Loading…
Moral motivation in defending classmates victimized by bullying
The study addresses factors that relate to defending of classmates victimized by bullying in early adolescence. Specifically, it examines whether moral motivation-measured as a combination of emotion attributions and their justifications in response to a hypothetical transgression-predicts defending...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of developmental psychology 2015-05, Vol.12 (3), p.297-309 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-d2852303ccc21e825a2013026921d4051e320c00c1e34007d33dbfc73b045b793 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-d2852303ccc21e825a2013026921d4051e320c00c1e34007d33dbfc73b045b793 |
container_end_page | 309 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 297 |
container_title | European journal of developmental psychology |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Kollerová, Lenka Janošová, Pavlína ŘíČan, Pavel |
description | The study addresses factors that relate to defending of classmates victimized by bullying in early adolescence. Specifically, it examines whether moral motivation-measured as a combination of emotion attributions and their justifications in response to a hypothetical transgression-predicts defending in context of gender, social preference, perceived popularity and teacher support. We gathered single-time-point data on a sample of 512 sixth-graders (aged 11-13 years). A three-step hierarchical regression analysis showed that defending was positively predicted by: (1) moral motivation, when gender, social preference, perceived popularity and teacher support were accounted for; (2) interaction between moral motivation and social preference, when all other independent variables were accounted for. Simple slopes indicated that increased social preference strengthened the link between moral motivation and defending. The full model explained 40.5% of the variance in defending. The findings underscore the relevance of morality and its interplay with social preference in understanding defending. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17405629.2015.1006125 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1672617820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3652701271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-d2852303ccc21e825a2013026921d4051e320c00c1e34007d33dbfc73b045b793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJgrf4EYcHz1pdksx8nleIXVLzoOWSTrKRkk5rsVtZfb0qrR09veMzMmzcIXWJYYKjhGlcFsJI0CwKYpRWUmLAjNNvtc1ZiOP7DpDlFZzGuASgpcT1DNy8-CJv1fjBbMRjvMuMypTvtlHEfmbQixl4MOmZbIwfTm2-tsnbK2tHaKTHO0UknbNQXhzlH7w_3b8unfPX6-Ly8W-WygHrIFakZoUCllATrmjCRslIgZUOwSumxpgQkgEygAKgUpartZEVbKFhbNXSOrva-m-A_Rx0HvvZjcOkkx2WVfqlqAonF9iwZfIxBd3wTTC_CxDHwXVf8tyu-64ofukq6273OuM6HXnz5YBUfxGR96IJw0kRO_7f4ATjsbns</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1672617820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moral motivation in defending classmates victimized by bullying</title><source>Taylor & Francis</source><creator>Kollerová, Lenka ; Janošová, Pavlína ; ŘíČan, Pavel</creator><creatorcontrib>Kollerová, Lenka ; Janošová, Pavlína ; ŘíČan, Pavel</creatorcontrib><description>The study addresses factors that relate to defending of classmates victimized by bullying in early adolescence. Specifically, it examines whether moral motivation-measured as a combination of emotion attributions and their justifications in response to a hypothetical transgression-predicts defending in context of gender, social preference, perceived popularity and teacher support. We gathered single-time-point data on a sample of 512 sixth-graders (aged 11-13 years). A three-step hierarchical regression analysis showed that defending was positively predicted by: (1) moral motivation, when gender, social preference, perceived popularity and teacher support were accounted for; (2) interaction between moral motivation and social preference, when all other independent variables were accounted for. Simple slopes indicated that increased social preference strengthened the link between moral motivation and defending. The full model explained 40.5% of the variance in defending. The findings underscore the relevance of morality and its interplay with social preference in understanding defending.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1740-5629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-5610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17405629.2015.1006125</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hove: Routledge</publisher><subject>Adolescence ; Bullying ; Defending ; Elementary school students ; Moral motivation ; Morality ; Peer relations ; Peer relationships ; Prosocial behaviour</subject><ispartof>European journal of developmental psychology, 2015-05, Vol.12 (3), p.297-309</ispartof><rights>2015 Taylor & Francis 2015</rights><rights>2015 Taylor & Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-d2852303ccc21e825a2013026921d4051e320c00c1e34007d33dbfc73b045b793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-d2852303ccc21e825a2013026921d4051e320c00c1e34007d33dbfc73b045b793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kollerová, Lenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janošová, Pavlína</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ŘíČan, Pavel</creatorcontrib><title>Moral motivation in defending classmates victimized by bullying</title><title>European journal of developmental psychology</title><description>The study addresses factors that relate to defending of classmates victimized by bullying in early adolescence. Specifically, it examines whether moral motivation-measured as a combination of emotion attributions