Loading…
Scientists and software - surveying the species distribution modelling community
Aim Software use is ubiquitous in the species distribution modelling (SDM) domain; nearly every scientist working on SDM either uses or develops specialist SDM software; however, little is formally known about the prevalence or preference of one software over another. We seek to provide, for the fir...
Saved in:
Published in: | Diversity & distributions 2015-03, Vol.21 (3), p.258-267 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3925-1830852dead9d62130e26e0d8f87bd25f3a9cc5b351ebd54fe7a7b8cb10ea9d03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3925-1830852dead9d62130e26e0d8f87bd25f3a9cc5b351ebd54fe7a7b8cb10ea9d03 |
container_end_page | 267 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 258 |
container_title | Diversity & distributions |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Ahmed, Sadia E. McInerny, Greg O'Hara, Kenton Harper, Richard Salido, Lara Emmott, Stephen Joppa, Lucas N. |
description | Aim Software use is ubiquitous in the species distribution modelling (SDM) domain; nearly every scientist working on SDM either uses or develops specialist SDM software; however, little is formally known about the prevalence or preference of one software over another. We seek to provide, for the first time, a 'snapshot' of SDM users, the methods they use and the questions they answer. Location Global. Methods We conducted a survey of over 300 SDM scientists to capture a snapshot of the community and used an extensive literature search of SDM papers in order to investigate the characteristics of the SDM community and its interactions with software developers in terms of co-authoring research publications. Results Our results show that those members of the community who develop software and who are directly connected with developers are among the most highly connected and published authors in the field. We further show that the two most popular softwares for SDM lie at opposite ends of the 'use-complexity' continuum. Main conclusion Given the importance of SDM research in a changing environment, with its increasing use in the policy domain, it is vital to be aware of what software and methodologies are being implemented. Here, we present a snapshot of the SDM community, the software and the methods being used. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ddi.12305 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1654887001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24817749</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24817749</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3925-1830852dead9d62130e26e0d8f87bd25f3a9cc5b351ebd54fe7a7b8cb10ea9d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRSMEEqWw4AOQIrFikdaPOE6WqEBbVJW3YGc58QRc0qTYCSV_j0ugO7wZS_fcGel43jFGA-zeUCk9wIQituP1cMhJEEYh2XV_GkVBwnC07x1Yu0AIUcpIz7t9yDSUtba19WWpfFvl9Voa8APfNuYTWl2--vUb-HYFjrS-cqjRaVPrqvSXlYKi2CBZtVw2pa7bQ28vl4WFo9_Z956uLh9Hk2B2M56OzmdBRhPCAhxTFDOiQKpERQRTBCQCpOI85qkiLKcyyTKWUoYhVSzMgUuexlmKEchEIdr3Tru9K1N9NGBrsagaU7qTAkcsjGOOEHbUWUdlprLWQC5WRi-laQVGYiNMOGHiR5hjhx271gW0_4Pi4mL61zjpGgtbV2bbIGGMOQ8Tlwdd7pzB1zaX5l1EnHImnudjcY3u55PRHRYv9BuM6oZR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1654887001</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scientists and software - surveying the species distribution modelling community</title><source>Wiley_OA刊</source><creator>Ahmed, Sadia E. ; McInerny, Greg ; O'Hara, Kenton ; Harper, Richard ; Salido, Lara ; Emmott, Stephen ; Joppa, Lucas N.</creator><contributor>Elith, Jane ; Elith, Jane</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Sadia E. ; McInerny, Greg ; O'Hara, Kenton ; Harper, Richard ; Salido, Lara ; Emmott, Stephen ; Joppa, Lucas N. ; Elith, Jane ; Elith, Jane</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Software use is ubiquitous in the species distribution modelling (SDM) domain; nearly every scientist working on SDM either uses or develops specialist SDM software; however, little is formally known about the prevalence or preference of one software over another. We seek to provide, for the first time, a 'snapshot' of SDM users, the methods they use and the questions they answer. Location Global. Methods We conducted a survey of over 300 SDM scientists to capture a snapshot of the community and used an extensive literature search of SDM papers in order to investigate the characteristics of the SDM community and its interactions with software developers in terms of co-authoring research publications. Results Our results show that those members of the community who develop software and who are directly connected with developers are among the most highly connected and published authors in the field. We further show that the two most popular softwares for SDM lie at opposite ends of the 'use-complexity' continuum. Main conclusion Given the importance of SDM research in a changing environment, with its increasing use in the policy domain, it is vital to be aware of what software and methodologies are being implemented. Here, we present a snapshot of the SDM community, the software and the methods being used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH ; Scientific software ; Software ; species distribution ; survey</subject><ispartof>Diversity & distributions, 2015-03, Vol.21 (3), p.258-267</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3925-1830852dead9d62130e26e0d8f87bd25f3a9cc5b351ebd54fe7a7b8cb10ea9d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3925-1830852dead9d62130e26e0d8f87bd25f3a9cc5b351ebd54fe7a7b8cb10ea9d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fddi.12305$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fddi.12305$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11562,27924,27925,46052,46476</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fddi.12305$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc></links><search><contributor>Elith, Jane</contributor><contributor>Elith, Jane</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Sadia E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInerny, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Hara, Kenton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salido, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmott, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joppa, Lucas N.