Generalizing from Research Findings: The Merits of Case Studies

The case study as a key research method has often been criticized for generating results that are less generalizable than those of large‐sample, quantitative methods. This paper clearly defines generalization and distinguishes it from other related concepts. Drawing on the literature, the author sho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of management reviews : IJMR 2014-10, Vol.16 (4), p.369-383
Main Author: Tsang, Eric W.K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Case studies
Management science
Organization theory
Research methodology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4394-e167b3b27449e8df714f6e40f371242aad1e4ecff39b15ce05f2e206d6086c763
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4394-e167b3b27449e8df714f6e40f371242aad1e4ecff39b15ce05f2e206d6086c763
container_end_page 383
container_issue 4
container_start_page 369
container_title International journal of management reviews : IJMR
container_volume 16
creator Tsang, Eric W.K.
description The case study as a key research method has often been criticized for generating results that are less generalizable than those of large‐sample, quantitative methods. This paper clearly defines generalization and distinguishes it from other related concepts. Drawing on the literature, the author shows that case study results may be less generalizable than those of quantitative methods only in the case of within‐population generalization. The author argues that case studies have merits over quantitative methods in terms of theoretical generalization, identifying disconfirming cases and providing useful information for assessing the empirical generalizability of results.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ijmr.12024
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1566613555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3447984891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4394-e167b3b27449e8df714f6e40f371242aad1e4ecff39b15ce05f2e206d6086c763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwkAQhjdGExG9-As28WZS3O8WL8agFAyoQYzHzdLOyiK0uFui-OstoB6dy0wmzzuTPAidUtKidV242cK3KCNM7KEGFSqJGI_J_nYmUSKFPERHIcwIIZQnrIGuUijAm7n7csUrtr5c4BEEMD6b4q4r8nobLvF4CngI3lUBlxZ3TAD8VK1yB-EYHVgzD3Dy05vouXs77vSiwUPa71wPokzwtoiAqnjCJywWog1JbmMqrAJBLI8pE8yYnIKAzFrenlCZAZGWASMqVyRRWax4E53t7i59-b6CUOlZufJF_VJTqZSiXEpZU-c7KvNlCB6sXnq3MH6tKdEbQXojSG8F1TDdwR9uDut_SN2_G45-M9Eu40IFn38Z49-0inks9ct9qh8VUTfpsKdT_g2tWHW3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1566613555</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Generalizing from Research Findings: The Merits of Case Studies</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Tsang, Eric W.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Eric W.K.</creatorcontrib><description>The case study as a key research method has often been criticized for generating results that are less generalizable than those of large‐sample, quantitative methods. This paper clearly defines generalization and distinguishes it from other related concepts. Drawing on the literature, the author shows that case study results may be less generalizable than those of quantitative methods only in the case of within‐population generalization. The author argues that case studies have merits over quantitative methods in terms of theoretical generalization, identifying disconfirming cases and providing useful information for assessing the empirical generalizability of results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-8545</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2370</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Management science ; Organization theory ; Research methodology</subject><ispartof>International journal of management reviews : IJMR, 2014-10, Vol.16 (4), p.369-383</ispartof><rights>2013 British Academy of Management and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 British Academy of Management and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4394-e167b3b27449e8df714f6e40f371242aad1e4ecff39b15ce05f2e206d6086c763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4394-e167b3b27449e8df714f6e40f371242aad1e4ecff39b15ce05f2e206d6086c763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Eric W.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Generalizing from Research Findings: The Merits of Case Studies</title><title>International journal of management reviews : IJMR</title><addtitle>International Journal of Management Reviews</addtitle><description>The case study as a key research method has often been criticized for generating results that are less generalizable than those of large‐sample, quantitative methods. This paper clearly defines generalization and distinguishes it from other related concepts. Drawing on the literature, the author shows that case study results may be less generalizable than those of quantitative methods only in the case of within‐population generalization. The author argues that case studies have merits over quantitative methods in terms of theoretical generalization, identifying disconfirming cases and providing useful information for assessing the empirical generalizability of results.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Management science</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><issn>1460-8545</issn><issn>1468-2370</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwkAQhjdGExG9-As28WZS3O8WL8agFAyoQYzHzdLOyiK0uFui-OstoB6dy0wmzzuTPAidUtKidV242cK3KCNM7KEGFSqJGI_J_nYmUSKFPERHIcwIIZQnrIGuUijAm7n7csUrtr5c4BEEMD6b4q4r8nobLvF4CngI3lUBlxZ3TAD8VK1yB-EYHVgzD3Dy05vouXs77vSiwUPa71wPokzwtoiAqnjCJywWog1JbmMqrAJBLI8pE8yYnIKAzFrenlCZAZGWASMqVyRRWax4E53t7i59-b6CUOlZufJF_VJTqZSiXEpZU-c7KvNlCB6sXnq3MH6tKdEbQXojSG8F1TDdwR9uDut_SN2_G45-M9Eu40IFn38Z49-0inks9ct9qh8VUTfpsKdT_g2tWHW3</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Tsang, Eric W.K.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Generalizing from Research Findings: The Merits of Case Studies</title><author>Tsang, Eric W.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4394-e167b3b27449e8df714f6e40f371242aad1e4ecff39b15ce05f2e206d6086c763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Management science</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Eric W.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of management reviews : IJMR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsang, Eric W.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Generalizing from Research Findings: The Merits of Case Studies</atitle><jtitle>International journal of management reviews : IJMR</jtitle><addtitle>International Journal of Management Reviews</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>383</epage><pages>369-383</pages><issn>1460-8545</issn><eissn>1468-2370</eissn><abstract>The case study as a key research method has often been criticized for generating results that are less generalizable than those of large‐sample, quantitative methods. This paper clearly defines generalization and distinguishes it from other related concepts. Drawing on the literature, the author shows that case study results may be less generalizable than those of quantitative methods only in the case of within‐population generalization. The author argues that case studies have merits over quantitative methods in terms of theoretical generalization, identifying disconfirming cases and providing useful information for assessing the empirical generalizability of results.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ijmr.12024</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1460-8545
ispartof International journal of management reviews : IJMR, 2014-10, Vol.16 (4), p.369-383
issn 1460-8545
1468-2370
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1566613555
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)
subjects Case studies
Management science
Organization theory
Research methodology
title Generalizing from Research Findings: The Merits of Case Studies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T16%3A28%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Generalizing%20from%20Research%20Findings:%20The%20Merits%20of%20Case%20Studies&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20management%20reviews%20:%20IJMR&rft.au=Tsang,%20Eric%20W.K.&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=383&rft.pages=369-383&rft.issn=1460-8545&rft.eissn=1468-2370&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijmr.12024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3447984891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4394-e167b3b27449e8df714f6e40f371242aad1e4ecff39b15ce05f2e206d6086c763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1566613555&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true