Effects of abdominocentesis technique on peritoneal fluid and clinical variables in horses

Summary Eleven healthy horses underwent 5 repeated abdominocenteses, with either a sharp‐tipped spinal needle or a blunt‐tipped teat cannula to investigate possible differences in success rate, sample volume, depth at which a sample was obtained, length of procedure, complications and cytological va...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Equine veterinary education 2014-05, Vol.26 (5), p.262-268
Main Authors: Duesterdieck-Zellmer, K. F., Riehl, J. H., McKenzie, E. C., Firshman, A. M, Payton, M. E., Gorman, M. E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
abdominocentesis
Blood
cannula
horse
Horses
Medical research
needle
technique
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3355-5069aa01553ad2549a0f7348f419381f250d5f4d28ec30f303b22c1fb0661d8d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3355-5069aa01553ad2549a0f7348f419381f250d5f4d28ec30f303b22c1fb0661d8d3
container_end_page 268
container_issue 5
container_start_page 262
container_title Equine veterinary education
container_volume 26
creator Duesterdieck-Zellmer, K. F.
Riehl, J. H.
McKenzie, E. C.
Firshman, A. M
Payton, M. E.
Gorman, M. E.
description Summary Eleven healthy horses underwent 5 repeated abdominocenteses, with either a sharp‐tipped spinal needle or a blunt‐tipped teat cannula to investigate possible differences in success rate, sample volume, depth at which a sample was obtained, length of procedure, complications and cytological variables. Variables were analysed with a repeated‐measures ANOVA or Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05). Success rate, sample volume, length of procedure, occurrence of haemorrhage during the procedure and incidence of grossly visible blood contamination were not different between techniques or over time. Depth at which samples were obtained was greater using a cannula than a needle (P
doi_str_mv 10.1111/eve.12155
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1513506064</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3268812941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3355-5069aa01553ad2549a0f7348f419381f250d5f4d28ec30f303b22c1fb0661d8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL_0HAlYtp85zHUkutQtWND-gmZDIJTR2Tmkyr_fdGR915Nxcu3zn3cAA4xWiE04z1Vo8wwZzvgQFBjGSUVGQfDFDFi6woKDsERzGuEOKsIMUALKbGaNVF6A2UdeNfrfNKu05HG2Gn1dLZt42G3sG1DrbzTssWmnZjGyhdA1VrnVXptJXByrrVEVoHlz5EHY_BgZFt1Cc_ewger6YPk-tsfj-7mVzMM0Up5xlHeSUlSpGpbAhnlUQm5SwNwxUtsSEcNdywhpRaUWQoojUhCpsa5TluyoYOwVnvuw4-ZY2dWPlNcOmlwBzT5I9ylqjznlLBxxi0EetgX2XYCYzEV3UiVSe-q0vsuGffbat3_4Ni-jT9VWS9wsZOf_wpZHgReUELLp7vZmKCGb9c3BJB6CeiJX5e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1513506064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of abdominocentesis technique on peritoneal fluid and clinical variables in horses</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Duesterdieck-Zellmer, K. F. ; Riehl, J. H. ; McKenzie, E. C. ; Firshman, A. M ; Payton, M. E. ; Gorman, M. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Duesterdieck-Zellmer, K. F. ; Riehl, J. H. ; McKenzie, E. C. ; Firshman, A. M ; Payton, M. E. ; Gorman, M. E.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Eleven healthy horses underwent 5 repeated abdominocenteses, with either a sharp‐tipped spinal needle or a blunt‐tipped teat cannula to investigate possible differences in success rate, sample volume, depth at which a sample was obtained, length of procedure, complications and cytological variables. Variables were analysed with a repeated‐measures ANOVA or Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05). Success rate, sample volume, length of procedure, occurrence of haemorrhage during the procedure and incidence of grossly visible blood contamination were not different between techniques or over time. Depth at which samples were obtained was greater using a cannula than a needle (P&lt;0.02), and samples were obtained with either technique at a greater depth than abdominal wall thickness assessed via ultrasound (P&lt;0.014). Peritoneal fluid total and differential nucleated cell counts, and total protein concentration did not differ between techniques or over time. Red blood cell count in the least blood contaminated fraction of each sample was not affected by time, but it was lower after needle abdominocentesis than after cannula abdominocentesis (P = 0.04). Swelling of abdominocentesis sites increased with both techniques over time (P&lt;0.05) and was more severe in horses undergoing cannula abdominocentesis (P&lt;0.05). Enterocentesis occurred with a spinal needle in one horse, but no subsequent complications were noted. Both techniques appear to be safe