‘We the People’ Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances

All over the world, constitutional theory has been experiencing developments which have been studied under the rubric of dialogic constitutionalism, dialogic justice or dialogic judicial review. These novelties seem to have the capacity to challenge traditional ideas and assumptions concerning the s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current legal problems 2014, Vol.67 (1), p.1-47
Main Author: Gargarella, Roberto
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Constitutional law
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-3d895de90aa328c558c5b9ce948aec749c1ba710511f600774fa8fc4ed4b9873
cites
container_end_page 47
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Current legal problems
container_volume 67
creator Gargarella, Roberto
description All over the world, constitutional theory has been experiencing developments which have been studied under the rubric of dialogic constitutionalism, dialogic justice or dialogic judicial review. These novelties seem to have the capacity to challenge traditional ideas and assumptions concerning the system of separation of powers, the organization of checks and balances, and more particularly judicial review. This article critically assesses the recent development of this dialogic practice through examples mainly coming from Latin America. It maintains that, beside the genuine reasons we have to celebrate the coming of dialogic constitutionalism, we also have reasons for concern, particularly if we are not willing to modify the basic structure of the system of checks and balances on which it is usually based.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/clp/cuu008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1564014953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/clp/cuu008</oup_id><sourcerecordid>3438822331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-3d895de90aa328c558c5b9ce948aec749c1ba710511f600774fa8fc4ed4b9873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1OwzAQgC0EElXpwhNEQixIoXbiNDYblF-pqEhUYowc50INaRxie-iC-hjwen0S3ISBieF00t13p7sPoWOCzwnm8VhWzVg6hzHbQ4MIUxoyGkX7aIBxikPCOTtEI2NUjgklNGFRPECf283XCwR2CcET6KaC7eY7mDtrVAGBLrvGVNfGKuus0vVFsPCVayUq_apk8KgLqHbcX0ZUyqwCURfd9PPaWFh1zBLku-kaV6IStQRzhA5KURkY_eYhWtzeLKb34Wx-9zC9nIUyYtyGccF4UgDHQsQRk0niI-cSOGUCZEq5JLlICU4IKSf-25SWgpWSQkFzztJ4iE76tU2rPxwYm71p1_pDTUaSCfU-eBJ76qynZKuNaaHMmlatRLvOCM52hjNvOOsNe_i0h7Vr_uN-ACBnfoE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1564014953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘We the People’ Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances</title><source>LexisPlusUK Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Gargarella, Roberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Gargarella, Roberto</creatorcontrib><description>All over the world, constitutional theory has been experiencing developments which have been studied under the rubric of dialogic constitutionalism, dialogic justice or dialogic judicial review. These novelties seem to have the capacity to challenge traditional ideas and assumptions concerning the system of separation of powers, the organization of checks and balances, and more particularly judicial review. This article critically assesses the recent development of this dialogic practice through examples mainly coming from Latin America. It maintains that, beside the genuine reasons we have to celebrate the coming of dialogic constitutionalism, we also have reasons for concern, particularly if we are not willing to modify the basic structure of the system of checks and balances on which it is usually based.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0070-1998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/clp/cuu008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Constitutional law</subject><ispartof>Current legal problems, 2014, Vol.67 (1), p.1-47</ispartof><rights>The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-3d895de90aa328c558c5b9ce948aec749c1ba710511f600774fa8fc4ed4b9873</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gargarella, Roberto</creatorcontrib><title>‘We the People’ Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances</title><title>Current legal problems</title><description>All over the world, constitutional theory has been experiencing developments which have been studied under the rubric of dialogic constitutionalism, dialogic justice or dialogic judicial review. These novelties seem to have the capacity to challenge traditional ideas and assumptions concerning the system of separation of powers, the organization of checks and balances, and more particularly judicial review. This article critically assesses the recent development of this dialogic practice through examples mainly coming from Latin America. It maintains that, beside the genuine reasons we have to celebrate the coming of dialogic constitutionalism, we also have reasons for concern, particularly if we are not willing to modify the basic structure of the system of checks and balances on which it is usually based.</description><subject>Constitutional law</subject><issn>0070-1998</issn><issn>2044-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kL1OwzAQgC0EElXpwhNEQixIoXbiNDYblF-pqEhUYowc50INaRxie-iC-hjwen0S3ISBieF00t13p7sPoWOCzwnm8VhWzVg6hzHbQ4MIUxoyGkX7aIBxikPCOTtEI2NUjgklNGFRPECf283XCwR2CcET6KaC7eY7mDtrVAGBLrvGVNfGKuus0vVFsPCVayUq_apk8KgLqHbcX0ZUyqwCURfd9PPaWFh1zBLku-kaV6IStQRzhA5KURkY_eYhWtzeLKb34Wx-9zC9nIUyYtyGccF4UgDHQsQRk0niI-cSOGUCZEq5JLlICU4IKSf-25SWgpWSQkFzztJ4iE76tU2rPxwYm71p1_pDTUaSCfU-eBJ76qynZKuNaaHMmlatRLvOCM52hjNvOOsNe_i0h7Vr_uN-ACBnfoE</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Gargarella, Roberto</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>‘We the People’ Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances</title><author>Gargarella, Roberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-3d895de90aa328c558c5b9ce948aec749c1ba710511f600774fa8fc4ed4b9873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Constitutional law</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gargarella, Roberto</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>UK &amp; Ireland Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Current legal problems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gargarella, Roberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘We the People’ Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances</atitle><jtitle>Current legal problems</jtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>1-47</pages><issn>0070-1998</issn><eissn>2044-8422</eissn><abstract>All over the world, constitutional theory has been experiencing developments which have been studied under the rubric of dialogic constitutionalism, dialogic justice or dialogic judicial review. These novelties seem to have the capacity to challenge traditional ideas and assumptions concerning the system of separation of powers, the organization of checks and balances, and more particularly judicial review. This article critically assesses the recent development of this dialogic practice through examples mainly coming from Latin America. It maintains that, beside the genuine reasons we have to celebrate the coming of dialogic constitutionalism, we also have reasons for concern, particularly if we are not willing to modify the basic structure of the system of checks and balances on which it is usually based.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/clp/cuu008</doi><tpages>47</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0070-1998
ispartof Current legal problems, 2014, Vol.67 (1), p.1-47
issn 0070-1998
2044-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1564014953
source LexisPlusUK Journals; Oxford Journals Online
subjects Constitutional law
title ‘We the People’ Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T23%3A40%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98We%20the%20People%E2%80%99%20Outside%20of%20the%20Constitution:%20The%20Dialogic%20Model%20of%20Constitutionalism%20and%20the%20System%20of%20Checks%20and%20Balances&rft.jtitle=Current%20legal%20problems&rft.au=Gargarella,%20Roberto&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=1-47&rft.issn=0070-1998&rft.eissn=2044-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/clp/cuu008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3438822331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-3d895de90aa328c558c5b9ce948aec749c1ba710511f600774fa8fc4ed4b9873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1564014953&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/clp/cuu008&rfr_iscdi=true