Loading…
A low-cost non-toxic post-growth activation step for CdTe solar cells
MgCl 2 is shown to be a cheap and non-toxic replacement for the costly and environmentally unfriendly salt CdCl 2 that has long been used as the ‘activation’ step in the production of cadmium telluride solar cells. Just add salt for cheaper solar cells Solar cells based on cadmium telluride, CdTe, a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nature (London) 2014-07, Vol.511 (7509), p.334-337 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-21b7626f19bfdcf2961b6d32332e7c2b9e4654b7335da15df3a29519f68c80323 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-21b7626f19bfdcf2961b6d32332e7c2b9e4654b7335da15df3a29519f68c80323 |
container_end_page | 337 |
container_issue | 7509 |
container_start_page | 334 |
container_title | Nature (London) |
container_volume | 511 |
creator | Major, J. D. Treharne, R. E. Phillips, L. J. Durose, K. |
description | MgCl
2
is shown to be a cheap and non-toxic replacement for the costly and environmentally unfriendly salt CdCl
2
that has long been used as the ‘activation’ step in the production of cadmium telluride solar cells.
Just add salt for cheaper solar cells
Solar cells based on cadmium telluride, CdTe, are among the most cost-efficient photovoltaic systems currently in use. But according to Jonathan Major
et al
., there is still plenty of room for improvement. Specifically, they show that it is possible to replace the costly and environmentally unfriendly cadmium-containing salt (CdCl
2
), which has long been used to 'activate' the CdTe during processing, with a cheap and non-toxic alternative, MgCl
2
. This change does not appear to be detrimental to device performance, yet shows great potential for reducing processing costs and environmental risk.
Cadmium telluride, CdTe, is now firmly established as the basis for the market-leading thin-film solar-cell technology. With laboratory efficiencies approaching 20 per cent
1
, the research and development targets for CdTe are to reduce the cost of power generation further to less than half a US dollar per watt (ref.
2
) and to minimize the environmental impact. A central part of the manufacturing process involves doping the polycrystalline thin-film CdTe with CdCl
2
. This acts to form the photovoltaic junction at the CdTe/CdS interface
3
,
4
and to passivate the grain boundaries
5
, making it essential in achieving high device efficiencies. However, although such doping has been almost ubiquitous since the development of this processing route over 25 years ago
6
, CdCl
2
has two severe disadvantages; it is both expensive (about 30 cents per gram) and a water-soluble source of toxic cadmium ions, presenting a risk to both operators and the environment during manufacture. Here we demonstrate that solar cells prepared using MgCl
2
, which is non-toxic and costs less than a cent per gram, have efficiencies (around 13%) identical to those of a CdCl
2
-processed control group. They have similar hole densities in the active layer (9 × 10
14
cm
−3
) and comparable impurity profiles for Cl and O, these elements being important p-type dopants for CdTe thin films. Contrary to expectation, CdCl
2
-processed and MgCl
2
-processed solar cells contain similar concentrations of Mg; this is because of Mg out-diffusion from the soda-lime glass substrates and is not disadvantageous to device performance. However, treatment with oth |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/nature13435 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1547948144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A375585978</galeid><sourcerecordid>A375585978</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-21b7626f19bfdcf2961b6d32332e7c2b9e4654b7335da15df3a29519f68c80323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10s9rFDEUB_Agil2rJ-8S7El0an5OMsdlabVQFHTFY8hkknHKbDJNMrb-94206i6M5BCSfPJ98HgAvMToFCMq33ud52gxZZQ_AivMRF2xWorHYIUQkRWStD4Cz1K6QghxLNhTcEQ4oggLvAJnaziGm8qElKEPvsrhdjBwKseqj-Em_4Da5OGnzkPwMGU7QRci3HRbC1MYdYTGjmN6Dp44PSb74mE_Bt_Oz7abj9Xl5w8Xm_VlZXhDc0VwK2pSO9y0rjOONDVu644SSokVhrSNZTVnraCUdxrzzlFNGo4bV0sjUXHH4OQ-d4rherYpq6swR19KKsyZaJjEjP1TvR6tGrwLOWqzG5JRayo4l7wRsqhqQfXW26jH4K0byvWBf73gzTRcq310uoDK6uxuMIupbw4-FJPtbe71nJK6-Prl0L79v11vv28-LWoTQ0rROjXFYafjL4WR-j04am9win710Nm53dnur_0zKQW8uwepPPnexr3WL-TdATpIx9c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1547948144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A low-cost non-toxic post-growth activation step for CdTe solar cells</title><source>Nature Journals Online</source><creator>Major, J. D. ; Treharne, R. E. ; Phillips, L. J. ; Durose, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Major, J. D. ; Treharne, R. E. ; Phillips, L. J. ; Durose, K.</creatorcontrib><description>MgCl
2
is shown to be a cheap and non-toxic replacement for the costly and environmentally unfriendly salt CdCl
2
that has long been used as the ‘activation’ step in the production of cadmium telluride solar cells.
