Policymakers’ and Scientists’ Ranks of Research Priorities for Resource-Management Policy

Recent collaboration between decisionmakers and scientists in the United States yielded 40 research questions that reflected the needs of those with jurisdiction over natural resources. We surveyed managers, policymakers and their advisers, and scientists to rank the questions with respect to their...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioscience 2014-03, Vol.64 (3), p.219-228
Main Authors: RUDD, MURRAY A., FLEISHMAN, ERICA
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agricultural management
Agroecosystems
Climate change
Climate change policy
Collaboration
Ecosystem management
Ecosystem resilience
Ecosystems
Environmental policy
Environmental science
Human populations
Jurisdiction
Marine ecosystems
Natural resource management
Professional Biologist
Scientists
Species
Terrestrial ecosystems
Water supply
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Recent collaboration between decisionmakers and scientists in the United States yielded 40 research questions that reflected the needs of those with jurisdiction over natural resources. We surveyed managers, policymakers and their advisers, and scientists to rank the questions with respect to their applicability to policy. The 602 respondents included 194 policymakers, 70 government scientists, and 228 academic scientists. A question on the water supply necessary to sustain human populations and ecosystem resilience was ranked as having the greatest potential, if it were answered, to increase the effectiveness of policies related to natural resource management in the United States. Research priorities differed significantly among the respondents. However, no simple science–policy divide was evident. Priorities did not differ between academics and government employees or between scientists (academic and government) and policymakers. Our results suggest that participatory exercises can establish priorities to guide funders of research and researchers who aim to inform policy.
ISSN:0006-3568
1525-3244
DOI:10.1093/biosci/bit035