Loading…

Compound Eye Miniaturization in Lepidoptera: a comparative morphological analysis

Superposition and apposition compound eyes are commonly associated with moths and butterflies, respectively. However, recently intermediate eye designs, combining features of both apposition and superposition eyes were found in tiny insects. Here, we examine the eyes of 12 species of moth, ranging f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta zoologica (Stockholm) 2014-10, Vol.95 (4), p.438-464
Main Authors: Fischer, Stefan, Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno, Müller, Carsten H. G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 464
container_issue 4
container_start_page 438
container_title Acta zoologica (Stockholm)
container_volume 95
creator Fischer, Stefan
Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno
Müller, Carsten H. G.
description Superposition and apposition compound eyes are commonly associated with moths and butterflies, respectively. However, recently intermediate eye designs, combining features of both apposition and superposition eyes were found in tiny insects. Here, we examine the eyes of 12 species of moth, ranging from 1.88 to 6.03 mm body size, by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Correlations between body and eye sizes are discussed with regard to the eyes' functionality. Although all of the species shared an ommatidial organization characteristic of pterygote insects, three optical designs were found: (a) an apposition eye, (b) an eye resembling apposition eyes, but with a unique crystalline cone, and (c) an eye intermediate in structure between apposition and superposition eyes. Our comparisons also revealed a new type of basal matrix for the Lepidoptera. The results show that in most of the examined compound eyes (with the exception of the apposition eye of Micropterix aruncella), a clear distinction between apposition and superposition eyes is not feasible. Due to functional morphological constraints as a consequence of miniaturization, evolutionary transformations from superposition into apposition optics may have occurred several times independently in various ‘microlepidopteran’ taxa. The Phyllonorycter medicaginella eye appears to illustrate this evolutionary scenario best.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/azo.12041
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1563018891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3436298341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3601-9971fb0e6c07f53ca758cc7c1698f5a52e7cba6b6e9d038959460e2237d5d98c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHv8GC522TTfPPWym1Kq1FUBQvIc1mNXW7WZNddfvpja04l5lhfm94PADOERygWEO1dQOUwRE6AD00ojilWJBD0IMQopRlLDsGJyGs48ohznrgfuI2tWurPJl2JlnYyqqm9XarGuuqxFbJ3NQ2d3VjvLpMVKIjrny8fppk43z95kr3arUqE1Wpsgs2nIKjQpXBnP31Pni8mj5MrtP5cnYzGc9Ti2n0IgRDxQoaqiErCNaKEa4104gKXhBFMsP0StEVNSKHmAsiRhSaLMMsJ7ngGvfBxf5v7d1Ha0Ij16710USQiFAMEecCRWq4p75saTpZe7tRvpMIyt-4ZIxL7uKS45flboiKdK-woTHf_wrl3yVlmBH5dDeTYpYt-K3g8hn_APdabog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1563018891</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compound Eye Miniaturization in Lepidoptera: a comparative morphological analysis</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Fischer, Stefan ; Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno ; Müller, Carsten H. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Stefan ; Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno ; Müller, Carsten H. G.</creatorcontrib><description>Superposition and apposition compound eyes are commonly associated with moths and butterflies, respectively. However, recently intermediate eye designs, combining features of both apposition and superposition eyes were found in tiny insects. Here, we examine the eyes of 12 species of moth, ranging from 1.88 to 6.03 mm body size, by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Correlations between body and eye sizes are discussed with regard to the eyes' functionality. Although all of the species shared an ommatidial organization characteristic of pterygote insects, three optical designs were found: (a) an apposition eye, (b) an eye resembling apposition eyes, but with a unique crystalline cone, and (c) an eye intermediate in structure between apposition and superposition eyes. Our comparisons also revealed a new type of basal matrix for the Lepidoptera. The results show that in most of the examined compound eyes (with the exception of the apposition eye of Micropterix aruncella), a clear distinction between apposition and superposition eyes is not feasible. Due to functional morphological constraints as a consequence of miniaturization, evolutionary transformations from superposition into apposition optics may have occurred several times independently in various ‘microlepidopteran’ taxa. The Phyllonorycter medicaginella eye appears to illustrate this evolutionary scenario best.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-7272</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-6395</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/azo.12041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>apposition ; basal matrix ; Butterflies &amp; moths ; Entomology ; Evolution ; insect ; Morphology ; superposition ; vision</subject><ispartof>Acta zoologica (Stockholm), 2014-10, Vol.95 (4), p.438-464</ispartof><rights>2013 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Carsten H. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Compound Eye Miniaturization in Lepidoptera: a comparative morphological analysis</title><title>Acta zoologica (Stockholm)</title><addtitle>Acta Zool</addtitle><description>Superposition and apposition compound eyes are commonly associated with moths and butterflies, respectively. However, recently intermediate eye designs, combining features of both apposition and superposition eyes were found in tiny insects. Here, we examine the eyes of 12 species of moth, ranging from 1.88 to 6.03 mm body size, by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Correlations between body and eye sizes are discussed with regard to the eyes' functionality. Although all of the species shared an ommatidial organization characteristic of pterygote insects, three optical designs were found: (a) an apposition eye, (b) an eye resembling apposition eyes, but with a unique crystalline cone, and (c) an eye intermediate in structure between apposition and superposition eyes. Our comparisons also revealed a new type of basal matrix for the Lepidoptera. The results show that in most of the examined compound eyes (with the exception of the apposition eye of Micropterix aruncella), a clear distinction between apposition and superposition eyes is not feasible. Due to functional morphological constraints as a consequence of miniaturization, evolutionary transformations from superposition into apposition optics may have occurred several times independently in various ‘microlepidopteran’ taxa. The Phyllonorycter medicaginella eye appears to illustrate this evolutionary scenario best.</description><subject>apposition</subject><subject>basal matrix</subject><subject>Butterflies &amp; moths</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>insect</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>superposition</subject><subject>vision</subject><issn>0001-7272</issn><issn>1463-6395</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHv8GC522TTfPPWym1Kq1FUBQvIc1mNXW7WZNddfvpja04l5lhfm94PADOERygWEO1dQOUwRE6AD00ojilWJBD0IMQopRlLDsGJyGs48ohznrgfuI2tWurPJl2JlnYyqqm9XarGuuqxFbJ3NQ2d3VjvLpMVKIjrny8fppk43z95kr3arUqE1Wpsgs2nIKjQpXBnP31Pni8mj5MrtP5cnYzGc9Ti2n0IgRDxQoaqiErCNaKEa4104gKXhBFMsP0StEVNSKHmAsiRhSaLMMsJ7ngGvfBxf5v7d1Ha0Ij16710USQiFAMEecCRWq4p75saTpZe7tRvpMIyt-4ZIxL7uKS45flboiKdK-woTHf_wrl3yVlmBH5dDeTYpYt-K3g8hn_APdabog</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Fischer, Stefan</creator><creator>Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno</creator><creator>Müller, Carsten H. G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Compound Eye Miniaturization in Lepidoptera: a comparative morphological analysis</title><author>Fischer, Stefan ; Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno ; Müller, Carsten H. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3601-9971fb0e6c07f53ca758cc7c1698f5a52e7cba6b6e9d038959460e2237d5d98c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>apposition</topic><topic>basal matrix</topic><topic>Butterflies &amp; moths</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>insect</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>superposition</topic><topic>vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Carsten H. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Acta zoologica (Stockholm)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fischer, Stefan</au><au>Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno</au><au>Müller, Carsten H. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Compound Eye Miniaturization in Lepidoptera: a comparative morphological analysis</atitle><jtitle>Acta zoologica (Stockholm)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Zool</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>438</spage><epage>464</epage><pages>438-464</pages><issn>0001-7272</issn><eissn>1463-6395</eissn><abstract>Superposition and apposition compound eyes are commonly associated with moths and butterflies, respectively. However, recently intermediate eye designs, combining features of both apposition and superposition eyes were found in tiny insects. Here, we examine the eyes of 12 species of moth, ranging from 1.88 to 6.03 mm body size, by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Correlations between body and eye sizes are discussed with regard to the eyes' functionality. Although all of the species shared an ommatidial organization characteristic of pterygote insects, three optical designs were found: (a) an apposition eye, (b) an eye resembling apposition eyes, but with a unique crystalline cone, and (c) an eye intermediate in structure between apposition and superposition eyes. Our comparisons also revealed a new type of basal matrix for the Lepidoptera. The results show that in most of the examined compound eyes (with the exception of the apposition eye of Micropterix aruncella), a clear distinction between apposition and superposition eyes is not feasible. Due to functional morphological constraints as a consequence of miniaturization, evolutionary transformations from superposition into apposition optics may have occurred several times independently in various ‘microlepidopteran’ taxa. The Phyllonorycter medicaginella eye appears to illustrate this evolutionary scenario best.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/azo.12041</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-7272
ispartof Acta zoologica (Stockholm), 2014-10, Vol.95 (4), p.438-464
issn 0001-7272
1463-6395
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1563018891
source Wiley
subjects apposition
basal matrix
Butterflies & moths
Entomology
Evolution
insect
Morphology
superposition
vision
title Compound Eye Miniaturization in Lepidoptera: a comparative morphological analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A45%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compound%20Eye%20Miniaturization%20in%20Lepidoptera:%20a%20comparative%20morphological%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Acta%20zoologica%20(Stockholm)&rft.au=Fischer,%20Stefan&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=438&rft.epage=464&rft.pages=438-464&rft.issn=0001-7272&rft.eissn=1463-6395&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/azo.12041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3436298341%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3601-9971fb0e6c07f53ca758cc7c1698f5a52e7cba6b6e9d038959460e2237d5d98c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1563018891&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true