Loading…
Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact
Design science research (DSR) has staked its rightful ground as an important and legitimate Information Systems (IS) research paradigm. We contend that DSR has yet to attain its full potential impact on the development and use of information systems due to gaps in the understanding and application o...
Saved in:
Published in: | MIS quarterly 2013-06, Vol.37 (2), p.337-355 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-86b7436ba6921004408bce4a09531ac1b02923af14b56577162cc8bb5955b5f63 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 355 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 337 |
container_title | MIS quarterly |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Gregor, Shirley Hevner, Alan R. |
description | Design science research (DSR) has staked its rightful ground as an important and legitimate Information Systems (IS) research paradigm. We contend that DSR has yet to attain its full potential impact on the development and use of information systems due to gaps in the understanding and application of DSR concepts and methods. This essay aims to help researchers (1) appreciate the levels of artifact abstractions that may be DSR contributions, (2) identify appropriate ways of consuming and producing knowledge when they are preparing journal articles or other scholarly works, (3) understand and position the knowledge contributions of their research projects, and (4) structure a DSR article so that it emphasizes significant contributions to the knowledge base. Our focal contribution is the DSR knowledge contribution framework with two dimensions based on the existing state of knowledge in both the problem and solution domains for the research opportunity under study. In addition, we propose a DSR communication schema with similarities to more conventional publication patterns, but which substitutes the description of the DSR artifact in place of a traditional results section. We evaluate the DSR contribution framework and the DSR communication schema via examinations of DSR exemplar publications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.01 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1505325903</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43825912</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43825912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-86b7436ba6921004408bce4a09531ac1b02923af14b56577162cc8bb5955b5f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UNtKAzEQDaJgrf6AIAR83naSSTa7j1JvhRar1eeQxGxNcXfbZAv6926t-DRnOJcZDiGXDEZcIsC4Dmk75sBwjGrER8COyICznGelQjgmA-Aqz5Qq8JScpbQGAKaYGpC7RZtCF9omNCtqmne6iD75ptuvtz6FVUOXLvjGefrSEya6D1q1kc7NV6h3NZ3WG-O6c3JSmc_kL_7mkLzd371OHrPZ08N0cjPLnBDYZUVulcDcmrzkDEAIKKzzwkApkRnHLPCSo6mYsDKXSvX_O1dYK0spraxyHJLrQ-4mttudT51et7vY9Cc1kyCRyxKwV_GDysU2pegrvYmhNvFbM9C_den5dPms93VpVJrrHgzJ1cG0Tl0b_x0Ciz6UcfwBMH9mGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1505325903</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Gregor, Shirley ; Hevner, Alan R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gregor, Shirley ; Hevner, Alan R. ; University of South Florida ; The Australian National University</creatorcontrib><description>Design science research (DSR) has staked its rightful ground as an important and legitimate Information Systems (IS) research paradigm. We contend that DSR has yet to attain its full potential impact on the development and use of information systems due to gaps in the understanding and application of DSR concepts and methods. This essay aims to help researchers (1) appreciate the levels of artifact abstractions that may be DSR contributions, (2) identify appropriate ways of consuming and producing knowledge when they are preparing journal articles or other scholarly works, (3) understand and position the knowledge contributions of their research projects, and (4) structure a DSR article so that it emphasizes significant contributions to the knowledge base. Our focal contribution is the DSR knowledge contribution framework with two dimensions based on the existing state of knowledge in both the problem and solution domains for the research opportunity under study. In addition, we propose a DSR communication schema with similarities to more conventional publication patterns, but which substitutes the description of the DSR artifact in place of a traditional results section. We evaluate the DSR contribution framework and the DSR communication schema via examinations of DSR exemplar publications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-7783</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-9730</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.01</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MISQDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Minneapolis: Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota</publisher><subject>Information systems ; Knowledge management ; Research Essay ; Studies ; Systems development</subject><ispartof>MIS quarterly, 2013-06, Vol.37 (2), p.337-355</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Management Information Systems Research Center (MISRC) of the University of Minnesota</rights><rights>Copyright University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center Jun 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-86b7436ba6921004408bce4a09531ac1b02923af14b56577162cc8bb5955b5f63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43825912$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43825912$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,58216,58449</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gregor, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hevner, Alan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of South Florida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Australian National University</creatorcontrib><title>Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact</title><title>MIS