Loading…
Denis Dutton: Interview with John Horgan
Dutton: The idea . . . that has dominated academic criticism and scholarship of the last forty years [is] that our artistic values are relative to culture, are constructed by culture, are socially constructed by culture-a very popular idea with Marxists, with all sorts of social constructionists: cu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Philosophy and literature 2014-10, Vol.38 (1), p.A293-A313 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | A313 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | A293 |
container_title | Philosophy and literature |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Horgan, John |
description | Dutton: The idea . . . that has dominated academic criticism and scholarship of the last forty years [is] that our artistic values are relative to culture, are constructed by culture, are socially constructed by culture-a very popular idea with Marxists, with all sorts of social constructionists: culture, culture, culture. The book is not a denial of the importance of culture, but it says that culture is working on deeper, biologically evolved adaptations; that in the Pleistocene, the period . . . of 80,000 generations, 1.6 million years, before the modern period, where we became modern humans, we actually acquired as part of our nature hardwired tastes for storytelling, for music, for the enjoyment of images, for dancing, and these adaptations are the basis for the arts. The tide is going in our direction-in Pinker's direction and mine-and I think it is in part an almost Kuhnian breakdown of the poststructuralist, social-constructionist paradigm-art theory and literary theory as it's done by grayheads that got their graduate degrees in the '70s and '80s. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/phl.2014.0039 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1626357821</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3502025841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-d7785ff05bc6a9656d1332024f0e7ad49116212cd589a0128d9dd6d3018d4d093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0L1PwzAQBXALgUQpjOyRWFgS7vyVmA21hRZVYgAkNivEDk3VJsV2qPjvcVQE0y3v3pN-hFwiZMgEu9mtNhkF5BkAU0dkhFDIlFH1dkxGgApSAGSn5Mz7NQDkjNMRuZ7atvHJtA-ha2-TRRus-2rsPtk3YZU8dqs2mXfuo2zPyUldbry9-L1j8no_e5nM0-XTw2Jyt0wrKmVITZ4Xoq5BvFeyVFJIg4xRoLwGm5eGK0RJkVZGFKoEpIVRxkjDAAvDDSg2JleH3p3rPnvrg153vWvjpI6fkom8oBhT6SFVuc57Z2u9c822dN8aQQ8YOmLoAUMPGDHP_1rXtgrb3tv_YiEUz0E_D2CDF3KMVHHsB_tKX7I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1626357821</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Denis Dutton: Interview with John Horgan</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><creator>Horgan, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Horgan, John</creatorcontrib><description>Dutton: The idea . . . that has dominated academic criticism and scholarship of the last forty years [is] that our artistic values are relative to culture, are constructed by culture, are socially constructed by culture-a very popular idea with Marxists, with all sorts of social constructionists: culture, culture, culture. The book is not a denial of the importance of culture, but it says that culture is working on deeper, biologically evolved adaptations; that in the Pleistocene, the period . . . of 80,000 generations, 1.6 million years, before the modern period, where we became modern humans, we actually acquired as part of our nature hardwired tastes for storytelling, for music, for the enjoyment of images, for dancing, and these adaptations are the basis for the arts. The tide is going in our direction-in Pinker's direction and mine-and I think it is in part an almost Kuhnian breakdown of the poststructuralist, social-constructionist paradigm-art theory and literary theory as it's done by grayheads that got their graduate degrees in the '70s and '80s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-0013</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1086-329X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1086-329X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/phl.2014.0039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press</publisher><subject>Cultural change ; Human relations ; Literary theory ; Music ; Philosophy ; Post structuralist linguistics ; Story telling ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Philosophy and literature, 2014-10, Vol.38 (1), p.A293-A313</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Johns Hopkins University Press.</rights><rights>Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press Oct 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,27922,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horgan, John</creatorcontrib><title>Denis Dutton: Interview with John Horgan</title><title>Philosophy and literature</title><description>Dutton: The idea . . . that has dominated academic criticism and scholarship of the last forty years [is] that our artistic values are relative to culture, are constructed by culture, are socially constructed by culture-a very popular idea with Marxists, with all sorts of social constructionists: culture, culture, culture. The book is not a denial of the importance of culture, but it says that culture is working on deeper, biologically evolved adaptations; that in the Pleistocene, the period . . . of 80,000 generations, 1.6 million years, before the modern period, where we became modern humans, we actually acquired as part of our nature hardwired tastes for storytelling, for music, for the enjoyment of images, for dancing, and these adaptations are the basis for the arts. The tide is going in our direction-in Pinker's direction and mine-and I think it is in part an almost Kuhnian breakdown of the poststructuralist, social-constructionist paradigm-art theory and literary theory as it's done by grayheads that got their graduate degrees in the '70s and '80s.