Loading…

A low-cost non-toxic post-growth activation step for CdTe solar cells

MgCl 2 is shown to be a cheap and non-toxic replacement for the costly and environmentally unfriendly salt CdCl 2 that has long been used as the ‘activation’ step in the production of cadmium telluride solar cells. Just add salt for cheaper solar cells Solar cells based on cadmium telluride, CdTe, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature (London) 2014-07, Vol.511 (7509), p.334-337
Main Authors: Major, J. D., Treharne, R. E., Phillips, L. J., Durose, K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-21b7626f19bfdcf2961b6d32332e7c2b9e4654b7335da15df3a29519f68c80323
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-21b7626f19bfdcf2961b6d32332e7c2b9e4654b7335da15df3a29519f68c80323
container_end_page 337
container_issue 7509
container_start_page 334
container_title Nature (London)
container_volume 511
creator Major, J. D.
Treharne, R. E.
Phillips, L. J.
Durose, K.
description MgCl 2 is shown to be a cheap and non-toxic replacement for the costly and environmentally unfriendly salt CdCl 2 that has long been used as the ‘activation’ step in the production of cadmium telluride solar cells. Just add salt for cheaper solar cells Solar cells based on cadmium telluride, CdTe, are among the most cost-efficient photovoltaic systems currently in use. But according to Jonathan Major et al ., there is still plenty of room for improvement. Specifically, they show that it is possible to replace the costly and environmentally unfriendly cadmium-containing salt (CdCl 2 ), which has long been used to 'activate' the CdTe during processing, with a cheap and non-toxic alternative, MgCl 2 . This change does not appear to be detrimental to device performance, yet shows great potential for reducing processing costs and environmental risk. Cadmium telluride, CdTe, is now firmly established as the basis for the market-leading thin-film solar-cell technology. With laboratory efficiencies approaching 20 per cent 1 , the research and development targets for CdTe are to reduce the cost of power generation further to less than half a US dollar per watt (ref. 2 ) and to minimize the environmental impact. A central part of the manufacturing process involves doping the polycrystalline thin-film CdTe with CdCl 2 . This acts to form the photovoltaic junction at the CdTe/CdS interface 3 , 4 and to passivate the grain boundaries 5 , making it essential in achieving high device efficiencies. However, although such doping has been almost ubiquitous since the development of this processing route over 25 years ago 6 , CdCl 2 has two severe disadvantages; it is both expensive (about 30 cents per gram) and a water-soluble source of toxic cadmium ions, presenting a risk to both operators and the environment during manufacture. Here we demonstrate that solar cells prepared using MgCl 2 , which is non-toxic and costs less than a cent per gram, have efficiencies (around 13%) identical to those of a CdCl 2 -processed control group. They have similar hole densities in the active layer (9 × 10 14  cm −3 ) and comparable impurity profiles for Cl and O, these elements being important p-type dopants for CdTe thin films. Contrary to expectation, CdCl 2 -processed and MgCl 2 -processed solar cells contain similar concentrations of Mg; this is because of Mg out-diffusion from the soda-lime glass substrates and is not disadvantageous to device performance. However, treatment with oth
doi_str_mv 10.1038/nature13435
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1547948144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A375585978</galeid><sourcerecordid>A375585978</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-21b7626f19bfdcf2961b6d32332e7c2b9e4654b7335da15df3a29519f68c80323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10s9rFDEUB_Agil2rJ-8S7El0an5OMsdlabVQFHTFY8hkknHKbDJNMrb-94206i6M5BCSfPJ98HgAvMToFCMq33ud52gxZZQ_AivMRF2xWorHYIUQkRWStD4Cz1K6QghxLNhTcEQ4oggLvAJnaziGm8qElKEPvsrhdjBwKseqj-Em_4Da5OGnzkPwMGU7QRci3HRbC1MYdYTGjmN6Dp44PSb74mE_Bt_Oz7abj9Xl5w8Xm_VlZXhDc0VwK2pSO9y0rjOONDVu644SSokVhrSNZTVnraCUdxrzzlFNGo4bV0sjUXHH4OQ-d4rherYpq6swR19KKsyZaJjEjP1TvR6tGrwLOWqzG5JRayo4l7wRsqhqQfXW26jH4K0byvWBf73gzTRcq310uoDK6uxuMIupbw4-FJPtbe71nJK6-Prl0L79v11vv28-LWoTQ0rROjXFYafjL4WR-j04am9win710Nm53dnur_0zKQW8uwepPPnexr3WL-TdATpIx9c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1547948144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A low-cost non-toxic post-growth activation step for CdTe solar cells</title><source>Nature Journals Online</source><creator>Major, J. D. ; Treharne, R. E. ; Phillips, L. J. ; Durose, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Major, J. D. ; Treharne, R. E. ; Phillips, L. J. ; Durose, K.