quarterly</title><description>Design science research (DSR) has staked its rightful ground as an important and legitimate Information Systems (IS) research paradigm. We contend that DSR has yet to attain its full potential impact on the development and use of information systems due to gaps in the understanding and application of DSR concepts and methods. This essay aims to help researchers (1) appreciate the levels of artifact abstractions that may be DSR contributions, (2) identify appropriate ways of consuming and producing knowledge when they are preparing journal articles or other scholarly works, (3) understand and position the knowledge contributions of their research projects, and (4) structure a DSR article so that it emphasizes significant contributions to the knowledge base. Our focal contribution is the DSR knowledge contribution framework with two dimensions based on the existing state of knowledge in both the problem and solution domains for the research opportunity under study. In addition, we propose a DSR communication schema with similarities to more conventional publication patterns, but which substitutes the description of the DSR artifact in place of a traditional results section. We evaluate the DSR contribution framework and the DSR communication schema via examinations of DSR exemplar publications.</description><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Research Essay</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systems development</subject><issn>0276-7783</issn><issn>2162-9730</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UNtKAzEQDaJgrf6AIAR83naSSTa7j1JvhRar1eeQxGxNcXfbZAv6926t-DRnOJcZDiGXDEZcIsC4Dmk75sBwjGrER8COyICznGelQjgmA-Aqz5Qq8JScpbQGAKaYGpC7RZtCF9omNCtqmne6iD75ptuvtz6FVUOXLvjGefrSEya6D1q1kc7NV6h3NZ3WG-O6c3JSmc_kL_7mkLzd371OHrPZ08N0cjPLnBDYZUVulcDcmrzkDEAIKKzzwkApkRnHLPCSo6mYsDKXSvX_O1dYK0spraxyHJLrQ-4mttudT51et7vY9Cc1kyCRyxKwV_GDysU2pegrvYmhNvFbM9C_den5dPms93VpVJrrHgzJ1cG0Tl0b_x0Ciz6UcfwBMH9mGg</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Gregor, Shirley</creator><creator>Hevner, Alan R.</creator><general>Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota</general><general>University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact</title><author>Gregor, Shirley ; Hevner, Alan R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-86b7436ba6921004408bce4a09531ac1b02923af14b56577162cc8bb5955b5f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Research Essay</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systems development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gregor, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hevner, Alan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of South Florida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Australian National University</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>MIS quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gregor, Shirley</au><au>Hevner, Alan R.</au><aucorp>University of South Florida</aucorp><aucorp>The Australian National University</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact</atitle><jtitle>MIS quarterly</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>337-355</pages><issn>0276-7783</issn><eissn>2162-9730</eissn><coden>MISQDP</coden><abstract>Design science research (DSR) has staked its rightful ground as an important and legitimate Information Systems (IS) research paradigm. We contend that DSR has yet to attain its full potential impact on the development and use of information systems due to gaps in the understanding and application of DSR concepts and methods. This essay aims to help researchers (1) appreciate the levels of artifact abstractions that may be DSR contributions, (2) identify appropriate ways of consuming and producing knowledge when they are preparing journal articles or other scholarly works, (3) understand and position the knowledge contributions of their research projects, and (4) structure a DSR article so that it emphasizes significant contributions to the knowledge base. Our focal contribution is the DSR knowledge contribution framework with two dimensions based on the existing state of knowledge in both the problem and solution domains for the research opportunity under study. In addition, we propose a DSR communication schema with similarities to more conventional publication patterns, but which substitutes the description of the DSR artifact in place of a traditional results section. We evaluate the DSR contribution framework and the DSR communication schema via examinations of DSR exemplar publications.</abstract><cop>Minneapolis</cop><pub>Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota</pub><doi>10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.01</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0276-7783 |
ispartof | MIS quarterly, 2013-06, Vol.37 (2), p.337-355 |
issn | 0276-7783 2162-9730 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1505325903 |
source | Business Source Ultimate; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Information systems Knowledge management Research Essay Studies Systems development |
title | Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A32%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Positioning%20and%20Presenting%20Design%20Science%20Research%20for%20Maximum%20Impact&rft.jtitle=MIS%20quarterly&rft.au=Gregor,%20Shirley&rft.aucorp=University%20of%20South%20Florida&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=337-355&rft.issn=0276-7783&rft.eissn=2162-9730&rft.coden=MISQDP&rft_id=info:doi/10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.01&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43825912%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-86b7436ba6921004408bce4a09531ac1b02923af14b56577162cc8bb5955b5f63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1505325903&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43825912&rfr_iscdi=true |