Loading…
Intellectual Humility: Scale Development and Theoretical Elaborations in the Context of Religious Leadership
This article focused on how perceptions of intellectual humility (IH)—humility regarding one's knowledge or influence over ideas—affect relationships with religious leaders. We developed an informant report measure of IH perceptions using exploratory (Study 1; N = 213) and confirmatory (Study 2...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of psychology and theology 2014-03, Vol.42 (1), p.19-30 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-2155a4d9547034b0e56d308b92c2dfceffbee17403902501c9450dfe971f4f233 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-2155a4d9547034b0e56d308b92c2dfceffbee17403902501c9450dfe971f4f233 |
container_end_page | 30 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | Journal of psychology and theology |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | McElroy, Stacey E Rice, Kenneth G Davis, Don E Hook, Joshua N Hill, Peter C Worthington, Everett L. Jr Tongeren, Daryl R. Van |
description | This article focused on how perceptions of intellectual humility (IH)—humility regarding one's knowledge or influence over ideas—affect relationships with religious leaders. We developed an informant report measure of IH perceptions using exploratory (Study 1; N = 213) and confirmatory (Study 2; N = 213) factor analyses, as well as a basic manipulation of IH (Study 3; N = 139). Then in Study 4 (N = 105), we examined IH in the context of a major betrayal by a religious leader (i.e., aligning with several factors theorized to strain the practice of IH). The results provide preliminary evidence for the psychometric soundness of the scale, including reliability and content validity of the scores. The scale was able to distinguish between IH and other constructs. Furthermore, the results provide initial evidence that IH is related to social bonds, as perceptions of IH were related to trust and higher forgiveness toward the religious leader, and positive attitudes towards the Sacred. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/009164711404200103 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1562513472</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A366346810</galeid><sourcerecordid>A366346810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-2155a4d9547034b0e56d308b92c2dfceffbee17403902501c9450dfe971f4f233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0s2LEzEUAPAgCtbqP-Ap4MnDrPmaL29LXXcLxQV3PYc08zLNkklqklnc_96ULkixiOQQSH7vJXl5CL2n5ILStv1ESE8b0VIqiGCEUMJfoAXjrKsobdhLtDiA6iBeozcpPRBCmOj4Arm1z-Ac6Dwrh2_myTqbnz7jO60c4C_wCC7sJ_AZKz_g-x2ECNmWTXzl1DZElW3wCVuP8w7wKpRsvzIOBn8HZ0cb5oQ3oAaIaWf3b9Ero1yCd8_zEv34enW_uqk2t9fr1eWm0oI2uWK0rpUY-lq0hIstgboZOOm2PdNsMBqM2QLQVhDeE1YTqntRk8FA31IjDON8iT4c8-5j-DlDyvIhzNGXIyWtG1ZTLlr2R43lqdJ6E3JUerJJy0veNFw0XanjElVn1AgeonLBg7Fl-cRfnPFlDDBZfTbg40mAPtZwVHNKcn337b9td73518WfrQ7lt0eQpeCr21PPjl7HkFIEI_fRTio-SUrkocnk303GfwM0l78L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1562513472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intellectual Humility: Scale Development and Theoretical Elaborations in the Context of Religious Leadership</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>McElroy, Stacey E ; Rice, Kenneth G ; Davis, Don E ; Hook, Joshua N ; Hill, Peter C ; Worthington, Everett L. Jr ; Tongeren, Daryl R. Van</creator><creatorcontrib>McElroy, Stacey E ; Rice, Kenneth G ; Davis, Don E ; Hook, Joshua N ; Hill, Peter C ; Worthington, Everett L. Jr ; Tongeren, Daryl R. Van</creatorcontrib><description>This article focused on how perceptions of intellectual humility (IH)—humility regarding one's knowledge or influence over ideas—affect relationships with religious leaders. We developed an informant report measure of IH perceptions using exploratory (Study 1; N = 213) and confirmatory (Study 2; N = 213) factor analyses, as well as a basic manipulation of IH (Study 3; N = 139). Then in Study 4 (N = 105), we examined IH in the context of a major betrayal by a religious leader (i.e., aligning with several factors theorized to strain the practice of IH). The results provide preliminary evidence for the psychometric soundness of the scale, including reliability and content validity of the scores. The scale was able to distinguish between IH and other constructs. Furthermore, the results provide initial evidence that IH is related to social bonds, as perceptions of IH were related to trust and higher forgiveness toward the religious leader, and positive attitudes towards the Sacred.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-1162</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/009164711404200103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>La Mirada: Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</publisher><subject>Humility ; Intellect ; Intelligence (Psychology) ; Intelligence levels ; Religious aspects ; Religious leaders</subject><ispartof>Journal of psychology and theology, 2014-03, Vol.42 (1), p.19-30</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</rights><rights>Copyright Rosemead Graduate School of Professional Psychology Spring 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-2155a4d9547034b0e56d308b92c2dfceffbee17403902501c9450dfe971f4f233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-2155a4d9547034b0e56d308b92c2dfceffbee17403902501c9450dfe971f4f233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McElroy, Stacey E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Kenneth G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Don E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hook, Joshua N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worthington, Everett L. Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tongeren, Daryl R. Van</creatorcontrib><title>Intellectual Humility: Scale Development and Theoretical Elaborations in the Context of Religious Leadership</title><title>Journal of psychology and theology</title><addtitle>Journal of Psychology and Theology</addtitle><description>This article focused on how perceptions of intellectual humility (IH)—humility regarding one's knowledge or influence over ideas—affect relationships with religious leaders. We developed an informant report measure of IH perceptions using exploratory (Study 1; N = 213) and confirmatory (Study 2; N = 213) factor analyses, as well as a basic manipulation of IH (Study 3; N = 139). Then in Study 4 (N = 105), we examined IH in the context of a major betrayal by a religious leader (i.e., aligning with several factors theorized to strain the practice of IH). The results provide preliminary evidence for the psychometric soundness of the scale, including reliability and content validity of the scores. The scale was able to distinguish between IH and other constructs. Furthermore, the results provide initial evidence that IH is related to social bonds, as perceptions of IH were related to trust and higher forgiveness toward the religious leader, and positive attitudes towards the Sacred.</description><subject>Humility</subject><subject>Intellect</subject><subject>Intelligence (Psychology)</subject><subject>Intelligence levels</subject><subject>Religious aspects</subject><subject>Religious leaders</subject><issn>0091-6471</issn><issn>2328-1162</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0s2LEzEUAPAgCtbqP-Ap4MnDrPmaL29LXXcLxQV3PYc08zLNkklqklnc_96ULkixiOQQSH7vJXl5CL2n5ILStv1ESE8b0VIqiGCEUMJfoAXjrKsobdhLtDiA6iBeozcpPRBCmOj4Arm1z-Ac6Dwrh2_myTqbnz7jO60c4C_wCC7sJ_AZKz_g-x2ECNmWTXzl1DZElW3wCVuP8w7wKpRsvzIOBn8HZ0cb5oQ3oAaIaWf3b9Ero1yCd8_zEv34enW_uqk2t9fr1eWm0oI2uWK0rpUY-lq0hIstgboZOOm2PdNsMBqM2QLQVhDeE1YTqntRk8FA31IjDON8iT4c8-5j-DlDyvIhzNGXIyWtG1ZTLlr2R43lqdJ6E3JUerJJy0veNFw0XanjElVn1AgeonLBg7Fl-cRfnPFlDDBZfTbg40mAPtZwVHNKcn337b9td73518WfrQ7lt0eQpeCr21PPjl7HkFIEI_fRTio-SUrkocnk303GfwM0l78L</recordid><startdate>20140322</startdate><enddate>20140322</enddate><creator>McElroy, Stacey E</creator><creator>Rice, Kenneth G</creator><creator>Davis, Don E</creator><creator>Hook, Joshua N</creator><creator>Hill, Peter C</creator><creator>Worthington, Everett L. Jr</creator><creator>Tongeren, Daryl R. Van</creator><general>Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140322</creationdate><title>Intellectual Humility: Scale Development and Theoretical Elaborations in the Context of Religious Leadership</title><author>McElroy, Stacey E ; Rice, Kenneth G ; Davis, Don E ; Hook, Joshua N ; Hill, Peter C ; Worthington, Everett L. Jr ; Tongeren, Daryl R. Van</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-2155a4d9547034b0e56d308b92c2dfceffbee17403902501c9450dfe971f4f233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Humility</topic><topic>Intellect</topic><topic>Intelligence (Psychology)</topic><topic>Intelligence levels</topic><topic>Religious aspects</topic><topic>Religious leaders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McElroy, Stacey E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Kenneth G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Don E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hook, Joshua N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worthington, Everett L. Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tongeren, Daryl R. Van</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychology and theology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McElroy, Stacey E</au><au>Rice, Kenneth G</au><au>Davis, Don E</au><au>Hook, Joshua N</au><au>Hill, Peter C</au><au>Worthington, Everett L. Jr</au><au>Tongeren, Daryl R. Van</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intellectual Humility: Scale Development and Theoretical Elaborations in the Context of Religious Leadership</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychology and theology</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Psychology and Theology</addtitle><date>2014-03-22</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>19-30</pages><issn>0091-6471</issn><eissn>2328-1162</eissn><abstract>This article focused on how perceptions of intellectual humility (IH)—humility regarding one's knowledge or influence over ideas—affect relationships with religious leaders. We developed an informant report measure of IH perceptions using exploratory (Study 1; N = 213) and confirmatory (Study 2; N = 213) factor analyses, as well as a basic manipulation of IH (Study 3; N = 139). Then in Study 4 (N = 105), we examined IH in the context of a major betrayal by a religious leader (i.e., aligning with several factors theorized to strain the practice of IH). The results provide preliminary evidence for the psychometric soundness of the scale, including reliability and content validity of the scores. The scale was able to distinguish between IH and other constructs. Furthermore, the results provide initial evidence that IH is related to social bonds, as perceptions of IH were related to trust and higher forgiveness toward the religious leader, and positive attitudes towards the Sacred.</abstract><cop>La Mirada</cop><pub>Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</pub><doi>10.1177/009164711404200103</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-6471 |
ispartof | Journal of psychology and theology, 2014-03, Vol.42 (1), p.19-30 |
issn | 0091-6471 2328-1162 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1562513472 |
source | Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Humility Intellect Intelligence (Psychology) Intelligence levels Religious aspects Religious leaders |
title | Intellectual Humility: Scale Development and Theoretical Elaborations in the Context of Religious Leadership |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A12%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intellectual%20Humility:%20Scale%20Development%20and%20Theoretical%20Elaborations%20in%20the%20Context%20of%20Religious%20Leadership&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychology%20and%20theology&rft.au=McElroy,%20Stacey%20E&rft.date=2014-03-22&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=19-30&rft.issn=0091-6471&rft.eissn=2328-1162&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/009164711404200103&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA366346810%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-2155a4d9547034b0e56d308b92c2dfceffbee17403902501c9450dfe971f4f233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1562513472&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A366346810&rfr_iscdi=true |