Just add salt for cheaper solar cells
Solar cells based on cadmium telluride, CdTe, are among the most cost-efficient photovoltaic systems currently in use. But according to Jonathan Major
et al
., there is still plenty of room for improvement. Specifically, they show that it is possible to replace the costly and environmentally unfriendly cadmium-containing salt (CdCl
2
), which has long been used to 'activate' the CdTe during processing, with a cheap and non-toxic alternative, MgCl
2
. This change does not appear to be detrimental to device performance, yet shows great potential for reducing processing costs and environmental risk.
Cadmium telluride, CdTe, is now firmly established as the basis for the market-leading thin-film solar-cell technology. With laboratory efficiencies approaching 20 per cent
1
, the research and development targets for CdTe are to reduce the cost of power generation further to less than half a US dollar per watt (ref.
2
) and to minimize the environmental impact. A central part of the manufacturing process involves doping the polycrystalline thin-film CdTe with CdCl
2
. This acts to form the photovoltaic junction at the CdTe/CdS interface
3
,
4
and to passivate the grain boundaries
5
, making it essential in achieving high device efficiencies. However, although such doping has been almost ubiquitous since the development of this processing route over 25 years ago
6
, CdCl
2
has two severe disadvantages; it is both expensive (about 30 cents per gram) and a water-soluble source of toxic cadmium ions, presenting a risk to both operators and the environment during manufacture. Here we demonstrate that solar cells prepared using MgCl
2
, which is non-toxic and costs less than a cent per gram, have efficiencies (around 13%) identical to those of a CdCl
2
-processed control group. They have similar hole densities in the active layer (9 × 10
14
cm
−3
) and comparable impurity profiles for Cl and O, these elements being important p-type dopants for CdTe thin films. Contrary to expectation, CdCl
2
-processed and MgCl
2
-processed solar cells contain similar concentrations of Mg; this is because of Mg out-diffusion from the soda-lime glass substrates and is not disadvantageous to device performance. However, treatment with other low-cost chlorides such as NaCl, KCl and MnCl
2
leads to the introduction of electrically active impurities that do compromise device performance. Our results demonstrate that CdCl
2
may simply be replaced directly with MgCl
2
in the existing fabrication process, thus both minimizing the environmental risk and reducing the cost of CdTe solar-cell production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nature13435</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25030171</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NATUAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>639/301/299/946 ; 639/638/298/917 ; Annealing ; Cadmium ; Cadmium telluride ; Design and construction ; Efficiency ; Environmental impact ; Environmental risk ; Fabrication ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; letter ; Manufacturing industry ; Materials ; multidisciplinary ; Photovoltaic cells ; Photovoltaics ; R&D ; Research & development ; Science ; Sodium chloride ; Solar batteries ; Solar cells ; Solar energy ; Thin films</subject><ispartof>Nature (London), 2014-07, Vol.511 (7509), p.334-337</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jul 17, 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-21b7626f19bfdcf2961b6d32332e7c2b9e4654b7335da15df3a29519f68c80323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-21b7626f19bfdcf2961b6d32332e7c2b9e4654b7335da15df3a29519f68c80323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25030171$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Major, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treharne, R. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durose, K.</creatorcontrib><title>A low-cost non-toxic post-growth activation step for CdTe solar cells</title><title>Nature (London)</title><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><description>MgCl
2
is shown to be a cheap and non-toxic replacement for the costly and environmentally unfriendly salt CdCl
2
that has long been used as the ‘activation’ step in the production of cadmium telluride solar cells.
Just add salt for cheaper solar cells
Solar cells based on cadmium telluride, CdTe, are among the most cost-efficient photovoltaic systems currently in use. But according to Jonathan Major
et al
., there is still plenty of room for improvement. Specifically, they show that it is possible to replace the costly and environmentally unfriendly cadmium-containing salt (CdCl
2
), which has long been used to 'activate' the CdTe during processing, with a cheap and non-toxic alternative, MgCl
2
. This change does not appear to be detrimental to device performance, yet shows great potential for reducing processing costs and environmental risk.
Cadmium telluride, CdTe, is now firmly established as the basis for the market-leading thin-film solar-cell technology. With laboratory efficiencies approaching 20 per cent
1
, the research and development targets for CdTe are to reduce the cost of power generation further to less than half a US dollar per watt (ref.
2
) and to minimize the environmental impact. A central part of the manufacturing process involves doping the polycrystalline thin-film CdTe with CdCl
2
. This acts to form the photovoltaic junction at the CdTe/CdS interface
3
,
4
and to passivate the grain boundaries
5
, making it essential in achieving high device efficiencies. However, although such doping has been almost ubiquitous since the development of this processing route over 25 years ago
6
, CdCl
2
has two severe disadvantages; it is both expensive (about 30 cents per gram) and a water-soluble source of toxic cadmium ions, presenting a risk to both operators and the environment during manufacture. Here we demonstrate that solar cells prepared using MgCl
2
, which is non-toxic and costs less than a cent per gram, have efficiencies (around 13%) identical to those of a CdCl
2
-processed control group. They have similar hole densities in the active layer (9 × 10
14
cm
−3
) and comparable impurity profiles for Cl and O, these elements being important p-type dopants for CdTe thin films. Contrary to expectation, CdCl
2
-processed and MgCl
2
-processed solar cells contain similar concentrations of Mg; this is because of Mg out-diffusion from the soda-lime glass substrates and is not disadvantageous to device performance. However, treatment with other low-cost chlorides such as NaCl, KCl and MnCl
2
leads to the introduction of electrically active impurities that do compromise device performance. Our results demonstrate that CdCl
2
may simply be replaced directly with MgCl
2
in the existing fabrication process, thus both minimizing the environmental risk and reducing the cost of CdTe solar-cell production.</description><subject>639/301/299/946</subject><subject>639/638/298/917</subject><subject>Annealing</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Cadmium telluride</subject><subject>Design and construction</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Fabrication</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>letter</subject><subject>Manufacturing industry</subject><subject>Materials</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Photovoltaic cells</subject><subject>Photovoltaics</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Sodium chloride</subject><subject>Solar batteries</subject><subject>Solar cells</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Thin films</subject><issn>0028-0836</issn><issn>1476-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10s9rFDEUB_Agil2rJ-8S7El0an5OMsdlabVQFHTFY8hkknHKbDJNMrb-94206i6M5BCSfPJ98HgAvMToFCMq33ud52gxZZQ_AivMRF2xWorHYIUQkRWStD4Cz1K6QghxLNhTcEQ4oggLvAJnaziGm8qElKEPvsrhdjBwKseqj-Em_4Da5OGnzkPwMGU7QRci3HRbC1MYdYTGjmN6Dp44PSb74mE_Bt_Oz7abj9Xl5w8Xm_VlZXhDc0VwK2pSO9y0rjOONDVu644SSokVhrSNZTVnraCUdxrzzlFNGo4bV0sjUXHH4OQ-d4rherYpq6swR19KKsyZaJjEjP1TvR6tGrwLOWqzG5JRayo4l7wRsqhqQfXW26jH4K0byvWBf73gzTRcq310uoDK6uxuMIupbw4-FJPtbe71nJK6-Prl0L79v11vv28-LWoTQ0rROjXFYafjL4WR-j04am9win710Nm53dnur_0zKQW8uwepPPnexr3WL-TdATpIx9c</recordid><startdate>20140717</startdate><enddate>20140717</enddate><creator>Major, J. D.</creator><creator>Treharne, R. E.</creator><creator>Phillips, L. J.</creator><creator>Durose, K.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ATWCN</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140717</creationdate><title>A low-cost non-toxic post-growth activation step for CdTe solar cells</title><author>Major, J. D. ; Treharne, R. E. ; Phillips, L. J. ; Durose, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-21b7626f19bfdcf2961b6d32332e7c2b9e4654b7335da15df3a29519f68c80323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>639/301/299/946</topic><topic>639/638/298/917</topic><topic>Annealing</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Cadmium telluride</topic><topic>Design and construction</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Fabrication</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>letter</topic><topic>Manufacturing industry</topic><topic>Materials</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Photovoltaic cells</topic><topic>Photovoltaics</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Sodium chloride</topic><topic>Solar batteries</topic><topic>Solar cells</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Thin films</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Major, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treharne, R. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durose, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Middle School</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Major, J. D.</au><au>Treharne, R. E.</au><au>Phillips, L. J.</au><au>Durose, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A low-cost non-toxic post-growth activation step for CdTe solar cells</atitle><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle><stitle>Nature</stitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><date>2014-07-17</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>511</volume><issue>7509</issue><spage>334</spage><epage>337</epage><pages>334-337</pages><issn>0028-0836</issn><eissn>1476-4687</eissn><coden>NATUAS</coden><abstract>MgCl
2
is shown to be a cheap and non-toxic replacement for the costly and environmentally unfriendly salt CdCl
2
that has long been used as the ‘activation’ step in the production of cadmium telluride solar cells.
