Loading…
Structure and Physical Properties of Plant Wax Crystal Networks and Their Relationship to Oil Binding Capacity
The microstructure, melting and crystallization behavior, rheological properties and oil binding capacity of crystalline networks of plant-derived waxes in edible oil were studied and then compared amongst different wax types. The critical concentrations for oleogelation of canola oil by rice bran w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 2014-06, Vol.91 (6), p.885-903 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4345-609e142dcd2eeaf0555249e23045da52fecd75cd94a744e597990e4c9c0d1fa73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4345-609e142dcd2eeaf0555249e23045da52fecd75cd94a744e597990e4c9c0d1fa73 |
container_end_page | 903 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 885 |
container_title | Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Blake, Alexia I. Co, Edmund D. Marangoni, Alejandro G. |
description | The microstructure, melting and crystallization behavior, rheological properties and oil binding capacity of crystalline networks of plant-derived waxes in edible oil were studied and then compared amongst different wax types. The critical concentrations for oleogelation of canola oil by rice bran wax (RBX), sunflower wax, candelilla wax, and carnauba wax were 1, 1, 2, and 4 %, respectively, suggesting RBX and sunflower wax are more efficient structurants. A phenomenological two-phase exponential decay model was implemented to quantify the oil-binding capacity of these oleogels. Parameters obtained from this empirical model were then evaluated against microscale structural attributes such as crystal size, mass distribution and porosity to determine the structural dependence of oil-binding capacity. Gels containing candelilla wax exhibited the greatest oil-binding capacity, as they retained nearly 90 % of their oil. This is due to the small crystal size as well as the spatial distribution of these crystals. Using a microscopic to macroscopic approach, this study examines how the structural characteristics unique to each wax and resulting oleogel system affect functionality and macroscopic behavior. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11746-014-2435-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1530071062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3318076211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4345-609e142dcd2eeaf0555249e23045da52fecd75cd94a744e597990e4c9c0d1fa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9XJ13Z71OIXiLv4gd5CSKdutLY1yaL990brwYt4GoZ5n5nhIWSfwSEDyI8CY7mcZcBkxqVQGWyQCVNqnhVCsE0yAQCRAWeP22QnhOfUzgVXE9LeRr-2ce2Rmraiy9UQnDUNXfquRx8dBtrVdNmYNtIH80FLP4SY5tcY3zv_Er6puxU6T2-wMdF1bVi5nsaOLlxDT1xbufaJlqY31sVhl2zVpgm491On5P7s9K68yK4W55fl8VVmpZAqm0GBTPLKVhzR1KCU4rJALkCqyiheo61yZatCmlxKVEVeFIDSFhYqVptcTMnBuLf33dsaQ9TP3dq36aRmSiRhDGY8pdiYsr4LwWOte-9ejR80A_2lVY9addKqv7RqSEw-Mu-uweF_QB8vyluYz1Ui-UiGBLVP6H_99Oe5T4Wni18</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1530071062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structure and Physical Properties of Plant Wax Crystal Networks and Their Relationship to Oil Binding Capacity</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><creator>Blake, Alexia I. ; Co, Edmund D. ; Marangoni, Alejandro G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blake, Alexia I. ; Co, Edmund D. ; Marangoni, Alejandro G.</creatorcontrib><description>The microstructure, melting and crystallization behavior, rheological properties and oil binding capacity of crystalline networks of plant-derived waxes in edible oil were studied and then compared amongst different wax types. The critical concentrations for oleogelation of canola oil by rice bran wax (RBX), sunflower wax, candelilla wax, and carnauba wax were 1, 1, 2, and 4 %, respectively, suggesting RBX and sunflower wax are more efficient structurants. A phenomenological two-phase exponential decay model was implemented to quantify the oil-binding capacity of these oleogels. Parameters obtained from this empirical model were then evaluated against microscale structural attributes such as crystal size, mass distribution and porosity to determine the structural dependence of oil-binding capacity. Gels containing candelilla wax exhibited the greatest oil-binding capacity, as they retained nearly 90 % of their oil. This is due to the small crystal size as well as the spatial distribution of these crystals. Using a microscopic to macroscopic approach, this study examines how the structural characteristics unique to each wax and resulting oleogel system affect functionality and macroscopic behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-021X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11746-014-2435-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Biomaterials ; Biotechnology ; Canola oil ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Crystal structure ; Crystallization ; Crystals ; Edible oils ; Food Science ; Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering ; Microstructure ; Network ; Oil binding ; Oils & fats ; Oleogel ; Original Paper ; Physical properties ; Porosity ; Rheology ; Rice bran ; Spatial distribution ; Wax</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 2014-06, Vol.91 (6), p.885-903</ispartof><rights>AOCS 2014</rights><rights>2014 American Oil Chemists' Society (AOCS)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4345-609e142dcd2eeaf0555249e23045da52fecd75cd94a744e597990e4c9c0d1fa73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4345-609e142dcd2eeaf0555249e23045da52fecd75cd94a744e597990e4c9c0d1fa73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11746-014-2435-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11746-014-2435-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1643,27922,27923,41416,42485,51316</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blake, Alexia I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Co, Edmund D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marangoni, Alejandro G.</creatorcontrib><title>Structure and Physical Properties of Plant Wax Crystal Networks and Their Relationship to Oil Binding Capacity</title><title>Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society</title><addtitle>J Am Oil Chem Soc</addtitle><description>The microstructure, melting and crystallization behavior, rheological properties and oil binding capacity of crystalline networks of plant-derived waxes in edible oil were studied and then compared amongst different wax types. The critical concentrations for oleogelation of canola oil by rice bran wax (RBX), sunflower wax, candelilla wax, and carnauba wax were 1, 1, 2, and 4 %, respectively, suggesting RBX and sunflower wax are more efficient structurants. A phenomenological two-phase exponential decay model was implemented to quantify the oil-binding capacity of these oleogels. Parameters obtained from this empirical model were then evaluated against microscale structural attributes such as crystal size, mass distribution and porosity to determine the structural dependence of oil-binding capacity. Gels containing candelilla wax exhibited the greatest oil-binding capacity, as they retained nearly 90 % of their oil. This is due to the small crystal size as well as the spatial distribution of these crystals. Using a microscopic to macroscopic approach, this study examines how the structural characteristics unique to each wax and resulting oleogel system affect functionality and macroscopic behavior.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Canola oil</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Crystal structure</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>Edible oils</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering</subject><subject>Microstructure</subject><subject>Network</subject><subject>Oil binding</subject><subject>Oils & fats</subject><subject>Oleogel</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Rheology</subject><subject>Rice bran</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Wax</subject><issn>0003-021X</issn><issn>1558-9331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9XJ13Z71OIXiLv4gd5CSKdutLY1yaL990brwYt4GoZ5n5nhIWSfwSEDyI8CY7mcZcBkxqVQGWyQCVNqnhVCsE0yAQCRAWeP22QnhOfUzgVXE9LeRr-2ce2Rmraiy9UQnDUNXfquRx8dBtrVdNmYNtIH80FLP4SY5tcY3zv_Er6puxU6T2-wMdF1bVi5nsaOLlxDT1xbufaJlqY31sVhl2zVpgm491On5P7s9K68yK4W55fl8VVmpZAqm0GBTPLKVhzR1KCU4rJALkCqyiheo61yZatCmlxKVEVeFIDSFhYqVptcTMnBuLf33dsaQ9TP3dq36aRmSiRhDGY8pdiYsr4LwWOte-9ejR80A_2lVY9addKqv7RqSEw-Mu-uweF_QB8vyluYz1Ui-UiGBLVP6H_99Oe5T4Wni18</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Blake, Alexia I.</creator><creator>Co, Edmund D.</creator><creator>Marangoni, Alejandro G.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>Structure and Physical Properties of Plant Wax Crystal Networks and Their Relationship to Oil Binding Capacity</title><author>Blake, Alexia I. ; Co, Edmund D. ; Marangoni, Alejandro G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4345-609e142dcd2eeaf0555249e23045da52fecd75cd94a744e597990e4c9c0d1fa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Canola oil</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Crystal structure</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>Edible oils</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering</topic><topic>Microstructure</topic><topic>Network</topic><topic>Oil binding</topic><topic>Oils & fats</topic><topic>Oleogel</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Rheology</topic><topic>Rice bran</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Wax</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blake, Alexia I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Co, Edmund D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marangoni, Alejandro G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blake, Alexia I.</au><au>Co, Edmund D.</au><au>Marangoni, Alejandro G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structure and Physical Properties of Plant Wax Crystal Networks and Their Relationship to Oil Binding Capacity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society</jtitle><stitle>J Am Oil Chem Soc</stitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>885</spage><epage>903</epage><pages>885-903</pages><issn>0003-021X</issn><eissn>1558-9331</eissn><abstract>The microstructure, melting and crystallization behavior, rheological properties and oil binding capacity of crystalline networks of plant-derived waxes in edible oil were studied and then compared amongst different wax types. The critical concentrations for oleogelation of canola oil by rice bran wax (RBX), sunflower wax, candelilla wax, and carnauba wax were 1, 1, 2, and 4 %, respectively, suggesting RBX and sunflower wax are more efficient structurants. A phenomenological two-phase exponential decay model was implemented to quantify the oil-binding capacity of these oleogels. Parameters obtained from this empirical model were then evaluated against microscale structural attributes such as crystal size, mass distribution and porosity to determine the structural dependence of oil-binding capacity. Gels containing candelilla wax exhibited the greatest oil-binding capacity, as they retained nearly 90 % of their oil. This is due to the small crystal size as well as the spatial distribution of these crystals. Using a microscopic to macroscopic approach, this study examines how the structural characteristics unique to each wax and resulting oleogel system affect functionality and macroscopic behavior.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11746-014-2435-0</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-021X |
ispartof | Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 2014-06, Vol.91 (6), p.885-903 |
issn | 0003-021X 1558-9331 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1530071062 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access |
subjects | Agriculture Biomaterials Biotechnology Canola oil Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Crystal structure Crystallization Crystals Edible oils Food Science Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering Microstructure Network Oil binding Oils & fats Oleogel Original Paper Physical properties Porosity Rheology Rice bran Spatial distribution Wax |
title | Structure and Physical Properties of Plant Wax Crystal Networks and Their Relationship to Oil Binding Capacity |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A02%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structure%20and%20Physical%20Properties%20of%20Plant%20Wax%20Crystal%20Networks%20and%20Their%20Relationship%20to%20Oil%20Binding%20Capacity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Oil%20Chemists'%20Society&rft.au=Blake,%20Alexia%20I.&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=885&rft.epage=903&rft.pages=885-903&rft.issn=0003-021X&rft.eissn=1558-9331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11746-014-2435-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3318076211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4345-609e142dcd2eeaf0555249e23045da52fecd75cd94a744e597990e4c9c0d1fa73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1530071062&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |