Loading…

What’S Different About Social Media Networks? A Framework and Research Agenda

In recent years, we have witnessed the rapid proliferation and widespread adoption of a new class of information technologies, commonly known as social media. Researchers often rely on social network analysis (SNA) when attempting to understand these technologies, often without considering how the n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:MIS quarterly 2014-03, Vol.38 (1), p.275-304
Main Authors: Kane, Gerald C., Alavi, Maryam, Labianca, Giuseppe (Joe), Borgatti, Stephen P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
ref 1
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-a0c9f1d4cfc3996f3a22f94bd16445f28f2f38be7146fc7a12bf5bee5463386f3
cites
container_end_page 304
container_issue 1
container_start_page 275
container_title MIS quarterly
container_volume 38
creator Kane, Gerald C.
Alavi, Maryam
Labianca, Giuseppe (Joe)
Borgatti, Stephen P.
description In recent years, we have witnessed the rapid proliferation and widespread adoption of a new class of information technologies, commonly known as social media. Researchers often rely on social network analysis (SNA) when attempting to understand these technologies, often without considering how the novel capabilities of social media platforms might affect the underlying theories of SNA, which were developed primarily through studies of offline social networks. This article outlines several key differences between traditional offline social networks and online social media networks by juxtaposing an established typology of social network research with a well-regarded definition of social media platforms that articulates four key features. The results show that at four major points of intersection, social media has considerable theoretical implications for SNA. In exploring these points of intersection, this study outlines a series of theoretically distinct research questions for SNA in social media contexts. These points of intersection offer considerable opportunities for researchers to investigate the theoretical implications introduced by social media and lay the groundwork for a robust social media agenda potentially spanning multiple disciplines.
doi_str_mv 10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.13
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1505326259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26554878</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26554878</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-a0c9f1d4cfc3996f3a22f94bd16445f28f2f38be7146fc7a12bf5bee5463386f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1KAzEQgIMoWKsvIAgBz9tm8rt7klKtFqpFq3gM2Wxit7a7Ndki3nwNX88ncWvF0zDwfTPwIXQKpEcFI6R_O57d9ykB3mdpD3rA9lCHgqRJphjZRx1ClUyUStkhOopxQQgBBaqDps9z03x_fs3wZem9C65q8CCvNw2e1bY0S3zritLgO9e81-E1XuABHgWzctsNm6rADy46E-wcD15cVZhjdODNMrqTv9lFT6Orx-FNMplej4eDSWKZUk1iiM08FNx6y7JMemYo9RnPC5CcC09TTz1Lc6eAS2-VAZp7kTsnuGQsbfkuOt_dXYf6beNioxf1JlTtSw2CCEYlFVlL0R1lQx1jcF6vQ7ky4UMD0b_h9Dac3obTLNWggbXS2U5axKYO_waVQvC0LfgDNeRqpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1505326259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What’S Different About Social Media Networks? A Framework and Research Agenda</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><creator>Kane, Gerald C. ; Alavi, Maryam ; Labianca, Giuseppe (Joe) ; Borgatti, Stephen P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kane, Gerald C. ; Alavi, Maryam ; Labianca, Giuseppe (Joe) ; Borgatti, Stephen P. ; Boston College ; Emory University ; University of Kentucky</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, we have witnessed the rapid proliferation and widespread adoption of a new class of information technologies, commonly known as social media. Researchers often rely on social network analysis (SNA) when attempting to understand these technologies, often without considering how the novel capabilities of social media platforms might affect the underlying theories of SNA, which were developed primarily through studies of offline social networks. This article outlines several key differences between traditional offline social networks and online social media networks by juxtaposing an established typology of social network research with a well-regarded definition of social media platforms that articulates four key features. The results show that at four major points of intersection, social media has considerable theoretical implications for SNA. In exploring these points of intersection, this study outlines a series of theoretically distinct research questions for SNA in social media contexts. These points of intersection offer considerable opportunities for researchers to investigate the theoretical implications introduced by social media and lay the groundwork for a robust social media agenda potentially spanning multiple disciplines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-7783</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-9730</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.13</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MISQDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Minneapolis: Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota</publisher><subject>Information technology ; Research methodology ; Social network analysis ; Social networks ; Studies ; Technology adoption ; Theory and Review</subject><ispartof>MIS quarterly, 2014-03, Vol.38 (1), p.275-304</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center Mar 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-a0c9f1d4cfc3996f3a22f94bd16445f28f2f38be7146fc7a12bf5bee5463386f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26554878$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26554878$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kane, Gerald C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alavi, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labianca, Giuseppe (Joe)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borgatti, Stephen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boston College</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emory University</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Kentucky</creatorcontrib><title>What’S Different About Social Media Networks? A Framework and Research Agenda</title><title>MIS quarterly</title><description>In recent years, we have witnessed the rapid proliferation and widespread adoption of a new class of information technologies, commonly known as social media. Researchers often rely on social network analysis (SNA) when attempting to understand these technologies, often without considering how the novel capabilities of social media platforms might affect the underlying theories of SNA, which were developed primarily through studies of offline social networks. This article outlines several key differences between traditional offline social networks and online social media networks by juxtaposing an established typology of social network research with a well-regarded definition of social media platforms that articulates four key features. The results show that at four major points of intersection, social media has considerable theoretical implications for SNA. In exploring these points of intersection, this study outlines a series of theoretically distinct research questions for SNA in social media contexts. These points of intersection offer considerable opportunities for researchers to investigate the theoretical implications introduced by social media and lay the groundwork for a robust social media agenda potentially spanning multiple disciplines.</description><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Social network analysis</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><subject>Theory and Review</subject><issn>0276-7783</issn><issn>2162-9730</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1KAzEQgIMoWKsvIAgBz9tm8rt7klKtFqpFq3gM2Wxit7a7Ndki3nwNX88ncWvF0zDwfTPwIXQKpEcFI6R_O57d9ykB3mdpD3rA9lCHgqRJphjZRx1ClUyUStkhOopxQQgBBaqDps9z03x_fs3wZem9C65q8CCvNw2e1bY0S3zritLgO9e81-E1XuABHgWzctsNm6rADy46E-wcD15cVZhjdODNMrqTv9lFT6Orx-FNMplej4eDSWKZUk1iiM08FNx6y7JMemYo9RnPC5CcC09TTz1Lc6eAS2-VAZp7kTsnuGQsbfkuOt_dXYf6beNioxf1JlTtSw2CCEYlFVlL0R1lQx1jcF6vQ7ky4UMD0b_h9Dac3obTLNWggbXS2U5axKYO_waVQvC0LfgDNeRqpg</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Kane, Gerald C.</creator><creator>Alavi, Maryam</creator><creator>Labianca, Giuseppe (Joe)</creator><creator>Borgatti, Stephen P.</creator><general>Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota</general><general>University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>What’S Different About Social Media Networks? A Framework and Research Agenda</title><author>Kane, Gerald C. ; Alavi, Maryam ; Labianca, Giuseppe (Joe) ; Borgatti, Stephen P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-a0c9f1d4cfc3996f3a22f94bd16445f28f2f38be7146fc7a12bf5bee5463386f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Social network analysis</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><topic>Theory and Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kane, Gerald C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alavi, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labianca, Giuseppe (Joe)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borgatti, Stephen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boston College</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emory University</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Kentucky</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>MIS quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kane, Gerald C.</au><au>Alavi, Maryam</au><au>Labianca, Giuseppe (Joe)</au><au>Borgatti, Stephen P.</au><aucorp>Boston College</aucorp><aucorp>Emory University</aucorp><aucorp>University of Kentucky</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What’S Different About Social Media Networks? A Framework and Research Agenda</atitle><jtitle>MIS quarterly</jtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>275</spage><epage>304</epage><pages>275-304</pages><issn>0276-7783</issn><eissn>2162-9730</eissn><coden>MISQDP</coden><abstract>In recent years, we have witnessed the rapid proliferation and widespread adoption of a new class of information technologies, commonly known as social media. Researchers often rely on social network analysis (SNA) when attempting to understand these technologies, often without considering how the novel capabilities of social media platforms might affect the underlying theories of SNA, which were developed primarily through studies of offline social networks. This article outlines several key differences between traditional offline social networks and online social media networks by juxtaposing an established typology of social network research with a well-regarded definition of social media platforms that articulates four key features. The results show that at four major points of intersection, social media has considerable theoretical implications for SNA. In exploring these points of intersection, this study outlines a series of theoretically distinct research questions for SNA in social media contexts. These points of intersection offer considerable opportunities for researchers to investigate the theoretical implications introduced by social media and lay the groundwork for a robust social media agenda potentially spanning multiple disciplines.</abstract><cop>Minneapolis</cop><pub>Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota</pub><doi>10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.13</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0276-7783
ispartof MIS quarterly, 2014-03, Vol.38 (1), p.275-304
issn 0276-7783
2162-9730
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1505326259
source Business Source Ultimate; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】
subjects Information technology
Research methodology
Social network analysis
Social networks
Studies
Technology adoption
Theory and Review
title What’S Different About Social Media Networks? A Framework and Research Agenda
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A16%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%E2%80%99S%20Different%20About%20Social%20Media%20Networks?%20A%20Framework%20and%20Research%20Agenda&rft.jtitle=MIS%20quarterly&rft.au=Kane,%20Gerald%20C.&rft.aucorp=Boston%20College&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=275&rft.epage=304&rft.pages=275-304&rft.issn=0276-7783&rft.eissn=2162-9730&rft.coden=MISQDP&rft_id=info:doi/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.13&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26554878%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-a0c9f1d4cfc3996f3a22f94bd16445f28f2f38be7146fc7a12bf5bee5463386f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1505326259&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26554878&rfr_iscdi=true