Loading…
Performance and trends in recent opinion retrieval techniques
This paper presents trends and performance of opinion retrieval techniques proposed within the last 8 years. We identify major techniques in opinion retrieval and group them into four popular categories. We describe the state-of-the-art techniques for each category and emphasize on their performance...
Saved in:
Published in: | Knowledge engineering review 2015-01, Vol.30 (1), p.76-105 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-3acc3ab38f82c00eaadedbd950e62875cd27d9f5b788198d66ff4b629ddc1c773 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-3acc3ab38f82c00eaadedbd950e62875cd27d9f5b788198d66ff4b629ddc1c773 |
container_end_page | 105 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 76 |
container_title | Knowledge engineering review |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Orimaye, Sylvester O. Alhashmi, Saadat M. Siew, Eu-Gene |
description | This paper presents trends and performance of opinion retrieval techniques proposed within the last 8 years. We identify major techniques in opinion retrieval and group them into four popular categories. We describe the state-of-the-art techniques for each category and emphasize on their performance and limitations. We then summarize with a performance comparison table for the techniques on different datasets. Finally, we highlight possible future research directions that can help solve existing challenges in opinion retrieval. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0269888913000167 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1638238884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0269888913000167</cupid><sourcerecordid>3531743101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-3acc3ab38f82c00eaadedbd950e62875cd27d9f5b788198d66ff4b629ddc1c773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKAzEUDaJgrX6AuwHXo_dOOnksXEjxBQUFdT1kkhtNaTM1mQr-vTO0C0FcXS7nxTmMnSNcIqC8eoFKaKWURg4AKOQBm-BM6FIB1IdsMsLliB-zk5yXA4Uj8Am7fqbku7Q20VJhoiv6RNHlIsQikaXYF90mxNCNb58CfZlV0ZP9iOFzS_mUHXmzynS2v1P2dnf7On8oF0_3j_ObRWk5yr7kxlpuWq68qiwAGePItU7XQKJSsraukk77upVKoVZOCO9nrai0cxatlHzKLna-m9SNuX2z7LYpDpENCq4qPjSbDSzcsWzqck7km00Ka5O-G4RmXKn5s9Kg4XuNWbcpuHf6Zf2v6ge2HWna</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1638238884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance and trends in recent opinion retrieval techniques</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Orimaye, Sylvester O. ; Alhashmi, Saadat M. ; Siew, Eu-Gene</creator><creatorcontrib>Orimaye, Sylvester O. ; Alhashmi, Saadat M. ; Siew, Eu-Gene</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents trends and performance of opinion retrieval techniques proposed within the last 8 years. We identify major techniques in opinion retrieval and group them into four popular categories. We describe the state-of-the-art techniques for each category and emphasize on their performance and limitations. We then summarize with a performance comparison table for the techniques on different datasets. Finally, we highlight possible future research directions that can help solve existing challenges in opinion retrieval.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8005</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0269888913000167</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Blogs ; Classification ; Datasets ; Information retrieval ; Opinions ; R&D ; Research & development ; Sentiment analysis ; Social networks ; Text categorization ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Knowledge engineering review, 2015-01, Vol.30 (1), p.76-105</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-3acc3ab38f82c00eaadedbd950e62875cd27d9f5b788198d66ff4b629ddc1c773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-3acc3ab38f82c00eaadedbd950e62875cd27d9f5b788198d66ff4b629ddc1c773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1638238884?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orimaye, Sylvester O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alhashmi, Saadat M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siew, Eu-Gene</creatorcontrib><title>Performance and trends in recent opinion retrieval techniques</title><title>Knowledge engineering review</title><addtitle>The Knowledge Engineering Review</addtitle><description>This paper presents trends and performance of opinion retrieval techniques proposed within the last 8 years. We identify major techniques in opinion retrieval and group them into four popular categories. We describe the state-of-the-art techniques for each category and emphasize on their performance and limitations. We then summarize with a performance comparison table for the techniques on different datasets. Finally, we highlight possible future research directions that can help solve existing challenges in opinion retrieval.</description><subject>Blogs</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Information retrieval</subject><subject>Opinions</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Sentiment analysis</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Text categorization</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0269-8889</issn><issn>1469-8005</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtKAzEUDaJgrX6AuwHXo_dOOnksXEjxBQUFdT1kkhtNaTM1mQr-vTO0C0FcXS7nxTmMnSNcIqC8eoFKaKWURg4AKOQBm-BM6FIB1IdsMsLliB-zk5yXA4Uj8Am7fqbku7Q20VJhoiv6RNHlIsQikaXYF90mxNCNb58CfZlV0ZP9iOFzS_mUHXmzynS2v1P2dnf7On8oF0_3j_ObRWk5yr7kxlpuWq68qiwAGePItU7XQKJSsraukk77upVKoVZOCO9nrai0cxatlHzKLna-m9SNuX2z7LYpDpENCq4qPjSbDSzcsWzqck7km00Ka5O-G4RmXKn5s9Kg4XuNWbcpuHf6Zf2v6ge2HWna</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Orimaye, Sylvester O.</creator><creator>Alhashmi, Saadat M.</creator><creator>Siew, Eu-Gene</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Performance and trends in recent opinion retrieval techniques</title><author>Orimaye, Sylvester O. ; Alhashmi, Saadat M. ; Siew, Eu-Gene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-3acc3ab38f82c00eaadedbd950e62875cd27d9f5b788198d66ff4b629ddc1c773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Blogs</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Information retrieval</topic><topic>Opinions</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Sentiment analysis</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Text categorization</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orimaye, Sylvester O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alhashmi, Saadat M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siew, Eu-Gene</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer science database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Knowledge engineering review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orimaye, Sylvester O.</au><au>Alhashmi, Saadat M.</au><au>Siew, Eu-Gene</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance and trends in recent opinion retrieval techniques</atitle><jtitle>Knowledge engineering review</jtitle><addtitle>The Knowledge Engineering Review</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>76</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>76-105</pages><issn>0269-8889</issn><eissn>1469-8005</eissn><abstract>This paper presents trends and performance of opinion retrieval techniques proposed within the last 8 years. We identify major techniques in opinion retrieval and group them into four popular categories. We describe the state-of-the-art techniques for each category and emphasize on their performance and limitations. We then summarize with a performance comparison table for the techniques on different datasets. Finally, we highlight possible future research directions that can help solve existing challenges in opinion retrieval.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0269888913000167</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-8889 |
ispartof | Knowledge engineering review, 2015-01, Vol.30 (1), p.76-105 |
issn | 0269-8889 1469-8005 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1638238884 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online; ABI/INFORM Global |
subjects | Blogs Classification Datasets Information retrieval Opinions R&D Research & development Sentiment analysis Social networks Text categorization Trends |
title | Performance and trends in recent opinion retrieval techniques |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T12%3A39%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20and%20trends%20in%20recent%20opinion%20retrieval%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Knowledge%20engineering%20review&rft.au=Orimaye,%20Sylvester%20O.&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=76&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=76-105&rft.issn=0269-8889&rft.eissn=1469-8005&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0269888913000167&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3531743101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-3acc3ab38f82c00eaadedbd950e62875cd27d9f5b788198d66ff4b629ddc1c773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1638238884&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0269888913000167&rfr_iscdi=true |