Loading…

Director networks and takeovers

We study the impact of corporate networks on the takeover process. We find that better connected companies are more active bidders. When a bidder and a target have one or more directors in common, the probability that the takeover transaction will be successfully completed augments, and the duration...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2014-10, Vol.28, p.218-234
Main Authors: Renneboog, Luc, Zhao, Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-8f618e55e954abd15b44d28757d3dd737601fee3913d235642caa81dfffdeb893
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-8f618e55e954abd15b44d28757d3dd737601fee3913d235642caa81dfffdeb893
container_end_page 234
container_issue
container_start_page 218
container_title Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
container_volume 28
creator Renneboog, Luc
Zhao, Yang
description We study the impact of corporate networks on the takeover process. We find that better connected companies are more active bidders. When a bidder and a target have one or more directors in common, the probability that the takeover transaction will be successfully completed augments, and the duration of the negotiations is shorter. Connected targets more frequently accept offers that involve equity. Directors of the target firm (who are not interlocked) have a better chance to be invited to the board of the combined firm in connected M&As. While connections have a clear impact on the takeover strategy and process, we do not find evidence that the market acknowledges connections between bidders and targets as the announcement returns are not statistically different from those bidders and targets which are ex ante not connected. •Firms with one or more common directors have a higher probability to merge.•Firms with higher centrality measures are more active acquirers.•Negotiations between connected firms are shorter and more often successfully completed.•Connected bidders more frequently make equity offers.•The market does not recognize the impact of connections on the takeover process.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.012
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1615768119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0929119913001193</els_id><sourcerecordid>3470047921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-8f618e55e954abd15b44d28757d3dd737601fee3913d235642caa81dfffdeb893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwC1CJdYLHjl87UHlKldjA2nLtsZQU4mKnRfw9KYU1q9ncx9xDyDnQGijIq67ufMrr2PY1o8BrgJoCOyAT0IpVkgM_JBNqmKkAjDkmJ6V0lFJQVE7IxW2b0Q8pz3ocPlNelZnrw2xwK0xbzOWUHEX3VvDs907J6_3dy_yxWjw_PM1vFpUXjA2VjhI0CoFGNG4ZQCybJjCthAo8BMWVpBARuQEeGBeyYd45DSHGGHCpDZ-Sy33uOqePDZbBdmmT-7HSggShpB6fH1Vyr_I5lZIx2nVu313-skDtDobt7B8Mu4NhAewIYzRe7404bti2mG3xLfYew898G1L7X8Q3AZZqYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1615768119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Director networks and takeovers</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Renneboog, Luc ; Zhao, Yang</creator><creatorcontrib>Renneboog, Luc ; Zhao, Yang</creatorcontrib><description>We study the impact of corporate networks on the takeover process. We find that better connected companies are more active bidders. When a bidder and a target have one or more directors in common, the probability that the takeover transaction will be successfully completed augments, and the duration of the negotiations is shorter. Connected targets more frequently accept offers that involve equity. Directors of the target firm (who are not interlocked) have a better chance to be invited to the board of the combined firm in connected M&amp;As. While connections have a clear impact on the takeover strategy and process, we do not find evidence that the market acknowledges connections between bidders and targets as the announcement returns are not statistically different from those bidders and targets which are ex ante not connected. •Firms with one or more common directors have a higher probability to merge.•Firms with higher centrality measures are more active acquirers.•Negotiations between connected firms are shorter and more often successfully completed.•Connected bidders more frequently make equity offers.•The market does not recognize the impact of connections on the takeover process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0929-1199</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6313</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers ; Bidders ; Bids ; Boards of directors ; Centrality ; Connections ; Director networks ; Mergers and acquisitions ; Rates of return ; Social networks ; Studies ; Target company</subject><ispartof>Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2014-10, Vol.28, p.218-234</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-8f618e55e954abd15b44d28757d3dd737601fee3913d235642caa81dfffdeb893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-8f618e55e954abd15b44d28757d3dd737601fee3913d235642caa81dfffdeb893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Renneboog, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yang</creatorcontrib><title>Director networks and takeovers</title><title>Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</title><description>We study the impact of corporate networks on the takeover process. We find that better connected companies are more active bidders. When a bidder and a target have one or more directors in common, the probability that the takeover transaction will be successfully completed augments, and the duration of the negotiations is shorter. Connected targets more frequently accept offers that involve equity. Directors of the target firm (who are not interlocked) have a better chance to be invited to the board of the combined firm in connected M&amp;As. While connections have a clear impact on the takeover strategy and process, we do not find evidence that the market acknowledges connections between bidders and targets as the announcement returns are not statistically different from those bidders and targets which are ex ante not connected. •Firms with one or more common directors have a higher probability to merge.•Firms with higher centrality measures are more active acquirers.•Negotiations between connected firms are shorter and more often successfully completed.•Connected bidders more frequently make equity offers.•The market does not recognize the impact of connections on the takeover process.</description><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</subject><subject>Bidders</subject><subject>Bids</subject><subject>Boards of directors</subject><subject>Centrality</subject><subject>Connections</subject><subject>Director networks</subject><subject>Mergers and acquisitions</subject><subject>Rates of return</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Target company</subject><issn>0929-1199</issn><issn>1872-6313</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwC1CJdYLHjl87UHlKldjA2nLtsZQU4mKnRfw9KYU1q9ncx9xDyDnQGijIq67ufMrr2PY1o8BrgJoCOyAT0IpVkgM_JBNqmKkAjDkmJ6V0lFJQVE7IxW2b0Q8pz3ocPlNelZnrw2xwK0xbzOWUHEX3VvDs907J6_3dy_yxWjw_PM1vFpUXjA2VjhI0CoFGNG4ZQCybJjCthAo8BMWVpBARuQEeGBeyYd45DSHGGHCpDZ-Sy33uOqePDZbBdmmT-7HSggShpB6fH1Vyr_I5lZIx2nVu313-skDtDobt7B8Mu4NhAewIYzRe7404bti2mG3xLfYew898G1L7X8Q3AZZqYg</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Renneboog, Luc</creator><creator>Zhao, Yang</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Director networks and takeovers</title><author>Renneboog, Luc ; Zhao, Yang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-8f618e55e954abd15b44d28757d3dd737601fee3913d235642caa81dfffdeb893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</topic><topic>Bidders</topic><topic>Bids</topic><topic>Boards of directors</topic><topic>Centrality</topic><topic>Connections</topic><topic>Director networks</topic><topic>Mergers and acquisitions</topic><topic>Rates of return</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Target company</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Renneboog, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Renneboog, Luc</au><au>Zhao, Yang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Director networks and takeovers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><spage>218</spage><epage>234</epage><pages>218-234</pages><issn>0929-1199</issn><eissn>1872-6313</eissn><abstract>We study the impact of corporate networks on the takeover process. We find that better connected companies are more active bidders. When a bidder and a target have one or more directors in common, the probability that the takeover transaction will be successfully completed augments, and the duration of the negotiations is shorter. Connected targets more frequently accept offers that involve equity. Directors of the target firm (who are not interlocked) have a better chance to be invited to the board of the combined firm in connected M&amp;As. While connections have a clear impact on the takeover strategy and process, we do not find evidence that the market acknowledges connections between bidders and targets as the announcement returns are not statistically different from those bidders and targets which are ex ante not connected. •Firms with one or more common directors have a higher probability to merge.•Firms with higher centrality measures are more active acquirers.•Negotiations between connected firms are shorter and more often successfully completed.•Connected bidders more frequently make equity offers.•The market does not recognize the impact of connections on the takeover process.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.012</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0929-1199
ispartof Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2014-10, Vol.28, p.218-234
issn 0929-1199
1872-6313
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1615768119
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Acquisitions & mergers
Bidders
Bids
Boards of directors
Centrality
Connections
Director networks
Mergers and acquisitions
Rates of return
Social networks
Studies
Target company
title Director networks and takeovers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A23%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Director%20networks%20and%20takeovers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20corporate%20finance%20(Amsterdam,%20Netherlands)&rft.au=Renneboog,%20Luc&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=28&rft.spage=218&rft.epage=234&rft.pages=218-234&rft.issn=0929-1199&rft.eissn=1872-6313&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3470047921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-8f618e55e954abd15b44d28757d3dd737601fee3913d235642caa81dfffdeb893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1615768119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true