Loading…
The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry?
Although research and managerial practice have demonstrated great interest in the role of marketing departments within firms and have raised repeated concerns that their influence is in sharp decline, prior research has not analyzed whether marketing departments are truly losing ground. To do so, we...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2015-01, Vol.43 (1), p.1-13 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-68913c9eb79b28a705bb6e1d4887ac6664620eb4520b6dc1e8d31a06d19318043 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-68913c9eb79b28a705bb6e1d4887ac6664620eb4520b6dc1e8d31a06d19318043 |
container_end_page | 13 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Homburg, Christian Vomberg, Arnd Enke, Margit Grimm, Philipp H. |
description | Although research and managerial practice have demonstrated great interest in the role of marketing departments within firms and have raised repeated concerns that their influence is in sharp decline, prior research has not analyzed whether marketing departments are truly losing ground. To do so, we build on the work of
Homburg et al. (1999)
, which assessed the influence of the marketing department two decades ago. Drawing on structurally equivalent data, the results demonstrate that the marketing department has indeed lost significant influence. Additionally, we analyze which department has benefited from this loss of influence. Interestingly, it is the sales department that has gained influence, rather than the finance department, as one might assume. We also study the performance consequences of the intraorganizational distribution of influence among the marketing, sales, R&D, operations, and finance departments. Our results are alarming because an influential marketing department makes the greatest contribution to company performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11747-014-0416-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1645530415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A407109452</galeid><sourcerecordid>A407109452</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-68913c9eb79b28a705bb6e1d4887ac6664620eb4520b6dc1e8d31a06d19318043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EEpfCA7CzxBaXcezYCZvqqio_UiU2ZcPGcpJJbkquE2xH1d3xGrweT8JUYVGkIkv-03dmdOYw9lrCuQSw75KUVlsBUgvQ0gj1hO1kWRbCVoV-ynYAdSHAgnrOXqR0CwBaGb1j324OyKc5JT73PNP96ON3zGMYeIeLj_mIIf_--SvxMfTTiqHF93ykV-YR_TSd-MEvCwYSXPB96Pjd4cTv5hhPFy_Zs95PCV_9Pc_Y1w9XN5efxPWXj58v99ei1QqyMFUtVVtjY-umqLyFsmkMyk5XlfWtMUabArDRZQGN6VqJVaekB9PJWsmKbJyxN1vdJc4_VkzZ3c5rDNTSSaPLUtFASqLERg1-Qkdm5hx9O2DA6Kc5YD_S916DlVBTL-LPH-FpdXgc20cFbx8ImjWNARNtaRwOOQ1-TelfXG54G2n6EXu3xJGGf3IS3H2kbovUUaTuPlKnSFNsmkRsGDA-cPpf0R8gZaI9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1645530415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ABI/INFORM Archive</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Homburg, Christian ; Vomberg, Arnd ; Enke, Margit ; Grimm, Philipp H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Homburg, Christian ; Vomberg, Arnd ; Enke, Margit ; Grimm, Philipp H.</creatorcontrib><description>Although research and managerial practice have demonstrated great interest in the role of marketing departments within firms and have raised repeated concerns that their influence is in sharp decline, prior research has not analyzed whether marketing departments are truly losing ground. To do so, we build on the work of
Homburg et al. (1999)
, which assessed the influence of the marketing department two decades ago. Drawing on structurally equivalent data, the results demonstrate that the marketing department has indeed lost significant influence. Additionally, we analyze which department has benefited from this loss of influence. Interestingly, it is the sales department that has gained influence, rather than the finance department, as one might assume. We also study the performance consequences of the intraorganizational distribution of influence among the marketing, sales, R&D, operations, and finance departments. Our results are alarming because an influential marketing department makes the greatest contribution to company performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0092-0703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7824</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11747-014-0416-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAMSDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Business and Management ; Business enterprises ; Customer relationship management ; Departments ; Employees ; Financial performance ; Influence ; Management ; Marketing ; Methods ; Organizational structure ; Original Empirical Research ; Packaged goods ; Questionnaires ; R&D ; Research & development ; Response rates ; Sales ; Social Sciences ; Strategic business units ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2015-01, Vol.43 (1), p.1-13</ispartof><rights>Academy of Marketing Science 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><rights>Academy of Marketing Science 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-68913c9eb79b28a705bb6e1d4887ac6664620eb4520b6dc1e8d31a06d19318043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-68913c9eb79b28a705bb6e1d4887ac6664620eb4520b6dc1e8d31a06d19318043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1645530415/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1645530415?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,11885,27901,27902,36027,36037,44337,44339,74636,74638</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Homburg, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vomberg, Arnd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enke, Margit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimm, Philipp H.</creatorcontrib><title>The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry?</title><title>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</title><addtitle>J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci</addtitle><description>Although research and managerial practice have demonstrated great interest in the role of marketing departments within firms and have raised repeated concerns that their influence is in sharp decline, prior research has not analyzed whether marketing departments are truly losing ground. To do so, we build on the work of
