Loading…
Examining tumor control and toxicity after stereotactic body radiotherapy in locally recurrent previously irradiated head and neck cancers: Implications of treatment duration and tumor volume
Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been studied in locally recurrent previously‐irradiated head and neck cancers; however, the optimum fractionation and patient selection continues to be defined. Methods Patients (n = 132) with locally recurrent head and neck cancer salvaged via SB...
Saved in:
Published in: | Head & neck 2014-09, Vol.36 (9), p.1349-1355 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been studied in locally recurrent previously‐irradiated head and neck cancers; however, the optimum fractionation and patient selection continues to be defined.
Methods
Patients (n = 132) with locally recurrent head and neck cancer salvaged via SBRT ± cetuximab (median, 44 Gy/5 fractions) from November 2004 to May 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Disease outcomes and toxicity were analyzed by predictive factors including treatment duration and tumor volume.
Results
At a median 6‐month follow‐up (range, 0–55 months), treatment duration 25 cc remained a significant predictor of inferior survival and tumor control, and was associated with significantly more acute toxicity (p = .017) but no difference in late toxicity.
Conclusion
SBRT ± cetuximab achieves promising tumor control and survival with low rates of acute/late toxicity even for recurrences >25 cc. Prolongations in treatment time may decrease late toxicity at the expense of disease control. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 36: 1349–1355, 2014 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1043-3074 1097-0347 |
DOI: | 10.1002/hed.23462 |