Loading…
Metallic Intraocular Foreign Bodies: Characteristics, Interventions, and Prognostic Factors for Visual Outcome and Globe Survival
Purpose To describe metallic intraocular foreign body (IOFB) injuries and identify prognostic factors for visual outcome and globe survival. Design Interventional, consecutive, retrospective case series. Methods setting: Wills Eye Hospital. study population: Ninety-six eyes of 96 patients with metal...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of ophthalmology 2008-09, Vol.146 (3), p.427-433.e2 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose To describe metallic intraocular foreign body (IOFB) injuries and identify prognostic factors for visual outcome and globe survival. Design Interventional, consecutive, retrospective case series. Methods setting: Wills Eye Hospital. study population: Ninety-six eyes of 96 patients with metallic intraocular foreign bodies. procedures: Metallic IOFB injuries between January 1991 to June 2002 were reviewed for clinical characteristics, surgical intervention, and outcome. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic variables. main outcome measures: Final visual acuity and globe survival. Results The average patient age was 33.0 years with a male predominance (94%). Forty percent of eyes had a presenting vision of 20/50 or better. Following IOFB removal, 40% of patients required additional interventions. Thirty-one percent of eyes had a final acuity of 20/50 or better. Eight percent of patients ultimately required enucleation or evisceration. Excellent visual outcome (defined as ≥20/50) was associated with multiple variables, including normal lens at presentation and anterior segment IOFB ( P < .003). Factors associated with poor visual outcome (defined as |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9394 1879-1891 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.021 |