Loading…

The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry?

Although research and managerial practice have demonstrated great interest in the role of marketing departments within firms and have raised repeated concerns that their influence is in sharp decline, prior research has not analyzed whether marketing departments are truly losing ground. To do so, we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2015-01, Vol.43 (1), p.1-13
Main Authors: Homburg, Christian, Vomberg, Arnd, Enke, Margit, Grimm, Philipp H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-68913c9eb79b28a705bb6e1d4887ac6664620eb4520b6dc1e8d31a06d19318043
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-68913c9eb79b28a705bb6e1d4887ac6664620eb4520b6dc1e8d31a06d19318043
container_end_page 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
container_volume 43
creator Homburg, Christian
Vomberg, Arnd
Enke, Margit
Grimm, Philipp H.
description Although research and managerial practice have demonstrated great interest in the role of marketing departments within firms and have raised repeated concerns that their influence is in sharp decline, prior research has not analyzed whether marketing departments are truly losing ground. To do so, we build on the work of Homburg et al. (1999) , which assessed the influence of the marketing department two decades ago. Drawing on structurally equivalent data, the results demonstrate that the marketing department has indeed lost significant influence. Additionally, we analyze which department has benefited from this loss of influence. Interestingly, it is the sales department that has gained influence, rather than the finance department, as one might assume. We also study the performance consequences of the intraorganizational distribution of influence among the marketing, sales, R&D, operations, and finance departments. Our results are alarming because an influential marketing department makes the greatest contribution to company performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11747-014-0416-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1645530415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A407109452</galeid><sourcerecordid>A407109452</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-68913c9eb79b28a705bb6e1d4887ac6664620eb4520b6dc1e8d31a06d19318043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EEpfCA7CzxBaXcezYCZvqqio_UiU2ZcPGcpJJbkquE2xH1d3xGrweT8JUYVGkIkv-03dmdOYw9lrCuQSw75KUVlsBUgvQ0gj1hO1kWRbCVoV-ynYAdSHAgnrOXqR0CwBaGb1j324OyKc5JT73PNP96ON3zGMYeIeLj_mIIf_--SvxMfTTiqHF93ykV-YR_TSd-MEvCwYSXPB96Pjd4cTv5hhPFy_Zs95PCV_9Pc_Y1w9XN5efxPWXj58v99ei1QqyMFUtVVtjY-umqLyFsmkMyk5XlfWtMUabArDRZQGN6VqJVaekB9PJWsmKbJyxN1vdJc4_VkzZ3c5rDNTSSaPLUtFASqLERg1-Qkdm5hx9O2DA6Kc5YD_S916DlVBTL-LPH-FpdXgc20cFbx8ImjWNARNtaRwOOQ1-TelfXG54G2n6EXu3xJGGf3IS3H2kbovUUaTuPlKnSFNsmkRsGDA-cPpf0R8gZaI9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1645530415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ABI/INFORM Archive</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Homburg, Christian ; Vomberg, Arnd ; Enke, Margit ; Grimm, Philipp H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Homburg, Christian ; Vomberg, Arnd ; Enke, Margit ; Grimm, Philipp H.</creatorcontrib><description>Although research and managerial practice have demonstrated great interest in the role of marketing departments within firms and have raised repeated concerns that their influence is in sharp decline, prior research has not analyzed whether marketing departments are truly losing ground. To do so, we build on the work of Homburg et al. (1999) , which assessed the influence of the marketing department two decades ago. Drawing on structurally equivalent data, the results demonstrate that the marketing department has indeed lost significant influence. Additionally, we analyze which department has benefited from this loss of influence. Interestingly, it is the sales department that has gained influence, rather than the finance department, as one might assume. We also study the performance consequences of the intraorganizational distribution of influence among the marketing, sales, R&amp;D, operations, and finance departments. Our results are alarming because an influential marketing department makes the greatest contribution to company performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0092-0703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7824</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11747-014-0416-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAMSDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Business and Management ; Business enterprises ; Customer relationship management ; Departments ; Employees ; Financial performance ; Influence ; Management ; Marketing ; Methods ; Organizational structure ; Original Empirical Research ; Packaged goods ; Questionnaires ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Response rates ; Sales ; Social Sciences ; Strategic business units ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2015-01, Vol.43 (1), p.1-13</ispartof><rights>Academy of Marketing Science 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><rights>Academy of Marketing Science 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-68913c9eb79b28a705bb6e1d4887ac6664620eb4520b6dc1e8d31a06d19318043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-68913c9eb79b28a705bb6e1d4887ac6664620eb4520b6dc1e8d31a06d19318043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1645530415/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1645530415?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,11885,27901,27902,36027,36037,44337,44339,74636,74638</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Homburg, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vomberg, Arnd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enke, Margit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimm, Philipp H.</creatorcontrib><title>The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry?</title><title>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</title><addtitle>J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci</addtitle><description>Although research and managerial practice have demonstrated great interest in the role of marketing departments within firms and have raised repeated concerns that their influence is in sharp decline, prior research has not analyzed whether marketing departments are truly losing ground. To do so, we build on the work of Homburg et al. (1999) , which assessed the influence of the marketing department two decades ago. Drawing on structurally equivalent data, the results demonstrate that the marketing department has indeed lost significant influence. Additionally, we analyze which department has benefited from this loss of influence. Interestingly, it is the sales department that has gained influence, rather than the finance department, as one might assume. We also study the performance consequences of the intraorganizational distribution of influence among the marketing, sales, R&amp;D, operations, and finance departments. Our results are alarming because an influential marketing department makes the greatest contribution to company performance.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business enterprises</subject><subject>Customer relationship management</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Financial performance</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Original Empirical Research</subject><subject>Packaged goods</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Strategic business units</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0092-0703</issn><issn>1552-7824</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EEpfCA7CzxBaXcezYCZvqqio_UiU2ZcPGcpJJbkquE2xH1d3xGrweT8JUYVGkIkv-03dmdOYw9lrCuQSw75KUVlsBUgvQ0gj1hO1kWRbCVoV-ynYAdSHAgnrOXqR0CwBaGb1j324OyKc5JT73PNP96ON3zGMYeIeLj_mIIf_--SvxMfTTiqHF93ykV-YR_TSd-MEvCwYSXPB96Pjd4cTv5hhPFy_Zs95PCV_9Pc_Y1w9XN5efxPWXj58v99ei1QqyMFUtVVtjY-umqLyFsmkMyk5XlfWtMUabArDRZQGN6VqJVaekB9PJWsmKbJyxN1vdJc4_VkzZ3c5rDNTSSaPLUtFASqLERg1-Qkdm5hx9O2DA6Kc5YD_S916DlVBTL-LPH-FpdXgc20cFbx8ImjWNARNtaRwOOQ1-TelfXG54G2n6EXu3xJGGf3IS3H2kbovUUaTuPlKnSFNsmkRsGDA-cPpf0R8gZaI9</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Homburg, Christian</creator><creator>Vomberg, Arnd</creator><creator>Enke, Margit</creator><creator>Grimm, Philipp H.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry?</title><author>Homburg, Christian ; Vomberg, Arnd ; Enke, Margit ; Grimm, Philipp H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-68913c9eb79b28a705bb6e1d4887ac6664620eb4520b6dc1e8d31a06d19318043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business enterprises</topic><topic>Customer relationship management</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Financial performance</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Original Empirical Research</topic><topic>Packaged goods</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Strategic business units</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Homburg, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vomberg, Arnd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enke, Margit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimm, Philipp H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Homburg, Christian</au><au>Vomberg, Arnd</au><au>Enke, Margit</au><au>Grimm, Philipp H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</jtitle><stitle>J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci</stitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>1-13</pages><issn>0092-0703</issn><eissn>1552-7824</eissn><coden>JAMSDE</coden><abstract>Although research and managerial practice have demonstrated great interest in the role of marketing departments within firms and have raised repeated concerns that their influence is in sharp decline, prior research has not analyzed whether marketing departments are truly losing ground. To do so, we build on the work of Homburg et al. (1999) , which assessed the influence of the marketing department two decades ago. Drawing on structurally equivalent data, the results demonstrate that the marketing department has indeed lost significant influence. Additionally, we analyze which department has benefited from this loss of influence. Interestingly, it is the sales department that has gained influence, rather than the finance department, as one might assume. We also study the performance consequences of the intraorganizational distribution of influence among the marketing, sales, R&amp;D, operations, and finance departments. Our results are alarming because an influential marketing department makes the greatest contribution to company performance.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11747-014-0416-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0092-0703
ispartof Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2015-01, Vol.43 (1), p.1-13
issn 0092-0703
1552-7824
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1645530415
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; ABI/INFORM Archive; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature
subjects Analysis
Business and Management
Business enterprises
Customer relationship management
Departments
Employees
Financial performance
Influence
Management
Marketing
Methods
Organizational structure
Original Empirical Research
Packaged goods
Questionnaires
R&D
Research & development
Response rates
Sales
Social Sciences
Strategic business units
Studies
title The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T03%3A28%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20loss%20of%20the%20marketing%20department%E2%80%99s%20influence:%20is%20it%20really%20happening?%20And%20why%20worry?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Academy%20of%20Marketing%20Science&rft.au=Homburg,%20Christian&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=1-13&rft.issn=0092-0703&rft.eissn=1552-7824&rft.coden=JAMSDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11747-014-0416-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA407109452%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-68913c9eb79b28a705bb6e1d4887ac6664620eb4520b6dc1e8d31a06d19318043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1645530415&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A407109452&rfr_iscdi=true