</creatorcontrib><description>MgCl 2 is shown to be a cheap and non-toxic replacement for the costly and environmentally unfriendly salt CdCl 2 that has long been used as the ‘activation’ step in the production of cadmium telluride solar cells. Just add salt for cheaper solar cells Solar cells based on cadmium telluride, CdTe, are among the most cost-efficient photovoltaic systems currently in use. But according to Jonathan Major et al ., there is still plenty of room for improvement. Specifically, they show that it is possible to replace the costly and environmentally unfriendly cadmium-containing salt (CdCl 2 ), which has long been used to 'activate' the CdTe during processing, with a cheap and non-toxic alternative, MgCl 2 . This change does not appear to be detrimental to device performance, yet shows great potential for reducing processing costs and environmental risk. Cadmium telluride, CdTe, is now firmly established as the basis for the market-leading thin-film solar-cell technology. With laboratory efficiencies approaching 20 per cent 1 , the research and development targets for CdTe are to reduce the cost of power generation further to less than half a US dollar per watt (ref. 2 ) and to minimize the environmental impact. A central part of the manufacturing process involves doping the polycrystalline thin-film CdTe with CdCl 2 . This acts to form the photovoltaic junction at the CdTe/CdS interface 3 , 4 and to passivate the grain boundaries 5 , making it essential in achieving high device efficiencies. However, although such doping has been almost ubiquitous since the development of this processing route over 25 years ago 6 , CdCl 2 has two severe disadvantages; it is both expensive (about 30 cents per gram) and a water-soluble source of toxic cadmium ions, presenting a risk to both operators and the environment during manufacture. Here we demonstrate that solar cells prepared using MgCl 2 , which is non-toxic and costs less than a cent per gram, have efficiencies (around 13%) identical to those of a CdCl 2 -processed control group. They have similar hole densities in the active layer (9 × 10 14  cm −3 ) and comparable impurity profiles for Cl and O, these elements being important p-type dopants for CdTe thin films. Contrary to expectation, CdCl 2 -processed and MgCl 2 -processed solar cells contain similar concentrations of Mg; this is because of Mg out-diffusion from the soda-lime glass substrates and is not disadvantageous to device performance. However, treatment with other low-cost chlorides such as NaCl, KCl and MnCl 2 leads to the introduction of electrically active impurities that do compromise device performance. Our results demonstrate that CdCl 2 may simply be replaced directly with MgCl 2 in the existing fabrication process, thus both minimizing the environmental risk and reducing the cost of CdTe solar-cell production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nature13435</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25030171</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NATUAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>639/301/299/946 ; 639/638/298/917 ; Annealing ; Cadmium ; Cadmium telluride ; Design and construction ; Efficiency ; Environmental impact ; Environmental risk ; Fabrication ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; letter ; Manufacturing industry ; Materials ; multidisciplinary ; Photovoltaic cells ; Photovoltaics ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Science ; Sodium chloride ; Solar batteries ; Solar cells ; Solar energy ; Thin films</subject><ispartof>Nature (London), 2014-07, Vol.511 (7509), p.334-337</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jul 17, 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-21b7626f19bfdcf2961b6d32332e7c2b9e4654b7335da15df3a29519f68c80323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-21b7626f19bfdcf2961b6d32332e7c2b9e4654b7335da15df3a29519f68c80323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25030171$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Major, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treharne, R. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durose, K.</creatorcontrib><title>A low-cost non-toxic post-growth activation step for CdTe solar cells</title><title>Nature (London)</title><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><description>MgCl 2 is shown to be a cheap and non-toxic replacement for the costly and environmentally unfriendly salt CdCl 2 that has long been used as the ‘activation’ step in the production of cadmium telluride solar cells. Just add salt for cheaper solar cells Solar cells based on cadmium telluride, CdTe, are among the most cost-efficient photovoltaic systems currently in use. But according to Jonathan Major et al ., there is still plenty of room for improvement. Specifically, they show that it is possible to replace the costly and environmentally unfriendly cadmium-containing salt (CdCl 2 ), which has long been used to 'activate' the CdTe during processing, with a cheap and non-toxic alternative, MgCl 2 . This change does not appear to be detrimental to device performance, yet shows great potential for reducing processing costs and environmental risk. Cadmium telluride, CdTe, is now firmly established as the basis for the market-leading thin-film solar-cell technology. With laboratory efficiencies approaching 20 per cent 1 , the research and development targets for CdTe are to reduce the cost of power generation further to less than half a US dollar per watt (ref. 2 ) and to minimize the environmental impact. A central part of the manufacturing process involves doping the polycrystalline thin-film CdTe with CdCl 2 . This acts to form the photovoltaic junction at the CdTe/CdS interface 3 , 4 and to passivate the grain boundaries 5 , making it essential in achieving high device efficiencies. However, although such doping has been almost ubiquitous since the development of this processing route over 25 years ago 6 , CdCl 2 has two severe disadvantages; it is both expensive (about 30 cents per gram) and a water-soluble source of toxic cadmium ions, presenting a risk to both operators and the environment during manufacture. Here we demonstrate that solar cells prepared using MgCl 2 , which is non-toxic and costs less than a cent per gram, have efficiencies (around 13%) identical to those of a CdCl 2 -processed control group. They have similar hole densities in the active layer (9 × 10 14  cm −3 ) and comparable impurity profiles for Cl and O, these elements being important p-type dopants for CdTe thin films. Contrary to expectation, CdCl 2 -processed and MgCl 2 -processed solar cells contain similar concentrations of Mg; this is because of Mg out-diffusion from the soda-lime glass substrates and is not disadvantageous to device performance. However, treatment with other low-cost chlorides such as NaCl, KCl and MnCl 2 leads to the introduction of electrically active impurities that do compromise device performance. Our results demonstrate that CdCl 2 may simply be replaced directly with MgCl 2 in the existing fabrication process, thus both minimizing the environmental risk and reducing the cost of CdTe solar-cell production.</description><subject>639/301/299/946</subject><subject>639/638/298/917</subject><subject>Annealing</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Cadmium telluride</subject><subject>Design and construction</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Fabrication</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>letter</subject><subject>Manufacturing industry</subject><subject>Materials</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Photovoltaic cells</subject><subject>Photovoltaics</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Sodium chloride</subject><subject>Solar batteries</subject><subject>Solar cells</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Thin films</subject><issn>0028-0836</issn><issn>1476-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10s9rFDEUB_Agil2rJ-8S7El0an5OMsdlabVQFHTFY8hkknHKbDJNMrb-94206i6M5BCSfPJ98HgAvMToFCMq33ud52gxZZQ_AivMRF2xWorHYIUQkRWStD4Cz1K6QghxLNhTcEQ4oggLvAJnaziGm8qElKEPvsrhdjBwKseqj-Em_4Da5OGnzkPwMGU7QRci3HRbC1MYdYTGjmN6Dp44PSb74mE_Bt_Oz7abj9Xl5w8Xm_VlZXhDc0VwK2pSO9y0rjOONDVu644SSokVhrSNZTVnraCUdxrzzlFNGo4bV0sjUXHH4OQ-d4rherYpq6swR19KKsyZaJjEjP1TvR6tGrwLOWqzG5JRayo4l7wRsqhqQfXW26jH4K0byvWBf73gzTRcq310uoDK6uxuMIupbw4-FJPtbe71nJK6-Prl0L79v11vv28-LWoTQ0rROjXFYafjL4WR-j04am9win710Nm53dnur_0zKQW8uwepPPnexr3WL-TdATpIx9c</recordid><startdate>20140717</startdate><enddate>20140717</enddate><creator>Major, J. D.</creator><creator>Treharne, R. E.</creator><creator>Phillips, L. J.</creator><creator>Durose, K.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ATWCN</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140717</creationdate><title>A low-cost non-toxic post-growth activation step for CdTe solar cells</title><author>Major, J. D. ; Treharne, R. E. ; Phillips, L. J. ; Durose, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-21b7626f19bfdcf2961b6d32332e7c2b9e4654b7335da15df3a29519f68c80323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>639/301/299/946</topic><topic>639/638/298/917</topic><topic>Annealing</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Cadmium telluride</topic><topic>Design and construction</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Fabrication</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>letter</topic><topic>Manufacturing industry</topic><topic>Materials</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Photovoltaic cells</topic><topic>Photovoltaics</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Sodium chloride</topic><topic>Solar batteries</topic><topic>Solar cells</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Thin films</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Major, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treharne, R. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durose, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Middle School</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Major, J. D.</au><au>Treharne, R. E.</au><au>Phillips, L. J.</au><au>Durose, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A low-cost non-toxic post-growth activation step for CdTe solar cells</atitle><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle><stitle>Nature</stitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><date>2014-07-17</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>511</volume><issue>7509</issue><spage>334</spage><epage>337</epage><pages>334-337</pages><issn>0028-0836</issn><eissn>1476-4687</eissn><coden>NATUAS</coden><abstract>MgCl 2 is shown to be a cheap and non-toxic replacement for the costly and environmentally unfriendly salt CdCl 2 that has long been used as the ‘activation’ step in the production of cadmium telluride solar cells. Just add salt for cheaper solar cells Solar cells based on cadmium telluride, CdTe, are among the most cost-efficient photovoltaic systems currently in use. But according to Jonathan Major et al ., there is still plenty of room for improvement. Specifically, they show that it is possible to replace the costly and environmentally unfriendly cadmium-containing salt (CdCl 2 ), which has long been used to 'activate' the CdTe during processing, with a cheap and non-toxic alternative, MgCl 2 . This change does not appear to be detrimental to device performance, yet shows great potential for reducing processing costs and environmental risk. Cadmium telluride, CdTe, is now firmly established as the basis for the market-leading thin-film solar-cell technology. With laboratory efficiencies approaching 20 per cent 1 , the research and development targets for CdTe are to reduce the cost of power generation further to less than half a US dollar per watt (ref. 2 ) and to minimize the environmental impact. A central part of the manufacturing process involves doping the polycrystalline thin-film CdTe with CdCl 2 . This acts to form the photovoltaic junction at the CdTe/CdS interface 3 , 4 and to passivate the grain boundaries 5 , making it essential in achieving high device efficiencies. However, although such doping has been almost ubiquitous since the development of this processing route over 25 years ago 6 , CdCl 2 has two severe disadvantages; it is both expensive (about 30 cents per gram) and a water-soluble source of toxic cadmium ions, presenting a risk to both operators and the environment during manufacture. Here we demonstrate that solar cells prepared using MgCl 2 , which is non-toxic and costs less than a cent per gram, have efficiencies (around 13%) identical to those of a CdCl 2 -processed control group. They have similar hole densities in the active layer (9 × 10 14  cm −3 ) and comparable impurity profiles for Cl and O, these elements being important p-type dopants for CdTe thin films. Contrary to expectation, CdCl 2 -processed and MgCl 2 -processed solar cells contain similar concentrations of Mg; this is because of Mg out-diffusion from the soda-lime glass substrates and is not disadvantageous to device performance. However, treatment with other low-cost chlorides such as NaCl, KCl and MnCl 2 leads to the introduction of electrically active impurities that do compromise device performance. Our results demonstrate that CdCl 2 may simply be replaced directly with MgCl 2 in the existing fabrication process, thus both minimizing the environmental risk and reducing the cost of CdTe solar-cell production.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>25030171</pmid><doi>10.1038/nature13435</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-0836
ispartof Nature (London), 2014-07, Vol.511 (7509), p.334-337
issn 0028-0836
1476-4687
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1547948144
source Nature Journals Online
subjects 639/301/299/946
639/638/298/917
Annealing
Cadmium
Cadmium telluride
Design and construction
Efficiency
Environmental impact
Environmental risk
Fabrication
Humanities and Social Sciences
letter
Manufacturing industry
Materials
multidisciplinary
Photovoltaic cells
Photovoltaics
R&D
Research & development
Science
Sodium chloride
Solar batteries
Solar cells
Solar energy
Thin films
title A low-cost non-toxic post-growth activation step for CdTe solar cells
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A39%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20low-cost%20non-toxic%20post-growth%20activation%20step%20for%20CdTe%20solar%20cells&rft.jtitle=Nature%20(London)&rft.au=Major,%20J.%20D.&rft.date=2014-07-17&rft.volume=511&rft.issue=7509&rft.spage=334&rft.epage=337&rft.pages=334-337&rft.issn=0028-0836&rft.eissn=1476-4687&rft.coden=NATUAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nature13435&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA375585978%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-21b7626f19bfdcf2961b6d32332e7c2b9e4654b7335da15df3a29519f68c80323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1547948144&rft_id=info:pmid/25030171&rft_galeid=A375585978&rfr_iscdi=true