Homburg et al. (1999)
, which assessed the influence of the marketing department two decades ago. Drawing on structurally equivalent data, the results demonstrate that the marketing department has indeed lost significant influence. Additionally, we analyze which department has benefited from this loss of influence. Interestingly, it is the sales department that has gained influence, rather than the finance department, as one might assume. We also study the performance consequences of the intraorganizational distribution of influence among the marketing, sales, R&D, operations, and finance departments. Our results are alarming because an influential marketing department makes the greatest contribution to company performance.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business enterprises</subject><subject>Customer relationship management</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Financial performance</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Original Empirical Research</subject><subject>Packaged goods</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Strategic business units</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0092-0703</issn><issn>1552-7824</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EEpfCA7CzxBaXcezYCZvqqio_UiU2ZcPGcpJJbkquE2xH1d3xGrweT8JUYVGkIkv-03dmdOYw9lrCuQSw75KUVlsBUgvQ0gj1hO1kWRbCVoV-ynYAdSHAgnrOXqR0CwBaGb1j324OyKc5JT73PNP96ON3zGMYeIeLj_mIIf_--SvxMfTTiqHF93ykV-YR_TSd-MEvCwYSXPB96Pjd4cTv5hhPFy_Zs95PCV_9Pc_Y1w9XN5efxPWXj58v99ei1QqyMFUtVVtjY-umqLyFsmkMyk5XlfWtMUabArDRZQGN6VqJVaekB9PJWsmKbJyxN1vdJc4_VkzZ3c5rDNTSSaPLUtFASqLERg1-Qkdm5hx9O2DA6Kc5YD_S916DlVBTL-LPH-FpdXgc20cFbx8ImjWNARNtaRwOOQ1-TelfXG54G2n6EXu3xJGGf3IS3H2kbovUUaTuPlKnSFNsmkRsGDA-cPpf0R8gZaI9</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Homburg, Christian</creator><creator>Vomberg, Arnd</creator><creator>Enke, Margit</creator><creator>Grimm, Philipp H.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry?</title><author>Homburg, Christian ; Vomberg, Arnd ; Enke, Margit ; Grimm, Philipp H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-68913c9eb79b28a705bb6e1d4887ac6664620eb4520b6dc1e8d31a06d19318043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business enterprises</topic><topic>Customer relationship management</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Financial performance</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Original Empirical Research</topic><topic>Packaged goods</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Strategic business units</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Homburg, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vomberg, Arnd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enke, Margit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimm, Philipp H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Homburg, Christian</au><au>Vomberg, Arnd</au><au>Enke, Margit</au><au>Grimm, Philipp H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</jtitle><stitle>J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci</stitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>1-13</pages><issn>0092-0703</issn><eissn>1552-7824</eissn><coden>JAMSDE</coden><abstract>Although research and managerial practice have demonstrated great interest in the role of marketing departments within firms and have raised repeated concerns that their influence is in sharp decline, prior research has not analyzed whether marketing departments are truly losing ground. To do so, we build on the work of
Homburg et al. (1999)
, which assessed the influence of the marketing department two decades ago. Drawing on structurally equivalent data, the results demonstrate that the marketing department has indeed lost significant influence. Additionally, we analyze which department has benefited from this loss of influence. Interestingly, it is the sales department that has gained influence, rather than the finance department, as one might assume. We also study the performance consequences of the intraorganizational distribution of influence among the marketing, sales, R&D, operations, and finance departments. Our results are alarming because an influential marketing department makes the greatest contribution to company performance.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11747-014-0416-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0092-0703 |
ispartof | Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2015-01, Vol.43 (1), p.1-13 |
issn | 0092-0703 1552-7824 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1645530415 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; ABI/INFORM Archive; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature |
subjects | Analysis Business and Management Business enterprises Customer relationship management Departments Employees Financial performance Influence Management Marketing Methods Organizational structure Original Empirical Research Packaged goods Questionnaires R&D Research & development Response rates Sales Social Sciences Strategic business units Studies |
title | The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T03%3A28%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20loss%20of%20the%20marketing%20department%E2%80%99s%20influence:%20is%20it%20really%20happening?%20And%20why%20worry?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Academy%20of%20Marketing%20Science&rft.au=Homburg,%20Christian&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=1-13&rft.issn=0092-0703&rft.eissn=1552-7824&rft.coden=JAMSDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11747-014-0416-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA407109452%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-68913c9eb79b28a705bb6e1d4887ac6664620eb4520b6dc1e8d31a06d19318043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1645530415&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A407109452&rfr_iscdi=true |