and their justifications in response to a hypothetical transgression-predicts defending in context of gender, social preference, perceived popularity and teacher support. We gathered single-time-point data on a sample of 512 sixth-graders (aged 11-13 years). A three-step hierarchical regression analysis showed that defending was positively predicted by: (1) moral motivation, when gender, social preference, perceived popularity and teacher support were accounted for; (2) interaction between moral motivation and social preference, when all other independent variables were accounted for. Simple slopes indicated that increased social preference strengthened the link between moral motivation and defending. The full model explained 40.5% of the variance in defending. The findings underscore the relevance of morality and its interplay with social preference in understanding defending.</description><subject>Adolescence</subject><subject>Bullying</subject><subject>Defending</subject><subject>Elementary school students</subject><subject>Moral motivation</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Peer relations</subject><subject>Peer relationships</subject><subject>Prosocial behaviour</subject><issn>1740-5629</issn><issn>1740-5610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJgrf4EYcHz1pdksx8nleIXVLzoOWSTrKRkk5rsVtZfb0qrR09veMzMmzcIXWJYYKjhGlcFsJI0CwKYpRWUmLAjNNvtc1ZiOP7DpDlFZzGuASgpcT1DNy8-CJv1fjBbMRjvMuMypTvtlHEfmbQixl4MOmZbIwfTm2-tsnbK2tHaKTHO0UknbNQXhzlH7w_3b8unfPX6-Ly8W-WygHrIFakZoUCllATrmjCRslIgZUOwSumxpgQkgEygAKgUpartZEVbKFhbNXSOrva-m-A_Rx0HvvZjcOkkx2WVfqlqAonF9iwZfIxBd3wTTC_CxDHwXVf8tyu-64ofukq6273OuM6HXnz5YBUfxGR96IJw0kRO_7f4ATjsbns</recordid><startdate>20150504</startdate><enddate>20150504</enddate><creator>Kollerová, Lenka</creator><creator>Janošová, Pavlína</creator><creator>ŘíČan, Pavel</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150504</creationdate><title>Moral motivation in defending classmates victimized by bullying</title><author>Kollerová, Lenka ; Janošová, Pavlína ; ŘíČan, Pavel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-d2852303ccc21e825a2013026921d4051e320c00c1e34007d33dbfc73b045b793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescence</topic><topic>Bullying</topic><topic>Defending</topic><topic>Elementary school students</topic><topic>Moral motivation</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Peer relations</topic><topic>Peer relationships</topic><topic>Prosocial behaviour</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kollerová, Lenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janošová, Pavlína</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ŘíČan, Pavel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European journal of developmental psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kollerová, Lenka</au><au>Janošová, Pavlína</au><au>ŘíČan, Pavel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moral motivation in defending classmates victimized by bullying</atitle><jtitle>European journal of developmental psychology</jtitle><date>2015-05-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>309</epage><pages>297-309</pages><issn>1740-5629</issn><eissn>1740-5610</eissn><abstract>The study addresses factors that relate to defending of classmates victimized by bullying in early adolescence. Specifically, it examines whether moral motivation-measured as a combination of emotion attributions and their justifications in response to a hypothetical transgression-predicts defending in context of gender, social preference, perceived popularity and teacher support. We gathered single-time-point data on a sample of 512 sixth-graders (aged 11-13 years). A three-step hierarchical regression analysis showed that defending was positively predicted by: (1) moral motivation, when gender, social preference, perceived popularity and teacher support were accounted for; (2) interaction between moral motivation and social preference, when all other independent variables were accounted for. Simple slopes indicated that increased social preference strengthened the link between moral motivation and defending. The full model explained 40.5% of the variance in defending. The findings underscore the relevance of morality and its interplay with social preference in understanding defending.</abstract><cop>Hove</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/17405629.2015.1006125</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1740-5629 |
ispartof | European journal of developmental psychology, 2015-05, Vol.12 (3), p.297-309 |
issn | 1740-5629 1740-5610 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1672617820 |
source | Taylor & Francis |
subjects | Adolescence Bullying Defending Elementary school students Moral motivation Morality Peer relations Peer relationships Prosocial behaviour |
title | Moral motivation in defending classmates victimized by bullying |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T19%3A58%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moral%20motivation%20in%20defending%20classmates%20victimized%20by%20bullying&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20developmental%20psychology&rft.au=Kollerov%C3%A1,%20Lenka&rft.date=2015-05-04&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=309&rft.pages=297-309&rft.issn=1740-5629&rft.eissn=1740-5610&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17405629.2015.1006125&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3652701271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-d2852303ccc21e825a2013026921d4051e320c00c1e34007d33dbfc73b045b793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1672617820&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |