Loading…
Ecological and economic evaluation of biogas from intercrops: Doc 26
Biogas made from main crops (e.g., corn) is commonly used for producing electricity and heat. Nevertheless, the production of energy from monocultures is highly unsustainable and not truly renewable. Since neither monocultures nor food competition are desirable, intercrops can be used to increase th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energy, sustainability and society sustainability and society, 2012-09, Vol.2, p.1 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Energy, sustainability and society |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Niemetz, Nora Kettl, Karl-heinz |
description | Biogas made from main crops (e.g., corn) is commonly used for producing electricity and heat. Nevertheless, the production of energy from monocultures is highly unsustainable and not truly renewable. Since neither monocultures nor food competition are desirable, intercrops can be used to increase the yield per hectare instead of leaving agricultural fields unplanted for soil regeneration. The extra biomass can be used for biogas production. In a case study, the economic as well as the ecological feasibility of biogas production using intercrops, cattle manure, grass and corn silage as feedstocks for fermenters was analyzed. The set-up for the case study included different feedstock combinations as well as spatial distributions of substrate supply and heat demand for modeling and optimization. Using the process network synthesis, an optimum structure was generated representing the most economical technology constellation which included transport of substrates, heat and biogas (when applicable). The ecological evaluation was carried out by using the sustainable process index method. The application of both methodologies to different scenarios allowed a constellation to be found which is economically feasible while entailing low ecological pressure. It is demonstrated that the production of intercrops for producing biogas has so far not been regarded as a viable option by the farmers due to a variety of barriers. Sensitization is needed to emphasize that planting intercrops holds many advantages like positive effects on soil regeneration and raised nitrogen fixation, as well as increased biomass output per hectare and, last but not least, it allows the production of energy without conflicts between food and energy production. Using intercrops for the production of biogas has the potential to decrease the ecological footprint decisively while still offering opportunities in the lucrative biogas market. The transfer of know how regarding this option should be taken up by agricultural training.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/2192-0567-2-18 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1564429674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3441105591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_15644296743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjbEKwjAURYMgWLSr8wPnaBLbtAU3qfgB7hJjWlLSvJq0fr8dxNm7XDj3wCVky9me81IeBK8EZbksqKC8XJDkB1YkjbFjcwomM1El5FRrdNharRwo_wSj0WNvNZi3cpMaLXrABh4WWxWhCdiD9aMJOuAQN2TZKBdN-u012V3q2_lKh4CvycTx3uEU_DzdeS6z-VAW2fE_6wO6EDxd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1564429674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecological and economic evaluation of biogas from intercrops: Doc 26</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Niemetz, Nora ; Kettl, Karl-heinz</creator><creatorcontrib>Niemetz, Nora ; Kettl, Karl-heinz</creatorcontrib><description>Biogas made from main crops (e.g., corn) is commonly used for producing electricity and heat. Nevertheless, the production of energy from monocultures is highly unsustainable and not truly renewable. Since neither monocultures nor food competition are desirable, intercrops can be used to increase the yield per hectare instead of leaving agricultural fields unplanted for soil regeneration. The extra biomass can be used for biogas production. In a case study, the economic as well as the ecological feasibility of biogas production using intercrops, cattle manure, grass and corn silage as feedstocks for fermenters was analyzed. The set-up for the case study included different feedstock combinations as well as spatial distributions of substrate supply and heat demand for modeling and optimization. Using the process network synthesis, an optimum structure was generated representing the most economical technology constellation which included transport of substrates, heat and biogas (when applicable). The ecological evaluation was carried out by using the sustainable process index method. The application of both methodologies to different scenarios allowed a constellation to be found which is economically feasible while entailing low ecological pressure. It is demonstrated that the production of intercrops for producing biogas has so far not been regarded as a viable option by the farmers due to a variety of barriers. Sensitization is needed to emphasize that planting intercrops holds many advantages like positive effects on soil regeneration and raised nitrogen fixation, as well as increased biomass output per hectare and, last but not least, it allows the production of energy without conflicts between food and energy production. Using intercrops for the production of biogas has the potential to decrease the ecological footprint decisively while still offering opportunities in the lucrative biogas market. The transfer of know how regarding this option should be taken up by agricultural training.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>EISSN: 2192-0567</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/2192-0567-2-18</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural production ; Biogas ; Biomass ; Case studies ; Cattle ; Cattle manure ; Corn ; Corn silage ; Costs ; Crop rotation ; Ecological footprint ; Economics ; Electricity ; Electricity distribution ; Energy ; Feeds ; Manures ; Monoculture ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen fixation ; Optimization ; Power plants ; Raw materials ; Spatial distribution ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Energy, sustainability and society, 2012-09, Vol.2, p.1</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1564429674/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1564429674?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,21394,25753,27924,27925,33611,36060,37012,43733,44363,44590,74221,74895,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niemetz, Nora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kettl, Karl-heinz</creatorcontrib><title>Ecological and economic evaluation of biogas from intercrops: Doc 26</title><title>Energy, sustainability and society</title><description>Biogas made from main crops (e.g., corn) is commonly used for producing electricity and heat. Nevertheless, the production of energy from monocultures is highly unsustainable and not truly renewable. Since neither monocultures nor food competition are desirable, intercrops can be used to increase the yield per hectare instead of leaving agricultural fields unplanted for soil regeneration. The extra biomass can be used for biogas production. In a case study, the economic as well as the ecological feasibility of biogas production using intercrops, cattle manure, grass and corn silage as feedstocks for fermenters was analyzed. The set-up for the case study included different feedstock combinations as well as spatial distributions of substrate supply and heat demand for modeling and optimization. Using the process network synthesis, an optimum structure was generated representing the most economical technology constellation which included transport of substrates, heat and biogas (when applicable). The ecological evaluation was carried out by using the sustainable process index method. The application of both methodologies to different scenarios allowed a constellation to be found which is economically feasible while entailing low ecological pressure. It is demonstrated that the production of intercrops for producing biogas has so far not been regarded as a viable option by the farmers due to a variety of barriers. Sensitization is needed to emphasize that planting intercrops holds many advantages like positive effects on soil regeneration and raised nitrogen fixation, as well as increased biomass output per hectare and, last but not least, it allows the production of energy without conflicts between food and energy production. Using intercrops for the production of biogas has the potential to decrease the ecological footprint decisively while still offering opportunities in the lucrative biogas market. The transfer of know how regarding this option should be taken up by agricultural training.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle manure</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Corn silage</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Ecological footprint</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity distribution</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen fixation</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2192-0567</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjbEKwjAURYMgWLSr8wPnaBLbtAU3qfgB7hJjWlLSvJq0fr8dxNm7XDj3wCVky9me81IeBK8EZbksqKC8XJDkB1YkjbFjcwomM1El5FRrdNharRwo_wSj0WNvNZi3cpMaLXrABh4WWxWhCdiD9aMJOuAQN2TZKBdN-u012V3q2_lKh4CvycTx3uEU_DzdeS6z-VAW2fE_6wO6EDxd</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Niemetz, Nora</creator><creator>Kettl, Karl-heinz</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Ecological and economic evaluation of biogas from intercrops</title><author>Niemetz, Nora ; Kettl, Karl-heinz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_15644296743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle manure</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Corn silage</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Ecological footprint</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity distribution</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen fixation</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niemetz, Nora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kettl, Karl-heinz</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Energy, sustainability and society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niemetz, Nora</au><au>Kettl, Karl-heinz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecological and economic evaluation of biogas from intercrops: Doc 26</atitle><jtitle>Energy, sustainability and society</jtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2</volume><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><eissn>2192-0567</eissn><abstract>Biogas made from main crops (e.g., corn) is commonly used for producing electricity and heat. Nevertheless, the production of energy from monocultures is highly unsustainable and not truly renewable. Since neither monocultures nor food competition are desirable, intercrops can be used to increase the yield per hectare instead of leaving agricultural fields unplanted for soil regeneration. The extra biomass can be used for biogas production. In a case study, the economic as well as the ecological feasibility of biogas production using intercrops, cattle manure, grass and corn silage as feedstocks for fermenters was analyzed. The set-up for the case study included different feedstock combinations as well as spatial distributions of substrate supply and heat demand for modeling and optimization. Using the process network synthesis, an optimum structure was generated representing the most economical technology constellation which included transport of substrates, heat and biogas (when applicable). The ecological evaluation was carried out by using the sustainable process index method. The application of both methodologies to different scenarios allowed a constellation to be found which is economically feasible while entailing low ecological pressure. It is demonstrated that the production of intercrops for producing biogas has so far not been regarded as a viable option by the farmers due to a variety of barriers. Sensitization is needed to emphasize that planting intercrops holds many advantages like positive effects on soil regeneration and raised nitrogen fixation, as well as increased biomass output per hectare and, last but not least, it allows the production of energy without conflicts between food and energy production. Using intercrops for the production of biogas has the potential to decrease the ecological footprint decisively while still offering opportunities in the lucrative biogas market. The transfer of know how regarding this option should be taken up by agricultural training.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1186/2192-0567-2-18</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2192-0567 |
ispartof | Energy, sustainability and society, 2012-09, Vol.2, p.1 |
issn | 2192-0567 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1564429674 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Agricultural land Agricultural production Biogas Biomass Case studies Cattle Cattle manure Corn Corn silage Costs Crop rotation Ecological footprint Economics Electricity Electricity distribution Energy Feeds Manures Monoculture Nitrogen Nitrogen fixation Optimization Power plants Raw materials Spatial distribution Sustainability |
title | Ecological and economic evaluation of biogas from intercrops: Doc 26 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A56%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecological%20and%20economic%20evaluation%20of%20biogas%20from%20intercrops:%20Doc%2026&rft.jtitle=Energy,%20sustainability%20and%20society&rft.au=Niemetz,%20Nora&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=2&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.eissn=2192-0567&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/2192-0567-2-18&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3441105591%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_15644296743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1564429674&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |