Loading…

Comparative vaccine efficacy of different isoforms of recombinant protective antigen againstBacillus anthracisspore challenge in rabbits

The next-generation human anthrax vaccine developed by the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) is based upon purifiedBacillus anthracisrecombinant protective antigen (rPA) adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant (Alhydrogel). In addition to being safe, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vaccine 2006-04, Vol.24 (17), p.3469
Main Authors: Ribot, WJ, Powell, BS, Ivins, BE, Little, SF, Johnson, WM, Hoover, TA, Norris, SL, Adamovicz, JJ, Friedlander, AM, Andrews, GP
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 17
container_start_page 3469
container_title Vaccine
container_volume 24
creator Ribot, WJ
Powell, BS
Ivins, BE
Little, SF
Johnson, WM
Hoover, TA
Norris, SL
Adamovicz, JJ
Friedlander, AM
Andrews, GP
description The next-generation human anthrax vaccine developed by the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) is based upon purifiedBacillus anthracisrecombinant protective antigen (rPA) adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant (Alhydrogel). In addition to being safe, and effective, it is important that such a vaccine be fully characterized. Four major protein isoforms detected in purified rPA by native PAGE during research and development were reduced to two primary isoforms in bulk material produced by an improved process performed under Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Analysis of both rPA preparations by a protein-isoaspartyl-methyl-transferase assay (PIMT) revealed the presence of increasing amounts of iso-aspartic acid correlating with isoform content and suggesting deamidation as the source of rPA charge heterogeneity. Additional purification of GMP rPA by anion exchange chromatography separated and enriched the two principal isoforms. The in vitro and in vivo biological activities of each isoform were measured in comparison to the whole GMP preparation. There was no significant difference in the biological activity of each isoform compared to GMP rPA when analyzed in the presence of lethal factor using a macrophage lysis assay. Vaccination with the two individual isoforms revealed no differences in cytotoxicity neutralization antibody titers when compared to the GMP preparation although one isoform induced more anti-PA IgG antibody than the GMP material. Most importantly, each of the two isoforms as well as the whole GMP preparation protected 90-100% of rabbits challenged parenterally with 129 LD50ofB. anthracisAmes spores. The equivalent biological activity and vaccine efficacy of the two isoforms suggests that further processing to separate isoforms is unnecessary for continued testing of this next-generation anthrax vaccine.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.02.013
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1547144955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3379224401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_15471449553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjE1OwzAQhS0EEuXnCEiWWCeM89d2SwXiACzYVRMzTidK7OBxKnEDjk2KegBWT-97T59SDwZyA6Z56vMjWsue8gKgyaHIwZQXamU26zIrarO5VCsomiqrDHxcqxuRHgDq0mxX6mcXxgkjJj6SPms0OccW7bcOTn-ycxTJJ80SXIijnGgkG8aWPS58iiGR_RMslTvyGjtkL-kZLQ_DLCd-iEsRmUIkbQ84DOQ70ux1xLblJHfqyuEgdH_OW_X4-vK-e8sW_ddMkvZ9mKNfpr2pq7Wpqm1dl_97_QKg_V5c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1547144955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative vaccine efficacy of different isoforms of recombinant protective antigen againstBacillus anthracisspore challenge in rabbits</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Ribot, WJ ; Powell, BS ; Ivins, BE ; Little, SF ; Johnson, WM ; Hoover, TA ; Norris, SL ; Adamovicz, JJ ; Friedlander, AM ; Andrews, GP</creator><creatorcontrib>Ribot, WJ ; Powell, BS ; Ivins, BE ; Little, SF ; Johnson, WM ; Hoover, TA ; Norris, SL ; Adamovicz, JJ ; Friedlander, AM ; Andrews, GP</creatorcontrib><description>The next-generation human anthrax vaccine developed by the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) is based upon purifiedBacillus anthracisrecombinant protective antigen (rPA) adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant (Alhydrogel). In addition to being safe, and effective, it is important that such a vaccine be fully characterized. Four major protein isoforms detected in purified rPA by native PAGE during research and development were reduced to two primary isoforms in bulk material produced by an improved process performed under Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Analysis of both rPA preparations by a protein-isoaspartyl-methyl-transferase assay (PIMT) revealed the presence of increasing amounts of iso-aspartic acid correlating with isoform content and suggesting deamidation as the source of rPA charge heterogeneity. Additional purification of GMP rPA by anion exchange chromatography separated and enriched the two principal isoforms. The in vitro and in vivo biological activities of each isoform were measured in comparison to the whole GMP preparation. There was no significant difference in the biological activity of each isoform compared to GMP rPA when analyzed in the presence of lethal factor using a macrophage lysis assay. Vaccination with the two individual isoforms revealed no differences in cytotoxicity neutralization antibody titers when compared to the GMP preparation although one isoform induced more anti-PA IgG antibody than the GMP material. Most importantly, each of the two isoforms as well as the whole GMP preparation protected 90-100% of rabbits challenged parenterally with 129 LD50ofB. anthracisAmes spores. The equivalent biological activity and vaccine efficacy of the two isoforms suggests that further processing to separate isoforms is unnecessary for continued testing of this next-generation anthrax vaccine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.02.013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Animals ; Anion exchange ; Biological activity ; Biological products ; Chromatography ; Cytotoxicity ; Heterogeneity ; Infectious diseases ; Medical research ; Neutralization ; Product development ; Proteins ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2006-04, Vol.24 (17), p.3469</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Apr 24, 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ribot, WJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivins, BE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Little, SF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, WM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, TA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, SL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamovicz, JJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedlander, AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, GP</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative vaccine efficacy of different isoforms of recombinant protective antigen againstBacillus anthracisspore challenge in rabbits</title><title>Vaccine</title><description>The next-generation human anthrax vaccine developed by the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) is based upon purifiedBacillus anthracisrecombinant protective antigen (rPA) adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant (Alhydrogel). In addition to being safe, and effective, it is important that such a vaccine be fully characterized. Four major protein isoforms detected in purified rPA by native PAGE during research and development were reduced to two primary isoforms in bulk material produced by an improved process performed under Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Analysis of both rPA preparations by a protein-isoaspartyl-methyl-transferase assay (PIMT) revealed the presence of increasing amounts of iso-aspartic acid correlating with isoform content and suggesting deamidation as the source of rPA charge heterogeneity. Additional purification of GMP rPA by anion exchange chromatography separated and enriched the two principal isoforms. The in vitro and in vivo biological activities of each isoform were measured in comparison to the whole GMP preparation. There was no significant difference in the biological activity of each isoform compared to GMP rPA when analyzed in the presence of lethal factor using a macrophage lysis assay. Vaccination with the two individual isoforms revealed no differences in cytotoxicity neutralization antibody titers when compared to the GMP preparation although one isoform induced more anti-PA IgG antibody than the GMP material. Most importantly, each of the two isoforms as well as the whole GMP preparation protected 90-100% of rabbits challenged parenterally with 129 LD50ofB. anthracisAmes spores. The equivalent biological activity and vaccine efficacy of the two isoforms suggests that further processing to separate isoforms is unnecessary for continued testing of this next-generation anthrax vaccine.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anion exchange</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Biological products</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Neutralization</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjE1OwzAQhS0EEuXnCEiWWCeM89d2SwXiACzYVRMzTidK7OBxKnEDjk2KegBWT-97T59SDwZyA6Z56vMjWsue8gKgyaHIwZQXamU26zIrarO5VCsomiqrDHxcqxuRHgDq0mxX6mcXxgkjJj6SPms0OccW7bcOTn-ycxTJJ80SXIijnGgkG8aWPS58iiGR_RMslTvyGjtkL-kZLQ_DLCd-iEsRmUIkbQ84DOQ70ux1xLblJHfqyuEgdH_OW_X4-vK-e8sW_ddMkvZ9mKNfpr2pq7Wpqm1dl_97_QKg_V5c</recordid><startdate>20060424</startdate><enddate>20060424</enddate><creator>Ribot, WJ</creator><creator>Powell, BS</creator><creator>Ivins, BE</creator><creator>Little, SF</creator><creator>Johnson, WM</creator><creator>Hoover, TA</creator><creator>Norris, SL</creator><creator>Adamovicz, JJ</creator><creator>Friedlander, AM</creator><creator>Andrews, GP</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060424</creationdate><title>Comparative vaccine efficacy of different isoforms of recombinant protective antigen againstBacillus anthracisspore challenge in rabbits</title><author>Ribot, WJ ; Powell, BS ; Ivins, BE ; Little, SF ; Johnson, WM ; Hoover, TA ; Norris, SL ; Adamovicz, JJ ; Friedlander, AM ; Andrews, GP</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_15471449553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anion exchange</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Biological products</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Neutralization</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ribot, WJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivins, BE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Little, SF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, WM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, TA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, SL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamovicz, JJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedlander, AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, GP</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ribot, WJ</au><au>Powell, BS</au><au>Ivins, BE</au><au>Little, SF</au><au>Johnson, WM</au><au>Hoover, TA</au><au>Norris, SL</au><au>Adamovicz, JJ</au><au>Friedlander, AM</au><au>Andrews, GP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative vaccine efficacy of different isoforms of recombinant protective antigen againstBacillus anthracisspore challenge in rabbits</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><date>2006-04-24</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>3469</spage><pages>3469-</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>The next-generation human anthrax vaccine developed by the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) is based upon purifiedBacillus anthracisrecombinant protective antigen (rPA) adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant (Alhydrogel). In addition to being safe, and effective, it is important that such a vaccine be fully characterized. Four major protein isoforms detected in purified rPA by native PAGE during research and development were reduced to two primary isoforms in bulk material produced by an improved process performed under Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Analysis of both rPA preparations by a protein-isoaspartyl-methyl-transferase assay (PIMT) revealed the presence of increasing amounts of iso-aspartic acid correlating with isoform content and suggesting deamidation as the source of rPA charge heterogeneity. Additional purification of GMP rPA by anion exchange chromatography separated and enriched the two principal isoforms. The in vitro and in vivo biological activities of each isoform were measured in comparison to the whole GMP preparation. There was no significant difference in the biological activity of each isoform compared to GMP rPA when analyzed in the presence of lethal factor using a macrophage lysis assay. Vaccination with the two individual isoforms revealed no differences in cytotoxicity neutralization antibody titers when compared to the GMP preparation although one isoform induced more anti-PA IgG antibody than the GMP material. Most importantly, each of the two isoforms as well as the whole GMP preparation protected 90-100% of rabbits challenged parenterally with 129 LD50ofB. anthracisAmes spores. The equivalent biological activity and vaccine efficacy of the two isoforms suggests that further processing to separate isoforms is unnecessary for continued testing of this next-generation anthrax vaccine.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.02.013</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-410X
ispartof Vaccine, 2006-04, Vol.24 (17), p.3469
issn 0264-410X
1873-2518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1547144955
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Aluminum
Animals
Anion exchange
Biological activity
Biological products
Chromatography
Cytotoxicity
Heterogeneity
Infectious diseases
Medical research
Neutralization
Product development
Proteins
R&D
Research & development
Vaccines
title Comparative vaccine efficacy of different isoforms of recombinant protective antigen againstBacillus anthracisspore challenge in rabbits
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T17%3A56%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20vaccine%20efficacy%20of%20different%20isoforms%20of%20recombinant%20protective%20antigen%20againstBacillus%20anthracisspore%20challenge%20in%20rabbits&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Ribot,%20WJ&rft.date=2006-04-24&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=3469&rft.pages=3469-&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.02.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3379224401%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_15471449553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1547144955&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true