Loading…

Structure and Physical Properties of Plant Wax Crystal Networks and Their Relationship to Oil Binding Capacity

The microstructure, melting and crystallization behavior, rheological properties and oil binding capacity of crystalline networks of plant-derived waxes in edible oil were studied and then compared amongst different wax types. The critical concentrations for oleogelation of canola oil by rice bran w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 2014-06, Vol.91 (6), p.885-903
Main Authors: Blake, Alexia I., Co, Edmund D., Marangoni, Alejandro G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4345-609e142dcd2eeaf0555249e23045da52fecd75cd94a744e597990e4c9c0d1fa73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4345-609e142dcd2eeaf0555249e23045da52fecd75cd94a744e597990e4c9c0d1fa73
container_end_page 903
container_issue 6
container_start_page 885
container_title Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society
container_volume 91
creator Blake, Alexia I.
Co, Edmund D.
Marangoni, Alejandro G.
description The microstructure, melting and crystallization behavior, rheological properties and oil binding capacity of crystalline networks of plant-derived waxes in edible oil were studied and then compared amongst different wax types. The critical concentrations for oleogelation of canola oil by rice bran wax (RBX), sunflower wax, candelilla wax, and carnauba wax were 1, 1, 2, and 4 %, respectively, suggesting RBX and sunflower wax are more efficient structurants. A phenomenological two-phase exponential decay model was implemented to quantify the oil-binding capacity of these oleogels. Parameters obtained from this empirical model were then evaluated against microscale structural attributes such as crystal size, mass distribution and porosity to determine the structural dependence of oil-binding capacity. Gels containing candelilla wax exhibited the greatest oil-binding capacity, as they retained nearly 90 % of their oil. This is due to the small crystal size as well as the spatial distribution of these crystals. Using a microscopic to macroscopic approach, this study examines how the structural characteristics unique to each wax and resulting oleogel system affect functionality and macroscopic behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11746-014-2435-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1530071062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3318076211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4345-609e142dcd2eeaf0555249e23045da52fecd75cd94a744e597990e4c9c0d1fa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9XJ13Z71OIXiLv4gd5CSKdutLY1yaL990brwYt4GoZ5n5nhIWSfwSEDyI8CY7mcZcBkxqVQGWyQCVNqnhVCsE0yAQCRAWeP22QnhOfUzgVXE9LeRr-2ce2Rmraiy9UQnDUNXfquRx8dBtrVdNmYNtIH80FLP4SY5tcY3zv_Er6puxU6T2-wMdF1bVi5nsaOLlxDT1xbufaJlqY31sVhl2zVpgm491On5P7s9K68yK4W55fl8VVmpZAqm0GBTPLKVhzR1KCU4rJALkCqyiheo61yZatCmlxKVEVeFIDSFhYqVptcTMnBuLf33dsaQ9TP3dq36aRmSiRhDGY8pdiYsr4LwWOte-9ejR80A_2lVY9addKqv7RqSEw-Mu-uweF_QB8vyluYz1Ui-UiGBLVP6H_99Oe5T4Wni18</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1530071062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structure and Physical Properties of Plant Wax Crystal Networks and Their Relationship to Oil Binding Capacity</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><creator>Blake, Alexia I. ; Co, Edmund D. ; Marangoni, Alejandro G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blake, Alexia I. ; Co, Edmund D. ; Marangoni, Alejandro G.</creatorcontrib><description>The microstructure, melting and crystallization behavior, rheological properties and oil binding capacity of crystalline networks of plant-derived waxes in edible oil were studied and then compared amongst different wax types. The critical concentrations for oleogelation of canola oil by rice bran wax (RBX), sunflower wax, candelilla wax, and carnauba wax were 1, 1, 2, and 4 %, respectively, suggesting RBX and sunflower wax are more efficient structurants. A phenomenological two-phase exponential decay model was implemented to quantify the oil-binding capacity of these oleogels. Parameters obtained from this empirical model were then evaluated against microscale structural attributes such as crystal size, mass distribution and porosity to determine the structural dependence of oil-binding capacity. Gels containing candelilla wax exhibited the greatest oil-binding capacity, as they retained nearly 90 % of their oil. This is due to the small crystal size as well as the spatial distribution of these crystals. Using a microscopic to macroscopic approach, this study examines how the structural characteristics unique to each wax and resulting oleogel system affect functionality and macroscopic behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-021X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11746-014-2435-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Biomaterials ; Biotechnology ; Canola oil ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Crystal structure ; Crystallization ; Crystals ; Edible oils ; Food Science ; Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering ; Microstructure ; Network ; Oil binding ; Oils &amp; fats ; Oleogel ; Original Paper ; Physical properties ; Porosity ; Rheology ; Rice bran ; Spatial distribution ; Wax</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 2014-06, Vol.91 (6), p.885-903</ispartof><rights>AOCS 2014</rights><rights>2014 American Oil Chemists' Society (AOCS)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4345-609e142dcd2eeaf0555249e23045da52fecd75cd94a744e597990e4c9c0d1fa73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4345-609e142dcd2eeaf0555249e23045da52fecd75cd94a744e597990e4c9c0d1fa73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11746-014-2435-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11746-014-2435-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1643,27922,27923,41416,42485,51316</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blake, Alexia I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Co, Edmund D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marangoni, Alejandro G.</creatorcontrib><title>Structure and Physical Properties of Plant Wax Crystal Networks and Their Relationship to Oil Binding Capacity</title><title>Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society</title><addtitle>J Am Oil Chem Soc</addtitle><description>The microstructure, melting and crystallization behavior, rheological properties and oil binding capacity of crystalline networks of plant-derived waxes in edible oil were studied and then compared amongst different wax types. The critical concentrations for oleogelation of canola oil by rice bran wax (RBX), sunflower wax, candelilla wax, and carnauba wax were 1, 1, 2, and 4 %, respectively, suggesting RBX and sunflower wax are more efficient structurants. A phenomenological two-phase exponential decay model was implemented to quantify the oil-binding capacity of these oleogels. Parameters obtained from this empirical model were then evaluated against microscale structural attributes such as crystal size, mass distribution and porosity to determine the structural dependence of oil-binding capacity. Gels containing candelilla wax exhibited the greatest oil-binding capacity, as they retained nearly 90 % of their oil. This is due to the small crystal size as well as the spatial distribution of these crystals. Using a microscopic to macroscopic approach, this study examines how the structural characteristics unique to each wax and resulting oleogel system affect functionality and macroscopic behavior.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Canola oil</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Crystal structure</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>Edible oils</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering</subject><subject>Microstructure</subject><subject>Network</subject><subject>Oil binding</subject><subject>Oils &amp; fats</subject><subject>Oleogel</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Rheology</subject><subject>Rice bran</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Wax</subject><issn>0003-021X</issn><issn>1558-9331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9XJ13Z71OIXiLv4gd5CSKdutLY1yaL990brwYt4GoZ5n5nhIWSfwSEDyI8CY7mcZcBkxqVQGWyQCVNqnhVCsE0yAQCRAWeP22QnhOfUzgVXE9LeRr-2ce2Rmraiy9UQnDUNXfquRx8dBtrVdNmYNtIH80FLP4SY5tcY3zv_Er6puxU6T2-wMdF1bVi5nsaOLlxDT1xbufaJlqY31sVhl2zVpgm491On5P7s9K68yK4W55fl8VVmpZAqm0GBTPLKVhzR1KCU4rJALkCqyiheo61yZatCmlxKVEVeFIDSFhYqVptcTMnBuLf33dsaQ9TP3dq36aRmSiRhDGY8pdiYsr4LwWOte-9ejR80A_2lVY9addKqv7RqSEw-Mu-uweF_QB8vyluYz1Ui-UiGBLVP6H_99Oe5T4Wni18</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Blake, Alexia I.</creator><creator>Co, Edmund D.</creator><creator>Marangoni, Alejandro G.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>Structure and Physical Properties of Plant Wax Crystal Networks and Their Relationship to Oil Binding Capacity</title><author>Blake, Alexia I. ; Co, Edmund D. ; Marangoni, Alejandro G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4345-609e142dcd2eeaf0555249e23045da52fecd75cd94a744e597990e4c9c0d1fa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Canola oil</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Crystal structure</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>Edible oils</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering</topic><topic>Microstructure</topic><topic>Network</topic><topic>Oil binding</topic><topic>Oils &amp; fats</topic><topic>Oleogel</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Rheology</topic><topic>Rice bran</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Wax</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blake, Alexia I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Co, Edmund D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marangoni, Alejandro G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blake, Alexia I.</au><au>Co, Edmund D.</au><au>Marangoni, Alejandro G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structure and Physical Properties of Plant Wax Crystal Networks and Their Relationship to Oil Binding Capacity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society</jtitle><stitle>J Am Oil Chem Soc</stitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>885</spage><epage>903</epage><pages>885-903</pages><issn>0003-021X</issn><eissn>1558-9331</eissn><abstract>The microstructure, melting and crystallization behavior, rheological properties and oil binding capacity of crystalline networks of plant-derived waxes in edible oil were studied and then compared amongst different wax types. The critical concentrations for oleogelation of canola oil by rice bran wax (RBX), sunflower wax, candelilla wax, and carnauba wax were 1, 1, 2, and 4 %, respectively, suggesting RBX and sunflower wax are more efficient structurants. A phenomenological two-phase exponential decay model was implemented to quantify the oil-binding capacity of these oleogels. Parameters obtained from this empirical model were then evaluated against microscale structural attributes such as crystal size, mass distribution and porosity to determine the structural dependence of oil-binding capacity. Gels containing candelilla wax exhibited the greatest oil-binding capacity, as they retained nearly 90 % of their oil. This is due to the small crystal size as well as the spatial distribution of these crystals. Using a microscopic to macroscopic approach, this study examines how the structural characteristics unique to each wax and resulting oleogel system affect functionality and macroscopic behavior.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11746-014-2435-0</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-021X
ispartof Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 2014-06, Vol.91 (6), p.885-903
issn 0003-021X
1558-9331
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1530071062
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access
subjects Agriculture
Biomaterials
Biotechnology
Canola oil
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Crystal structure
Crystallization
Crystals
Edible oils
Food Science
Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering
Microstructure
Network
Oil binding
Oils & fats
Oleogel
Original Paper
Physical properties
Porosity
Rheology
Rice bran
Spatial distribution
Wax
title Structure and Physical Properties of Plant Wax Crystal Networks and Their Relationship to Oil Binding Capacity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A02%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structure%20and%20Physical%20Properties%20of%20Plant%20Wax%20Crystal%20Networks%20and%20Their%20Relationship%20to%20Oil%20Binding%20Capacity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Oil%20Chemists'%20Society&rft.au=Blake,%20Alexia%20I.&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=885&rft.epage=903&rft.pages=885-903&rft.issn=0003-021X&rft.eissn=1558-9331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11746-014-2435-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3318076211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4345-609e142dcd2eeaf0555249e23045da52fecd75cd94a744e597990e4c9c0d1fa73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1530071062&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true