and reliable for abdominocentesis in healthy horses. Using a blunt‐tipped cannula, as opposed to a needle, is likely to result in greater subcutaneous swelling. Both the cannula and needle must be long enough to penetrate well beyond the thickness of the abdominal wall to achieve successful peritoneal fluid collection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-7734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-3292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/eve.12155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>abdominocentesis ; Blood ; cannula ; horse ; Horses ; Medical research ; needle ; technique</subject><ispartof>Equine veterinary education, 2014-05, Vol.26 (5), p.262-268</ispartof><rights>2014 EVJ Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3355-5069aa01553ad2549a0f7348f419381f250d5f4d28ec30f303b22c1fb0661d8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3355-5069aa01553ad2549a0f7348f419381f250d5f4d28ec30f303b22c1fb0661d8d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2641-3105</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duesterdieck-Zellmer, K. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riehl, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, E. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firshman, A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payton, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorman, M. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of abdominocentesis technique on peritoneal fluid and clinical variables in horses</title><title>Equine veterinary education</title><addtitle>Equine Veterinary Education</addtitle><description>Summary Eleven healthy horses underwent 5 repeated abdominocenteses, with either a sharp‐tipped spinal needle or a blunt‐tipped teat cannula to investigate possible differences in success rate, sample volume, depth at which a sample was obtained, length of procedure, complications and cytological variables. Variables were analysed with a repeated‐measures ANOVA or Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05). Success rate, sample volume, length of procedure, occurrence of haemorrhage during the procedure and incidence of grossly visible blood contamination were not different between techniques or over time. Depth at which samples were obtained was greater using a cannula than a needle (P&lt;0.02), and samples were obtained with either technique at a greater depth than abdominal wall thickness assessed via ultrasound (P&lt;0.014). Peritoneal fluid total and differential nucleated cell counts, and total protein concentration did not differ between techniques or over time. Red blood cell count in the least blood contaminated fraction of each sample was not affected by time, but it was lower after needle abdominocentesis than after cannula abdominocentesis (P = 0.04). Swelling of abdominocentesis sites increased with both techniques over time (P&lt;0.05) and was more severe in horses undergoing cannula abdominocentesis (P&lt;0.05). Enterocentesis occurred with a spinal needle in one horse, but no subsequent complications were noted. Both techniques appear to be safe and reliable for abdominocentesis in healthy horses. Using a blunt‐tipped cannula, as opposed to a needle, is likely to result in greater subcutaneous swelling. Both the cannula and needle must be long enough to penetrate well beyond the thickness of the abdominal wall to achieve successful peritoneal fluid collection.</description><subject>abdominocentesis</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>cannula</subject><subject>horse</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>needle</subject><subject>technique</subject><issn>0957-7734</issn><issn>2042-3292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL_0HAlYtp85zHUkutQtWND-gmZDIJTR2Tmkyr_fdGR915Nxcu3zn3cAA4xWiE04z1Vo8wwZzvgQFBjGSUVGQfDFDFi6woKDsERzGuEOKsIMUALKbGaNVF6A2UdeNfrfNKu05HG2Gn1dLZt42G3sG1DrbzTssWmnZjGyhdA1VrnVXptJXByrrVEVoHlz5EHY_BgZFt1Cc_ewger6YPk-tsfj-7mVzMM0Up5xlHeSUlSpGpbAhnlUQm5SwNwxUtsSEcNdywhpRaUWQoojUhCpsa5TluyoYOwVnvuw4-ZY2dWPlNcOmlwBzT5I9ylqjznlLBxxi0EetgX2XYCYzEV3UiVSe-q0vsuGffbat3_4Ni-jT9VWS9wsZOf_wpZHgReUELLp7vZmKCGb9c3BJB6CeiJX5e</recordid><startdate>201405</startdate><enddate>201405</enddate><creator>Duesterdieck-Zellmer, K. F.</creator><creator>Riehl, J. H.</creator><creator>McKenzie, E. C.</creator><creator>Firshman, A. M</creator><creator>Payton, M. E.</creator><creator>Gorman, M. E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2641-3105</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201405</creationdate><title>Effects of abdominocentesis technique on peritoneal fluid and clinical variables in horses</title><author>Duesterdieck-Zellmer, K. F. ; Riehl, J. H. ; McKenzie, E. C. ; Firshman, A. M ; Payton, M. E. ; Gorman, M. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3355-5069aa01553ad2549a0f7348f419381f250d5f4d28ec30f303b22c1fb0661d8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>abdominocentesis</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>cannula</topic><topic>horse</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>needle</topic><topic>technique</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duesterdieck-Zellmer, K. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riehl, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, E. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firshman, A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payton, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorman, M. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Equine veterinary education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duesterdieck-Zellmer, K. F.</au><au>Riehl, J. H.</au><au>McKenzie, E. C.</au><au>Firshman, A. M</au><au>Payton, M. E.</au><au>Gorman, M. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of abdominocentesis technique on peritoneal fluid and clinical variables in horses</atitle><jtitle>Equine veterinary education</jtitle><addtitle>Equine Veterinary Education</addtitle><date>2014-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>262</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>262-268</pages><issn>0957-7734</issn><eissn>2042-3292</eissn><abstract>Summary Eleven healthy horses underwent 5 repeated abdominocenteses, with either a sharp‐tipped spinal needle or a blunt‐tipped teat cannula to investigate possible differences in success rate, sample volume, depth at which a sample was obtained, length of procedure, complications and cytological variables. Variables were analysed with a repeated‐measures ANOVA or Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05). Success rate, sample volume, length of procedure, occurrence of haemorrhage during the procedure and incidence of grossly visible blood contamination were not different between techniques or over time. Depth at which samples were obtained was greater using a cannula than a needle (P&lt;0.02), and samples were obtained with either technique at a greater depth than abdominal wall thickness assessed via ultrasound (P&lt;0.014). Peritoneal fluid total and differential nucleated cell counts, and total protein concentration did not differ between techniques or over time. Red blood cell count in the least blood contaminated fraction of each sample was not affected by time, but it was lower after needle abdominocentesis than after cannula abdominocentesis (P = 0.04). Swelling of abdominocentesis sites increased with both techniques over time (P&lt;0.05) and was more severe in horses undergoing cannula abdominocentesis (P&lt;0.05). Enterocentesis occurred with a spinal needle in one horse, but no subsequent complications were noted. Both techniques appear to be safe and reliable for abdominocentesis in healthy horses. Using a blunt‐tipped cannula, as opposed to a needle, is likely to result in greater subcutaneous swelling. Both the cannula and needle must be long enough to penetrate well beyond the thickness of the abdominal wall to achieve successful peritoneal fluid collection.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/eve.12155</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2641-3105</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-7734
ispartof Equine veterinary education, 2014-05, Vol.26 (5), p.262-268
issn 0957-7734
2042-3292
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1513506064
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects abdominocentesis
Blood
cannula
horse
Horses
Medical research
needle
technique
title Effects of abdominocentesis technique on peritoneal fluid and clinical variables in horses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T09%3A30%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20abdominocentesis%20technique%20on%20peritoneal%20fluid%20and%20clinical%20variables%20in%20horses&rft.jtitle=Equine%20veterinary%20education&rft.au=Duesterdieck-Zellmer,%20K.%20F.&rft.date=2014-05&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=262&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=262-268&rft.issn=0957-7734&rft.eissn=2042-3292&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/eve.12155&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3268812941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3355-5069aa01553ad2549a0f7348f419381f250d5f4d28ec30f303b22c1fb0661d8d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1513506064&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true