Loading…
Outcomes-Based Accreditation: Advancing the OSH Profession
In Brief *This article argues for the development of minimum requirements to accredit academic programs in the OSH field. *As a sovereign profession, OSH should have professional boundaries characterized by a standardized set of educational outcomes that represent the knowledge, skills or abilities/...
Saved in:
Published in: | Professional safety 2015-02, Vol.60 (2), p.39-48 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In Brief
*This article argues for the development of minimum requirements to accredit academic programs in the OSH field.
*As a sovereign profession, OSH should have professional boundaries characterized by a standardized set of educational outcomes that represent the knowledge, skills or abilities/behaviors required by practitioners.
*Without a commonly accepted set of educational outcomes, the discipline is at risk of dilution.
*This article focuses on why program-level accreditation is critical to securing a specific body of knowledge and the ongoing maturation of the OSH profession.
The OSH profession is wonderfully dynamic and complex. It consists of a mix of line and staff positions; incorporates practitioners from a wide variety of backgrounds; has dozens of professional credentials (e.g., CSP, CIH, OHST, ARM, CPE); is compliant to reams of state and federal mandates; exists in hundreds of industries; and involves a range of disparate work sites from nanotechnology and manufacturing to healthcare, construction and energy generation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0099-0027 2163-6176 |