Loading…

Epistemic justification in the context of pursuit: a coherentist approach

The aim of this paper is to offer an account of epistemic justification suitable for the context of theory pursuit, that is, for the context in which new scientific ideas, possibly incompatible with the already established theories, emerge and are pursued by scientists. We will frame our account par...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Synthese (Dordrecht) 2014-09, Vol.191 (13), p.3111-3141
Main Authors: Seselja, Dunja, Straßer, Christian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-e7ab87b7de2bf691c9494f45a5c87f3e705a3a0911492bc41de1d129fd046fef3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-e7ab87b7de2bf691c9494f45a5c87f3e705a3a0911492bc41de1d129fd046fef3
container_end_page 3141
container_issue 13
container_start_page 3111
container_title Synthese (Dordrecht)
container_volume 191
creator Seselja, Dunja
Straßer, Christian
description The aim of this paper is to offer an account of epistemic justification suitable for the context of theory pursuit, that is, for the context in which new scientific ideas, possibly incompatible with the already established theories, emerge and are pursued by scientists. We will frame our account paradigmatically on the basis of one of the influential systems of epistemic justification: Laurence Bonjour's coherence theory of justification. The idea underlying our approach is to develop a set of criteria which indicate that the pursued system is promising of contributing to the epistemic goal of robustness of scientific knowledge and of developing into a candidate for acceptance. In order to realize this we will (a) adjust the scope of Bonjour's standards—consistency, inferential density, and explanatory power, and (b) complement them by the requirement of a programmatic character. In this way we allow for the evaluation of the "potential coherence" of the given epistemic system.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11229-014-0476-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1550071515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24021598</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24021598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-e7ab87b7de2bf691c9494f45a5c87f3e705a3a0911492bc41de1d129fd046fef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKxDAURYMoOI5-gAuh4DqalyZN406GUQcG3Og6pGnipDhtTVLQvzdDRVy5evC45144CF0CuQFCxG0EoFRiAgwTJirMjtACuCgxkRU7RgtCSolFzcUpOouxIwSgYmSBNuvRx2T33hTdFJN33ujkh77wfZF2tjBDn-xnKgZXjFOIk093hc7fnQ22Txkt9DiGQZvdOTpx-j3ai5-7RK8P65fVE94-P25W91tsSgEJW6GbWjSitbRxlQQjmWSOcc1NLVxpBeG61EQCMEkbw6C10AKVriWsctaVS3Q99-bZj8nGpLphCn2eVMB5dgEceE7BnDJhiDFYp8bg9zp8KSDqYEzNxlQ2pg7GFMsMnZmYs_2bDX-a_4GuZqiLaQi_K5QRClzW5Td7oHgN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1550071515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epistemic justification in the context of pursuit: a coherentist approach</title><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><creator>Seselja, Dunja ; Straßer, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Seselja, Dunja ; Straßer, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this paper is to offer an account of epistemic justification suitable for the context of theory pursuit, that is, for the context in which new scientific ideas, possibly incompatible with the already established theories, emerge and are pursued by scientists. We will frame our account paradigmatically on the basis of one of the influential systems of epistemic justification: Laurence Bonjour's coherence theory of justification. The idea underlying our approach is to develop a set of criteria which indicate that the pursued system is promising of contributing to the epistemic goal of robustness of scientific knowledge and of developing into a candidate for acceptance. In order to realize this we will (a) adjust the scope of Bonjour's standards—consistency, inferential density, and explanatory power, and (b) complement them by the requirement of a programmatic character. In this way we allow for the evaluation of the "potential coherence" of the given epistemic system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-7857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11229-014-0476-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Atomic theory ; Coherence theory ; Coherentism ; Context ; Continental drift ; Education ; Empiricism ; Epistemic justification ; Epistemology ; Heuristics ; Logic ; Metaphysics ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Language ; Philosophy of Science ; Physical theory ; Research methods ; Theology</subject><ispartof>Synthese (Dordrecht), 2014-09, Vol.191 (13), p.3111-3141</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2014</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-e7ab87b7de2bf691c9494f45a5c87f3e705a3a0911492bc41de1d129fd046fef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-e7ab87b7de2bf691c9494f45a5c87f3e705a3a0911492bc41de1d129fd046fef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1550071515/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1550071515?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12861,27924,27925,34775,44200,58238,58471,62661,62662,62677,74196,74728</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seselja, Dunja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straßer, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Epistemic justification in the context of pursuit: a coherentist approach</title><title>Synthese (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Synthese</addtitle><description>The aim of this paper is to offer an account of epistemic justification suitable for the context of theory pursuit, that is, for the context in which new scientific ideas, possibly incompatible with the already established theories, emerge and are pursued by scientists. We will frame our account paradigmatically on the basis of one of the influential systems of epistemic justification: Laurence Bonjour's coherence theory of justification. The idea underlying our approach is to develop a set of criteria which indicate that the pursued system is promising of contributing to the epistemic goal of robustness of scientific knowledge and of developing into a candidate for acceptance. In order to realize this we will (a) adjust the scope of Bonjour's standards—consistency, inferential density, and explanatory power, and (b) complement them by the requirement of a programmatic character. In this way we allow for the evaluation of the "potential coherence" of the given epistemic system.</description><subject>Atomic theory</subject><subject>Coherence theory</subject><subject>Coherentism</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Continental drift</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Empiricism</subject><subject>Epistemic justification</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Heuristics</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Language</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Physical theory</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Theology</subject><issn>0039-7857</issn><issn>1573-0964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKxDAURYMoOI5-gAuh4DqalyZN406GUQcG3Og6pGnipDhtTVLQvzdDRVy5evC45144CF0CuQFCxG0EoFRiAgwTJirMjtACuCgxkRU7RgtCSolFzcUpOouxIwSgYmSBNuvRx2T33hTdFJN33ujkh77wfZF2tjBDn-xnKgZXjFOIk093hc7fnQ22Txkt9DiGQZvdOTpx-j3ai5-7RK8P65fVE94-P25W91tsSgEJW6GbWjSitbRxlQQjmWSOcc1NLVxpBeG61EQCMEkbw6C10AKVriWsctaVS3Q99-bZj8nGpLphCn2eVMB5dgEceE7BnDJhiDFYp8bg9zp8KSDqYEzNxlQ2pg7GFMsMnZmYs_2bDX-a_4GuZqiLaQi_K5QRClzW5Td7oHgN</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Seselja, Dunja</creator><creator>Straßer, Christian</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Epistemic justification in the context of pursuit: a coherentist approach</title><author>Seselja, Dunja ; Straßer, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-e7ab87b7de2bf691c9494f45a5c87f3e705a3a0911492bc41de1d129fd046fef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Atomic theory</topic><topic>Coherence theory</topic><topic>Coherentism</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Continental drift</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Empiricism</topic><topic>Epistemic justification</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Heuristics</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Language</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Physical theory</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seselja, Dunja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straßer, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seselja, Dunja</au><au>Straßer, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epistemic justification in the context of pursuit: a coherentist approach</atitle><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Synthese</stitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>191</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>3111</spage><epage>3141</epage><pages>3111-3141</pages><issn>0039-7857</issn><eissn>1573-0964</eissn><abstract>The aim of this paper is to offer an account of epistemic justification suitable for the context of theory pursuit, that is, for the context in which new scientific ideas, possibly incompatible with the already established theories, emerge and are pursued by scientists. We will frame our account paradigmatically on the basis of one of the influential systems of epistemic justification: Laurence Bonjour's coherence theory of justification. The idea underlying our approach is to develop a set of criteria which indicate that the pursued system is promising of contributing to the epistemic goal of robustness of scientific knowledge and of developing into a candidate for acceptance. In order to realize this we will (a) adjust the scope of Bonjour's standards—consistency, inferential density, and explanatory power, and (b) complement them by the requirement of a programmatic character. In this way we allow for the evaluation of the "potential coherence" of the given epistemic system.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11229-014-0476-4</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-7857
ispartof Synthese (Dordrecht), 2014-09, Vol.191 (13), p.3111-3141
issn 0039-7857
1573-0964
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1550071515
source Art, Design and Architecture Collection; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Link; ProQuest One Literature
subjects Atomic theory
Coherence theory
Coherentism
Context
Continental drift
Education
Empiricism
Epistemic justification
Epistemology
Heuristics
Logic
Metaphysics
Philosophy
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Science
Physical theory
Research methods
Theology
title Epistemic justification in the context of pursuit: a coherentist approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A36%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epistemic%20justification%20in%20the%20context%20of%20pursuit:%20a%20coherentist%20approach&rft.jtitle=Synthese%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Seselja,%20Dunja&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=191&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=3111&rft.epage=3141&rft.pages=3111-3141&rft.issn=0039-7857&rft.eissn=1573-0964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11229-014-0476-4&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24021598%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-e7ab87b7de2bf691c9494f45a5c87f3e705a3a0911492bc41de1d129fd046fef3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1550071515&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24021598&rfr_iscdi=true