Just add salt for cheaper solar cells
Solar cells based on cadmium telluride, CdTe, are among the most cost-efficient photovoltaic systems currently in use. But according to Jonathan Major
et al
., there is still plenty of room for improvement. Specifically, they show that it is possible to replace the costly and environmentally unfriendly cadmium-containing salt (CdCl
2
), which has long been used to 'activate' the CdTe during processing, with a cheap and non-toxic alternative, MgCl
2
. This change does not appear to be detrimental to device performance, yet shows great potential for reducing processing costs and environmental risk.
Cadmium telluride, CdTe, is now firmly established as the basis for the market-leading thin-film solar-cell technology. With laboratory efficiencies approaching 20 per cent
1
, the research and development targets for CdTe are to reduce the cost of power generation further to less than half a US dollar per watt (ref.
2
) and to minimize the environmental impact. A central part of the manufacturing process involves doping the polycrystalline thin-film CdTe with CdCl
2
. This acts to form the photovoltaic junction at the CdTe/CdS interface
3
,
4
and to passivate the grain boundaries
5
, making it essential in achieving high device efficiencies. However, although such doping has been almost ubiquitous since the development of this processing route over 25 years ago
6
, CdCl
2
has two severe disadvantages; it is both expensive (about 30 cents per gram) and a water-soluble source of toxic cadmium ions, presenting a risk to both operators and the environment during manufacture. Here we demonstrate that solar cells prepared using MgCl
2
, which is non-toxic and costs less than a cent per gram, have efficiencies (around 13%) identical to those of a CdCl
2
-processed control group. They have similar hole densities in the active layer (9 × 10
14
cm
−3
) and comparable impurity profiles for Cl and O, these elements being important p-type dopants for CdTe thin films. Contrary to expectation, CdCl
2
-processed and MgCl
2
-processed solar cells contain similar concentrations of Mg; this is because of Mg out-diffusion from the soda-lime glass substrates and is not disadvantageous to device performance. However, treatment with other low-cost chlorides such as NaCl, KCl and MnCl
2
leads to the introduction of electrically active impurities that do compromise device performance. Our results demonstrate that CdCl
2
may simply be replaced directly with MgCl
2
in the existing fabrication process, thus both minimizing the environmental risk and reducing the cost of CdTe solar-cell production.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>25030171</pmid><doi>10.1038/nature13435</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-0836 |
ispartof | Nature (London), 2014-07, Vol.511 (7509), p.334-337 |
issn | 0028-0836 1476-4687 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1547948144 |
source | Nature Journals Online |
subjects | 639/301/299/946 639/638/298/917 Annealing Cadmium Cadmium telluride Design and construction Efficiency Environmental impact Environmental risk Fabrication Humanities and Social Sciences letter Manufacturing industry Materials multidisciplinary Photovoltaic cells Photovoltaics R&D Research & development Science Sodium chloride Solar batteries Solar cells Solar energy Thin films |
title | A low-cost non-toxic post-growth activation step for CdTe solar cells |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A39%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20low-cost%20non-toxic%20post-growth%20activation%20step%20for%20CdTe%20solar%20cells&rft.jtitle=Nature%20(London)&rft.au=Major,%20J.%20D.&rft.date=2014-07-17&rft.volume=511&rft.issue=7509&rft.spage=334&rft.epage=337&rft.pages=334-337&rft.issn=0028-0836&rft.eissn=1476-4687&rft.coden=NATUAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nature13435&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA375585978%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-21b7626f19bfdcf2961b6d32332e7c2b9e4654b7335da15df3a29519f68c80323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1547948144&rft_id=info:pmid/25030171&rft_galeid=A375585978&rfr_iscdi=true |