</description><subject>Cultural change</subject><subject>Human relations</subject><subject>Literary theory</subject><subject>Music</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Post structuralist linguistics</subject><subject>Story telling</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0190-0013</issn><issn>1086-329X</issn><issn>1086-329X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0L1PwzAQBXALgUQpjOyRWFgS7vyVmA21hRZVYgAkNivEDk3VJsV2qPjvcVQE0y3v3pN-hFwiZMgEu9mtNhkF5BkAU0dkhFDIlFH1dkxGgApSAGSn5Mz7NQDkjNMRuZ7atvHJtA-ha2-TRRus-2rsPtk3YZU8dqs2mXfuo2zPyUldbry9-L1j8no_e5nM0-XTw2Jyt0wrKmVITZ4Xoq5BvFeyVFJIg4xRoLwGm5eGK0RJkVZGFKoEpIVRxkjDAAvDDSg2JleH3p3rPnvrg153vWvjpI6fkom8oBhT6SFVuc57Z2u9c822dN8aQQ8YOmLoAUMPGDHP_1rXtgrb3tv_YiEUz0E_D2CDF3KMVHHsB_tKX7I</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Horgan, John</creator><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Denis Dutton: Interview with John Horgan</title><author>Horgan, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-d7785ff05bc6a9656d1332024f0e7ad49116212cd589a0128d9dd6d3018d4d093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cultural change</topic><topic>Human relations</topic><topic>Literary theory</topic><topic>Music</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Post structuralist linguistics</topic><topic>Story telling</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horgan, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Literature Online</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Religion</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) – US</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION eBooks)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Philosophy and literature</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horgan, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Denis Dutton: Interview with John Horgan</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy and literature</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>A293</spage><epage>A313</epage><pages>A293-A313</pages><issn>0190-0013</issn><issn>1086-329X</issn><eissn>1086-329X</eissn><abstract>Dutton: The idea . . . that has dominated academic criticism and scholarship of the last forty years [is] that our artistic values are relative to culture, are constructed by culture, are socially constructed by culture-a very popular idea with Marxists, with all sorts of social constructionists: culture, culture, culture. The book is not a denial of the importance of culture, but it says that culture is working on deeper, biologically evolved adaptations; that in the Pleistocene, the period . . . of 80,000 generations, 1.6 million years, before the modern period, where we became modern humans, we actually acquired as part of our nature hardwired tastes for storytelling, for music, for the enjoyment of images, for dancing, and these adaptations are the basis for the arts. The tide is going in our direction-in Pinker's direction and mine-and I think it is in part an almost Kuhnian breakdown of the poststructuralist, social-constructionist paradigm-art theory and literary theory as it's done by grayheads that got their graduate degrees in the '70s and '80s.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>Johns Hopkins University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/phl.2014.0039</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0190-0013 |
ispartof | Philosophy and literature, 2014-10, Vol.38 (1), p.A293-A313 |
issn | 0190-0013 1086-329X 1086-329X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1626357821 |
source | EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection |
subjects | Cultural change Human relations Literary theory Music Philosophy Post structuralist linguistics Story telling Studies |
title | Denis Dutton: Interview with John Horgan |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A28%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Denis%20Dutton:%20Interview%20with%20John%20Horgan&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20and%20literature&rft.au=Horgan,%20John&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=A293&rft.epage=A313&rft.pages=A293-A313&rft.issn=0190-0013&rft.eissn=1086-329X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/phl.2014.0039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3502025841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-d7785ff05bc6a9656d1332024f0e7ad49116212cd589a0128d9dd6d3018d4d093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1626357821&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |