STUDENT EVALUATION OF TEACHING AS IF CRITICAL THINKING REALLY MATTERED

Argues that student evaluations of teachers (SETs) in their current format are fundamentally a student-controlled process, but that students are not adequately prepared for such control. Advocates greater teacher control in the SET process and presents sample evaluation criteria from an ideal proces...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of general education (University Park, Pa.) Pa.), 1997-01, Vol.46 (3), p.192-206
Main Authors: Browne, M. Neil, Hoag, John H., Myers, Melanie L., Hiers, Wesley J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Classroom environment
College instruction
Critical Thinking
Enthusiasm
Evaluation Criteria
Heirs
Higher education
Postsecondary Education
Program Effectiveness
Scholarly Essay
Student evaluation
Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance
Student Role
Teacher Effectiveness
Teacher Role
Teachers
Universities
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 206
container_issue 3
container_start_page 192
container_title The Journal of general education (University Park, Pa.)
container_volume 46
creator Browne, M. Neil
Hoag, John H.
Myers, Melanie L.
Hiers, Wesley J.
description Argues that student evaluations of teachers (SETs) in their current format are fundamentally a student-controlled process, but that students are not adequately prepared for such control. Advocates greater teacher control in the SET process and presents sample evaluation criteria from an ideal process in which teachers interested in critical thinking design evaluations. (46 citations) (BCY)
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1518361470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ550920</ericid><jstor_id>27797342</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27797342</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e710-e3809b9241e5aee5bcddfaed0b3e32356c635bd62f0e9c2feebeb28a3352782b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j1FLwzAUhYMoOKf_QCHgc-EmaZLmMXTpVq0bbJngU2naW9hQN9vtYf_ejolPF853zrmcKzJikuuIg4JrMgLgLBJK6Vty1_dbADCxNCOSrfx64uaeundbrK3PF3O6yKh3Np3l8ym1K5pnNF3mPk9tQf0gvp71pbNF8UHfrPdu6Sb35KatPnt8-Ltj4jPn01lULKbnYISaQYQiARMMjxnKClGGumnaChsIAgUXUtVKyNAo3gKamreIAQNPKiGGJQkPYkyeL7X7bvdzxP5QbnfH7nv4WDLJEqFYrGFwPV5c2G3qct9tvqruVLoXKcHwM3664G1_2HX_nGtttIi5-AVTLVRi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1518361470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>STUDENT EVALUATION OF TEACHING AS IF CRITICAL THINKING REALLY MATTERED</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Browne, M. Neil ; Hoag, John H. ; Myers, Melanie L. ; Hiers, Wesley J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Browne, M. Neil ; Hoag, John H. ; Myers, Melanie L. ; Hiers, Wesley J.</creatorcontrib><description>Argues that student evaluations of teachers (SETs) in their current format are fundamentally a student-controlled process, but that students are not adequately prepared for such control. Advocates greater teacher control in the SET process and presents sample evaluation criteria from an ideal process in which teachers interested in critical thinking design evaluations. (46 citations) (BCY)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-3667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-2060</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University Park, Pa., etc: Pennsylvania State University Press</publisher><subject>Classroom environment ; College instruction ; Critical Thinking ; Enthusiasm ; Evaluation Criteria ; Heirs ; Higher education ; Postsecondary Education ; Program Effectiveness ; Scholarly Essay ; Student evaluation ; Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance ; Student Role ; Teacher Effectiveness ; Teacher Role ; Teachers ; Universities</subject><ispartof>The Journal of general education (University Park, Pa.), 1997-01, Vol.46 (3), p.192-206</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1997 The Pennsylvania State University</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27797342$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27797342$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ550920$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Browne, M. Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoag, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Melanie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiers, Wesley J.</creatorcontrib><title>STUDENT EVALUATION OF TEACHING AS IF CRITICAL THINKING REALLY MATTERED</title><title>The Journal of general education (University Park, Pa.)</title><description>Argues that student evaluations of teachers (SETs) in their current format are fundamentally a student-controlled process, but that students are not adequately prepared for such control. Advocates greater teacher control in the SET process and presents sample evaluation criteria from an ideal process in which teachers interested in critical thinking design evaluations. (46 citations) (BCY)</description><subject>Classroom environment</subject><subject>College instruction</subject><subject>Critical Thinking</subject><subject>Enthusiasm</subject><subject>Evaluation Criteria</subject><subject>Heirs</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Postsecondary Education</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Scholarly Essay</subject><subject>Student evaluation</subject><subject>Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance</subject><subject>Student Role</subject><subject>Teacher Effectiveness</subject><subject>Teacher Role</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>0021-3667</issn><issn>1527-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNo9j1FLwzAUhYMoOKf_QCHgc-EmaZLmMXTpVq0bbJngU2naW9hQN9vtYf_ejolPF853zrmcKzJikuuIg4JrMgLgLBJK6Vty1_dbADCxNCOSrfx64uaeundbrK3PF3O6yKh3Np3l8ym1K5pnNF3mPk9tQf0gvp71pbNF8UHfrPdu6Sb35KatPnt8-Ltj4jPn01lULKbnYISaQYQiARMMjxnKClGGumnaChsIAgUXUtVKyNAo3gKamreIAQNPKiGGJQkPYkyeL7X7bvdzxP5QbnfH7nv4WDLJEqFYrGFwPV5c2G3qct9tvqruVLoXKcHwM3664G1_2HX_nGtttIi5-AVTLVRi</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>Browne, M. Neil</creator><creator>Hoag, John H.</creator><creator>Myers, Melanie L.</creator><creator>Hiers, Wesley J.</creator><general>Pennsylvania State University Press</general><general>Pennsylvania State University Press, etc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>STUDENT EVALUATION OF TEACHING AS IF CRITICAL THINKING REALLY MATTERED</title><author>Browne, M. Neil ; Hoag, John H. ; Myers, Melanie L. ; Hiers, Wesley J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e710-e3809b9241e5aee5bcddfaed0b3e32356c635bd62f0e9c2feebeb28a3352782b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Classroom environment</topic><topic>College instruction</topic><topic>Critical Thinking</topic><topic>Enthusiasm</topic><topic>Evaluation Criteria</topic><topic>Heirs</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Postsecondary Education</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Scholarly Essay</topic><topic>Student evaluation</topic><topic>Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance</topic><topic>Student Role</topic><topic>Teacher Effectiveness</topic><topic>Teacher Role</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Browne, M. Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoag, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Melanie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiers, Wesley J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>The Journal of general education (University Park, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Browne, M. Neil</au><au>Hoag, John H.</au><au>Myers, Melanie L.</au><au>Hiers, Wesley J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ550920</ericid><atitle>STUDENT EVALUATION OF TEACHING AS IF CRITICAL THINKING REALLY MATTERED</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of general education (University Park, Pa.)</jtitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>192</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>192-206</pages><issn>0021-3667</issn><eissn>1527-2060</eissn><abstract>Argues that student evaluations of teachers (SETs) in their current format are fundamentally a student-controlled process, but that students are not adequately prepared for such control. Advocates greater teacher control in the SET process and presents sample evaluation criteria from an ideal process in which teachers interested in critical thinking design evaluations. (46 citations) (BCY)</abstract><cop>University Park, Pa., etc</cop><pub>Pennsylvania State University Press</pub><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-3667
ispartof The Journal of general education (University Park, Pa.), 1997-01, Vol.46 (3), p.192-206
issn 0021-3667
1527-2060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1518361470
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ERIC
subjects Classroom environment
College instruction
Critical Thinking
Enthusiasm
Evaluation Criteria
Heirs
Higher education
Postsecondary Education
Program Effectiveness
Scholarly Essay
Student evaluation
Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance
Student Role
Teacher Effectiveness
Teacher Role
Teachers
Universities
title STUDENT EVALUATION OF TEACHING AS IF CRITICAL THINKING REALLY MATTERED
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A05%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=STUDENT%20EVALUATION%20OF%20TEACHING%20AS%20IF%20CRITICAL%20THINKING%20REALLY%20MATTERED&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20general%20education%20(University%20Park,%20Pa.)&rft.au=Browne,%20M.%20Neil&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=192&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=192-206&rft.issn=0021-3667&rft.eissn=1527-2060&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27797342%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e710-e3809b9241e5aee5bcddfaed0b3e32356c635bd62f0e9c2feebeb28a3352782b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1518361470&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ550920&rft_jstor_id=27797342&rfr_iscdi=true