Loading…
Genetic stability ofBrucella abortusS19 and RB51 vaccine strains by multiplelocusvariable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA16)
The aims of the present study were (i) to assess thein vitrogenetic stability of S19 and RB51Brucella abortusvaccines strains and (ii) to evaluate the ability of multiple-locusvariable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) analysis (MLVA) as a tool to be used in the quality control of live vaccines against br...
Saved in:
Published in: | Vaccine 2013-10, Vol.31 (42), p.4856 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 42 |
container_start_page | 4856 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Dorneles, Elaine Maria Seles de Faria, Ana Paula Paiva Pauletti, Rebeca Barbosa Santana, Jordana Almeida Caldeira, George Afonso Vítor Heinemann, Marcos Bryan Titze-de-Almeida, Ricardo Lage, Andrey Pereira |
description | The aims of the present study were (i) to assess thein vitrogenetic stability of S19 and RB51Brucella abortusvaccines strains and (ii) to evaluate the ability of multiple-locusvariable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) analysis (MLVA) as a tool to be used in the quality control of live vaccines against brucellosis. Sixty-three batches of commercial S19 (n=53) and RB51 (n=10) vaccines, produced between 2006 and 2009, were used in this study. S19 and RB51 vaccines were obtained from, respectively, seven and two different manufacturers. Tenin vitroserial passages were performed on reference strains and on selected batches of commercial vaccines. All batches, reference strains and strains of serial passages were typed by the MLVA16. The results demonstrated thatB. abortusS19 and RB51 vaccine strains are genetically stable and very homogeneous in their respective groups. Anyway, batches of S19 from one manufacturer and batches of RB51 from another presented genotypes distincts from the reference vaccine strains. In both cases, differences were found onlocusBruce07, which had addition of one repeat unit in the case of S19 batches and the deletion of one repeat unit in the case of RB51 batches. In summary, MLVA16 proved to be a molecular tool capable of discriminating small genomic variations and should be included inin vitroofficial tests. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.063 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1560069813</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3423091921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_15600698133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzbtOw0AQBdAVAgnz-ASkkWigsJnxxhu7JChAkTSAEF20NhNprfWDfURyx6fjIh9AdZt77hXihjAjJPXQZgfdNKbnLEeSGS4zVPJEJFQuZZoXVJ6KBHO1SBeEX-fiwvsWEQtJVSJ-X7jnYBrwQdfGmjDBsF-52LC1GnQ9uBD9O1Wg-294WxUEx68ZOG16D_UEXbTBjJbt0ER_0M7o2jL0savZQZgld-B4ZB3mGW0nbzzcbTefj6Tur8TZXlvP18e8FLfP64-n13R0w09kH3btEN2s_I4KhaiqkqT8X-sPJWtYsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1560069813</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic stability ofBrucella abortusS19 and RB51 vaccine strains by multiplelocusvariable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA16)</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Dorneles, Elaine Maria Seles ; de Faria, Ana Paula Paiva ; Pauletti, Rebeca Barbosa ; Santana, Jordana Almeida ; Caldeira, George Afonso Vítor ; Heinemann, Marcos Bryan ; Titze-de-Almeida, Ricardo ; Lage, Andrey Pereira</creator><creatorcontrib>Dorneles, Elaine Maria Seles ; de Faria, Ana Paula Paiva ; Pauletti, Rebeca Barbosa ; Santana, Jordana Almeida ; Caldeira, George Afonso Vítor ; Heinemann, Marcos Bryan ; Titze-de-Almeida, Ricardo ; Lage, Andrey Pereira</creatorcontrib><description>The aims of the present study were (i) to assess thein vitrogenetic stability of S19 and RB51Brucella abortusvaccines strains and (ii) to evaluate the ability of multiple-locusvariable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) analysis (MLVA) as a tool to be used in the quality control of live vaccines against brucellosis. Sixty-three batches of commercial S19 (n=53) and RB51 (n=10) vaccines, produced between 2006 and 2009, were used in this study. S19 and RB51 vaccines were obtained from, respectively, seven and two different manufacturers. Tenin vitroserial passages were performed on reference strains and on selected batches of commercial vaccines. All batches, reference strains and strains of serial passages were typed by the MLVA16. The results demonstrated thatB. abortusS19 and RB51 vaccine strains are genetically stable and very homogeneous in their respective groups. Anyway, batches of S19 from one manufacturer and batches of RB51 from another presented genotypes distincts from the reference vaccine strains. In both cases, differences were found onlocusBruce07, which had addition of one repeat unit in the case of S19 batches and the deletion of one repeat unit in the case of RB51 batches. In summary, MLVA16 proved to be a molecular tool capable of discriminating small genomic variations and should be included inin vitroofficial tests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Animal vaccines ; Bacteriology ; Brucellosis ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Genetic diversity ; Genotypes ; Glycerol ; Immunization ; Laboratories ; Manufacturers ; Quality control ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2013-10, Vol.31 (42), p.4856</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 1, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dorneles, Elaine Maria Seles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Faria, Ana Paula Paiva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauletti, Rebeca Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Jordana Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldeira, George Afonso Vítor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinemann, Marcos Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titze-de-Almeida, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lage, Andrey Pereira</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic stability ofBrucella abortusS19 and RB51 vaccine strains by multiplelocusvariable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA16)</title><title>Vaccine</title><description>The aims of the present study were (i) to assess thein vitrogenetic stability of S19 and RB51Brucella abortusvaccines strains and (ii) to evaluate the ability of multiple-locusvariable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) analysis (MLVA) as a tool to be used in the quality control of live vaccines against brucellosis. Sixty-three batches of commercial S19 (n=53) and RB51 (n=10) vaccines, produced between 2006 and 2009, were used in this study. S19 and RB51 vaccines were obtained from, respectively, seven and two different manufacturers. Tenin vitroserial passages were performed on reference strains and on selected batches of commercial vaccines. All batches, reference strains and strains of serial passages were typed by the MLVA16. The results demonstrated thatB. abortusS19 and RB51 vaccine strains are genetically stable and very homogeneous in their respective groups. Anyway, batches of S19 from one manufacturer and batches of RB51 from another presented genotypes distincts from the reference vaccine strains. In both cases, differences were found onlocusBruce07, which had addition of one repeat unit in the case of S19 batches and the deletion of one repeat unit in the case of RB51 batches. In summary, MLVA16 proved to be a molecular tool capable of discriminating small genomic variations and should be included inin vitroofficial tests.</description><subject>Animal vaccines</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Brucellosis</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Glycerol</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNzbtOw0AQBdAVAgnz-ASkkWigsJnxxhu7JChAkTSAEF20NhNprfWDfURyx6fjIh9AdZt77hXihjAjJPXQZgfdNKbnLEeSGS4zVPJEJFQuZZoXVJ6KBHO1SBeEX-fiwvsWEQtJVSJ-X7jnYBrwQdfGmjDBsF-52LC1GnQ9uBD9O1Wg-294WxUEx68ZOG16D_UEXbTBjJbt0ER_0M7o2jL0savZQZgld-B4ZB3mGW0nbzzcbTefj6Tur8TZXlvP18e8FLfP64-n13R0w09kH3btEN2s_I4KhaiqkqT8X-sPJWtYsQ</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Dorneles, Elaine Maria Seles</creator><creator>de Faria, Ana Paula Paiva</creator><creator>Pauletti, Rebeca Barbosa</creator><creator>Santana, Jordana Almeida</creator><creator>Caldeira, George Afonso Vítor</creator><creator>Heinemann, Marcos Bryan</creator><creator>Titze-de-Almeida, Ricardo</creator><creator>Lage, Andrey Pereira</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Genetic stability ofBrucella abortusS19 and RB51 vaccine strains by multiplelocusvariable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA16)</title><author>Dorneles, Elaine Maria Seles ; de Faria, Ana Paula Paiva ; Pauletti, Rebeca Barbosa ; Santana, Jordana Almeida ; Caldeira, George Afonso Vítor ; Heinemann, Marcos Bryan ; Titze-de-Almeida, Ricardo ; Lage, Andrey Pereira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_15600698133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal vaccines</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Brucellosis</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Glycerol</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dorneles, Elaine Maria Seles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Faria, Ana Paula Paiva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauletti, Rebeca Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Jordana Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldeira, George Afonso Vítor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinemann, Marcos Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titze-de-Almeida, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lage, Andrey Pereira</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dorneles, Elaine Maria Seles</au><au>de Faria, Ana Paula Paiva</au><au>Pauletti, Rebeca Barbosa</au><au>Santana, Jordana Almeida</au><au>Caldeira, George Afonso Vítor</au><au>Heinemann, Marcos Bryan</au><au>Titze-de-Almeida, Ricardo</au><au>Lage, Andrey Pereira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic stability ofBrucella abortusS19 and RB51 vaccine strains by multiplelocusvariable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA16)</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>42</issue><spage>4856</spage><pages>4856-</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>The aims of the present study were (i) to assess thein vitrogenetic stability of S19 and RB51Brucella abortusvaccines strains and (ii) to evaluate the ability of multiple-locusvariable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) analysis (MLVA) as a tool to be used in the quality control of live vaccines against brucellosis. Sixty-three batches of commercial S19 (n=53) and RB51 (n=10) vaccines, produced between 2006 and 2009, were used in this study. S19 and RB51 vaccines were obtained from, respectively, seven and two different manufacturers. Tenin vitroserial passages were performed on reference strains and on selected batches of commercial vaccines. All batches, reference strains and strains of serial passages were typed by the MLVA16. The results demonstrated thatB. abortusS19 and RB51 vaccine strains are genetically stable and very homogeneous in their respective groups. Anyway, batches of S19 from one manufacturer and batches of RB51 from another presented genotypes distincts from the reference vaccine strains. In both cases, differences were found onlocusBruce07, which had addition of one repeat unit in the case of S19 batches and the deletion of one repeat unit in the case of RB51 batches. In summary, MLVA16 proved to be a molecular tool capable of discriminating small genomic variations and should be included inin vitroofficial tests.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.063</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2013-10, Vol.31 (42), p.4856 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1560069813 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Animal vaccines Bacteriology Brucellosis Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA Genetic diversity Genotypes Glycerol Immunization Laboratories Manufacturers Quality control Vaccines |
title | Genetic stability ofBrucella abortusS19 and RB51 vaccine strains by multiplelocusvariable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA16) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A42%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20stability%20ofBrucella%20abortusS19%20and%20RB51%20vaccine%20strains%20by%20multiplelocusvariable%20number%20tandem%20repeat%20analysis%20(MLVA16)&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Dorneles,%20Elaine%20Maria%20Seles&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=42&rft.spage=4856&rft.pages=4856-&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3423091921%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_15600698133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1560069813&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |