Loading…

Isobutane Dehydrogenation over Metal (Fe, Co, and Ni) Oxide and Sulfide Catalysts: Reactivity and Reaction Mechanism

Silica‐supported metal oxide and sulfide catalysts of Fe, Co, and Ni were evaluated comparatively for the catalytic dehydrogenation of isobutane. The results of the activity test and temperature‐programmed reduction of hydrogen characterization indicate that metal oxides, except Fe2O3, are easily re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ChemCatChem 2014-08, Vol.6 (8), p.2305-2314
Main Authors: Wang, Guowei, Gao, Chuancheng, Zhu, Xiaolin, Sun, Yanan, Li, Chunyi, Shan, Honghong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4913-cf7c01c202b3ff2605adb80f7d599fb28a2856d151fec8a624de4c59c2ead0a33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4913-cf7c01c202b3ff2605adb80f7d599fb28a2856d151fec8a624de4c59c2ead0a33
container_end_page 2314
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2305
container_title ChemCatChem
container_volume 6
creator Wang, Guowei
Gao, Chuancheng
Zhu, Xiaolin
Sun, Yanan
Li, Chunyi
Shan, Honghong
description Silica‐supported metal oxide and sulfide catalysts of Fe, Co, and Ni were evaluated comparatively for the catalytic dehydrogenation of isobutane. The results of the activity test and temperature‐programmed reduction of hydrogen characterization indicate that metal oxides, except Fe2O3, are easily reduced to metal ensembles, which are extremely active for alkane hydrogenolysis and lead to the formation of a considerable amount of methane and coke. However, the dehydrogenation performance was significantly improved after sulfidation treatment. The introduction of sulfur affects the catalysts in two ways: one is the geometric effect, which dilutes the aggregated metallic species and reduces hydrogenolysis activity, and the other is the electronic effect, which facilitates the desorption of olefin and increases the product selectivity. Moreover, the reaction mechanism is explored by using the proposed model of the interaction between isobutane and sulfide catalysts. Finally, sulfur loss and partial coke deposition are determined to be the main reasons for catalyst deactivation. Benefits of sulfur: The introduction of sulfur into metal oxide catalysts dilutes and separates the aggregated metallic species. As a result, hydrogen atoms in isobutane molecules bond with sulfur atoms neighboring metallic species on the catalyst surface and thus the carbon–hydrogen bonds weaken and break. Subsequently, isobutene and hydrogen are released to the gas phase as final products.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cctc.201402173
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1550353149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3390116831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4913-cf7c01c202b3ff2605adb80f7d599fb28a2856d151fec8a624de4c59c2ead0a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctLxDAQh4so-Lx6DnhRsGseTdt40_qE9b2y4CVk04lG11aTrG7_e7tbWbx5mhn4vhn4TRRtE9wjGNMDrYPuUUwSTEnGlqI1kqdZzHIhlhd9jlejde9fMU4Fy_haFC59PZoEVQE6gZemdPUzVCrYukL1Fzh0BUGN0e4Z7KOi3keqKtG13UM3U1vCfHqYjM2sL1QLNj74Q3QPSgf7ZUMzJ7qxXXgF-kVV1r9vRitGjT1s_daN6PHsdFBcxP2b88viqB_rRBAWa5NpTDTFdMSMoSnmqhzl2GQlF8KMaK5oztOScGJA5yqlSQmJ5kJTUCVWjG1EO93eD1d_TsAH-VpPXNWelIRzzDgjiWipXkdpV3vvwMgPZ9-VayTBcpasnCUrF8m2guiEbzuG5h9aFsWg-OvGnWt9gOnCVe5Npln7ETm8PpfJQ_9u-HRyLG_ZD7H4jGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1550353149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Isobutane Dehydrogenation over Metal (Fe, Co, and Ni) Oxide and Sulfide Catalysts: Reactivity and Reaction Mechanism</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Wang, Guowei ; Gao, Chuancheng ; Zhu, Xiaolin ; Sun, Yanan ; Li, Chunyi ; Shan, Honghong</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Guowei ; Gao, Chuancheng ; Zhu, Xiaolin ; Sun, Yanan ; Li, Chunyi ; Shan, Honghong</creatorcontrib><description>Silica‐supported metal oxide and sulfide catalysts of Fe, Co, and Ni were evaluated comparatively for the catalytic dehydrogenation of isobutane. The results of the activity test and temperature‐programmed reduction of hydrogen characterization indicate that metal oxides, except Fe2O3, are easily reduced to metal ensembles, which are extremely active for alkane hydrogenolysis and lead to the formation of a considerable amount of methane and coke. However, the dehydrogenation performance was significantly improved after sulfidation treatment. The introduction of sulfur affects the catalysts in two ways: one is the geometric effect, which dilutes the aggregated metallic species and reduces hydrogenolysis activity, and the other is the electronic effect, which facilitates the desorption of olefin and increases the product selectivity. Moreover, the reaction mechanism is explored by using the proposed model of the interaction between isobutane and sulfide catalysts. Finally, sulfur loss and partial coke deposition are determined to be the main reasons for catalyst deactivation. Benefits of sulfur: The introduction of sulfur into metal oxide catalysts dilutes and separates the aggregated metallic species. As a result, hydrogen atoms in isobutane molecules bond with sulfur atoms neighboring metallic species on the catalyst surface and thus the carbon–hydrogen bonds weaken and break. Subsequently, isobutene and hydrogen are released to the gas phase as final products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1867-3880</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-3899</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201402173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag</publisher><subject>dehydrogenation ; isobutane ; metal oxides ; metal sulfides ; Sulfur ; supported catalysts</subject><ispartof>ChemCatChem, 2014-08, Vol.6 (8), p.2305-2314</ispartof><rights>2014 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4913-cf7c01c202b3ff2605adb80f7d599fb28a2856d151fec8a624de4c59c2ead0a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4913-cf7c01c202b3ff2605adb80f7d599fb28a2856d151fec8a624de4c59c2ead0a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Guowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Chuancheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xiaolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Chunyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shan, Honghong</creatorcontrib><title>Isobutane Dehydrogenation over Metal (Fe, Co, and Ni) Oxide and Sulfide Catalysts: Reactivity and Reaction Mechanism</title><title>ChemCatChem</title><addtitle>ChemCatChem</addtitle><description>Silica‐supported metal oxide and sulfide catalysts of Fe, Co, and Ni were evaluated comparatively for the catalytic dehydrogenation of isobutane. The results of the activity test and temperature‐programmed reduction of hydrogen characterization indicate that metal oxides, except Fe2O3, are easily reduced to metal ensembles, which are extremely active for alkane hydrogenolysis and lead to the formation of a considerable amount of methane and coke. However, the dehydrogenation performance was significantly improved after sulfidation treatment. The introduction of sulfur affects the catalysts in two ways: one is the geometric effect, which dilutes the aggregated metallic species and reduces hydrogenolysis activity, and the other is the electronic effect, which facilitates the desorption of olefin and increases the product selectivity. Moreover, the reaction mechanism is explored by using the proposed model of the interaction between isobutane and sulfide catalysts. Finally, sulfur loss and partial coke deposition are determined to be the main reasons for catalyst deactivation. Benefits of sulfur: The introduction of sulfur into metal oxide catalysts dilutes and separates the aggregated metallic species. As a result, hydrogen atoms in isobutane molecules bond with sulfur atoms neighboring metallic species on the catalyst surface and thus the carbon–hydrogen bonds weaken and break. Subsequently, isobutene and hydrogen are released to the gas phase as final products.</description><subject>dehydrogenation</subject><subject>isobutane</subject><subject>metal oxides</subject><subject>metal sulfides</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>supported catalysts</subject><issn>1867-3880</issn><issn>1867-3899</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctLxDAQh4so-Lx6DnhRsGseTdt40_qE9b2y4CVk04lG11aTrG7_e7tbWbx5mhn4vhn4TRRtE9wjGNMDrYPuUUwSTEnGlqI1kqdZzHIhlhd9jlejde9fMU4Fy_haFC59PZoEVQE6gZemdPUzVCrYukL1Fzh0BUGN0e4Z7KOi3keqKtG13UM3U1vCfHqYjM2sL1QLNj74Q3QPSgf7ZUMzJ7qxXXgF-kVV1r9vRitGjT1s_daN6PHsdFBcxP2b88viqB_rRBAWa5NpTDTFdMSMoSnmqhzl2GQlF8KMaK5oztOScGJA5yqlSQmJ5kJTUCVWjG1EO93eD1d_TsAH-VpPXNWelIRzzDgjiWipXkdpV3vvwMgPZ9-VayTBcpasnCUrF8m2guiEbzuG5h9aFsWg-OvGnWt9gOnCVe5Npln7ETm8PpfJQ_9u-HRyLG_ZD7H4jGA</recordid><startdate>201408</startdate><enddate>201408</enddate><creator>Wang, Guowei</creator><creator>Gao, Chuancheng</creator><creator>Zhu, Xiaolin</creator><creator>Sun, Yanan</creator><creator>Li, Chunyi</creator><creator>Shan, Honghong</creator><general>WILEY-VCH Verlag</general><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201408</creationdate><title>Isobutane Dehydrogenation over Metal (Fe, Co, and Ni) Oxide and Sulfide Catalysts: Reactivity and Reaction Mechanism</title><author>Wang, Guowei ; Gao, Chuancheng ; Zhu, Xiaolin ; Sun, Yanan ; Li, Chunyi ; Shan, Honghong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4913-cf7c01c202b3ff2605adb80f7d599fb28a2856d151fec8a624de4c59c2ead0a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>dehydrogenation</topic><topic>isobutane</topic><topic>metal oxides</topic><topic>metal sulfides</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>supported catalysts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Guowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Chuancheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xiaolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Chunyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shan, Honghong</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>ChemCatChem</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Guowei</au><au>Gao, Chuancheng</au><au>Zhu, Xiaolin</au><au>Sun, Yanan</au><au>Li, Chunyi</au><au>Shan, Honghong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Isobutane Dehydrogenation over Metal (Fe, Co, and Ni) Oxide and Sulfide Catalysts: Reactivity and Reaction Mechanism</atitle><jtitle>ChemCatChem</jtitle><addtitle>ChemCatChem</addtitle><date>2014-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2305</spage><epage>2314</epage><pages>2305-2314</pages><issn>1867-3880</issn><eissn>1867-3899</eissn><abstract>Silica‐supported metal oxide and sulfide catalysts of Fe, Co, and Ni were evaluated comparatively for the catalytic dehydrogenation of isobutane. The results of the activity test and temperature‐programmed reduction of hydrogen characterization indicate that metal oxides, except Fe2O3, are easily reduced to metal ensembles, which are extremely active for alkane hydrogenolysis and lead to the formation of a considerable amount of methane and coke. However, the dehydrogenation performance was significantly improved after sulfidation treatment. The introduction of sulfur affects the catalysts in two ways: one is the geometric effect, which dilutes the aggregated metallic species and reduces hydrogenolysis activity, and the other is the electronic effect, which facilitates the desorption of olefin and increases the product selectivity. Moreover, the reaction mechanism is explored by using the proposed model of the interaction between isobutane and sulfide catalysts. Finally, sulfur loss and partial coke deposition are determined to be the main reasons for catalyst deactivation. Benefits of sulfur: The introduction of sulfur into metal oxide catalysts dilutes and separates the aggregated metallic species. As a result, hydrogen atoms in isobutane molecules bond with sulfur atoms neighboring metallic species on the catalyst surface and thus the carbon–hydrogen bonds weaken and break. Subsequently, isobutene and hydrogen are released to the gas phase as final products.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY-VCH Verlag</pub><doi>10.1002/cctc.201402173</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1867-3880
ispartof ChemCatChem, 2014-08, Vol.6 (8), p.2305-2314
issn 1867-3880
1867-3899
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1550353149
source Wiley
subjects dehydrogenation
isobutane
metal oxides
metal sulfides
Sulfur
supported catalysts
title Isobutane Dehydrogenation over Metal (Fe, Co, and Ni) Oxide and Sulfide Catalysts: Reactivity and Reaction Mechanism
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A11%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Isobutane%20Dehydrogenation%20over%20Metal%20(Fe,%20Co,%20and%20Ni)%20Oxide%20and%20Sulfide%20Catalysts:%20Reactivity%20and%20Reaction%20Mechanism&rft.jtitle=ChemCatChem&rft.au=Wang,%20Guowei&rft.date=2014-08&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2305&rft.epage=2314&rft.pages=2305-2314&rft.issn=1867-3880&rft.eissn=1867-3899&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cctc.201402173&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3390116831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4913-cf7c01c202b3ff2605adb80f7d599fb28a2856d151fec8a624de4c59c2ead0a33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1550353149&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true