Loading…
Compound Eye Miniaturization in Lepidoptera: a comparative morphological analysis
Superposition and apposition compound eyes are commonly associated with moths and butterflies, respectively. However, recently intermediate eye designs, combining features of both apposition and superposition eyes were found in tiny insects. Here, we examine the eyes of 12 species of moth, ranging f...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta zoologica (Stockholm) 2014-10, Vol.95 (4), p.438-464 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 464 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 438 |
container_title | Acta zoologica (Stockholm) |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Fischer, Stefan Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno Müller, Carsten H. G. |
description | Superposition and apposition compound eyes are commonly associated with moths and butterflies, respectively. However, recently intermediate eye designs, combining features of both apposition and superposition eyes were found in tiny insects. Here, we examine the eyes of 12 species of moth, ranging from 1.88 to 6.03 mm body size, by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Correlations between body and eye sizes are discussed with regard to the eyes' functionality. Although all of the species shared an ommatidial organization characteristic of pterygote insects, three optical designs were found: (a) an apposition eye, (b) an eye resembling apposition eyes, but with a unique crystalline cone, and (c) an eye intermediate in structure between apposition and superposition eyes. Our comparisons also revealed a new type of basal matrix for the Lepidoptera. The results show that in most of the examined compound eyes (with the exception of the apposition eye of Micropterix aruncella), a clear distinction between apposition and superposition eyes is not feasible. Due to functional morphological constraints as a consequence of miniaturization, evolutionary transformations from superposition into apposition optics may have occurred several times independently in various ‘microlepidopteran’ taxa. The Phyllonorycter medicaginella eye appears to illustrate this evolutionary scenario best. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/azo.12041 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1563018891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3436298341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3601-9971fb0e6c07f53ca758cc7c1698f5a52e7cba6b6e9d038959460e2237d5d98c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHv8GC522TTfPPWym1Kq1FUBQvIc1mNXW7WZNddfvpja04l5lhfm94PADOERygWEO1dQOUwRE6AD00ojilWJBD0IMQopRlLDsGJyGs48ohznrgfuI2tWurPJl2JlnYyqqm9XarGuuqxFbJ3NQ2d3VjvLpMVKIjrny8fppk43z95kr3arUqE1Wpsgs2nIKjQpXBnP31Pni8mj5MrtP5cnYzGc9Ti2n0IgRDxQoaqiErCNaKEa4104gKXhBFMsP0StEVNSKHmAsiRhSaLMMsJ7ngGvfBxf5v7d1Ha0Ij16710USQiFAMEecCRWq4p75saTpZe7tRvpMIyt-4ZIxL7uKS45flboiKdK-woTHf_wrl3yVlmBH5dDeTYpYt-K3g8hn_APdabog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1563018891</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compound Eye Miniaturization in Lepidoptera: a comparative morphological analysis</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Fischer, Stefan ; Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno ; Müller, Carsten H. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Stefan ; Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno ; Müller, Carsten H. G.</creatorcontrib><description>Superposition and apposition compound eyes are commonly associated with moths and butterflies, respectively. However, recently intermediate eye designs, combining features of both apposition and superposition eyes were found in tiny insects. Here, we examine the eyes of 12 species of moth, ranging from 1.88 to 6.03 mm body size, by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Correlations between body and eye sizes are discussed with regard to the eyes' functionality. Although all of the species shared an ommatidial organization characteristic of pterygote insects, three optical designs were found: (a) an apposition eye, (b) an eye resembling apposition eyes, but with a unique crystalline cone, and (c) an eye intermediate in structure between apposition and superposition eyes. Our comparisons also revealed a new type of basal matrix for the Lepidoptera. The results show that in most of the examined compound eyes (with the exception of the apposition eye of Micropterix aruncella), a clear distinction between apposition and superposition eyes is not feasible. Due to functional morphological constraints as a consequence of miniaturization, evolutionary transformations from superposition into apposition optics may have occurred several times independently in various ‘microlepidopteran’ taxa. The Phyllonorycter medicaginella eye appears to illustrate this evolutionary scenario best.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-7272</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-6395</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/azo.12041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>apposition ; basal matrix ; Butterflies & moths ; Entomology ; Evolution ; insect ; Morphology ; superposition ; vision</subject><ispartof>Acta zoologica (Stockholm), 2014-10, Vol.95 (4), p.438-464</ispartof><rights>2013 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Carsten H. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Compound Eye Miniaturization in Lepidoptera: a comparative morphological analysis</title><title>Acta zoologica (Stockholm)</title><addtitle>Acta Zool</addtitle><description>Superposition and apposition compound eyes are commonly associated with moths and butterflies, respectively. However, recently intermediate eye designs, combining features of both apposition and superposition eyes were found in tiny insects. Here, we examine the eyes of 12 species of moth, ranging from 1.88 to 6.03 mm body size, by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Correlations between body and eye sizes are discussed with regard to the eyes' functionality. Although all of the species shared an ommatidial organization characteristic of pterygote insects, three optical designs were found: (a) an apposition eye, (b) an eye resembling apposition eyes, but with a unique crystalline cone, and (c) an eye intermediate in structure between apposition and superposition eyes. Our comparisons also revealed a new type of basal matrix for the Lepidoptera. The results show that in most of the examined compound eyes (with the exception of the apposition eye of Micropterix aruncella), a clear distinction between apposition and superposition eyes is not feasible. Due to functional morphological constraints as a consequence of miniaturization, evolutionary transformations from superposition into apposition optics may have occurred several times independently in various ‘microlepidopteran’ taxa. The Phyllonorycter medicaginella eye appears to illustrate this evolutionary scenario best.</description><subject>apposition</subject><subject>basal matrix</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>insect</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>superposition</subject><subject>vision</subject><issn>0001-7272</issn><issn>1463-6395</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHv8GC522TTfPPWym1Kq1FUBQvIc1mNXW7WZNddfvpja04l5lhfm94PADOERygWEO1dQOUwRE6AD00ojilWJBD0IMQopRlLDsGJyGs48ohznrgfuI2tWurPJl2JlnYyqqm9XarGuuqxFbJ3NQ2d3VjvLpMVKIjrny8fppk43z95kr3arUqE1Wpsgs2nIKjQpXBnP31Pni8mj5MrtP5cnYzGc9Ti2n0IgRDxQoaqiErCNaKEa4104gKXhBFMsP0StEVNSKHmAsiRhSaLMMsJ7ngGvfBxf5v7d1Ha0Ij16710USQiFAMEecCRWq4p75saTpZe7tRvpMIyt-4ZIxL7uKS45flboiKdK-woTHf_wrl3yVlmBH5dDeTYpYt-K3g8hn_APdabog</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Fischer, Stefan</creator><creator>Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno</creator><creator>Müller, Carsten H. G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Compound Eye Miniaturization in Lepidoptera: a comparative morphological analysis</title><author>Fischer, Stefan ; Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno ; Müller, Carsten H. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3601-9971fb0e6c07f53ca758cc7c1698f5a52e7cba6b6e9d038959460e2237d5d98c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>apposition</topic><topic>basal matrix</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>insect</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>superposition</topic><topic>vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Carsten H. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Acta zoologica (Stockholm)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fischer, Stefan</au><au>Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno</au><au>Müller, Carsten H. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Compound Eye Miniaturization in Lepidoptera: a comparative morphological analysis</atitle><jtitle>Acta zoologica (Stockholm)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Zool</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>438</spage><epage>464</epage><pages>438-464</pages><issn>0001-7272</issn><eissn>1463-6395</eissn><abstract>Superposition and apposition compound eyes are commonly associated with moths and butterflies, respectively. However, recently intermediate eye designs, combining features of both apposition and superposition eyes were found in tiny insects. Here, we examine the eyes of 12 species of moth, ranging from 1.88 to 6.03 mm body size, by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Correlations between body and eye sizes are discussed with regard to the eyes' functionality. Although all of the species shared an ommatidial organization characteristic of pterygote insects, three optical designs were found: (a) an apposition eye, (b) an eye resembling apposition eyes, but with a unique crystalline cone, and (c) an eye intermediate in structure between apposition and superposition eyes. Our comparisons also revealed a new type of basal matrix for the Lepidoptera. The results show that in most of the examined compound eyes (with the exception of the apposition eye of Micropterix aruncella), a clear distinction between apposition and superposition eyes is not feasible. Due to functional morphological constraints as a consequence of miniaturization, evolutionary transformations from superposition into apposition optics may have occurred several times independently in various ‘microlepidopteran’ taxa. The Phyllonorycter medicaginella eye appears to illustrate this evolutionary scenario best.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/azo.12041</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-7272 |
ispartof | Acta zoologica (Stockholm), 2014-10, Vol.95 (4), p.438-464 |
issn | 0001-7272 1463-6395 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1563018891 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | apposition basal matrix Butterflies & moths Entomology Evolution insect Morphology superposition vision |
title | Compound Eye Miniaturization in Lepidoptera: a comparative morphological analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A45%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compound%20Eye%20Miniaturization%20in%20Lepidoptera:%20a%20comparative%20morphological%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Acta%20zoologica%20(Stockholm)&rft.au=Fischer,%20Stefan&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=438&rft.epage=464&rft.pages=438-464&rft.issn=0001-7272&rft.eissn=1463-6395&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/azo.12041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3436298341%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3601-9971fb0e6c07f53ca758cc7c1698f5a52e7cba6b6e9d038959460e2237d5d98c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1563018891&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |