems ; Knowledge management ; Research Essay ; Studies ; Systems development</subject><ispartof>MIS quarterly, 2013-06, Vol.37 (2), p.337-355</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Management Information Systems Research Center (MISRC) of the University of Minnesota</rights><rights>Copyright University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center Jun 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-86b7436ba6921004408bce4a09531ac1b02923af14b56577162cc8bb5955b5f63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43825912$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43825912$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,58216,58449</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gregor, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hevner, Alan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of South Florida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Australian National University</creatorcontrib><title>Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact</title><title>MIS quarterly</title><description>Design science research (DSR) has staked its rightful ground as an important and legitimate Information Systems (IS) research paradigm. We contend that DSR has yet to attain its full potential impact on the development and use of information systems due to gaps in the understanding and application of DSR concepts and methods. This essay aims to help researchers (1) appreciate the levels of artifact abstractions that may be DSR contributions, (2) identify appropriate ways of consuming and producing knowledge when they are preparing journal articles or other scholarly works, (3) understand and position the knowledge contributions of their research projects, and (4) structure a DSR article so that it emphasizes significant contributions to the knowledge base. Our focal contribution is the DSR knowledge contribution framework with two dimensions based on the existing state of knowledge in both the problem and solution domains for the research opportunity under study. In addition, we propose a DSR communication schema with similarities to more conventional publication patterns, but which substitutes the description of the DSR artifact in place of a traditional results section. We evaluate the DSR contribution framework and the DSR communication schema via examinations of DSR exemplar publications.</description><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Research Essay</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systems development</subject><issn>0276-7783</issn><issn>2162-9730</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UNtKAzEQDaJgrf6AIAR83naSSTa7j1JvhRar1eeQxGxNcXfbZAv6926t-DRnOJcZDiGXDEZcIsC4Dmk75sBwjGrER8COyICznGelQjgmA-Aqz5Qq8JScpbQGAKaYGpC7RZtCF9omNCtqmne6iD75ptuvtz6FVUOXLvjGefrSEya6D1q1kc7NV6h3NZ3WG-O6c3JSmc_kL_7mkLzd371OHrPZ08N0cjPLnBDYZUVulcDcmrzkDEAIKKzzwkApkRnHLPCSo6mYsDKXSvX_O1dYK0spraxyHJLrQ-4mttudT51et7vY9Cc1kyCRyxKwV_GDysU2pegrvYmhNvFbM9C_den5dPms93VpVJrrHgzJ1cG0Tl0b_x0Ciz6UcfwBMH9mGg</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Gregor, Shirley</creator><creator>Hevner, Alan R.</creator><general>Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota</general><general>University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact</title><author>Gregor, Shirley ; Hevner, Alan R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-86b7436ba6921004408bce4a09531ac1b02923af14b56577162cc8bb5955b5f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Research Essay</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systems development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gregor, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hevner, Alan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of South Florida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Australian National University</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>MIS quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gregor, Shirley</au><au>Hevner, Alan R.</au><aucorp>University of South Florida</aucorp><aucorp>The Australian National University</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact</atitle><jtitle>MIS quarterly</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>337-355</pages><issn>0276-7783</issn><eissn>2162-9730</eissn><coden>MISQDP</coden><abstract>Design science research (DSR) has staked its rightful ground as an important and legitimate Information Systems (IS) research paradigm. We contend that DSR has yet to attain its full potential impact on the development and use of information systems due to gaps in the understanding and application of DSR concepts and methods. This essay aims to help researchers (1) appreciate the levels of artifact abstractions that may be DSR contributions, (2) identify appropriate ways of consuming and producing knowledge when they are preparing journal articles or other scholarly works, (3) understand and position the knowledge contributions of their research projects, and (4) structure a DSR article so that it emphasizes significant contributions to the knowledge base. Our focal contribution is the DSR knowledge contribution framework with two dimensions based on the existing state of knowledge in both the problem and solution domains for the research opportunity under study. In addition, we propose a DSR communication schema with similarities to more conventional publication patterns, but which substitutes the description of the DSR artifact in place of a traditional results section. We evaluate the DSR contribution framework and the DSR communication schema via examinations of DSR exemplar publications.</abstract><cop>Minneapolis</cop><pub>Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota</pub><doi>10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.01</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0276-7783
ispartof MIS quarterly, 2013-06, Vol.37 (2), p.337-355
issn 0276-7783
2162-9730
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1505325903
source Business Source Ultimate; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Information systems
Knowledge management
Research Essay
Studies
Systems development
title Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A32%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Positioning%20and%20Presenting%20Design%20Science%20Research%20for%20Maximum%20Impact&rft.jtitle=MIS%20quarterly&rft.au=Gregor,%20Shirley&rft.aucorp=University%20of%20South%20Florida&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=337-355&rft.issn=0276-7783&rft.eissn=2162-9730&rft.coden=MISQDP&rft_id=info:doi/10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.01&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43825912%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-86b7436ba6921004408bce4a09531ac1b02923af14b56577162cc8bb5955b5f63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1505325903&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43825912&rfr_iscdi=true