</creatorcontrib><title>Scientists and software - surveying the species distribution modelling community</title><title>Diversity & distributions</title><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><description>Aim Software use is ubiquitous in the species distribution modelling (SDM) domain; nearly every scientist working on SDM either uses or develops specialist SDM software; however, little is formally known about the prevalence or preference of one software over another. We seek to provide, for the first time, a 'snapshot' of SDM users, the methods they use and the questions they answer. Location Global. Methods We conducted a survey of over 300 SDM scientists to capture a snapshot of the community and used an extensive literature search of SDM papers in order to investigate the characteristics of the SDM community and its interactions with software developers in terms of co-authoring research publications. Results Our results show that those members of the community who develop software and who are directly connected with developers are among the most highly connected and published authors in the field. We further show that the two most popular softwares for SDM lie at opposite ends of the 'use-complexity' continuum. Main conclusion Given the importance of SDM research in a changing environment, with its increasing use in the policy domain, it is vital to be aware of what software and methodologies are being implemented. Here, we present a snapshot of the SDM community, the software and the methods being used.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</subject><subject>Scientific software</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>species distribution</subject><subject>survey</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRSMEEqWw4AOQIrFikdaPOE6WqEBbVJW3YGc58QRc0qTYCSV_j0ugO7wZS_fcGel43jFGA-zeUCk9wIQituP1cMhJEEYh2XV_GkVBwnC07x1Yu0AIUcpIz7t9yDSUtba19WWpfFvl9Voa8APfNuYTWl2--vUb-HYFjrS-cqjRaVPrqvSXlYKi2CBZtVw2pa7bQ28vl4WFo9_Z956uLh9Hk2B2M56OzmdBRhPCAhxTFDOiQKpERQRTBCQCpOI85qkiLKcyyTKWUoYhVSzMgUuexlmKEchEIdr3Tru9K1N9NGBrsagaU7qTAkcsjGOOEHbUWUdlprLWQC5WRi-laQVGYiNMOGHiR5hjhx271gW0_4Pi4mL61zjpGgtbV2bbIGGMOQ8Tlwdd7pzB1zaX5l1EnHImnudjcY3u55PRHRYv9BuM6oZR</recordid><startdate>201503</startdate><enddate>201503</enddate><creator>Ahmed, Sadia E.</creator><creator>McInerny, Greg</creator><creator>O'Hara, Kenton</creator><creator>Harper, Richard</creator><creator>Salido, Lara</creator><creator>Emmott, Stephen</creator><creator>Joppa, Lucas N.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201503</creationdate><title>Scientists and software - surveying the species distribution modelling community</title><author>Ahmed, Sadia E. ; McInerny, Greg ; O'Hara, Kenton ; Harper, Richard ; Salido, Lara ; Emmott, Stephen ; Joppa, Lucas N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3925-1830852dead9d62130e26e0d8f87bd25f3a9cc5b351ebd54fe7a7b8cb10ea9d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</topic><topic>Scientific software</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>species distribution</topic><topic>survey</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Sadia E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInerny, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Hara, Kenton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salido, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmott, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joppa, Lucas N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Diversity & distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahmed, Sadia E.</au><au>McInerny, Greg</au><au>O'Hara, Kenton</au><au>Harper, Richard</au><au>Salido, Lara</au><au>Emmott, Stephen</au><au>Joppa, Lucas N.</au><au>Elith, Jane</au><au>Elith, Jane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scientists and software - surveying the species distribution modelling community</atitle><jtitle>Diversity & distributions</jtitle><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><date>2015-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>258</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>258-267</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>Aim Software use is ubiquitous in the species distribution modelling (SDM) domain; nearly every scientist working on SDM either uses or develops specialist SDM software; however, little is formally known about the prevalence or preference of one software over another. We seek to provide, for the first time, a 'snapshot' of SDM users, the methods they use and the questions they answer. Location Global. Methods We conducted a survey of over 300 SDM scientists to capture a snapshot of the community and used an extensive literature search of SDM papers in order to investigate the characteristics of the SDM community and its interactions with software developers in terms of co-authoring research publications. Results Our results show that those members of the community who develop software and who are directly connected with developers are among the most highly connected and published authors in the field. We further show that the two most popular softwares for SDM lie at opposite ends of the 'use-complexity' continuum. Main conclusion Given the importance of SDM research in a changing environment, with its increasing use in the policy domain, it is vital to be aware of what software and methodologies are being implemented. Here, we present a snapshot of the SDM community, the software and the methods being used.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ddi.12305</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-9516 |
ispartof | Diversity & distributions, 2015-03, Vol.21 (3), p.258-267 |
issn | 1366-9516 1472-4642 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1654887001 |
source | Wiley_OA刊 |
subjects | Biodiversity BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH Scientific software Software species distribution survey |
title | Scientists and software - surveying the species distribution modelling community |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A49%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scientists%20and%20software%20-%20surveying%20the%20species%20distribution%20modelling%20community&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=Ahmed,%20Sadia%20E.&rft.date=2015-03&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=258-267&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ddi.12305&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_24P%3E24817749%3C/jstor_24P%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3925-1830852dead9d62130e26e0d8f87bd25f3a9cc5b351ebd54fe7a7b8cb10ea9d03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1654887001&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24817749&rfr_iscdi=true |