Loading…
Director networks and takeovers
We study the impact of corporate networks on the takeover process. We find that better connected companies are more active bidders. When a bidder and a target have one or more directors in common, the probability that the takeover transaction will be successfully completed augments, and the duration...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2014-10, Vol.28, p.218-234 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-8f618e55e954abd15b44d28757d3dd737601fee3913d235642caa81dfffdeb893 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-8f618e55e954abd15b44d28757d3dd737601fee3913d235642caa81dfffdeb893 |
container_end_page | 234 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 218 |
container_title | Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands) |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Renneboog, Luc Zhao, Yang |
description | We study the impact of corporate networks on the takeover process. We find that better connected companies are more active bidders. When a bidder and a target have one or more directors in common, the probability that the takeover transaction will be successfully completed augments, and the duration of the negotiations is shorter. Connected targets more frequently accept offers that involve equity. Directors of the target firm (who are not interlocked) have a better chance to be invited to the board of the combined firm in connected M&As. While connections have a clear impact on the takeover strategy and process, we do not find evidence that the market acknowledges connections between bidders and targets as the announcement returns are not statistically different from those bidders and targets which are ex ante not connected.
•Firms with one or more common directors have a higher probability to merge.•Firms with higher centrality measures are more active acquirers.•Negotiations between connected firms are shorter and more often successfully completed.•Connected bidders more frequently make equity offers.•The market does not recognize the impact of connections on the takeover process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.012 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1615768119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0929119913001193</els_id><sourcerecordid>3470047921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-8f618e55e954abd15b44d28757d3dd737601fee3913d235642caa81dfffdeb893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwC1CJdYLHjl87UHlKldjA2nLtsZQU4mKnRfw9KYU1q9ncx9xDyDnQGijIq67ufMrr2PY1o8BrgJoCOyAT0IpVkgM_JBNqmKkAjDkmJ6V0lFJQVE7IxW2b0Q8pz3ocPlNelZnrw2xwK0xbzOWUHEX3VvDs907J6_3dy_yxWjw_PM1vFpUXjA2VjhI0CoFGNG4ZQCybJjCthAo8BMWVpBARuQEeGBeyYd45DSHGGHCpDZ-Sy33uOqePDZbBdmmT-7HSggShpB6fH1Vyr_I5lZIx2nVu313-skDtDobt7B8Mu4NhAewIYzRe7404bti2mG3xLfYew898G1L7X8Q3AZZqYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1615768119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Director networks and takeovers</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Renneboog, Luc ; Zhao, Yang</creator><creatorcontrib>Renneboog, Luc ; Zhao, Yang</creatorcontrib><description>We study the impact of corporate networks on the takeover process. We find that better connected companies are more active bidders. When a bidder and a target have one or more directors in common, the probability that the takeover transaction will be successfully completed augments, and the duration of the negotiations is shorter. Connected targets more frequently accept offers that involve equity. Directors of the target firm (who are not interlocked) have a better chance to be invited to the board of the combined firm in connected M&As. While connections have a clear impact on the takeover strategy and process, we do not find evidence that the market acknowledges connections between bidders and targets as the announcement returns are not statistically different from those bidders and targets which are ex ante not connected.
•Firms with one or more common directors have a higher probability to merge.•Firms with higher centrality measures are more active acquirers.•Negotiations between connected firms are shorter and more often successfully completed.•Connected bidders more frequently make equity offers.•The market does not recognize the impact of connections on the takeover process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0929-1199</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6313</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acquisitions & mergers ; Bidders ; Bids ; Boards of directors ; Centrality ; Connections ; Director networks ; Mergers and acquisitions ; Rates of return ; Social networks ; Studies ; Target company</subject><ispartof>Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2014-10, Vol.28, p.218-234</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-8f618e55e954abd15b44d28757d3dd737601fee3913d235642caa81dfffdeb893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-8f618e55e954abd15b44d28757d3dd737601fee3913d235642caa81dfffdeb893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Renneboog, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yang</creatorcontrib><title>Director networks and takeovers</title><title>Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</title><description>We study the impact of corporate networks on the takeover process. We find that better connected companies are more active bidders. When a bidder and a target have one or more directors in common, the probability that the takeover transaction will be successfully completed augments, and the duration of the negotiations is shorter. Connected targets more frequently accept offers that involve equity. Directors of the target firm (who are not interlocked) have a better chance to be invited to the board of the combined firm in connected M&As. While connections have a clear impact on the takeover strategy and process, we do not find evidence that the market acknowledges connections between bidders and targets as the announcement returns are not statistically different from those bidders and targets which are ex ante not connected.
•Firms with one or more common directors have a higher probability to merge.•Firms with higher centrality measures are more active acquirers.•Negotiations between connected firms are shorter and more often successfully completed.•Connected bidders more frequently make equity offers.•The market does not recognize the impact of connections on the takeover process.</description><subject>Acquisitions & mergers</subject><subject>Bidders</subject><subject>Bids</subject><subject>Boards of directors</subject><subject>Centrality</subject><subject>Connections</subject><subject>Director networks</subject><subject>Mergers and acquisitions</subject><subject>Rates of return</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Target company</subject><issn>0929-1199</issn><issn>1872-6313</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwC1CJdYLHjl87UHlKldjA2nLtsZQU4mKnRfw9KYU1q9ncx9xDyDnQGijIq67ufMrr2PY1o8BrgJoCOyAT0IpVkgM_JBNqmKkAjDkmJ6V0lFJQVE7IxW2b0Q8pz3ocPlNelZnrw2xwK0xbzOWUHEX3VvDs907J6_3dy_yxWjw_PM1vFpUXjA2VjhI0CoFGNG4ZQCybJjCthAo8BMWVpBARuQEeGBeyYd45DSHGGHCpDZ-Sy33uOqePDZbBdmmT-7HSggShpB6fH1Vyr_I5lZIx2nVu313-skDtDobt7B8Mu4NhAewIYzRe7404bti2mG3xLfYew898G1L7X8Q3AZZqYg</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Renneboog, Luc</creator><creator>Zhao, Yang</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Director networks and takeovers</title><author>Renneboog, Luc ; Zhao, Yang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-8f618e55e954abd15b44d28757d3dd737601fee3913d235642caa81dfffdeb893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions & mergers</topic><topic>Bidders</topic><topic>Bids</topic><topic>Boards of directors</topic><topic>Centrality</topic><topic>Connections</topic><topic>Director networks</topic><topic>Mergers and acquisitions</topic><topic>Rates of return</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Target company</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Renneboog, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Renneboog, Luc</au><au>Zhao, Yang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Director networks and takeovers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><spage>218</spage><epage>234</epage><pages>218-234</pages><issn>0929-1199</issn><eissn>1872-6313</eissn><abstract>We study the impact of corporate networks on the takeover process. We find that better connected companies are more active bidders. When a bidder and a target have one or more directors in common, the probability that the takeover transaction will be successfully completed augments, and the duration of the negotiations is shorter. Connected targets more frequently accept offers that involve equity. Directors of the target firm (who are not interlocked) have a better chance to be invited to the board of the combined firm in connected M&As. While connections have a clear impact on the takeover strategy and process, we do not find evidence that the market acknowledges connections between bidders and targets as the announcement returns are not statistically different from those bidders and targets which are ex ante not connected.
•Firms with one or more common directors have a higher probability to merge.•Firms with higher centrality measures are more active acquirers.•Negotiations between connected firms are shorter and more often successfully completed.•Connected bidders more frequently make equity offers.•The market does not recognize the impact of connections on the takeover process.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.012</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0929-1199 |
ispartof | Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2014-10, Vol.28, p.218-234 |
issn | 0929-1199 1872-6313 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1615768119 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Acquisitions & mergers Bidders Bids Boards of directors Centrality Connections Director networks Mergers and acquisitions Rates of return Social networks Studies Target company |
title | Director networks and takeovers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A23%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Director%20networks%20and%20takeovers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20corporate%20finance%20(Amsterdam,%20Netherlands)&rft.au=Renneboog,%20Luc&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=28&rft.spage=218&rft.epage=234&rft.pages=218-234&rft.issn=0929-1199&rft.eissn=1872-6313&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3470047921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-8f618e55e954abd15b44d28757d3dd737601fee3913d235642caa81dfffdeb893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1615768119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |